中国管理科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1): 56-69.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.1071
王磊1, 2, 李守伟2, 何建敏2, 候德飞3
收稿日期:
2019-07-22
修回日期:
2020-04-14
出版日期:
2023-01-20
发布日期:
2023-02-09
通讯作者:
李守伟(1984-),男(汉族),安徽蚌埠人,东南大学经济管理学院,教授,博士,研究方向:金融复杂性与风险管理,Email:lishouwei@seu.edu.cn.
E-mail:lishouwei@seu.edu.cn
基金资助:
WANG Lei1, 2, LI Shou-wei2, HE Jian-min2, HOU De-fei3
Received:
2019-07-22
Revised:
2020-04-14
Online:
2023-01-20
Published:
2023-02-09
Contact:
李守伟
E-mail:lishouwei@seu.edu.cn
摘要: 一旦房地产投资者“追涨杀跌”行为发生大范围扩散,将诱发房地产市场的价格严重偏离甚至动荡。本文从传播学与行为金融学交叉视角,基于复杂网络理论构建了房地产投资者“追涨杀跌”行为的网络扩散模型,进而仿真分析了网络舆情与投资者行为偏好交互作用下房地产投资者“追涨杀跌”行为扩散的演化特征。研究表明:房地产投资者越偏向于随机建立关联,“追涨杀跌”行为越可能快速扩散;网络舆情因素在“追涨杀跌”行为扩散过程中发挥主导作用,同时对投资者行为偏好因素发挥较强的“强化效应”或“抑制效应”;当媒体权威性足够高或网民情绪足够乐观时,通过综合调节网络舆情和投资者行为偏好因素能够有效实现预防和限制“追涨杀跌”行为扩散的目的。
中图分类号:
王磊, 李守伟, 何建敏, 候德飞. 网络舆情扰动下房地产投资者“追涨杀跌”行为扩散研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(1): 56-69.
WANG Lei, , LI Shou-wei, HE Jian-min, HOU De-fei. The Behavior Spread of “Buying the Winners” of Real Estate Investors under the Disturbance of Internet Public Opinion[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(1): 56-69.
[1] 刘刚, 扈文秀, 章伟果,等. 随机交易行为、羊群行为与资产价格波动研究[J]. 管理科学, 2016(2):122-133.Liu Gang, Hu Wenxiu, Zhang Weiguo, et al. Study on random trading behavior, herd behavior and asset price volatility[J]. Journal of Management Science, 2016(2):122-133. [2] 胡昌生, 陶铸. 个体投资者情绪、网络自媒体效应与股票收益[J]. 预测, 2017(3):50-55.Hu Changsheng, Tao Zhu. Individual investor sentiment, network we-media effect and stock returns[J]. Frontiers of Science and Technology of Engineering Management, 2017(3):50-55. [3] 田高良, 司毅, 秦岭, 等. 网络舆情及其应对与上市公司的信息效率[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2018, 38(1):46-66.Tian Gaoliang, Si Yi, Qin Ling, et al. Internet public opinions, response and listed firms’ information efficiency[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2018, 38(1):46-66. [4] 刘圣尧, 李怡宗, 杨云红. 中国股市的崩盘系统性风险与投资者行为偏好[J]. 金融研究, 2016(2):55-70.Liu Shengyao, Li Yizong, Yang Yunhong. The systematic crash risk and investor preference in Chinese stock market[J]. Journal of Financial Research, 2016(2):55-70. [5] 岑咏华, 张灿, 吴承尧, 等. 互联网加剧投资者有限理性研究综述[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2018, 472(6):130-141.Cen Yonghua, Zhang Can, Wu Chengyao, et al. How does Internet escalate investor bounded rationality? A literature review[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2018, 472(6):130-141. [6] 陈文博, 陈浪南, 王升泉. 投资者的博彩行为研究——基于盈亏状态和投资者情绪的视角[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(2):22-33.Chen Wenbo, Chen langnan, Wang Shengquan. Investors’ gambling behavior-perspective from profit/loss condition and investor sentiment[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 27(2):22-33. [7] Liu Shuming. Investor sentiment and stock market liquidity[J]. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 2015, 16(1):51-67. [8] 刘晓星, 张旭, 顾笑贤, 等. 投资者行为如何影响股票市场流动性?——基于投资者情绪、信息认知和卖空约束的分析[J]. 管理科学学报, 2016, 19(10):87-100.Liu Xiaoxing, Zhang Xu, Gu Xiaoxian, et al. How does investor behavior affect stock market liquidity? Analysis of investor sentiment, information cognition and short-sale constraints[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2016, 19(10):87-100. [9] 贺志芳, 文凤华, 黄创霞, 等. 投资者情绪与时变风险补偿系数[J]. 