Improved estimators for the selected location parameters

_i , i = 1, 2, ..., k be k independent exponential populations with different unknown location parameters θ _i , i = 1, 2, ..., k and common known scale parameter σ. Let Y _i denote the smallest observation based on a random sample of size n from the i-th population. Suppose a subset of the given k population is selected using the subset selection procedure according to which the population π _i is selected iff Y _i ≥Y ₍₁₎−d, where Y ₍₁₎ is the largest of the Y _i 's and d is some suitable constant. The estimation of the location parameters associated with the selected populations is considered for the squared error loss. It is observed that the natural estimator dominates the unbiased estimator. It is also shown that the natural estimator itself is inadmissible and a class of improved estimators that dominate the natural estimator is obtained. The improved estimators are consistent and their risks are shown to be O(kn ⁻²). As a special case, we obtain the coresponding results for the estimation of θ₍₁₎, the parameter associated with Y ₍₁₎. Received: January 6, 1998; revised version: July 11, 2000     

Small-sample behavior of weighted least squares in experimental design applications

In experimental design applications unbiased estimators s_i ² of the variances σ_i ² are possible. These estimators may be used in Weighted Least Squares (WLS) when estimating the parameters β. The resulting small-sample behavior is investigated in a Monte Carlo experiment. This experiment shows that an asymptotically valid covariance formula can be used if s_i ² is based on, say, at least 5 observations. The WLS estimator based on estimators s_i ² gives more accurate estimators of β, provided the σ_i ² differ by a factor, say, 10.     

Estimating the parameter of selected uniform population under the squared log error loss function

Let π₁, …, π_k be k (? 2) independent populations, where π_i denotes the uniform distribution over the interval (0, θ_i) and θ_i > 0 (i = 1, …, k) is an unknown scale parameter. The population associated with the largest scale parameter is called the best population. For selecting the best population, We use a selection rule based on the natural estimators of θ_i, i = 1, …, k, for the case of unequal sample sizes. Consider the problem of estimating the scale parameter θ_L of the selected uniform population when sample sizes are unequal and the loss is measured by the squared log error (SLE) loss function. We derive the uniformly minimum risk unbiased (UMRU) estimator of θ_L under the SLE loss function and two natural estimators of θ_L are also studied. For k = 2, we derive a sufficient condition for inadmissibility of an estimator of θ_L. Using these condition, we conclude that the UMRU estimator and natural estimator are inadmissible. Finally, the risk functions of various competing estimators of θ_L are compared through simulation.     

New estimator for functions of the canonical correlation coefficients

Let ρ₁,…,ρ_p be the population canonical correlation coefficients from a normal distribution. This paper considers the estimation of δ₁,…,δ_p, where $\text{δ}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{=ρ}{}_{\mathrm{i}}{}^2\text{/(1−ρ}{}_{\mathrm{i}}{}^2\text{),}\text{i=1,…,p}$, in a decision theoretic way. Since the distribution of δ_i's is complicated, two-staged estimation has been a usual method so far; i.e., first find a good estimator of a matrix whose eigenvalues are the δ_i's, then use its eigenvalues as the estimators of δ_i's. In this paper we directly estimate δ_i's and evaluate the estimators with respect to a quadratic loss function. We propose a new class of estimators and prove its dominance over the usual estimator.     

Estimation of the mean of the selected gamma population

Let л₁ and л₂ denote two independent gamma populations G(α₁, p) and G(α₂, p) respectively. Assume α(i=1,2)are unknown and the common shape parameter p is a known positive integer. Let Y_i denote the sample mean based on a random sample of size n from the i-th population. For selecting the population with the larger mean, we consider, the natural rule according to which the population corresponding to the larger Y_i is selected. We consider? in this paper, the estimation of M, the mean of the selected population. It is shown that the natural estimator is positively biased. We obtain the uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimator(UMVE) of M. We also consider certain subclasses of estikmators of the form c₁x₍₁₎ +c₁x₍₂₎ and derive admissible estimators in these classes. The minimazity of certain estimators of interest is investigated. Itis shown that p(p+1)^-1x₍₁₎ is minimax and dominates the UMVUE. Also UMVUE is not minimax.     

