Confidence Intervals for Reliability of Stress-Strength Models in the Normal Case

In this article, we propose some procedures to get confidence intervals for the reliability in stress-strength models. The confidence intervals are obtained either through a parametric bootstrap procedure or using asymptotic results, and are applied to the particular context of two independent normal random variables. The performance of these estimators and other known approximate estimators are empirically checked through a simulation study which considers several scenarios.     

Confidence Intervals for the Current Status Model

We discuss a new way of constructing pointwise confidence intervals for the distribution function in the current status model. The confidence intervals are based on the smoothed maximum likelihood estimator, using local smooth functional theory and normal limit distributions. Bootstrap methods for constructing these intervals are considered. Other methods to construct confidence intervals, using the non‐standard limit distribution of the (restricted) maximum likelihood estimator, are compared with our approach via simulations and real data applications.     

Confidence Intervals for the Hyperparameters in Structural Models

This article deals with the bootstrap as an alternative method to construct confidence intervals for the hyperparameters of structural models. The bootstrap procedure considered is the classical nonparametric bootstrap in the residuals of the fitted model using a well-known approach. The performance of this procedure is empirically obtained through Monte Carlo simulations implemented in Ox. Asymptotic and percentile bootstrap confidence intervals for the hyperparameters are built and compared by means of the coverage percentages. The results are similar but the bootstrap procedure is better for small sample sizes. The methods are applied to a real time series and confidence intervals are built for the hyperparameters.     

Iterated Bootstrap-t Confidence Intervals for Density Functions

Abstract.  Conventional bootstrap- t intervals for density functions based on kernel density estimators exhibit poor coverages due to failure of the bootstrap to estimate the bias correctly. The problem can be resolved by either estimating the bias explicitly or undersmoothing the kernel density estimate to undermine its bias asymptotically. The resulting bias-corrected intervals have an optimal coverage error of order arbitrarily close to second order for a sufficiently smooth density function. We investigated the effects on coverage error of both bias-corrected intervals when the nominal coverage level is calibrated by the iterated bootstrap. In either case, an asymptotic reduction of coverage error is possible provided that the bias terms are handled using an extra round of smoothed bootstrapping. Under appropriate smoothness conditions, the optimal coverage error of the iterated bootstrap- t intervals has order arbitrarily close to third order. Examples of both simulated and real data are reported to illustrate the iterated bootstrap procedures.     

Weighted Bootstrap Confidence Intervals for Generalized Behrens-Fisher Problems

In this article, the weighted bootstrap difference between two-sample means for generalized Behrens-Fisher problems is investigated along with its strong consistency. Moreover, the one-order accurate weighted bootstrap approximation to the sample distribution of sample difference is also established and hence based on it the weighted bootstrap intervals for the population difference is constructed. Simulation studies show that the weighted bootstrap interval performs better than other intervals we considered in some cases.     

Confidence Intervals for Current Status Data

Abstract.  The likelihood ratio statistic for testing pointwise hypotheses about the survival time distribution in the current status model can be inverted to yield confidence intervals (CIs). One advantage of this procedure is that CIs can be formed without estimating the unknown parameters that figure in the asymptotic distribution of the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) of the distribution function. We discuss the likelihood ratio-based CIs for the distribution function and the quantile function and compare these intervals to several different intervals based on the MLE. The quantiles of the limiting distribution of the MLE are estimated using various methods including parametric fitting, kernel smoothing and subsampling techniques. Comparisons are carried out both for simulated data and on a data set involving time to immunization against rubella. The comparisons indicate that the likelihood ratio-based intervals are preferable from several perspectives.     

