An MEP.2 plan in 3 factorial experiment and its probability of correct identification

The present work consider the problem of constructing search designs for searching at most two active hidden two-factor interactions in 3ⁿ factorial setup under the assumption that the three-factor and higher-order interactions are negligible. The designs presented here are also capable of estimating all the main effects, general mean and the effects of identified active two-factor interactions. The performance of the designs has been studied in the noisy case by computing probability of correct identification.     

Choice experiments for estimating main effects and interactions

Choice-based conjoint experiments are used when choice alternatives can be described in terms of attributes. The objective is to infer the value that respondents attach to attribute levels. This method involves the design of profiles on the basis of attributes specified at certain levels. Respondents are presented sets of profiles and asked to select the one they consider best. However if choice sets have too many profiles, they may be difficult to implement. In this paper we provide strategies for reducing the number of profiles in choice sets. We consider situations where only a subset of interactions is of interest, and we obtain connected main effect plans with smaller choice sets that are capable of estimating subsets of two-factor and three-factor interactions in 2ⁿ and 3ⁿ plans. We also provide connected main effect plans for mixed level designs.     

Resolution v.2 search designs

A fractional factorial design is called a resolution V.2 plan if it is capable of estimating all main effects and two-factor interaction effects, plus two three-factor interaction effects, In this paper, a necessary and sufficient condition for such a resolution V.2 plan is given, Furthermore, a new class of two-level resolution V.2 designs is proposed, We prove that the proposed design always satisfies such a necessary and sufficient condition, A comparison of run size between designs of resolutions VII and V.2 is made, It is shown that run size for design of resolution V.2 is significantly smaller.     

De-aliasing effects using semifoldover techniques

Semifoldover designs, obtained by semifolding a regular two-level factorial design, have been discussed recently in the literature. In this article, with the use of indicator functions, we investigate various semifoldover designs that are obtained from a general two-level factorial design. We discuss when a main factor or a two-factor interaction can be de-aliased from their aliased two-factor interactions, and extend some of the existing results from regular designs to non-regular designs. Finally, we present some examples to illustrate the results developed here.     

Clear Effects in the 2 n−p Combined Design

The technique of semifolding is used to develop the 2 ^n?p designs. Based on the initial analysis, some factors may be more important than others. In other words, the results from analyzing the original experiment may suggest a specific set of effects to be de-aliased. On the other hand, some previously acquired information might be available for specific factors. In these cases, one may desire to isolate the main effects of these factors and each of their two-factor interactions in the experiments. Four rules that are presented in this article can systematically isolate effects of potential interest, which should serve well for researchers in all disciplines. The combined design, by semifolding, provides estimates of the interactions that involve specific factors so that the alias chains of the two-factor interactions can be broken.     

Classification of three-level strength-3 arrays

Generalized aberration (GA) is one of the most frequently used criteria to quantify the suitability of an orthogonal array (OA) to be used as an experimental design. The two main motivations for GA are that it quantifies bias in a main-effects only model and that it is a good surrogate for estimation efficiencies of models with all the main effects and some two-factor interaction components. We demonstrate that these motivations are not appropriate for three-level OAs of strength 3 and we propose a direct classification with other criteria instead. To illustrate, we classified complete series of three-level strength-3 OAs with 27, 54 and 81 runs using the GA criterion, the rank of the matrix with two-factor interaction contrasts, the estimation efficiency of two-factor interactions, the projection estimation capacity, and a new model robustness criterion. For all of the series, we provide a list of admissible designs according to these criteria.     

Statistical properties of Rechtschaffner designs

Rechtschaffner designs are saturated designs of resolution V   in which main effects and two-factor interactions are estimable if three-factor and higher order interactions are negligible. Statistical properties of Rechtschaffner designs are studied in this paper. Best linear unbiased estimators of main effects and two-factor interactions are given explicitly and asymptotic properties of correlations between these estimators are studied as well. It is shown that designs recommended by Rechtschaffner [1967. Saturated fractions of 2ⁿ$2^n$ and 3ⁿ$3^n$ factorial designs, Technometrics 9, 569–576] are not only A-optimal but also D-optimal. Comparisons of Rechtschaffner designs with other A- and D-optimal designs of resolution V are also discussed.     

On the use of partial confounding for the construction of alternative regular two-level blocked fractional factorial designs

In this paper, we consider experimental situations in which a regular fractional factorial design is to be used to study the effects of m two-level factors using n=2^m−k experimental units arranged in 2^p blocks of size 2^m−k−p. In such situations, two-factor interactions are often confounded with blocks and complete information is lost on these two-factor interactions. Here we consider the use of the foldover technique in conjunction with combining designs having different blocking schemes to produce alternative partially confounded blocked fractional factorial designs that have more estimable two-factor interactions or a higher estimation capacity or both than their traditional counterparts.     

