革命史体系与现代文学史写作的逻辑缺失

一切历史都是个人史,在历史的共名之下,可以包含有无数的个别理解。中国现代文学史写作面临着一个根本性的任务,就是在历史与逻辑的关系辨析中,对学科的学科本体的重新确认和方法论的进一步总结,将文学史写作纳入到人类思想史的分析之中,在一般思维逻辑上确立一种历史哲学观念,从而把文学史学上升为文学史哲学。革命史的合理性和合法性,并不一定能成为文学史和学术史的全部法则,应该在政治的合理性和合法性之内去寻找和确立人类性与个人性的尺度,以丰富人们对于中国现当代文学特别是战争文学的理解。

Lack of logic in Writing Revolutionary History and Modern Literary History

All history is personalized for numerous personal understanding exists in the common history.Writing modern Chinese literary history faces a fundamental task,that is,we should re-recognize the identity of the discipline and review the research methods further by studying history and logic;we should add the analysis of human history of thought into writing of literary history so as to format the concept of historic philosophy which exceeds common thinking logic and to elevate the discipline of literary history to philosophy of literary history.The legitimacy of revolutionary history,revolutionary history cannot constitute whole rules of literary history and academic history.Human and personal rules should be searched and established within the reasonable and legal political system.