| 寻衅滋事罪口袋化的司法限缩路径 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘浩. 寻衅滋事罪口袋化的司法限缩路径[J]. 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 24(1): 162-172. DOI: 10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2022.5202 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘浩 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 东南大学 法学院, 江苏 南京 211189 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家社会科学基金;江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划项目 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 针对寻衅滋事罪的不断口袋化，在司法层面的应对方案不能只是局限于构成要件的限缩解释与法益内容的一般界定，而应当对寻衅滋事罪在解释论层面予以体系性的分析与构建，包括有针对性地强调在寻衅滋事罪的构成要件解释中格外遵循罪刑法定的刑法解释基本原则，以刑法解释基本原则来限缩该罪的不合理扩张。在明确该罪法益内容包括社会秩序与个体权利的基础上，对法益内容之间的逻辑关系作出说明，进而以法益关系来制约该罪在司法适用过程中的成立范围。为了避免该罪的适用经常存在类推解释的嫌疑，应当具体明确有利于限缩该罪成立范围的主要刑法解释方法，禁止类推解释以及尽量避免容易导向类推解释的扩张解释，以解释方法对寻衅滋事罪的司法适用予以合理控制。注重不同部门法之间的有效协同，遵循谦抑原则，将刑法参与社会治理置于整个治理体系中予以观察，坚持刑法作为保障法的规范地位。
|
| 关 键 词： | 寻衅滋事罪 口袋化 法益内容 法益关系 刑法解释 |
| 收稿时间： | 2020-11-10 |
Judicial Path of Narrowing the Pocketing of Crime of Creating Troubles |
| |
| LIU Hao. Judicial Path of Narrowing the Pocketing of Crime of Creating Troubles[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 24(1): 162-172. DOI: 10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2022.5202 |
| |
| Authors: | LIU Hao |
| |
| Affiliation: | School of Law, Southeast University, Nanjing Jiangsu 211189, China |
| |
| Abstract: | In response to the constant pocketing of the crime of creating troubles, the judicial response should not be confined to the limiting interpretation of constituent elements and the general definition of legal benefits.The crime of creating troubles should be analyzed systematically and constructed at the interpretative level,including emphasis on the interpretation of the elements of the crime of creating troubles and provocations it should follow the basic principles of the criminal law interpretation of a legally prescribed punishment, and use the principles of criminal law interpretation to limit the unreasonable expansion of the crime. On the basis of clarifying that the legal benefits include social order and individual rights,the logical relationship between legal benefits is explained, and then the legal benefit relationship is used to restrict the scope of establishment of the crime in the judicial application process. In order to avoid the suspicion of analogy interpretation in the application of the crime, it’s necessary to clear the main interpretation methods to narrow the scope of the crime, prohibit analogy interpretation, and avoid the extended interpretation that is easy to lead to analogy interpretation. By using the main interpretation methods, to limit the scope of the crime.The judicial application of crimes shall be reasonably controlled. It’s vital to pay attention to the effective coordination between the laws of different departments, follow the principle of modesty, place the participation of criminal law in social governance of entire governance system for observation, and then maintain the normative status of the criminal law as the guarantee law. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《北京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《北京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》下载全文 |
|
