BAYES EMPIRICAL BAYES APPROACH TO ESTIMATION OF THE FAILURE RATE IN EXPONENTIAL DISTRIBUTION

ABSTRACT

In the empirical Bayes (EB) decision problem consisting of squared error estimation of the failure rate in exponential distribution, a prior Λ is placed on the gamma family of prior distributions to produce Bayes EB estimators which are admissible. A subclass of such estimators is shown to be asymptotically optimal (a.o.). The results of a Monte Carlo study are presented to demonstrate the a.o. property of the Bayes EB estimators.     

THE BOOTSTRAP RISK OF LINEAR EMPIRICAL BAYES ESTIMATES

This paper discusses the bootstrap risk of the linear empirical Bayes estimate of the form θ=Ǎ+B̌x, where x is the current observation, and Ǎ and B̌ are generally functions of the estimates of the prior parameters. The standard error of this risk is developed and ‘computations’ of both the bootstrap risk and its standard error are made.     

On empirical bayes sequential estimation

We study the empirical Bayes approach to the sequential estimation problem. An empirical Bayes sequential decision procedure, which consists of a stopping rule and a terminal decision rule, is constructed for use in the component. Asymptotic behaviors of the empirical Bayes risk and the empirical Bayes stopping times are investigated as the number of components increase.     

Asymptotic optimality of a two-stage procedure in Bayes sequential estimation

The problem of sequential estimation of the mean with quadratic loss and fixed cost per observation is considered within the Bayesian framework. Instead of fully sequential sampling, a two-stage sampling technique is introduced to solve the problem. The proposed two-stage procedure is robust in the sense that it does not depend on the distribution of outcome variables and the prior. It is shown to be asymptotically not worse than the optimal fixed-sample-size procedures for the arbitrary distributions, and to be asymptotically Bayes for the distributions of one-parameter exponential family.     

Empirical bayes estimation of a distribution function with a gamma process prior

A sequence of empirical Bayes estimators is given for estimating a distribution function. It is shown that ‘i’ this sequence is asymptotically optimum relative to a Gamma process prior, ‘ii’ the overall expected loss approaches the minimum Bayes risk at a rate of n , and ‘iii’ the estimators form a sequence of proper distribution functions. Finally, the numerical example presented by Susarla and Van Ryzin ‘Ann. Statist., 6, 1978’ reworked by Phadia ‘Ann. Statist., 1, 1980, to appear’ has been analyzed and the results are compared to the numerical results by Phadia     

Bayes and Empirical Bayes Two-Stage Procedures for Sampling Inspection

A batch of M items is inspected for defectives. Suppose there are d defective items in the batch. Let d ₀ be a given standard used to evaluate the quality of the population where 0 < d ₀ < M. The problem of testing H ₀: d < d ₀ versus H ₁: d ≥ d ₀ is considered. It is assumed that past observations are available when the current testing problem is considered. Accordingly, the empirical Bayes approach is employed. By using information obtained from the past data, an empirical Bayes two-stage testing procedure is developed. The associated asymptotic optimality is investigated. It is proved that the rate of convergence of the empirical Bayes two-stage testing procedure is of order O (exp(? c? n)), for some constant c? > 0, where n is the number of past observations at hand.     

Some comments on two-stage selection procedures

In this paper we study the procedures of Dudewicz and Dalal ( 1975 ), and the modifications suggested by Rinott ( 1978 ), for selecting the largest mean from k normal populations with unknown variances. We look at the case k = 2 in detail, because there is an optimal allocation scheme here. We do not really allocate the total number of samples into two groups, but we estimate this optimal sample size, as well, so as to guarantee the probability of correct selection (written as P(CS)) at least P^?, 1/2 < P^? < 1 . We prove that the procedure of Rinott is “asymptotically in-efficient” (to be defined below) in the sense of Chow and Robbins ( 1965 ) for any k  2. Next, we propose two-stage procedures having all the properties of Rinott's procedure, together with the property of “asymptotic efficiency” - which is highly desirable.     

On a problem of counting by weighing

Suppose it is desired to obtain a large number N_s of items for which individual counting is impractical, but one can demand a batch to weigh at least w units so that the number of items N in the batch may be close to the desired number N_s. If the items have mean weight ωTH, it is reasonable to have w equal to ωTHN_s when ωTH is known. When ωTH is unknown, one can take a sample of size n, not bigger than N_s, estimate ωTH by a good estimator ω_n, and set w equal to ω_nN_s. Let R_n = Kp²N²_s/n + K_sn be a measure of loss, where K_e and K_s are the coefficients representing the cost of the error in estimation and the cost of the sampling respectively, and p is the coefficient of variation for the weight of the items. If one determines the sample size to be the integer closest to pCN_s when p is known, where C is (K_e/K_s)^1/2, then R_n will be minimized. If p is unknown, a simple sequential procedure is proposed for which the average sample number is shown to be asymptotically equal to the optimal fixed sample size. When the weights are assumed to have a gamma distribution given ω and ω has a prior inverted gamma distribution, the optimal sample size can be found to be the nonnegative integer closest to pCN_s + p²A(pC – 1), where A is a known constant given in the prior distribution.     

On the computation of noncentral chi-squared distributions

A computational formula for computing the cumulative distribution function of noncentral chi-squared distributions with odd degrees of freedom is given.     

