存在保证域的模糊超效率DEA模型

模糊DEA模型是用于解决存在模糊数据的决策单元(DMUs)效率评价问题的,然而现有的模糊DEA模型分辨率低,本文构建了存在保证域的模糊超效率DEA模型,并给出了一种基于截集的求解方法并进行了证明,该模型有效地解决了输入和输出全部或部分为模糊数的决策单元全排序问题。最后给出了一个银行效率评价的实例说明了方法的有效性。     

DEA博弈模型的分析与发展

数据包络分析(Data Envelopment Analysis,DEA)与博弈论之间关系密切.传统DEA模型忽略了决策单元(Decision Making Units,DMUs)之间的竞合关系,对权重的限制过于宽松,难以合理评价DMU效率值.为此,将博弈论方法引入至DEA模型,开展DEA的博弈研究,既是对DEA理论的重大发展,也将极大拓宽博弈论的应用研究.本文分三个阶段对现有的DEA博弈研究进行述评:(1)DEA的博弈论解释;(2)DEA Game模型及其应用;(3)DEA效率博弈;在深入分析重点模型基础上,总结其发展脉络,促进DEA理论与实践的发展.     

技术项目评价与选择方法研究

本文从企业技术项目评价与选择的实际出发，针对企业技术项目选择多阶段的特点，制定了相应的技术项目评价指标体系，运用DEA方法建立了评价模型，并给出了DEA评价后项目选择的方法，对于定性指标使用灰色处理使之定量化。     

基于多种DEA模型和Gini准则的效率评价方法——兼对我国高校运营绩效的评价

针对多种数据包络分析（Data Envelopment Analysis,简称DEA）模型会产生不同绩效评价结果的问题,提出基于Gini准则科学地融合各DEA模型结果的方法。首先基于Gini准则定义信息纯度以衡量各DEA模型结果的确定性并赋予权重,然后通过加权融合最终得出客观唯一的综合效率。此外,根据评价者的偏好信息或先验知识,进一步提出交互式多DEA模型-Gini准则方法。以前学者仅从单一角度出发选择DEA模型评价高校的运营绩效,考虑到从不同角度出发的多种DEA模型可以给出高校更加全面客观的运营绩效评价,利用以上方法对2011年国内25所理工类高校的运营绩效进行了实证分析,结果验证了以上方法可以合理有效的衡量各高校的运营绩效表现,对于高校运营绩效的评价研究具有实际指导意义。     

两阶段DEA前沿面投影问题研究——兼对我国上市银行运营绩效进行评价

DEA方法,即数据包络分析方法,是一种用于评价决策单元(Decision Making Units,DMUs)相对有效性的实证方法。近年来DEA方法已经广泛的应用于各行各业的绩效评价中,并发展出两阶段DEA方法。两阶段DEA方法相对于传统DEA方法的优势在于,它不但可以提供被评价对象的总体效率值,还可以分别生成每一阶段的效率值。但正是由于中间要素的存在,按照传统的DEA方法来调整两阶段DEA投入、产出要素的优化过程已不能成功投影在有效前沿面上。本文基于两阶段DEA方法,通过加入"虚拟中间要素"在两阶段DEA中嵌入一个"虚拟阶段",这样不但完善了两阶段DEA的逻辑结构,而且成功的将被评价单元投影到有效前沿面。最后本文应用以上方法对我国上市银行的运营绩效进行了实证分析。实证结果令我们意外的是,国有商业银行运营绩效优于股份制银行。     

基于DEA模型的商业银行效率评价研究

DEA模型是一种有效地处理多投入多产出的效率评价模型。运用DEA模型对商业银行进行效率评价能够综合地考察商业银行经营管理情况,并通过选择合适的投入产出指标,直接指明与最佳银行相比,被评价银行在哪些投入产出项目上有差距,从而可以找出改进被评价银行经营效率的最佳途径。     

基于混合DEA模型的医药行业上市公司经营效率相对有效性评价

DEA模型作为一种客观的多指标决策方法应用十分广泛.但目前使用频率较高的两种通用模型C²R模型和C²GS²模型,在单独使用时都有比较大的局限性,评判结果往往无法令人满意;针对这一问题,本文提出构建混合DEA模型,并应用混合DEA模型对医药上市公司的经营效率相对有效性评价进行实证分析,阐述了混合DEA模型的使用方法,验证了评判方法的可行性和科学性.     

