管理科学与工程学科基金项目资助和SCI论文发表情况分析

系统地统计了2003～2008年国家自然科学基金委员会管理科学部管理科学与工程学科面上项目和青年项目受资助的总体情况,分析了各个子学科类别的资助状况和发表SCI论文情况,同时分析比较了国家"十一五"与"十五"期间的资助项目情况和发表SCI论文数量情况,找出其中存在的问题并对其原因进行了分析.最后,依据国家自然科学基金"十一五"发展战略,提出今后国家自然科学基金资助策略和建议.     

我国管理科学重要期刊的遴选及其认定

从科学文献的角度阐述了管理科学类期刊的现状。介绍了管理科学重要期刊遴选的原则、遴选工作过程及最终认定的管理科学重要学术期刊。从期刊论文与引文统计的角度分析了在管理科学期刊中存在的一些问题并提出了改进建议     

奖金激励与学术成果——来自浙江大学SCI论文奖励效果的证据

本文利用浙江大学的数据,讨论奖金激励对高校论文产出的影响.浙大在1999、2003和2005年做了学术激励机制改革,对SCI论文按影响因子大小分区和分等,对在高影响因子的SCI期刊发表论文给予相对更高的奖励.其后,浙江大学教师发表的高水平SCI论文的数量和比例出现显著的增加.进一步分析后发现,浙大学术生产力的提升,并不是由于浙江大学引进了更多“高水平”学者,而是因为激励制度产生了效果.本文的发现,对高校的管理机制改革,有现实指导意义.     

国际论文与国内论文合一统计方法研究

论述了期刊影响因子与期刊的有用性、显示度、论文质量的关系以及学科间影响因子不平衡分布的问题;以期刊影响因子为评价依据,用布拉德福区域分析法对SCI和CSCD的来源期刊进行等级区域的划分;用等级区域平均影响因子的倍差作为各个区域的权重,并赋以分值;用国际论文与国内论文合一统计方法进行了评价实验,排列出得分最高的前10名高等院校和科研院所．     

消费者促销国际研究的特点及趋势——基于2001～2011年SSCI数据库的文献分析

以SSCI数据库收录的7种国际知名营销期刊在2001～2011年期间所发表的共计170篇消费者促销文献为研究对象,从文献数量、研究主题、研究方法、本领域知名学者及研究机构等方面进行内容分析,归纳研究特点及发展趋势,以期对正在快速融入全球经济的中国企业和中国学者提供借鉴。     

《管理科学》投稿须知

《管理科学》为国家自然科学基金委员会管理科学部认定管理科学A级重要期刊、中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊、中国科技论文统计源期刊、《中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库》收录期刊、中文社会科学引文索引来源期刊(CSSCI)、中文核心期刊要目总览入编期刊、中国学术期刊综合评价数据库统计源期刊、中国期刊全文数据库全文收录期刊、中国     

《管理科学学报》征稿简则

一、本刊旨在介绍有关管理科学的基础理论、方法与应用等学术性研究成果,以及已取得社会或经济效益的应用性研究成果,是我国管理科学研究的学术性期刊。稿件要求未在其它公开发行期刊或正式出版会议论文集上发表。二、本刊发行对象与读者是从事管理科学研究和实践的管理科学工作者、管理工程技术人员,各行业、部门及企业管理人员,管理科学与经济管理院校师生等。     

A bibliometric analysis of operations research and management science

Bibliometric analysis is the quantitative study of bibliographic material. It provides a general picture of a research field that can be classified by papers, authors and journals. This paper presents a bibliometric overview of research published in operations research and management science in recent decades. The main objective of this study is to identify some of the most relevant research in this field and some of the newest trends according to the information found in the Web of Science database. Several classifications are made, including an analysis of the most influential journals, the two hundred most cited papers of all time and the most productive and influential authors. The results obtained are in accordance with the common wisdom, although some variations are found.     