管理科学学报, 2017, 20(12):29-38.He Zhifang, Wen Fenghua, Huang Chuangxia, et al. Investor sentiment and time-varying coefficient of risk compensation[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2017, 20(12):29-38. [10] 姚尧之, 王坚强, 刘志峰. 混频投资者情绪与股票价格行为[J]. 管理科学学报, 2018, 21(2):104-113.Yao Yaozhi, Wang jiangqiang, Liu Zhifeng. Mixed-frequency investor sentiment and stock price behavior[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2018, 21(2):104-113. [11] 石善冲, 朱颖楠, 赵志刚, 等. 基于微信文本挖掘的投资者情绪与股票市场表现[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2018, 38(6):1404-1412.Shi shanchong, Zhu Yingnan, Zhao Zhigang, et al. The investor sentiment mined from WeChat text and stock market performance[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2018, 38(6):1404-1412. [12] 赵汝为,熊熊,沈德华.投资者情绪与股价崩盘风险: 来自中国市场的经验证据[J]. 管理评论, 2019,31(3):50-60.Zhao Ruwei, Xiong Xiong, Shen Dehua. Investor sentiment and stock price crash risk: evidence from China[J]. Management Review, 2019,31(3):50-60. [13] 肖欣荣, 刘健. 基于网络理论的金融传染与投资者行为研究进展[J]. 经济学动态, 2015(5):139-146.Xiao Xinrong, Liu Jian. Progress on financial contagion and investor behavior based on network theory[J]. Economic Perspectives, 2015(5):139-146. [14] Chen Tingqiang, He Jianmin, Li Xindan. An evolving network model of credit risk contagion in the financial market[J]. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 2017, 23(1):22-37. [15] Linciano N, Lucarelli C, Gentile M, et al. How financial information disclosure affects risk perception. Evidence from Italian investors’ behaviour[J]. European Journal of Finance, 2018(3):1-22. [16] Wang Lei, Li Shouwei, Chen Tingqiang. Investor behavior, information disclosure strategy and counterparty credit risk contagion[J]. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 2019, 119:37-49. [17] Polkovnichenko V, Wei K, Zhao Feng. Cautious risk takers: investor preferences and demand for active management[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2019, 74(2):1025-1075. [18] Opie W, Zhang Hongfeng. Investor heterogeneity and the cross-sectional stock returns in China[J]. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 2013, 25(11):1-20. [19] 金永红, 罗丹. 异质信念、投资者情绪与资产定价研究综述[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2017(5):100-114.Jin Yonghong, Luo Dan. A literature review of heterogeneous belief, investor sentiment and asset pricing[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2017(5):100-114. [20] 孟庆斌, 黄清华. 卖空机制是否降低了股价高估?——基于投资者异质信念的视角[J]. 管理科学学报, 2018, 21(4):48-71.Meng Qingbin, Huang Qinghua. Does short selling decrease stock overvaluation: a perspective of heterogeneous beliefs[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2018, 21(4):48-71. [21] Allen M T, Rutherford J, Rutherford R, et al. Impact of investors in distressed housing markets[J]. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 2018, 56(4):622-652. [22] 肖斌卿, 王粟旸, 周小超, 等. 债务网络,投资者行为与传染性风险:来自中国银行业与房地产业的研究发现[J]. 管理科学学报, 2014, 17(11):139-150.Xiao binqing, Wang Sumin, Zhou Xiaochao, et al. Debt network, investor behavior and infectious risk: research findings from China’s banking and real estate industries[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2014, 17(11):139-150. [23] 张浩. 异质性预期、投资者行为与房价波动: 上海和广州的双城记[J]. 财经研究, 2016(8):51-61.Zhang Hao. Heterogeneous expectations,investor behavior and fluctuations in housing prices: tale of two cities between shanghai[J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2016(8):51-61. [24] Zanetti F. Housing and relative risk aversion[J]. Economics letters, 2014, 123(1):23-25. [25] 张光利, 刘小元. 