Approximate Bayesianity of Frequentist Confidence Intervals for a Binomial Proportion

The well-known Wilson and Agresti–Coull confidence intervals for a binomial proportion p are centered around a Bayesian estimator. Using this as a starting point, similarities between frequentist confidence intervals for proportions and Bayesian credible intervals based on low-informative priors are studied using asymptotic expansions. A Bayesian motivation for a large class of frequentist confidence intervals is provided. It is shown that the likelihood ratio interval for p approximates a Bayesian credible interval based on Kerman’s neutral noninformative conjugate prior up to O(n^{? 1}) in the confidence bounds. For the significance level α ? 0.317, the Bayesian interval based on the Jeffreys’ prior is then shown to be a compromise between the likelihood ratio and Wilson intervals. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.     

Confidence Intervals for Nonparametric Regression Functions with Missing Data

Suppose that we have a nonparametric regression model Y = m(X) + ε with X ∈ R^p, where X is a random design variable and is observed completely, and Y is the response variable and some Y-values are missing at random. Based on the “complete” data sets for Y after nonaprametric regression imputation and inverse probability weighted imputation, two estimators of the regression function m(x₀) for fixed x₀ ∈ R^p are proposed. Asymptotic normality of two estimators is established, which is used to construct normal approximation-based confidence intervals for m(x₀). We also construct an empirical likelihood (EL) statistic for m(x₀) with limiting distribution of χ²₁, which is used to construct an EL confidence interval for m(x₀).     

Simultaneous Confidence Intervals for the Difference of Two Survival Functions

In comparing two treatments with failure time observations, confidence bands for the "difference" of two survival curves provide useful information about a global picture of the treatment difference over time. In this note, we propose a rather simple procedure for constructing such simultaneous confidence intervals. Our technique can also be used in the one-sample case, which has been extensively studied in the literature.     

Confidence Intervals for the Scale Parameter of the Power-Law Process

The power-law process (PLP) is a two-parameter model widely used for modeling repairable system reliability. Results on exact point estimation for both parameters as well as exact interval estimation for the shape parameter are well known. In this paper, we investigate the interval estimation for the scale parameter. Asymptotic confidence intervals are derived using Fisher information matrix and theoretical results by Cocozza-Thivent (1997 Cocozza-Thivent , C. ( 1997 ). Processus Stochastiques et Fiabilité des Systèmes . Berlin : Springer-Verlag . [Google Scholar]). The accuracy of the interval estimation for finite samples is studied by simulation methods.     

Empirical Likelihood Confidence Intervals for Distribution Functions under Negatively Associated Samples

In this article, we discuss the construction of the confidence intervals for distribution functions under negatively associated samples. It is shown that the blockwise empirical likelihood (EL) ratio statistic for a distribution function is asymptotically χ²-type distributed. The result is used to obtain an EL-based confidence interval for the distribution function.     

Confidence Intervals for Univariate Impulse Responses With a Near Unit Root

This article proposes a method for constructing confidence intervals for the impulse response function of a univariate time series with a near unit root. These confidence intervals control coverage, whereas the existing techniques can all have coverage far below the nominal level. I apply the proposed method to several measures of U.S. aggregate output.     

Simultaneous Confidence Intervals for Ratios of Fixed Effect Parameters in Linear Mixed Models

In multiple comparisons of fixed effect parameters in linear mixed models, treatment effects can be reported as relative changes or ratios. Simultaneous confidence intervals for such ratios had been previously proposed based on Bonferroni adjustments or multivariate normal quantiles accounting for the correlation among the multiple contrasts. We propose Fieller-type intervals using multivariate t quantiles and the application of Markov chain Monte Carlo techniques to sample from the joint posterior distribution and construct percentile-based simultaneous intervals. The methods are compared in a simulation study including bioassay problems with random intercepts and slopes, repeated measurements designs, and multicenter clinical trials.     