Simultaneous estimation of ordered parameters

The problem of estimating ordered parameters is encountered in biological, agricultural, reliability and various other experiments. Consider two populations with densities f₁(x₁-ω₁) and f₂(x₂-ω₂) where ω₁#ω₂. The estimation of ω₁,ω₂) with the loss function, the sum of squared errors, is studied. when f_i is the f_i(,_i,,_i ²) density with ,_i known, i=1,2; we obtain a class of minimax estimators. When ω₁ #ω₂ we show some of these estimators are improved by the maximum likelihood estimator. For a general f_i we give sufficient conditions for the minimaxity of the analogue of the Pitman estimator.     

Estimation of the linear-plateau segmented regression model in the presence of measurement error

It is well known that when the true values of the independent variable are unobservable due to measurement error, the least squares estimator for a regression model is biased and inconsistent. When repeated observations on each x_i are taken, consistent estimators for the linear-plateau model can be formed. The repeated observations are required to classify each observation to the appropriate line segment. Two cases of repeated observations are treated in detail. First, when a single value of y_i is observed with the repeated observations of x_i the least squares estimator using the mean of the repeated x_i observations is consistent and asymptotically normal. Second, when repeated observations on the pair (x_i, y_i ) are taken the least squares estimator is inconsistent, but two consistent estimators are proposed: one that consistently estimates the bias of the least squares estimator and adjusts accordingly; the second is the least squares estimator using the mean of the repeated observations on each pair.     

Some locally optimal subset selection rules for comparison with a control

Let π₀,π₁,…,π_k be k+1 independent populations. For i=0,1,…,k,π_i has the densit f(x,θ_i), where the (unknown) parameter θ_i belongs to an interval of the real line. Our goal is to select from π₁,… π_k (experimental treatments) those populations, if any, that are better (suitably defined) than π₀ which is the control population. A locally optimal rule is derived in the class of rules for which Pr(π_i is selected)γ_i, i=1,…,k, when θ₀=θ₁=?=θ_k. The criterion used for local optimality amounts to maximizing the efficiency in a certain sense of the rule in picking out the superior populations for specific configurations of θ=(θ₀,…,θ_k) in a neighborhood of an equiparameter configuration. The general result is then applied to the following special cases: (a) normal means comparison — common known variance, (b) normal means comparison — common unknown variance, (c) gamma scale parameters comparison — known (unequal) shape parameters, and (d) comparison of regression slopes. In all these cases, the rule is obtained based on samples of unequal sizes.     

A comparison of estimators for the proportion in the tail of a normal distribution

Three estimators of the proportion in a tail of the normal distribution are compared using the criteria of mean squared error and mean absolute error. The estimators that we compare are the maximum likelihood estimator, the minimum variance unbiased estimator, and an intuitive estimator that is frequently used in practice. The intuitive estimator is similar to the MLE but uses the usual unbiased estimator of σ² rather than the MLE of σ². We show that the intuitive estimator has low efficiency, and for this reason it is not recommended. For very smallp and for largep the MVUE has the highest efficiency. The MLE is best for moderate values ofp.     

Importance tempering

Simulated tempering (ST) is an established Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method for sampling from a multimodal density π(θ). Typically, ST involves introducing an auxiliary variable k taking values in a finite subset of [0,1] and indexing a set of tempered distributions, say π _k (θ)∝ π(θ) ^k . In this case, small values of k encourage better mixing, but samples from π are only obtained when the joint chain for (θ,k) reaches k=1. However, the entire chain can be used to estimate expectations under π of functions of interest, provided that importance sampling (IS) weights are calculated. Unfortunately this method, which we call importance tempering (IT), can disappoint. This is partly because the most immediately obvious implementation is naïve and can lead to high variance estimators. We derive a new optimal method for combining multiple IS estimators and prove that the resulting estimator has a highly desirable property related to the notion of effective sample size. We briefly report on the success of the optimal combination in two modelling scenarios requiring reversible-jump MCMC, where the naïve approach fails.     

