首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

代谢综合征高危人群心血管危险因素综合干预的临床研究
引用本文:高阳,陈思娇,魏敏,胡怡,熊盈,白小涓,徐锦春,李廷富,宋今丹.代谢综合征高危人群心血管危险因素综合干预的临床研究[J].西南科技大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2008,6(1):45-48.
作者姓名:高阳  陈思娇  魏敏  胡怡  熊盈  白小涓  徐锦春  李廷富  宋今丹
作者单位:中国医科大学附属第一医院老年病教研室,中国医科大学附属第一医院老年病教研室,中国医科大学附属第一医院老年病教研室,中国医科大学附属第一医院老年病教研室,中国医科大学附属第一医院老年病教研室,中国医科大学附属第一医院老年病教研室,中国医科大学附属第一医院老年病教研室,中国医科大学附属第一医院老年病教研室,中国医科大学医学分子生物学研究所卫生部细胞生物学重点实验室 硕士研究生110001,硕士研究生110001,硕士研究生110001,硕士研究生110001,硕士研究生110001,硕士研究生110001,硕士研究生110001,硕士研究生110001
基金项目:辽宁省沈阳市科技计划,辽宁省科技攻关计划,辽宁省自然科学基金
摘    要:目的评价综合干预对代谢综合征高危人群心血管危险因素影响。方法对经常住院的100例代谢综合征高危患者进行综合干预,随访2年。另选一般临床资料相匹配,具有可比性的60例代谢综合征高危患者作对照组,评估综合干预前后即第0,1,2年腰围、体重指数、收缩压和舒张压、HDL-C、TG、LDL-C、空腹血糖、空腹胰岛素、胰岛素抵抗指数、C-反应蛋白的变化,并进行对照。结果干预组0年,1年,2年的比较,腰围、BMI、SBP和DBP、HDL-C、FBG、HOMA-IR、CRP的变化差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05),而TG和LDL-C变化差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);对照组0年,1年,2年的比较,腰围、BMI、SBP和DBP、HDL-C、TG、LDL-C、FBG、FINS、HOMA-IR、CRP的变化差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05);干预组与对照组两组第2年比较,除TG和LDL-C外,腰围、BMI、SBP和DBP、HDL-C、FBG、HOMA-IR、CRP的变化差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论综合干预可改善代谢综合征胰岛素抵抗,提高胰岛素敏感性,降低CRP。

关 键 词:代谢综合征(MS)  高危人群  心血管危险因素  综合干预
修稿时间:2007年12月18

Clinical Research in Intervention of High-risk Population of Metabolic Syndrome RiskFactors of Cardiovascular
Gao Yang,Chen Sijiao,Wei Ming,Hu Yi,Xiong Ying,Bai Xiaojuan,Xu Jinchun,Li Tingfu,Song Jindan.Clinical Research in Intervention of High-risk Population of Metabolic Syndrome RiskFactors of Cardiovascular[J].Journal of Southwest University of Science and Technology,2008,6(1):45-48.
Authors:Gao Yang  Chen Sijiao  Wei Ming  Hu Yi  Xiong Ying  Bai Xiaojuan  Xu Jinchun  Li Tingfu  Song Jindan
Institution:Gao Yang,Chen Sijiao, Wei Ming,Hu Yi,Xiong Ying,Bai Xiaojuan,Xu Jinchun,Li Tingfu,Song Jindan(Teaching and Research Office for Geriatric Disease of the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang,110001,China; 2 Medical Molecular Biology Research Institute of China Medical University-Key Laboratory of Cell Biology of Ministry of Health ,Shenyang, 110001, China)
Abstract:Objective Evaluation of intervention in cardiovascular risk factors in the metabolic syndrome in high-risk crowds.Mehtods This study take comprehensive intervention of 100 cases recurrent hospitalization metabolic syndrome high-risk groups,following-up of 2 years.Choose another general clinical data matching,comparable 60cases of the metabolic syndrome in high-risk groups as the control group,before and after the intervention,evaluating the following projects,Namely,the changes of waist circumference,body mass index,systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure,HDL-C,TG,LDL-C,fasting blood glucose,fasting insulin,the insulin resistance index,C-reactive protein in 0,1,2years,then compared.Results The comparation in intervention group in 0,1,2years:the changes in waist circumference,BMI,SBP and DBP,HDL-C,FBG,HOMA-IR,CRP had a statistical difference (P<0.05),while TG and changes in LDL-C was no statistical difference (P>0.05);the comparation in control group in 0,1,2years,the changes in waist circumference,BMI,SBP and DBP,HDL-C,TG,LDL-C,FBG,FINS,HOMA-IR,CRP had no statistical difference (P>0.05);the intervention group and the control group compared in the 2th years: Apart from LDL-C and TG,changes of waist circumference,BMI,SBP and DBP,HDL-C(mmol/L),FBG,HOMA-IR,CRP had a statistical difference (P<0.05).Conclusions Intervention can improve insulin resistance in metabolic syndrome,improve insulin sensitivity,decrease CRP.
Keywords:Metabolic syndrome(MS)  Risk factors of cardiovascular  High-risk  Population Interventions
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号