Confidence Intervals of Effect Size for Randomized Comparative Parallel-Group Studies with Unequal Variances

Recent years have seen a heightened interest in estimating effect size—a common measure of effect magnitude in biomedical research—because of its direct clinical relevance. In this article, three interval estimates of effect size for randomized comparative parallel-group studies with unequal variances are discussed. Two real-life examples illustrate that confidence intervals obtained by three methods are quite different, especially when the sample sizes are small. Simulation results show that confidence intervals generated by the modified signed log-likelihood ratio method yield essentially the exact coverage probabilities, whereas the other two methods, even though they are more popular methods, yield less satisfactory results.     

A Parametric Bootstrap Approach for One-Way ANOVA Under Unequal Variances with Unbalanced Data

This research is to provide a solution of one-way ANOVA without using transformation when variances are heteroscedastic and group sizes are unequal. Parametric bootstrap test (Krishnamoorthy et al., 2007 Krishnamoorthy, K., Lu, F., Mathew, T. (2007). A parametric bootstrap approach for anova with unequal variances: Fixed and random models. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 51:5731–5742.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) has been shown to be competitive with many other methods when testing the equality of group means. We extend the parametric bootstrap algorithm to a multiple comparison procedure. Simulation results show that the parametric bootstrap approach works well for one-way ANOVA.     

Comparison of Several Confidence Intervals for Median Residual Lifetime with Left-truncated and Right-censored Data

For left-truncated and right-censored data, the technique proposed by Brookmeyer and Crowley (1982) is extended to construct a point-wise confidence interval for median residual lifetime. This procedure is computationally simpler than the score type confidence interval in Jeong et al. (2008) and empirical likelihood ratio confidence interval in Zhou and Jeong (2011). Further, transformations of the estimator are applied to improve the approximation to the asymptotic distribution for small sample sizes. A simulation study is conducted to investigate the accuracy of these confidence intervals and the implementation of these confidence intervals to two real datasets is illustrated.     

Confidence intervals based on the deviance statistic for the hyperparameters in state space models

The main objective of this work is to evaluate the performance of confidence intervals, built using the deviance statistic, for the hyperparameters of state space models. The first procedure is a marginal approximation to confidence regions, based on the likelihood test, and the second one is based on the signed root deviance profile. Those methods are computationally efficient and are not affected by problems such as intervals with limits outside the parameter space, which can be the case when the focus is on the variances of the errors. The procedures are compared to the usual approaches existing in the literature, which includes the method based on the asymptotic distribution of the maximum likelihood estimator, as well as bootstrap confidence intervals. The comparison is performed via a Monte Carlo study, in order to establish empirically the advantages and disadvantages of each method. The results show that the methods based on the deviance statistic possess a better coverage rate than the asymptotic and bootstrap procedures.     

Evaluating the Performance of Simultaneous Stepwise Confidence Intervals for the Difference between two Poisson Rates

We consider the problem of simultaneously estimating Poisson rate differences via applications of the Hsu and Berger stepwise confidence interval method (termed HBM), where comparisons to a common reference group are performed. We discuss continuity-corrected confidence intervals (CIs) and investigate the HBM performance with a moment-based CI, and uncorrected and corrected for continuity Wald and Pooled confidence intervals (CIs). Using simulations, we compare nine individual CIs in terms of coverage probability and the HBM with nine intervals in terms of family-wise error rate (FWER) and overall and local power. The simulations show that these statistical properties depend highly on parameter settings.     

Confidence intervals for the difference in paired Youden indices

Comparison of accuracy between two diagnostic tests can be implemented by investigating the difference in paired Youden indices. However, few literature articles have discussed the inferences for the difference in paired Youden indices. In this paper, we propose an exact confidence interval for the difference in paired Youden indices based on the generalized pivotal quantities. For comparison, the maximum likelihood estimate‐based interval and a bootstrap‐based interval are also included in the study for the difference in paired Youden indices. Abundant simulation studies are conducted to compare the relative performance of these intervals by evaluating the coverage probability and average interval length. Our simulation results demonstrate that the exact confidence interval outperforms the other two intervals even with small sample size when the underlying distributions are normal. A real application is also used to illustrate the proposed intervals. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.