Risk analysis under attack: How risk science can address the legal,social, and reputational liabilities faced by risk analysts

The role of the risk analyst is critical in understanding and managing uncertainty. However, there is another type of uncertainty that is rarely discussed: The legal, social, and reputational liabilities of the risk analyst. Recent events have shown that professionals participating in risk analysis can be held personally liable. It is timely and important to ask: How can risk science guide risk analysis with consideration of those liabilities, particularly in response to emerging and unprecedented risk. This paper studies this topic by: (1) Categorizing how professionals with risk analysis responsibilities have historically been held liable, and (2) developing a framework to address uncertainty related to those potential liabilities. The result of this framework will enable individual analysts and organizations to investigate and manage the expectations of risk analysts and others as they apply risk principles and methods. This paper will be of interest to risk researchers, risk professionals, and industry professionals who seek maturity within their risk programs.     

Mapping the changes in management science: A review of ‘soft’ OR/MS articles published in Omega (1973–2008)

The paper proposes a framework to map the development of management science (MS) and uses it to survey the MS literature published in Omega, the International Journal of Management Science. The management science discourse over the last 35 years is mapped in four paradigms: (1) optimisation/normative; (2) interpretative/learning; (3) critical; and (4) a post-modern management science approach. Using a set of keywords and authors’ names associated with the main features of each MS discourse, articles published between 1973 and 2008 are grouped. Results seem to suggest that Omega, a US-based journal, has been mainly developing publications under the optimisation paradigm; only very few papers adhering to the interpretative/learning and critical paradigms have been given space in Omega. The handful of papers from the interpretative paradigm are seen as attempts of UK-based academics to open some space for ‘soft’ operational research (OR) or ‘problem structuring methods’ in a positivistic outlook that seems to pervade US management science practice. Results of the survey and features of MS literature published in Omega are discussed. The paper aims to raise awareness amongst management scientist, systems and operational researchers of the differences between the MS/OR practice in both countries.     

Building an integral metatheory of management

The increasing fragmentation of organization theory seems not to be responding to the challenges and complexities of organizations and society. This article contends that integral theory can make an important contribution to our discipline and presents a metatheory that integrates all previous organizational knowledge in an integral, balanced and non-marginalizing framework. Using metatriangulation techniques it reviews management and organization theories, classifies them according to their underlying paradigms and integrates them in a new metatheory. The resulting theory called “3D Management” maintains that there are 3 basic and irreducible dimensions of management: science, arts and ethics which refer respectively to the techno-economical, the aesthetic-emotional and the moral aspects of organizational reality. The fourth management dimension, the spiritual dimension, integrates the Big Three in an essential unit and strives for unity and meaning. An assessment of the theory and a concluding discussion of its contributions and potential applications is provided.     

复杂性科学及其在经济领域中的资助和研究进展

统计和分析了国家自然科学基金委员会(以下简称基金委) 管理科学部自 1986 年以来对复杂性科学及其在经济领域中相关研究的资助情况,同时,对复杂性科学及其与经济科学融合所产生的复杂经济学等研究进行了梳理,系统总结和分析了国内外相关研究的进展和发展趋势,以期为该领域的研究者提供参考和启示,促进复杂系统管理的研究,进而为管理科学部的十四五学科战略规划提供参考,为国家经济治理体系的完善等提供理论储备．     

2011年我国管理科学青年学者取得的巨大成就

根据管理科学与工程学科(管理科学部一处)2010年的《年度进展报告》中获资助者所提交的材料,总结了生产运作管理领域、服务运作管理领域、金融工程领域和技术管理领域等4个领域中我国学者以第1作者或通讯作者在学界公认的管理科学顶级期刊上发表的论文.这是我国管理科学与工程学科学者和国家自然科学基金委管理科学一处对十一五的阶段性总结,是个良好的开端.通过国家自然科学基金和国内学者共同的不懈努力,可望我国管理科学与工程领域的研究和实践会在十二五期间迈上新台阶.