Posterior ranges of functions of parameters under priors with specified quantiles

Suppose some quantiles of the prior distribution of a nonnegative parameter θ are specified. Instead of eliciting just one prior density function, consider the class Γ of all the density functions compatible with the quantile specification. Given a likelihood function, find the posterior upper and lower bounds for the expected value of any real-valued function h(θ), as the density varies in Γ. Such a scheme agrees with a robust Bayesian viewpoint. Under mild regularity conditions about h(θ) and the likelihood, a procedure for finding bounds is derived and applied to an example, after transforming the given functional optimisation problems into finite-dimensional ones.     

The interpretation of maximum-likelihood estimation

Maximum-likelihood estimation is interpreted as a procedure for generating approximate pivotal quantities, that is, functions u(X;θ) of the data X and parameter θ that have distributions not involving θ. Further, these pivotals should be efficient in the sense of reproducing approximately the likelihood function of θ based on X, and they should be approximately linear in θ. To this end the effect of replacing θ by a parameter ϕ = ϕ(θ) is examined. The relationship of maximum-likelihood estimation interpreted in this way to conditional inference is discussed. Examples illustrating this use of maximum-likelihood estimation on small samples are given.     

Bayesian robustness in bidimensional models: Prior independence

When θ is a multidimensional parameter, the issue of prior dependence or independence of coordinates is a serious concern. This is especially true in robust Bayesian analysis; Lavine et al. (J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.86, 964–971 (1991)) show that allowing a wide range of prior dependencies among coordinates can result in near vacuous conclusions. It is sometimes possible, however, to make confidently the judgement that the coordinates of θ are independent a priori and, when this can be done, robust Bayesian conclusions improve dramatically. In this paper, it is shown how to incorporate the independence assumption into robust Bayesian analysis involving -contamination and density band classes of priors. Attention is restricted to the case θ = (θ₁, θ₂) for clarity, although the ideas generalize.     

A Bayesian inference of P(λ1<λ2) for two Poisson parameters

The statistical inference drawn from the difference between two independent Poisson parameters is often discussed in the medical literature. However, such discussions are usually based on the frequentist viewpoint rather than the Bayesian viewpoint. Here, we propose an index θ=P(λ_{1, post}<λ_{2, post}), where λ_{1, post} and λ_{2, post} denote Poisson parameters following posterior density. We provide an exact and an approximate expression for calculating θ using the conjugate gamma prior and compare the probabilities obtained using the approximate and the exact expressions. Moreover, we also show a relation between θ and the p-value. We also highlight the significance of θ by applying it to the result of actual clinical trials. Our findings suggest that θ may provide useful information in a clinical trial.     

Optimality of the posterior predictive p-value based on the posterior. Odds

Thompson (1997) considered a wide definition of p-value and found the Baves p-value for testing a ooint null hypothesis H₀: θ= θ₀ versus H₁: θ ≠ θ₀. In this paper, the general case of testing H₀: θ ∈ ?₀ versus H₁: θ ∈ ?^c ₀ is studied. A generalization of the concept of p-value is given, and it is proved that the posterior predictive p-value based on the posterior odds is (asymptotically) a Bayes p-value. Finally, it is suggested that this posterior predictive p-value could be used as a reference p-value     

Minimax Estimation of the Bounded Parameter of Some Discrete Distributions Under LINEX Loss Function

For a class of discrete distributions, including Poisson(θ), Generalized Poisson(θ), Borel(m, θ), etc., we consider minimax estimation of the parameter θ under the assumption it lies in a bounded interval of the form [0, m] and a LINEX loss function. Explicit conditions for the minimax estimator to be Bayes with respect to a boundary supported prior are given. Also for Bernoulli(θ)-distribution, which is not in the mentioned class of discrete distributions, we give conditions for which the Bayes estimator of θ ∈ [0, m], m < 1 with respect to a boundary supported prior is minimax under LINEX loss function. Numerical values are given for the largest values of m for which the corresponding Bayes estimators of θ are minimax.     

