华兹华斯诗学：快乐的本体论认定——兼论韩、欧等“穷工论”的区别

华兹华斯的《抒情歌谣集序》不只是发现了创作情感的回忆性和一般性的强调了诗中情感的地位,更重要的是以非常完备的理论阐释对“快乐”的诗学地位作了本体论的认定。华兹华斯的观点成了与既同属于表现论诗学却又认定“忧愁”为诗之本体的中国古代韩、欧等所倡导的“穷工论”完全相反的诗学观。华、韩等的区别源于不同诗性主体的构成:前者从诗与生存的分离出发,以超功利的真、善、美为基本价值追求;后者认定诗与生存的一体性,以功利性的生存关注为诗性情感的本源。

WORDSWORTH's POETICAL ON TOLOGICAL RECOGNITION OF PLEASURE AND CHINESE QIONGGONG POETICS

Preface to lyrical ballads by Wordsworth makes a comprehensive statement that pleasure is the origin of poems. This view as confirms the ontological importance of feeling in poems as Qionggong poetics, one of ancient Chinese thoughts for poem, does. Qionggong poetics advocated mainly by Hanyu and Ouyangxiu, means that sorrow is the origin of poems. The difference between Wordsworth's poetics and Qionggong poetics is that Wordsworth's poetical subject craves for the transcendence of truth, love and beauty, while the subject of Qionggong poetics keeps focal awareness on the utilitarian existence.