On Kronecker block designs for factorial experiments

In this paper the use of Kronecker designs for factorial experiments is considered. The two-factor Kronecker design is considered in some detail and the efficiency factors of the main effects and interaction in such a design are derived. It is shown that the efficiency factor of the interaction is at least as large as the product of the efficiency factors of the two main effects and when both the component designs are totally balanced then its efficiency factor will be higher than the efficiency factor of either of the two main effects. If the component designs are nearly balanced then its efficiency factor will be approximately at least as large as the efficiency factor of either of the two main effects. It is argued that these designs are particularly useful for factorial experiments.Extensions to the multi-factor design are given and it is proved that the two-factor Kronecker design will be connected if the component designs are connected.     

2n−m designs with resolution III or IV containing clear two-factor interactions

For a fixed number of runs, not all 2^n−m designs with resolution III or IV have clear two-factor interactions. Therefore, it is highly desirable to know when resolution III or IV designs can have clear two-factor interactions. In this paper, we provide a unified geometrical study of this problem and give a complete classification of the existence of clear two-factor interactions in regular 2^n−m designs with resolution III or IV and reveal the structures of these designs.     

Subset selection for normal means in multi-factor experiments

The procedure of Gupta [1956], [1965] for selecting a random sized subset of k ≧ 2 normal populations which contains the population with the largest population mean when the populations have a common variance is generalized to multi-factor experiments. Two-factor experiments with equal replication on each factor-level combination are discussed in detail. The cases of zero and non-zero interactions between factor levels are considered. For the two-factor, zero interaction case with a common number of observations at each factor-level combination, a table of constants necessary to implement the procedure is provided for experiments having selected levels per factor; the constants are equi-coordinate upper percentage points of a multivariate Student t distribution.     

Isomorphism check in fractional factorial designs via letter interaction pattern matrix

Two fractional factorial designs are considered isomorphic if one can be obtained from the other by relabeling the factors, reordering the runs, and/or switching the levels of factors. To identify the isomorphism of two designs is known as an NP hard problem. In this paper, we propose a three-dimensional matrix named the letter interaction pattern matrix (LIPM) to characterize the information contained in the defining contrast subgroup of a regular two-level design. We first show that an LIPM could uniquely determine a design under isomorphism and then propose a set of principles to rearrange an LIPM to a standard form. In this way, we can significantly reduce the computational complexity in isomorphism check, which could only take O(2^p)+O(3k³)+O(2^k) operations to check two 2^k−p designs in the worst case. We also find a sufficient condition for two designs being isomorphic to each other, which is very simple and easy to use. In the end, we list some designs with the maximum numbers of clear or strongly clear two-factor interactions which were not found before.     

Simultaneous Confidence Intervals for the Population Cell Means,for Two-by-Two Factorial Data,that Utilize Uncertain Prior Information

Consider a two-by-two factorial experiment with more than one replicate. Suppose that we have uncertain prior information that the two-factor interaction is zero. We describe new simultaneous frequentist confidence intervals for the four population cell means, with simultaneous confidence coefficient 1 ? α, that utilize this prior information in the following sense. These simultaneous confidence intervals define a cube with expected volume that (a) is relatively small when the two-factor interaction is zero and (b) has maximum value that is not too large. Also, these intervals coincide with the standard simultaneous confidence intervals obtained by Tukey’s method, with simultaneous confidence coefficient 1 ? α, when the data strongly contradict the prior information that the two-factor interaction is zero. We illustrate the application of these new simultaneous confidence intervals to a real data set.     

Experimental designs for detecting synergy and antagonism between two drugs in a pre‐clinical study

The identification of synergistic interactions between combinations of drugs is an important area within drug discovery and development. Pre‐clinically, large numbers of screening studies to identify synergistic pairs of compounds can often be ran, necessitating efficient and robust experimental designs. We consider experimental designs for detecting interaction between two drugs in a pre‐clinical in vitro assay in the presence of uncertainty of the monotherapy response. The monotherapies are assumed to follow the Hill equation with common lower and upper asymptotes, and a common variance. The optimality criterion used is the variance of the interaction parameter. We focus on ray designs and investigate two algorithms for selecting the optimum set of dose combinations. The first is a forward algorithm in which design points are added sequentially. This is found to give useful solutions in simple cases but can lack robustness when knowledge about the monotherapy parameters is insufficient. The second algorithm is a more pragmatic approach where the design points are constrained to be distributed log‐normally along the rays and monotherapy doses. We find that the pragmatic algorithm is more stable than the forward algorithm, and even when the forward algorithm has converged, the pragmatic algorithm can still out‐perform it. Practically, we find that good designs for detecting an interaction have equal numbers of points on monotherapies and combination therapies, with those points typically placed in positions where a 50% response is expected. More uncertainty in monotherapy parameters leads to an optimal design with design points that are more spread out. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Hierarchical Generalized Linear Models and Frailty Models with Bayesian Nonparametric Mixing