Bayesian inference on P(X > Y) in bivariate Rayleigh model

In the literature, assuming independence of random variables X and Y, statistical estimation of the stress–strength parameter R = P(X > Y) is intensively investigated. However, in some real applications, the strength variable X could be highly dependent on the stress variable Y. In this paper, unlike the common practice in the literature, we discuss on estimation of the parameter R where more realistically X and Y are dependent random variables distributed as bivariate Rayleigh model. We derive the Bayes estimates and highest posterior density credible intervals of the parameters using suitable priors on the parameters. Because there are not closed forms for the Bayes estimates, we will use an approximation based on Laplace method and a Markov Chain Monte Carlo technique to obtain the Bayes estimate of R and unknown parameters. Finally, simulation studies are conducted in order to evaluate the performances of the proposed estimators and analysis of two data sets are provided.     

The discrepancy of P-values and posterior probability: Two-sided hypothesis of variance of normal distribution with unknown mean

This article is concerned with the comparison of P-value and Bayesian measure in point null hypothesis for the variance of Normal distribution with unknown mean. First, using fixed prior for test parameter, the posterior probability is obtained and compared with the P-value when an appropriate prior is used for the mean parameter. In the second, lower bounds of the posterior probability of H₀ under a reasonable class of prior are compared with the P-value. It has been shown that even in the presence of nuisance parameters, these two approaches can lead to different results in the statistical inference.     

Fisher information in weighted distributions

Suppose that a density f_θ (x) belongs to an exponential family, but that inference about θ must be based on data that are obtained from a density that is proportional to W(x)f_θ(x). The authors study the Fisher information about θ in observations obtained from such weighted distributions and give conditions under which this information is greater than under the original density. These conditions involve the hazard- and reversed-hazard-rate functions.     

Effect of individual observations on the Box–Cox transformation

In this paper, we consider the influence of individual observations on inferences about the Box–Cox power transformation parameter from a Bayesian point of view. We compare Bayesian diagnostic measures with the ‘forward’ method of analysis due to Riani and Atkinson. In particular, we look at the effect of omitting observations on the inference by comparing particular choices of transformation using the conditional predictive ordinate and the k _d measure of Pettit and Young. We illustrate the methods using a designed experiment. We show that a group of masked outliers can be detected using these single deletion diagnostics. Also, we show that Bayesian diagnostic measures are simpler to use to investigate the effect of observations on transformations than the forward search method.     

Posterior Bayes factor analysis for an exponential regression model

In the exponential regression model, Bayesian inference concerning the non-linear regression parameter has proved extremely difficult. In particular, standard improper diffuse priors for the usual parameters lead to an improper posterior for the non-linear regression parameter. In a recent paper Ye and Berger (1991) applied the reference prior approach of Bernardo (1979) and Berger and Bernardo (1989) yielding a proper informative prior for . This prior depends on the values of the explanatory variable, goes to 0 as goes to 1, and depends on the specification of a hierarchical ordering of importance of the parameters.This paper explains the failure of the uniform prior to give a proper posterior: the reason is the appearance of the determinant of the information matrix in the posterior density for . We apply the posterior Bayes factor approach of Aitkin (1991) to this problem; in this approach we integrate out nuisance parameters with respect to their conditional posterior density given the parameter of interest. The resulting integrated likelihood for requires only the standard diffuse prior for all the parameters, and is unaffected by orderings of importance of the parameters. Computation of the likelihood for is extremely simple. The approach is applied to the three examples discussed by Berger and Ye and the likelihoods compared with their posterior densities.     

MINIMUM MSE ESTIMATION BY LINEAR COMBINATIONS OF ORDER STATISTICS1

In this paper we assume that in a random sample of size ndrawn from a population having the pdf f(x; θ) the smallest r₁ observations and the largest r₂ observations are censored (r₁0, r₂0). We consider the problem of estimating θ on the basis of the middle n-r₁-r₂ observations when either f(x;θ)=θ^-1f(x/θ) or f(x;θ) = (aθ)¹f(x-θ)/aθ) where f(·) is a known pdf, a (<0) is known and θ (>0) is unknown. The minimum mean square error (MSE) linear estimator of θ proposed in this paper is a “shrinkage” of the minimum variance linear unbiased estimator of θ. We obtain explicit expressions of these estimators and their mean square errors when (i) f(·) is the uniform pdf defined on an interval of length one and (ii) f(·) is the standard exponential pdf, i.e., f(x) = exp(–x), x0. Various special cases of censoring from the left (right) and no censoring are considered.     

