Risk of a homoscedasticity pre-test estimator of the regression scale under LINEX loss

In this paper we consider the risk of an estimator of the error variance after a pre-test for homoscedasticity of the variances in the two-sample heteroscedastic linear regression model. This particular pre-test problem has been well investigated but always under the restrictive assumption of a squared error loss function. We consider an asymmetric loss function — the LINEX loss function — and derive the exact risks of various estimators of the error variance.     

Shrinkage estimator of regression model under asymmetric loss

This article investigates the performance of the shrinkage estimator (SE) of the parameters of a simple linear regression model under the LINEX loss criterion. The risk function of the estimator under the asymmetric LINEX loss is derived and analyzed. The moment-generating functions and the first two moments of the estimators are also obtained. The risks of the SE have been compared numerically with that of pre-test and least-square estimators (LSEs) under the LINEX loss criterion. The numerical comparison reveals that under certain conditions the LSE is inadmissible, and the SE is the best among the three estimators.     

A note on new feasible generalized ridge regression estimator under the linex loss function

In this paper, using the asymmetric LINEX loss function we derive and numerically evaluate the risk function of the new feasible ridge regression estimator.We also examine the risk performance of this estimator when the LINEX loss function is used.     

Risk behavior of a pre-test estimator for normal variance with the Stein-type estimator

In this paper, we examine the risk behavior of a pre-test estimator for normal variance with the Stein-type estimator. The one-sided pre-test is conducted for the null hypothesis that the population variance is equal to a specific value, and the Stein-type estimator is used if the null hypothesis is rejected. A sufficient condition for the pre-test estimator to dominate the Stein-type estimator is shown.     

On the sampling performance of an inequality pre-test estimator of the regression error variance under LINEX loss

We consider the estimation of the error variance of a linear regression model where prior information is available in the form of an (uncertain) inequality constraint on the coefficients. Previous studies on this and other related problems use the squared error loss in comparing estimator’s performance. Here, by adopting the asymmetric LINEX loss function, we derive and numerically evaluate the exact risks of the inequality constrained estimator and the inequality pre-test estimator which results after a preliminary test for an inequality constraint on the coefficients. The risks based on squared error loss are special cases of our results, and we draw appropriate comparisons.     

The exact distribution and density functions of a pre-test estimator of the error variance in a linear regression model with proxy variables

We consider a linear regression model when some independent variables are unobservable, but proxy variables are available instead of them. We derive the distribution and density functions of a pre-test estimator of the error variance after a pre-test for the null hypothesis that the coefficients for the unobservable variables are zeros. Based on the density function, we show that when the critical value of the pre-test is unity, the coverage probability in the interval estimation of the error variance is maximum.     

New biased estimators under the LINEX loss function

In this paper, using the asymmetric LINEX loss function we derive the risk function of the generalized Liu estimator and almost unbiased generalized Liu estimator. We also examine the risk performance of the feasible generalized Liu estimator and feasible almost unbiased generalized Liu estimator when the LINEX loss function is used.     

Finite sample properties of an HPT estimator when each individual regression coefficient is estimated in a misspecified linear regression model

ABSTRACT

In this paper, assuming that there exist omitted variables in the specified model, we analytically derive the exact formula for the mean squared error (MSE) of a heterogeneous pre-test (HPT) estimator whose components are the ordinary least squares (OLS) and feasible ridge regression (FRR) estimators. Since we cannot examine the MSE performance analytically, we execute numerical evaluations to investigate small sample properties of the HPT estimator, and compare the MSE performance of the HPT estimator with those of the FRR estimator and the usual OLS estimator. Our numerical results show that (1) the HPT estimator is more efficient when the model misspecification is severe; (2) the HPT estimator with the optimal critical value obtained under the correctly specified model can be safely used even when there exist omitted variables in the specified model.     

The exact risk performance of a pre-test estimator in a heteroskedastic linear regression model under the balanced loss function

We examine the risk of a pre-test estimator for regression coefficients after a pre-test for homoskedasticity under the Balanced Loss Function (BLF). We show analytically that the two stage Aitken estimator is dominated by the pre-test estimator with the critical value of unity, even if the BLF is used. We also show numerically that both the two stage Aitken estimator and the pre-test estimator can be dominated by the ordinary least squares estimator when “goodness of fit” is regarded as more important than precision of estimation.     

Preliminary test and Bayes Estimation of a Location Parameter Under Blinex Loss

In this article, the preliminary test estimator is considered under the BLINEX loss function. The problem under consideration is the estimation of the location parameter from a normal distribution. The risk under the null hypothesis for the preliminary test estimator, the exact risk function for restricted maximum likelihood and approximated risk function for the unrestricted maximum likelihood estimator, are derived under BLINEX loss and the different risk structures are compared to one another both analytically and computationally. As a motivation on the use of BLINEX rather than LINEX, the risk for the preliminary test estimator under BLINEX loss is compared to the risk of the preliminary test estimator under LINEX loss and it is shown that the LINEX expected loss is higher than BLINEX expected loss. Furthermore, two feasible Bayes estimators are derived under BLINEX loss, and a feasible Bayes preliminary test estimator is defined and compared to the classical preliminary test estimator.     