L-R型区间DEA模型及其变换

本文探讨了评价指标为IR型区间数时,决策单元的相对有效性评价问题,提出了I-R型区间DEA模型.相对一般DEA方法,该模型具有计算简单、适用性广、经济含义明确等特点.     

基于模糊综合评判的企业集团内部绩效评价

在区别对待企业集团内部不同类型所属企业的基础上,本文通过建立多层次、多因素绩效评价指标体系,按照定量分析与定性分析相结合的原则,运用层次分析法确定了各指标的相对重要性的排序权值,并建立多层次模糊综合评判模型,对企业集团内部绩效评价进行实证研究.     

企业商业模式对技术创新的影响——上海电气集团的启示

正随着技术创新评价指标体系的构建,专家和学者利用不同的方法对技术创新评价进行了广泛研究。钱燕云(2004)运用DEA方法和模型,对企业技术创新效率及有效性的综合评价进行了研究;高俊光等(2007)采用专家打分方法,建立了一整套衡量企业自主创新能力的评价指标体系。笔者选取学者具有代表性的指标,以此了解上海电气集团(以下简称上海电气)的技术创新现状。     

Two-level DEA approaches in research evaluation

It is well known that the discrimination power of data envelopment analysis (DEA) models will be much weakened if too many input or output indicators are used. It is a dilemma if decision makers wish to select comprehensive indicators, which often have some hierarchical structures, to present a relatively holistic evaluation using DEA. In this paper we show that it is possible to develop DEA models that utilize hierarchical structures of input–output data so that they are able to handle quite large numbers of inputs and outputs. We present two approaches in a pilot evaluation of 15 institutes for basic research in the Chinese Academy of Sciences using the DEA models.     

Hierarchical network systems: An application to high-technology industry in China

In real world situations, there is a hierarchical structure exists in a specific organization and each component has its network process. However, such hierarchical network system has not been well studied in previous literature, and misleading results often are produced. The current paper discusses a data envelopment analysis (DEA) modelling technique for a network structure where a hierarchical system consists of components having two-stage series processes. An additive network DEA is proposed to evaluate the performance of this type of network structure. The overall and divisional efficiencies of the system and each component can be derived, and the relationship between system efficiency, divisional efficiency and the ones of components is discussed. The newly developed additive network DEA is nonlinear and cannot be converted into a linear program. A semidefinite programming (SDP) approach is developed for effectively solving this model and the global solution can be guaranteed. Another linear multiplicative network DEA also developed for this hierarchical system. The two newly developed models are illustrated with a case of the performance evaluation of high-technology industry in China.     

Efficiency measurement for hierarchical network systems

The conventional data envelopment analysis (DEA) models for measuring the relative efficiency of a set of decision making units (DMUs), without considering the operations of the component processes, often produce misleading results, and network models have thus been recommended. This paper discusses the development of a network DEA model for systems with a hierarchical structure. It is shown that the hierarchical structure is equivalent to a parallel structure, with the components being the units at the bottom of the hierarchy. Due to the characteristics of a parallel system, the efficiency of a hierarchical system is thus a weighted average of those of the units at the bottom of the hierarchy. A hypothetic example shows that the proposed model is able to distinguish the order of the efficient DMUs evaluated by the conventional DEA model. Moreover, it provides the efficiencies of the functions of the DMU, which enables managers to identify areas of weakness, and thus better focus efforts to improve overall performance.     