On robust empirical bayes analysis of means and variances from stratified samples

Ghosh and Lahiri (1987a,b) considered simultaneous estimation of several strata means and variances where each stratum contains a finite number of elements, under the assumption that the posterior expectation of any stratum mean is a linear function of the sample observations - the so called“posterior linearity” property. In this paper we extend their result by retaining the “posterior linearity“ property of each stratum mean but allowing the superpopulation model whose mean as well as the variance-covariance structure changes from stratum to stratum. The performance of the proposed empirical Bayes estimators are found to be satisfactory both in terms of “asymptotic optimality” (Robbins (1955)) and “relative savings loss” (Efron and Morris (1973)).     

Fixed-width interval estimation of the minimum point of a regression function based on the Kiefer-Wolfowitz procedure

A version of the central limit theorem for the Kiefer-Wolfowitz procedure is stated. One constructs an asymptotically consistent fixed-width confidence interval for the minimum of a regression function. It is shown that the first moment of the corresponding stopping rule is finite. Both the construction and properties of the estimates of unknown parameters and an adaptive version of the procedure are presented.     

Higher than second order approximations for sequential point estimation by a two-stage procedure

We consider the sequential point estimation problem of the mean of a normal distribution N(μ, σ²) when the loss function is squared error plus linear cost. It is shown that a two-stage procedure has the asymptotic efficiency of which the order is higher than second order, provided the standard deviation has a known lower bound. We also give a higher than second-order approximation to the risk.     

Convex design theory 1

Bayesian fixed sample size estimation and sequential estimation of the parameters of the two parameter uniform distribution are discussed.     

Estimating population size with truncated sampling

Let X₁, X₂,…,X_n be independent, indentically distributed random variables with density f(x,θ) with respect to a σ-finite measure μ. Let R be a measurable set in the sample space X. The value of X is observable if X ? (X?R) and not otherwise. The number J of observable X’s is binomial, N, Q, Q = 1?P(X ? R). On the basis of J observations, it is desired to estimate N and θ. Estimators considered are conditional and unconditional maximum likelihood and modified maximum likelihood using a prior weight function to modify the likelihood before maximizing. Asymptotic expansions are developed for the [Ncirc]’s of the form [Ncirc] = N + α√N + β + o_p(1), where α and β are random variables. All estimators have the same α, which has mean 0, variance σ² (a function of θ) and is asymptotically normal. Hence all are asymptotically equivalent by the usual limit distributional theory. The β’s differ and Eβ can be considered an “asymptotic bias”. Formulas are developed to compare the asymptotic biases of the various estimators. For a scale parameter family of absolutely continuous distributions with X = (0,∞) and R = (T,∞), special formuli are developed and a best estimator is found.     

Conditional probability of correct selection under the continuum partition with applications

The problem of selecting the best population from among a finite number of populations in the presence of uncertainty is a problem one faces in many scientific investigations, and has been studied extensively, Many selection procedures have been derived for different selection goals. However, most of these selection procedures, being frequentist in nature, don't tell how to incorporate the information in a particular sample to give a data-dependent measure of correct selection achieved for this particular sample. They often assign the same decision and probability of correct selection for two different sample values, one of which actually seems intuitively much more conclusive than the other. The methodology of conditional inference offers an approach which achieves both frequentist interpret ability and a data-dependent measure of conclusiveness. By partitioning the sample space into a family of subsets, the achieved probability of correct selection is computed by conditioning on which subset the sample falls in. In this paper, the partition considered is the so called continuum partition, while the selection rules are both the fixed-size and random-size subset selection rules. Under the distributional assumption of being monotone likelihood ratio, results on least favourable configuration and alpha-correct selection are established. These re-sults are not only useful in themselves, but also are used to design a new sequential procedure with elimination for selecting the best of k Binomial populations. Comparisons between this new procedure and some other se-quential selection procedures with regard to total expected sample size and some risk functions are carried out by simulations.     

Estimating with percentile grouped and truncated date from a scale parameter distribution

Data which is grouped and truncated is considered. We are given numbers n₁<…<n_k=n and we observe X_ni ),i=1,…k, and the tottal number of observations available (N> n_k is unknown. If the underlying distribution has one unknown parameter θ which enters as a scale parameter, we examine the form of the equations for both conditional, unconditional and modified maximum likelihood estimators of θ and N and examine when these estimators will be finite, and unique. We also develop expressions for asymptotic bias and search for modified estimators which minimize the maximum asymptotic bias. These results are specialized tG the zxponential distribution. Methods of computing the solutions to the likelihood equatims are also discussed.     

ON A MULTIPLE THREE-DECISION PROCEDURE FOR COMPARING SEVERAL TREATMENTS WITH A CONTROL

For the two-sided comparisons of several treatments with a control, a common statistical problem is to decide which treatments are better than the control and which are worse than the control. This paper studies a multiple three-decision procedure for this purpose, proposed by Bohrer (1979) and Bohrer et al. (1981), and provides tables of critical points to facilitate the application of the procedure. The paper defines a power function of the procedure, and tabulates sample sizes necessary to guarantee a given power level. It addresses the problem of optimal sampling allocation in order to maximize the power for a given total sample size, and considers generalization to the situation where the treatments might have unequal numbers of observations.