首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

宪政的“名”“实”之辩
引用本文:莫纪宏. 宪政的“名”“实”之辩[J]. 吉首大学学报(社会科学版), 2013, 34(5): 1-7. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-4074.2013.05.001
作者姓名:莫纪宏
作者单位:(中国社会科学院 法学研究所,北京 100720)
基金项目:国家社会科学基金重大招标项目(07&ZD031)
摘    要:针对近期学术界关于“宪政”概念内涵争论日趋白热化的沉重氛围,应当将目前关于“宪政”概念的争议区分为“名相之争”与“实相之争”。“名相之争”涉及到“宪政”概念是有独立内涵的独立词还是仅仅作为汉语长句的缩写;“实相之争”在于如何赋予“宪政”概念相应的价值内涵。由于“宪政”概念在近百年的演变史中已脱离了原先的概念“名相”,成了目前学术界使用过度泛化的概念,无法产生概念上的基本共识;由于“名相之乱”导致了“实相之乱”,“宪政”价值从法律事实到“梦想状态”,已经成为人云亦云的麻烦概念。为不因“宪政”概念上的无谓之争影响了当下的宪法实践,可以在学术上暂时“去宪政”,围绕着“依宪治国”的价值理念,扎扎实实采取一些维护宪法权威、加强宪法实施的制度举措,以此来全面推进依法治国基本方略的贯彻落实。

关 键 词:宪政  宪法政治  宪法政府  宪治  依宪治国  依法治国  

On the Debate between the Name and Truth of Constitutionalism
MO Ji-Hong. On the Debate between the Name and Truth of Constitutionalism[J]. Journal of Jishou University(Social Science), 2013, 34(5): 1-7. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-4074.2013.05.001
Authors:MO Ji-Hong
Affiliation:(Institute of Law,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 100720,China)
Abstract:Recently the debate on the concept connotation of constitutionalism has been increasing in the academic circles.Actually,the focus of the debate should be on distinguishing the name and truth of it.The concept of constitutionalism has been over generalized in nearly a hundred years,thus has deviated from its original meaning and has caused misunderstanding.In order not to disturb the present constitutional practice,the concept of constitutionalism may be put aside in the academic circles.Based on the value concept of rule by constitution,measurements should be adopted to strengthen the constitution and promote rule by law.
Keywords:constitutionalism  constitutional politics  constitutional government  rule by constitution  managing state affairs according to constitution  rule by law  
点击此处可从《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号