首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


New options for national population surveys: The implications of internet and smartphone coverage
Institution:1. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, United States;2. Joint Program in Survey Methodology, United States;1. University of Southern California, USA;2. McGill University, Canada;3. University of Michigan, USA;1. Institute of Sociology, University of Bern, Fabrikstrasse 8, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland;2. SRUC, Land Economy, Environment & Society Group, King''s Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK;3. Technische Universität Berlin, Institute for Landscape and Environmental Planning, Straße des 17.Juni 145, D-10623 Berlin, Germany;1. University of Michigan, Survey Research Center, 426 Thompson Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48104-2321, United States;2. University of North Carolina, Carolina Population Center, 123 West Franklin Street, Chapel Hill, NC 27516-2524, United States
Abstract:Challenges to survey data collection have increased the costs of social research via face-to-face surveys so much that it may become extremely difficult for social scientists to continue using these methods. A key drawback to less expensive Internet-based alternatives is the threat of biased results from coverage errors in survey data. The rise of Internet-enabled smartphones presents an opportunity to re-examine the issue of Internet coverage for surveys and its implications for coverage bias. Two questions (on Internet access and smartphone ownership) were added to the National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG), a U.S. national probability survey of women and men age 15–44, using a continuous sample design. We examine 16 quarters (4 years) of data, from September 2012 to August 2016.Overall, we estimate that 82.9% of the target NSFG population has Internet access, and 81.6% has a smartphone. Combined, this means that about 90.7% of U.S. residents age 15–44 have Internet access, via either traditional devices or a smartphone. We find some evidence of compensatory coverage when looking at key race/ethnicity and age subgroups. For instance, while Black teens (15–18) have the lowest estimated rate of Internet access (81.9%) and the lowest rate of smartphone usage (72.6%), an estimated 88.0% of this subgroup has some form of Internet access.We also examine the socio-demographic correlates of Internet and smartphone coverage, separately and combined, as indicators of technology access in this population. In addition, we look at the effect of differential coverage on key estimates produced by the NSFG, related to fertility, family formation, and sexual activity. While this does not address nonresponse or measurement biases that may differ for alternative modes, our paper has implications for possible coverage biases that may arise when switching to a Web-based mode of data collection, either for follow-up surveys or to replace the main face-to-face data collection.
Keywords:Survey data  Internet  Smartphone  Coverage bias
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号