首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

社会转型时期替代性纠纷解决机制成因论略
引用本文:朱良好.社会转型时期替代性纠纷解决机制成因论略[J].扬州大学学报(人文社会科学版),2008,12(1):54-58.
作者姓名:朱良好
作者单位:扬州大学,法学院,江苏,扬州,225009
摘    要:中国社会正处于转型期,同质性日益瓦解,各种纠纷繁复,这就使得以诉讼这种单一化的纠纷解决机制既不可能满足社会需求,其内在的弊害也日益呈显。构建替代诉讼的纠纷解决机制是当今国际社会的通行做法,也是当下中国的必然选择。其深层原因可以通过下述现象得以透视:社会批判理论对现代性和现代法治的反思、真理观上由“符合论”向“共识论”的转变以及追求“无讼”和注重“调停”的传统文化的影响。深度探究其所倚赖的内在成因机制,对当下的法治建设和替代性纠纷解决机制的建构无疑具有宏观的指导意义。

关 键 词:社会转型  现代性批判  真理标准  传统文化  ADR
文章编号:1007-7030(2008)01-0054-05
修稿时间:2007年12月23

A Brief Discussion on the Construction of the ADR System in the Transforming Era
ZHU Liang-hao.A Brief Discussion on the Construction of the ADR System in the Transforming Era[J].Journal of Yangzhou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition),2008,12(1):54-58.
Authors:ZHU Liang-hao
Institution:ZHU Liang-hao (School of Law, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, Jiangsu, China)
Abstract:Chinese society is in the mid of a transforming era, when the homogeneity is increasingly broken down and various kinds of disputes arise. The sole way of settling disputes through lawsuit can no longer satisfy social demands and its indwelling shortcomings turn to be more manifest. ADR system is enjoying international popularity and will also prove to be the inevitable choice of modern China. The deep - seated reasons might be rooted in the following phenomena: the reflection of the social criticism theory on modernity and nomocracy, the transformation of truth value from accordance to mutual recognition, and the influence of the traditional legal culture pursuing "zero lawsuit" and "mediation". A profound inquisition into the reasons will undoubtedly be of much help for the recent construction of law system and the establishment of ADR.
Keywords:social transformation  criticism of modernity  truth value  traditional culture  ADR
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号