Simultaneous estimation of Poisson means of the selected subset

Let _π1,_π2,…,_πp${\pi }_1,{\pi }_2,\dots ,{\pi }_p$ be p   independent Poisson populations with means _λ1,…,_λp${\lambda }_1,\dots ,{\lambda }_p$, respectively. Let {X₁,…,X_p} denote the set of observations, where X_i is from _πi${\pi }_i$. Suppose a subset of populations is selected using Gupta and Huang's (1975) selection rule which selects _πi${\pi }_i$ if and only if _Xi+1?_cX(1)$X_i+1?{\mathit{cX}}_{(1)}$, where X₍₁₎=max{X₁,…,X_p}, and 0<c<1$0<c<1$. In this paper, the simultaneous estimation of the Poisson means associated with the selected populations is considered for the k-normalized squared error loss function. It is shown that the natural estimator is positively biased. Also, a class of estimators that are better than the natural estimator is obtained by solving certain difference inequalities over the sample space. A class of estimators which dominate the UMVUE is also obtained. Monte carlo simulations are used to assess the percentage improvements and an application to a real-life example is also discussed.     

Comparison of estimation methods for the finite population mean in simple random sampling: symmetric super-populations

In this paper, a new estimator combined estimator (CE) is proposed for estimating the finite population mean ¯ Y _N in simple random sampling assuming a long-tailed symmetric super-population model. The efficiency and robustness properties of the CE is compared with the widely used and well-known estimators of the finite population mean ¯ Y _N by Monte Carlo simulation. The parameter estimators considered in this study are the classical least squares estimator, trimmed mean, winsorized mean, trimmed L-mean, modified maximum-likelihood estimator, Huber estimator (W24) and the non-parametric Hodges–Lehmann estimator. The mean square error criteria are used to compare the performance of the estimators. We show that the CE is overall more efficient than the other estimators. The CE is also shown to be more robust for estimating the finite population mean ¯ Y _N , since it is insensitive to outliers and to misspecification of the distribution. We give a real life example.     

Three estimators for the poisson regression model with measurement errors

We consider two consistent estimators for the parameters of the linear predictor in the Poisson regression model, where the covariate is measured with errors. The measurement errors are assumed to be normally distributed with known error variance σ _u ² . The SQS estimator, based on a conditional mean-variance model, takes the distribution of the latent covariate into account, and this is here assumed to be a normal distribution. The CS estimator, based on a corrected score function, does not use the distribution of the latent covariate. Nevertheless, for small σ _u ² , both estimators have identical asymptotic covariance matrices up to the order of σ _u ² . We also compare the consistent estimators to the naive estimator, which is based on replacing the latent covariate with its (erroneously) measured counterpart. The naive estimator is biased, but has a smaller covariance matrix than the consistent estimators (at least up to the order of σ _u ² ).     

Estimating the mean of the selected uniform population

Let π_i(i=1,2,…K) be independent U(0,?_i) populations. Let Y_i denote the largest observation based on a random sample of size n from the i-th population. for selecting the best populaton, that is the one associated with the largest ?_i, we consider the natural selection rule, according to which the population corresponding to the largest Y_i is selected. In this paper, the estimation of M. the mean of the selected population is considered. The natural estimator is positively biased. The UMVUE (uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimator) of M is derived using the (U,V)-method of Robbins (1987) and its asymptotic distribution is found. We obtain a minimax estimator of M for K≤4 and a class of admissible estimators among those of the form cY_max. For the case K = 2, the UMVUE is improved using the Brewster-Zidek (1974) Technique with respect to the squared error loss function L₁ and the scale-invariant loss function L₂. For the case K = 2, the MSE'S of all the estimators are compared for selected values of n and ρ=?₁/(?₁+?₂).     