This paper proposes Bayesian nonparametric mixing for some well-known and popular models. The distribution of the observations is assumed to contain an unknown mixed effects term which includes a fixed effects term, a function of the observed covariates, and an additive or multiplicative random effects term. Typically these random effects are assumed to be independent of the observed covariates and independent and identically distributed from a distribution from some known parametric family. This assumption may be suspect if either there is interaction between observed covariates and unobserved covariates or the fixed effects predictor of observed covariates is misspecified. Another cause for concern might be simply that the covariates affect more than just the location of the mixed effects distribution. As a consequence the distribution of the random effects could be highly irregular in modality and skewness leaving parametric families unable to model the distribution adequately. This paper therefore proposes a Bayesian nonparametric prior for the random effects to capture possible deviances in modality and skewness and to explore the observed covariates' effect on the distribution of the mixed effects.     

Weakly resolvable IV.3 search designs for the pn factorial experiment

A series of weakly resolvable search designs for the pⁿ factorial experiment is given for which the mean and all main effects are estimable in the presence of any number of two-factor interactions and for which any combination of three or fewer pairs of factors that interact may be detected. The designs have N = p(p–1)n+p runs except in one case where additional runs are required for detection and one case where $\text{(p?1)}\text{2}$ additional runs are needed to estimate all (p–1)² degrees of freedom for each pair of detected interactions. The detection procedure is simple enough that computations can be carried out with hand calculations.     

Subset selection in two-factor experiments using randomization restricted designs

This paper studies subset selection procedures for screening in two-factor treatment designs that employ either a split-plot or strip-plot randomization restricted experimental design laid out in blocks. The goal is to select a subset of treatment combinations associated with the largest mean. In the split-plot design, it is assumed that the block effects, the confounding effects (whole-plot error) and the measurement errors are normally distributed. None of the selection procedures developed depend on the block variances. Subset selection procedures are given for both the case of additive and non-additive factors and for a variety of circumstances concerning the confounding effect and measurement error variances. In particular, procedures are given for (1) known confounding effect and measurement error variances (2) unknown measurement error variance but known confounding effect (3) unknown confounding effect and measurement error variances. The constants required to implement the procedures are shown to be obtainable from available FORTRAN programs and tables. Generalization to the case of strip-plot randomization restriction is considered.     

Switching-one-column follow-up experiments for Plackett-Burman designs

Industrial experiments are frequently performed sequentially using two-level fractional factorial designs. In this context, a common strategy for the design of follow-up experiments is to switch the signs in one column. It is well known that this strategy, when applied to two-level fractional factorial resolution III designs, will clear the main effect, for which the switch was performed, from any confounding with any other two-factor interactions and will also clear all the two-factor interactions between that factor and the other main effects from any confounding with other two-factor interactions. In this article, we extend this result and show that this strategy applies to any orthogonal two-level resolution III design and therefore specifically to any two-level Plackett- Burman design .     

Reliability models for categorical data

As assumed hypothetical consensus category corresponding to a case being classified provides a basis for assessment of reliability of judges. Equivalent judges are characterised by the joint probability distribution of the judge assignment and the consensus category. Estimates of the conditional probabilities of judge assignment given consensus category and of consensus category given judge assignments are indices of reliability. All parameters can be estimated if data include classifications of a number of cases by 3 or more judges. Restrictive assumptions are imposed to obtain models for data from classifications by two judges. Maximum likelihood estimation is discussed and illustrated by example for the 3 or more judges case.     

Some multiple comparison procedures for comparing treatments within several groups

Multiple comparison procedures are extended to designs consisting of several groups, where the treatment means are to be compared within each group. This may arise in two-factor experiments, with a significant interaction term, when one is interested in comparing the levels of one factor at each level of the other factor. A general approach is presented for deriving the distributions and calculating critical points, following three papers which dealt with two specific procedures. These points are used for constructing simultaneous confidence intervals over some restricted set of contrasts among treatment means in each of the groups. Tables of critical values are provided for two procedures and an application is demonstrated. Some extensions are presented for the case of possible different sets of contrasts and also for unequal variances in the various groups.