共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
On the adjudication of conflicting claims: an experimental study 总被引:1,自引:1,他引:0
This paper reports an experimental study on three well-known solutions for problems of adjudicating conflicting claims: the
constrained equal awards, the proportional, and the constrained equal losses rules. We first let subjects play three games
designed such that the unique equilibrium allocation coincides with the recommendation of one of these three rules. In addition,
we let subjects play an additional game that has the property that all (and only) strategy profiles in which players coordinate
on the same rule constitute a strict Nash equilibrium. While in the first three games subjects’ play easily converges to the
unique equilibrium rule, in the last game the proportional rule overwhelmingly prevails as a coordination device, especially
when we frame the game as an hypothetical bankruptcy situation. We also administered a questionnaire to a different group
of students, asking them to act as impartial arbitrators to solve (among others) the same problems played in the lab. Also
in this case, respondents were sensitive to the framing of the questions, but the proportional rule was selected by the vast
majority of respondents. 相似文献
18.
19.