Estimating a positive normal mean

Let X ₁, X ₂, ..., X _n be a random sample from a normal population with mean μ and variance σ ². In many real life situations, specially in lifetime or reliability estimation, the parameter μ is known a priori to lie in an interval [a, ∞). This makes the usual maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) ̄ an inadmissible estimator of μ with respect to the squared error loss. This is due to the fact that it may take values outside the parameter space. Katz (1961) and Gupta and Rohatgi (1980) proposed estimators which lie completely in the given interval. In this paper we derive some new estimators for μ and present a comparative study of the risk performance of these estimators. Both the known and unknown variance cases have been explored. The new estimators are shown to have superior risk performance over the existing ones over large portions of the parameter space.     

Super efficient frequency estimation

In this paper we propose a modified Newton-Raphson method to obtain super efficient estimators of the frequencies of a sinusoidal signal in presence of stationary noise. It is observed that if we start from an initial estimator with convergence rate O_p(n⁻¹) and use Newton-Raphson algorithm with proper step factor modification, then it produces super efficient frequency estimator in the sense that its asymptotic variance is lower than the asymptotic variance of the corresponding least squares estimator. The proposed frequency estimator is consistent and it has the same rate of convergence, namely O_p(n^−3/2), as the least squares estimator. Monte Carlo simulations are performed to observe the performance of the proposed estimator for different sample sizes and for different models. The results are quite satisfactory. One real data set has been analyzed for illustrative purpose.     

Combining unbiased estimates —a further examination of some old estimators

This paper considers the problem of combining k unbiased estimates, x _i of a parameter,μ, where each estimate, x _i is the average of n _i + l independent normal observations with unknown mean, μ, and unknown variance, σ _i ². The behavior of several commonly used estimators of μ is studied by means of an empirical sampling study, and the empirical results of this experiment are interpreted in terms of previous theoretical results. Finally, some extrapolations are made as to how these estimators might behave under varying conditions, and some new estimators are proposed which might have higher efficiencies under certain conditions than those which are generally used.     

The minimum L2 distance estimator for Poisson mixture models

A robust estimator is developed for Poisson mixture models with a known number of components. The proposed estimator minimizes the L₂ distance between a sample of data and the model. When the component distributions are completely known, the estimators for the mixing proportions are in closed form. When the parameters for the component Poisson distributions are unknown, numerical methods are needed to calculate the estimators. Compared to the minimum Hellinger distance estimator, the minimum L₂ estimator can be less robust to extreme outliers, and often more robust to moderate outliers.     

Maximum likelihood estimation of the parameters of the bivariate binomial distribution

We consider the problem of maximum likelihood estimation of the parameters of the bxvariate binomial distribution, In the statistical literature, this problem is solved when the observed sample is available in the form of a 2x2 contingency table, that is, with all four cell fre quencies given,, The present paper provides a solution for this problem when only the marginal totals of the 2x2 table are observed, which is the natural set-up in a bivariate sampling situation.. Thus, based on a sample [(X_i,Y_i:), i = 1, …, k] from a bivariate binomial population, we derive maximum likelihood (ML) estimators for the two marginal parameters p₁,p₂: and the covariance parameter p₁₁: It. turns out that the ML estimators for P₁: and P₂: are expressed explicitly in terms of the sample values, whereas the ML estimator for p₁₁: can only be obtained numerically by iterative methods Two nu merical illustrations are also presented     

Minimax estimation of a lower-bounded scale parameter of a gamma distribution for scale-invariant squared-error loss

Let X have a gamma distribution with known shape parameter θr;aL and unknown scale parameter θ. Suppose it is known that θ ≥ a for some known a > 0. An admissible minimax estimator for scale-invariant squared-error loss is presented. This estimator is the pointwise limit of a sequence of Bayes estimators. Further, the class of truncated linear estimators C = {θ_ρ|θ_ρ(x) = max(a, ρ), ρ > 0} is studied. It is shown that each θ_ρ is inadmissible and that exactly one of them is minimax. Finally, it is shown that Katz's [Ann. Math. Statist., 32, 136–142 (1961)] estimator of θ is not minimax for our loss function. Some further properties of and comparisons among these estimators are also presented.