住房价格与居民风险偏好[J]. 经济研究, 2018, 53(1):110-123.Zhang Guangli, Liu Xiaoyuan. Housing price and residents’ risk preference[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2018, 53(1):110-123. [26] 高波, 王文莉, 李祥. 预期、收入差距与中国城市房价租金“剪刀差”之谜[J]. 经济研究, 2013, 48(6):100-112,126.Gao Bo, Wang Wenli, Li Xiang. Expectation, income inequality and the puzzle of city’s housing price to rent scissors in China[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2013, 48(6):100-112,126. [27] 王永钦, 包特. 异质交易者、房地产泡沫与房地产政策[J]. 世界经济, 2011(11):86-104.Wang Yongqin, Bao Te. Heterogeneous traders, real estate foam and real estate policy[J]. The Journal of World Economy, 2011(11):86-104. [28] 张维, 沈德华, 熊熊, 等. 媒体偏见与资产价格[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2015, 35(11):2749-2754.Zhang Wei, Shen Dehua, Xiong Xiong, et al. Media bias and asset pricing[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2015, 35(11):2749-2754. [29] 吴鹏, 强韶华, 高庆宁. 基于SOAR模型的网民群体负面情感建模研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(3):126-138.Wu Peng, Qiang Shaohua, Gao Qingning. Modelling internet users’ negative emotion based on soar model[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 26(3):126-138. [30] 林燕霞, 谢湘生, 张德鹏. 复杂交互行为影响下的网络舆情演化分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(1):212-221.Lin Yanxia, Xie Xiangsheng, Zhang Depeng. Analysis of online public opinion evolution under the influence of complex interactions behaviors[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, 28(1):212-221. [31] 李诗悦, 李晚莲. 公共危机网络舆情演变机理: 路径及动因——以动物疫情危机为例[J]. 中国行政管理, 2019(2):116-121.Li Shiyue, Li Wanlian. Evolution mechanism of public crisis network public opinion: path and motivation —— Taking animal epidemic crisis as an example[J]. Chinese Public Administration, 2019(2):116-121. [32] 李永奎, 周宗放. 基于无标度网络的关联信用风险传染延迟效应[J]. 系统工程学报, 2015, 30(5):575-583.Li Yongkui, Zhou Zongfang. contagion delay end effects of associated credit risk based on scale-free network[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2015, 30(5):575-583. [33] 钱茜, 周宗放, 李永奎. 管控策略对关联企业网络稳定状态的影响——基于关联信用风险传染的视角[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(6):21-29.Qian Qian, Zhou Zongfang, Li Yongkui. The influence of control strategy on the stability of affiliated enterprises network——based on the Perspective of associated credit contagion[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 27(6):21-29. [34] 高宾, 王兰成. 网络衍生舆情的传播模型及分析方法研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2019, 42(3):169-174.Gao Bin, Wang Lancheng. Propagation model and analysis method of network-derived public opinion[J]. Information Studies:Theory & Application, 2019, 42(3):169-174. [35] Gilpin M E, Ayala F J. Global models of growth and competition[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1973, 70(12):3590-3593. [36] Chen Chiawei, Pantzalis C, Park J C. Press coverage and stock price deviation from fundamental value[J]. Journal of Financial Research, 2013, 36(2):175-214. [37] Li Huaye, Sakamoto Y. Social impacts in social media: an examination of perceived truthfulness and sharing of information[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2014, 41(12):278-287. [38] 陈庭强, 何建敏. 