Estimation of portfolio efficiency via DEA

Traditional DEA models and nonlinear (diversification) DEA models are often used in performance evaluation of portfolios. However, the diversification models are usually very complicated to compute except the very basic models. And the classic DEA models still need to be further justified and tested, since it is not clear whether they are over-linearised according to the diversification models. The existing studies on performance evaluation via the classic DEA models generally focus on the selection of inputs and outputs. In this work, we investigate theoretical foundation of DEA models for portfolios from a perspective of sampling portfolio. We show the classic DEA provides an effective and practical way to approximate the portfolio efficiency (PE). We further verify this approach through different portfolio models with various frictions and bounds on the market. Through the comprehensive simulations carried out in this study, we show that with adequate data sets, the classic DEA models can effectively sample portfolios to take into account sufficient diversification, and thus can be used as an effective tool in computing the PE for their performance assessments. This study can be viewed as a justification of the classic DEA performance assessments and the way to introduce other efficiency notions (like allocation efficiency, scale efficiency, etc) into assessment of portfolios.     

Time-staged outputs in DEA

This paper examines the issue of handling outputs in DEA that occur at different stages in time. As a backdrop for the research we examine a data set involving the evaluation of efficiencies of business schools. The data focuses explicitly on a particular institution, namely the business school ENCSH (Escuela de Negocios, Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades) at ITESM (Instituto Tecnologico y de Estudios Superiores Monterrey) in Mexico. This school of business is evaluated relative to 41 peer institutions in the USA, using data envelopment analysis as the principal evaluation instrument. Using internships and jobs as outputs, and various quality measures as inputs, we demonstrate that this problem setting gives rise to the phenomenon of time-staged outputs. Specifically, the two outputs occur at different points in time, meaning that one of them plays a dual role. While this problem might potentially be viewed as a type of network DEA model, we demonstrate that a modification of the conventional DEA methodology is a more appropriate structure to handle this situation.     

A study of DEA models without explicit inputs

In performance evaluations, data without explicit inputs (such as index data, pure output data) are widely used. To directly use such data, this paper presents a study on building DEA models without explicit inputs, so-called DEA-WEI models, which are applicable to the evaluation applications where inputs are not directly considered. We provide an axiom foundation of these kinds of models, and further discuss how to incorporate value judgments of decision makers into these DEA-WEI models. Several such models are derived. Finally, applications of the DEA-WEI models are presented.     

基于证据推理和前景理论的交叉效率排序方法研究

针对由交叉效率评价策略和交叉效率集结方法的多样性而造成评价结果不一致的问题,提出利用证据推理方法和前景理论,综合各个交叉效率评价策略的评价结果,实现对决策单元的统一评价。首先,分别将选用的交叉效率评价策略以及各个评价策略中的他评效率设置成一级指标和二级指标,依据算数平均和前景理论分别确定一、二级指标的权重;其次,依据他评效率确定二级指标置信度,利用证据推理方法将各个交叉效率评价策略的他评效率综合转换成决策单元被评价为有效的置信度。决策者可通过比较决策单元被识别为有效的置信度的大小来判断决策单元交叉效率的大小,进而实现对决策单元的排序;最后,通过案例验证和说明本文提出方法的有效性和实用性。     

基于可变权重的DEA效率评价模型

传统DEA模型将投入、产出权重视为固定变量。为了更合理地对决策单元的效率进行评价,本文研究了如何将有关投入、产出变量的权重的更多信息融入效率评价模型,提出了可变权重的概念,给出了一种基于可变权重的DEA效率评价模型。本文模型是CCR模型的推广。在有关权重信息可得的前提下,本文模型较之CCR模型中效率评价上更为合理。但是,如何准确度量投入、产出权重并将其函数化,是本文方法应用的难点。一个算例分析演示了本文模型。     

Developing a supplier selection system through integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy DEA: a case study on an auto lighting system company in Taiwan

Supplier selection plays a very important role in supply chain management. This study intends to develop a novel performance evaluation method, which integrates both fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method and fuzzy data envelopment analysis (DEA) for assisting organisations to make the supplier selection decision. Fuzzy AHP method is first applied to find the indicators’ weights through expert questionnaire survey. Then, these weights are integrated with fuzzy DEA. We use α -cut set and extension principle of fuzzy set theory to simplify the fuzzy DEA as a pair of traditional DEA model. Finally, fuzzy ranking using maximising and minimising set method is able to rank the evaluation samples. A case study on an internationally well-known auto lighting OEM company shows that the proposed method is very suitable for practical applications.