Irreconcilability of P-value and Bayesian measure in two-sided hypothesis: Pareto distribution with the presence of nuisance parameter

Abstract

This article is concerned with the comparison of Bayesian and classical testing of a point null hypothesis for the Pareto distribution when there is a nuisance parameter. In the first stage, using a fixed prior distribution, the posterior probability is obtained and compared with the P-value. In the second case, lower bounds of the posterior probability of H₀, under a reasonable class of prior distributions, are compared with the P-value. It has been shown that even in the presence of nuisance parameters for the model, these two approaches can lead to different results in statistical inference.     

Bayesian analysis of outlier problems using the Gibbs sampler

We consider the Bayesian analysis of outlier models. We show that the Gibbs sampler brings considerable conceptual and computational simplicity to the problem of calculating posterior marginals. Although other techniques for finding posterior marginals are available, the Gibbs sampling approach is notable for its ease of implementation. Allowing the probability of an outlier to be unknown introduces an extra parameter into the model but this turns out to involve only minor modification to the algorithm. We illustrate these ideas using a contaminated Gaussian distribution, at-distribution, a contaminated binomial model and logistic regression.     

Bayesian inference for double SARMA models

In this paper, we present a Bayesian analysis of double seasonal autoregressive moving average models. We first consider the problem of estimating unknown lagged errors in the moving average part using non linear least squares method, and then using natural conjugate and Jeffreys’ priors we approximate the marginal posterior distributions to be multivariate t and gamma distributions for the model coefficients and precision, respectively. We evaluate the proposed Bayesian methodology using simulation study, and apply to real-world hourly electricity load data sets.     

On the validation of fiducial techniques

A structured model is essentially a family of random vectors X_θ defined on a probability space with values in a sample space. If, for a given sample value x and for each ω in the probability space, there is at most one parameter value θ for which X_θ(ω) is equal to x, then the model is called additive at x. When a certain conditional distribution exists, a frequency interpretation specific to additive structured models holds, and is summarized in a unique structured distribution for the parameter. Many of the techniques used by Fisher in deriving and handling his fiducial probability distribution are shown to be valid when dealing with a structured distribution.     

Quasi Bayesian likelihood

If the form of the distribution of data is unknown, the Bayesian method fails in the parametric inference because there is no posterior distribution of the parameter. In this paper, a theoretical framework of Bayesian likelihood is introduced via the Hilbert space method, which is free of the distributions of data and the parameter. The posterior distribution and posterior score function based on given inner products are defined and, consequently, the quasi posterior distribution and quasi posterior score function are derived, respectively, as the projections of the posterior distribution and posterior score function onto the space spanned by given estimating functions. In the space spanned by data, particularly, an explicit representation for the quasi posterior score function is obtained, which can be derived as a projection of the true posterior score function onto this space. The methods of constructing conservative quasi posterior score and quasi posterior log-likelihood are proposed. Some examples are given to illustrate the theoretical results. As an application, the quasi posterior distribution functions are used to select variables for generalized linear models. It is proved that, for linear models, the variable selections via quasi posterior distribution functions are equivalent to the variable selections via the penalized residual sum of squares or regression sum of squares.     

The use of Jeffreys priors for the Student-t distribution

The Jeffreys-rule prior and the marginal independence Jeffreys prior are recently proposed in Fonseca et al. [Objective Bayesian analysis for the Student-t regression model, Biometrika 95 (2008), pp. 325–333] as objective priors for the Student-t regression model. The authors showed that the priors provide proper posterior distributions and perform favourably in parameter estimation. Motivated by a practical financial risk management application, we compare the performance of the two Jeffreys priors with other priors proposed in the literature in a problem of estimating high quantiles for the Student-t model with unknown degrees of freedom. Through an asymptotic analysis and a simulation study, we show that both Jeffreys priors perform better in using a specific quantile of the Bayesian predictive distribution to approximate the true quantile.     

Bayes estimation of Gompertz distribution parameters and acceleration factor under partially accelerated life tests with type-I censoring

In this paper, the Bayesian approach is applied to the estimation problem in the case of step stress partially accelerated life tests with two stress levels and type-I censoring. Gompertz distribution is considered as a lifetime model. The posterior means and posterior variances are derived using the squared-error loss function. The Bayes estimates cannot be obtained in explicit forms. Approximate Bayes estimates are computed using the method of Lindley [D.V. Lindley, Approximate Bayesian methods, Trabajos Estadistica 31 (1980), pp. 223–237]. The advantage of this proposed method is shown. The approximate Bayes estimates obtained under the assumption of non-informative priors are compared with their maximum likelihood counterparts using Monte Carlo simulation.