基于复杂网络的信用风险传染模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(11):1-10.Chen Tingqiang, he Jianmin. Credit risk contagion model based on complex network[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2014, 22(11):1-10. [39] King G, Pan J, Roberts M E. How the Chinese government fabricates social media posts for strategic distraction, not engaged argument[J]. American Political Science Review, 2017, 111(3):484-501. [40] Anderson J R. Cognitive psychology and its implications[M]. Macmillan: Worth Publishers, 2005. [41] Lachman R, Lachman J L, Butterfield E C. Cognitive psychology and information processing: an introduction[M]. New York: Psychology Press, 2015. [42] 李梦雨, 李志辉. 市场操纵与股价崩盘风险——基于投资者情绪的路径分析[J]. 国际金融研究, 2019, 384(4):87-94.Li Mengyu, Li Zhihui. Market manipulation and the risk of stock price collapse——a path analysis based on investor sentiment[J]. Studies of International Finance, 2019, 384(4):87-94. [43] Barabási A L, Albert R, Jeong H, et al. Mean-field theory for scale-free random networks[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics & Its Applications, 2000, 272(1-2):173-187. [44] Vikram S V, Sinha S. Emergence of universal scaling in financial markets from mean-field dynamics[J]. Physical Review E: Statistical Nonlinear & Soft Matter Physics, 2011, 83(2):016101. [45] Boguá M, Pastor-Satorras R, Vespignani A. Absence of epidemic threshold in scale-free networks with degree correlations[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2003, 90(2):028701. [46] Barabási A L, Albert R. Emergence of scaling in random networks[J]. Science, 1999, 286(5439):509-512. [47] Erds P, Rényi A. On the evolution of random graphs[J]. Publications of the Mathematical Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 1960, 5(1):17-60. |
[1] | 周坤,高晓辉,李廉水. 基于EMD-XGB-ELM和FSGM双元处理的碳排放交易价格集成预测[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(10): 325-334. |
[2] | 叶志强,张顺明,沈雪晨,郑洁菲. 我国上市公司定向增发的收益波动率择时效应研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(10): 30-40. |
[3] | 何枫,杜寒玉,郝晶. 中国股市存在互联网媒体关注溢价吗?[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(10): 20-29. |
[4] | 石晓军,邢佳騉. 信用保险下零售商主导型供应链融资模式研究:基于报童模型的分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(8): 194-203. |
[5] | 罗长青,刘澜,朱慧明,张敏. 基于多尺度信息份额模型的原油市场定价能力动态演变研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(6): 1-12. |
[6] | 何汉,李思呈. 基于有向复杂网络的担保圈违约风险传染建模研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(6): 22-33. |
[7] | 雷欣南,林乐凡,肖斌卿,俞红海. 小微企业违约特征再探索:基于SHAP解释方法的机器学习模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(5): 1-12. |
[8] | 谢林利,凌爱凡. 权益极端尾部风险、杠杆率与公司债信用利差[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(5): 47-60. |
[9] | 刘澜飚,郭亮. 中国A股市场下行风险研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(5): 61-72. |
[10] | 邹美凤,张信东,刘维奇. 供应商集中度与企业金融化:“风险效应”还是“协同效应”?[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(3): 116-124. |
[11] | 傅强,石泽龙. 系统性金融风险的联合网络关联度测量及频率研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(2): 1-10. |
[12] | 胡俊,李强,戴嘉诚,曾勇. 基于文本分析的商业银行金融科技测度及赋能效果检验[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(1): 31-41. |
[13] | 戚逸康. 非金融企业部门债务与资源配置优化[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(1): 65-74. |
[14] | 沈德华,李悦. 商品期货能够提高传统投资组合的绩效吗?来自中国市场的经验证据[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(12): 34-45. |
[15] | 张永冀,李天雄,苏治,黄琼. 基金规模、投资者关注与基金业绩持续性[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(12): 57-68. |
阅读次数 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
全文 498
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
摘要 437
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|