On estimating the common mean in two normal distributions after a preliminary test for equality of variances

Given two random samples of equal size from two normal distributions with common mean but possibly different variances, we examine the sampling performance of the pre-test estimator for the common mean after a preliminary test for equality of variances. It is shown that when the alternative in the pretest is one-sided, the Graybill-Deal estimator is dominated by the pre-test estimator if the critical value is chosen appropriately. It is also shown that all estimators, the grand mean, the Graybill-Deal estimator and the pre-test estimator, are admissible when the alternative in the pre-test is two-sided. The optimal critical values in the two-sided pre-test are sought based on the minimax regret and the minimum average risk criteria, and it is shown that the Graybill-Deal estimator is most preferable under the minimum average risk criterion when the alternative in the pre-test is two-sided.     

Generalized ridge regression estimators under the LINEX loss function

In this paper, we examine the risk performance of the generalized ridge regression (GRR) and feasible GRR estimators when the LINEX loss function is used. A sufficient condition for the GRR estimator to dominate the OLS estimator is shown, and the risk functions of the feasible GRR estimator and the OLS estimator are numerically compared.     

On risk comparisons of some estimators in a linear regression model under inagaki’S loss function and nonnormal error terms

In this paper we consider the risk performances of some estimators for both location and scale parameters in a linear regression model under Inagaki’s loss function We prove that the pre-test estimator for location parameter is dominated by the Stein-rule estimator under Inagaki’s loss function when the distribution of error terms is expressed by the scale mixture of normal distribution and the variance of error terms is unknown.. It is an extension of the results in Nagata (1983) to our situation Also we perform numerical calculations to draw the shapes of the risks.     

The exact distribution and density functions of the stein-type estimator for normal variance

In this paper, we derive the exact distribution and density functions of the Stein-type estimator for the normal variance. It is shown by numerical evaluation that the density function of the Stein-type estimator is unimodal and concentrates around the mode more than that of the usual estimator.     

Shrinkage Testimators for the Shape Parameter of Pareto Distribution Using LINEX Loss Function

In this article, shrinkage testimators for the shape parameter of a Pareto distribution are considered, when its prior guess value is available. The choices of shrinkage factor are also suggested. The proposed testimators are compared with the minimum risk estimator among the class of unbiased estimators with the LINEX loss function.     

The density function and the MSE dominance of the pre-test estimator in a heteroscedastic linear regression model with omitted variables

In this paper, we consider a heteroscedastic linear regression model with omitted variables. We derive the density function of the pre-test estimator consisting of the two-stage Aitken estimator (2SAE) and the ordinary least squares estimator (OLSE) after the pre-test for homoscedasticity. We also derive the first two moments based on the density function and show the sufficient condition for the pre-test estimator to dominate the 2SAE in terms of the MSE. Our numerical evaluations show that when this sufficient condition does not hold and when the magnitude of the specification error is large, the pre-test estimator can be dominated by the 2SAE, and further, the 2SAE can be dominated by the OLSE.     

AN ESTIMATION PROCEDURE FOR ERROR VARIANCE INCORPORATING PTS FOR RANDOM EFFECTS MODEL UNDER LINEX LOSS FUNCTION

In the present paper an estimator of the error variance for a three-way layout in random effects model incorporating two preliminary tests of significance has been proposed. It has been well recognized that estimation of parameters, of interest under asymmetric loss function (ASL) is generally better than that under squared error loss function (SELF), particularly where overestimation and underestimation are not equally penalised. As neither overestimation nor underestimation of error variance is desirable, with this motivation, the proposed estimator for the error variance has been studied under LINEX loss function. It is claimed that, with proper choice of degree of asymmetry and level of significance, proposed the sometimes pool estimator performs fairly better than unbiased estimator. Recommendations regarding its application have been attempted.     

Finite-sample properties of the Graybill-Deal estimator

This paper studies some finite-sample properties of the Graybill-Deal estimator under both the squared error as well as the asymmetric LINEX loss functions. In the process, a simpler proof of an existing result has been obtained.     

Comparison of risks of estimators under the LINEX loss for a family of truncated distributions

In most cases, we use a symmetric loss such as the quadratic loss in a usual estimation problem. But, in the non-regular case when the regularity conditions do not necessarily hold, it seems to be more reasonable to choose an asymmetric loss than the symmetric one. In this paper, we consider the Bayes estimation under the linear exponential (LINEX) loss which is regarded as a typical example of asymmetric loss. We also compare the Bayes risks of estimators under the LINEX loss for a family of truncated distributions and a location parameter family of truncated distributions.     

An estimator of the common mean of two normal populations

In this paper we consider the estimation of the common mean of two normal populations when the variances are unknown. If it is known that one specified variance is smaller than the other, then it is possible to modify the Graybill-Deal estimator in order to obtain a more efficient estimator. One such estimator is proposed by Mehta and Gurland (1969). We prove that this estimator is more efficient than the Graybill-Deal estimator under the condition that one variance is known to be less than the other.