| 鱼乐之辩:中国古代怀疑论和可知论的论证 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘明海.鱼乐之辩:中国古代怀疑论和可知论的论证[J].盐城工学院学报(社会科学版),2005,18(1):15-18. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘明海 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 华中师范大学,政法学院,湖北,武汉,430079 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 我国古代也存在怀疑论和可知论之争。庄子和惠施虽然不是两方代表,但二人在他心问题上的争论确也深刻反映了我国古代的认识论思想所达到的高度。这次鱼乐之辩无论就双方的思辩性还是逻辑推理的缜密性都为后人所称道。通过分析二者逻辑推理过程,以剖析其思想的渊源,从而审视庄子和惠施的哲学思想。
|
| 关 键 词： | 鱼乐之辩 庄子 惠施 怀疑论 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-5092(2005)01-0015-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2004年11月12 |
Debate over Fish's Happiness:Demonstration of Ancient Chinese Scepticism and Knowability |
| |
| LIU Ming-hai.Debate over Fish''s Happiness:Demonstration of Ancient Chinese Scepticism and Knowability[J].Journal of Yancheng Institute of Technology,2005,18(1):15-18. |
| |
| Authors: | LIU Ming-hai |
| |
| Abstract: | In ancient China ,there existed the debate over scepticism and knowability, Though Zhuang Zi and Hui Shi were not the representatives of these two philosophical schools, this demonstrated that ancient Chinese epistemology had reached a remarkable releration, both in its participants' eloquence and the logical meticulousness. Through the analysis of the logical process, the author attempts to make an circumspection into their philosophical thoughts. |
| |
| Keywords: | debate over fish's happiness Zhuang Zi Hui Shi scepticism |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《盐城工学院学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《盐城工学院学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
