共查询到18条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
自年初到4月17日、4月17日到9月29日、9月29日之后的三轮政策调控贯穿今年房地产业发展的全过程。从提高首付比例,到限制住房信贷,直至各地限购令纷纷出台以及央行突然加息,房地产调控重拳频出。岁末临近,展望当下市场,楼市前景迷雾重重,楼市将何去何从? 相似文献
6.
房地产管理调控在我国房地产市场快速发展,房价波动加剧的背景下备受关注。关于调控效果的研究,之前主要集中在货币政策、行政管控方面,在肯定宏观调控政策对房价影响的基础上,得出不同的结论。以往研究,主要以调控手段对供需双方影响为分析依据,较少考虑市场结构,而市场结构影响供需双方的行为,因此,市场结构影响研究结论。通过纳入市场结构因素,从理论角度推导出提高利率、法定存款准备金率均可以降低房价,且垄断势力越大,利率、法定存款准备金率对房价的抑制程度越小。限购、限贷等行政调控手段减少潜在购房需求,引起均衡价格降低,且市场垄断程度越大,行政调控对房价的抑制程度就越大。在此基础上,采用2010—2019年我国30省份数据,运用System-GMM方法(系统广义矩模型)实证检验了这一结论,为我国房地产市场建立长效管理调控机制提供依据。 相似文献
7.
目前,全国大部分省市房价仍有上涨过快的苗头,这说明政府对房地产价格的调控措施还需要进一步完善,政府在社会经济活动中的组织协调工作是必要的,如此,才能“建立市场配置和政府保障相结合的住房制度,也才能满足困难家庭需求”.可以说,中国对房地产的政策调节仍任重而道远.政府只有做好“裁判员”和“守夜人”的工作,才是最有效率和最佳的选择. 相似文献
8.
9.
世贸组织、经济全球化与中国社会福利改革 总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2
在过去20年中,我国社会福利模式发生了很大的变化。社会福利模式的变化是在我国经济体制改革和对外开放的过程中发生的,它既是我国的基本经济制度从计 相似文献
10.
我是最喜欢‘熊’的一个人,‘熊’来了,我就拥抱这个‘熊’。香港恒隆地产有限公司董事长陈启宗的这一段表白,似乎得到了市场的回应。熊真的来了。但并不是所有开发商都如陈启宗一样做足了准备。对大多数开发商来说,是该做出选择的时候了。不过,是加速出仓,还是挺过寒冬?是坚守住宅,还是进军商业?是发展旅游地产,还是研究养老地产?是借力民间资本,还是寄望信贷的放松?一时间,太多的选择摆在面前,有点为难。 相似文献
11.
12.
13.
Robyn Iredale 《The Australian journal of social issues》1997,32(3):239-255
Australia's immigration policies have had a dramatic effect on school populations, especially in the state of New South Wales which receives about 40 per cent of the intake. This paper is based on a study that was carried out for the Bureau of Immigration, Multicultural and Population Research and the NSW Ministry of Education. The study revealed that many non-English speaking background pupils miss out on English as a second language tuition, community languages are allowed to lapse and aspects of the school environment, such as relations between different groups, are not given the attention that they deserve. 相似文献
14.
我们是在‘没有枪,没有炮,只有冲锋号’的艰苦条件下,白手起家,硬是从一片荒芜的山坡上开辟出了全区食品加工集聚发展的新战场和主战场。在朝阳工业新区农产品食品加工产业基础采访,听到干部群众说的最多的就是这句话。朝阳市农产品食品加工园区依托园区建立了农产品食品加工产业集群,是朝阳市对外经济联系、经济往来的首要门户,周边地区农业生产条件良好,菜、牧、果三大产业优势突出,农产品 相似文献
15.
Patricia Harris 《The Australian journal of social issues》2000,35(4):279-300
Current discussions of welfare reform are influenced by various kinds of talk about ‘participation’. Three are predominant in Australia: talk of self‐sufficiency, paying your dues, and team effort. All imply a local/associational/voluntary model of society which deflects attention from broader structural and economic factors. This prevailing treatment of ‘participation’ is heavily biased, ignoring alternative interpretations such as the older tradition that emphasises rights. The general discourse it underwrites is at best ineffective and quite likely dangerous. 相似文献
16.
Charles Waldegrave Robert Stephens Peter King 《The Australian journal of social issues》2003,38(4):433-464
This paper presents the results of the New Zealand Poverty Measurement Project's analysis of the effects of the 1990s social reforms in New Zealand on the incidence and severity of poverty, and assesses the impact of five social and economic policies introduced by the Labour‐led coalition governments since 1999: New Zealand superannuation, income‐related rents on state houses, active labour market policies for an employment‐rich economy, the Primary Health Care Strategy and the planned income support policy to reduce child poverty. Superannuation is assessed as both adequate and sustainable, rents for state houses are found to be affordable, and GDP growth and employment have increased incrementally as unemployment and benefit numbers have decreased. The Primary Health Care Strategy is an innovative initiative that will increase affordable access to general practitioners, but it and the proposed child assistance initiatives are too new to be adequately assessed. Of the challenges that remain, policy priorities should centre on housing alternatives, including home ownership for low‐income households not in state houses; income support for poor households, particularly those with children; and multi‐sector development of education and training aimed at lifting economic and social capacity. 相似文献
17.
Gianni Zappal 《The Australian journal of social issues》2000,35(4):317-331
The concept of the ‘new economy’, though increasingly used by the media, policy makers and scholars, remains elusive. Two main definitions (the popular and specialised) may be identified; and the dimensions of the ensuing debate clarified in terms of three key questions: Is there is something qualitatively different about recent trends in the economy? What are the main economic consequences said to result from this new economy? What are the main social consequences? Of particular importance for social policy is that most models of the new economy suggest that it has led to an increase in inequality and social exclusion for those not positioned to take advantage of its supposed benefits. With most discussion focussed on a narrow use of the term — to do with communications technology — greater attention should be given to a broader definition which examines its consequences for the disadvantaged. 相似文献