| 数字资本主义在数字健康领域对公共利益价值内涵的重构 |
| |
| 引用本文： | [荷兰]塔马尔·沙龙/著,赵开开/译. 数字资本主义在数字健康领域对公共利益价值内涵的重构[J]. 吉首大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 44(1): 17-25. DOI: 10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2023.01.003 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | [荷兰]塔马尔·沙龙/著 赵开开/译 |
| |
| 作者单位： | （1.荷兰马斯特里赫特大学 哲学系，马斯特里赫特 6211；2.曲阜师范大学 马克思主义学院，山东日照 276826） |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家社会科学基金一般项目（18BJL021） |
| |
| 摘 要： | 近年来，所有主要的大型消费科技公司都进入了健康研究领域。这种谷歌式数字健康引出一个问题，即在研究中，公共利益如何得以维系?只有将谷歌式数字健康置于数字资本主义的政治经济中，才能更好地突出公共利益和公共价值问题。以往的研究通常把谷歌式数字健康框定在一个双重的、不可通约的分析逻辑中，其中：私人利益与公共利益是对立的，经济价值与社会价值是对立的。虽然有助于揭示数字资本主义的剥削潜力，但是这种分析逻辑是有缺陷的，因为它只承认关于公共利益的一种理解。通过借鉴博尔坦斯基和泰弗诺的价值理论分析框架，可以发现：谷歌式数字健康对公共利益的价值内涵进行了多重塑造，不仅包括公民价值(为社会做好事),还包括市场价值(创造更多财富)、工业价值(提高生产效率)和项目价值(创新和实验)以及活力价值(促进生命健康)。如果把治理方案看作是一系列价值准则的组合，那么就可以设计出实现和保障公共利益的治理方案。基于此，提出研究进路：探索和构建更丰富的体现公共利益的价值准则体系，对其进行批判性评估，最终制定出能确保“公民”价值的可行治理方案。
|
| 关 键 词： | 数字健康 数字资本主义 谷歌式数字健康 价值准则 公共利益 公共价值 |
Reconstruction of the Value Connotation of Public Interest by Digital Capitalism in the Field of Digital Health |
| |
| Written by Tamar Sharon,Translated by ZHao Kaikai. Reconstruction of the Value Connotation of Public Interest by Digital Capitalism in the Field of Digital Health[J]. Journal of Jishou University(Social Science), 2023, 44(1): 17-25. DOI: 10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2023.01.003 |
| |
| Authors: | Written by Tamar Sharon Translated by ZHao Kaikai |
| |
| Affiliation: | （1.Philosophy Department,Maastricht University,Maastricht 6211；2.School of Marxism,Qufu Normal University,Rizhao 276826） |
| |
| Abstract: | In recent years,all major consumer technology corporations have moved into the domain of health research.This‘Googlization of health research’ (‘GHR’) begs the question of how the common good will be served in this research.As critical data scholars contend,such phenomena must be situated within the political economy of digital capitalism in order to foreground the question of public interest and the common good.Here,trends like GHR are framed within a double,incommensurable logic,where private gain and economic value are pitted against public good and societal value.While helpful for highlighting the exploitative potential of digital capitalism,this framing is limiting,insofar as it acknowledges only one conception of the common good.This article uses the analytical framework of modes of justification developed by Boltanksi and The venot to identify a plurality of orders of worth and conceptualizations of the common good at work in GHR.Not just the ‘civic’ (doing good for society) and ‘market’ (enhancing wealth creation) orders,but also an ‘industrial’ (increasing efficiency),a ‘project’ (innovation and experimentation),and what I call a ‘vitalist’ (proliferating life) order.Using promotional material of GHR initiatives and preliminary interviews with participants in GHR projects,I ask what moral orientations guide different actors in GHR.Engaging seriously with these different conceptions of the common good is paramount.First,in order to critically evaluate them and explicate what is at stake in the move towards GHR,and ultimately,in order to develop viable governance solutions that ensure strong ‘civic’ components. |
| |
| Keywords: | Digital health digital capitalism Googlization of health research moral repertoires common good public values |
|
| 点击此处可从《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》下载全文 |
