“和而不同”思想与法治的文化认同

传统文化中的“和而不同”思想，对法治的文化认同具有许多有益的启示。它要求关照各种不同的利益需求，形成和谐的利益关系，这有利于形成法治文化认同的合理的现实利益支点。“和而不同”思想对提高公众的民主与法治方面的素质和能力，培养合格的法治文化认同的主体，具有很大的促进作用；“和而不同”思想还有利于建立合理的法治文化认同的内容体系，形成全面的法治文化认同：从“和而不同”思想的视角出发，我们要创造中国特色的法治文化，形成中国特色的法治发展规则，正确认识法律的作用，进一步促进国家法律对民间规则、习俗的认可、接纳力度，使法律成为公众内心习惯的一部分，增强法律的亲和力。     

SPECIAL ISSUE： ECOLOGICAL CIVILIZATION AND BEAUTIFUL CHINA Roadmap for the Construction of an Ecological Rule of Law in China

十八大报告在将建设社会主义法治国家作为治国理政总体方略的同时,把中国特色社会主义事业总体布局由经济建设、政治建设、文化建设、社会建设“四位一体”拓展为包括生态文明建设的‘五位一体’,勾画了中国生态法治建设的路线图。其目标是确立与生态文明相适应的生态环境法治系统,任务是将生态理性纳入法治运行轨道,路径是健全和完善生态法治的制度与体制机制。     

习近平法治思想的“中华法治文明论”试绎

党的十八大以来，以习近平同志为核心的党中央深刻总结中国古代法制传统和成败得失，挖掘传承中华优秀传统法律文化精华，深入揭示中华法治文明的深厚底蕴并赋予其新的时代内涵，可称之为习近平法治思想的“中华法治文明论”。习近平总书记系统阐明了中华法治文明突出的连续性、创新性、统一性、包容性、和平性及其清晰制度表达；中华法治文明的直接载体是中华法系，《唐律疏议》是其精华要素的集中呈现；中华法治文明的发展方向是建设中华民族现代法治文明，马克思主义法治理论同中国特色社会主义法治实践、同中华优秀传统法律文化相结合是必由之路。习近平法治思想的“中华法治文明论”是马克思主义基本原理同中华优秀传统文化相结合在法治领域的典范，是中华优秀传统法律文化创造性转化、创新性发展的理论基础与实践动力，为建构中国自主法学知识体系建构提供了智识来源与方法论指引。     

中国式法治现代化新道路的内在逻辑

一、引言 中国式法治现代化新道路是中国式现代化新道路在法治领域的集中体现,是在中国的具体国情条件下展开的法治变革过程.中国式法治现代化新道路和中国特色社会主义法治道路之间内在关联、不可分割,二者处于同一个历史进程中.如果说中国特色社会主义法治道路是中国式法治现代化新道路的前提和基础,那么,中国式法治现代化新道路则是在坚...     

对抗、继承与生成:对中国法治文化根基的现代性反省

当代中国法治发展在不断走向成熟的同时,也展现出诸多问题。在文化根基上,中西方法治一直存在明显的差异。当下中国法治文化根基具有双重来源:其一是对特有传统文化精神的扬弃;其二是对现代西方法治文化精神的合理吸收。文化根基是法治发展的根本前提,中国法治建设必须处理好传统文化结构与现代法治精神的张力关系。当代中国法治文化根基的构筑在面对中西方文化对抗与自有文化继承问题的同时,还要考虑如何使传统文化在自我反思中获得新的内涵,并最终促使法治文化根基的生成。     

法治观念历史演变与中国社会主义法治观

依法治国作为党领导人民治理国家的基本方略古已有之,西方法治思想更是源远流长,通过研究法治观念古今中外的历史演变,可以看到中国特色社会主义法治观是马克思主义和中国历史逻辑的辩证统一,是根植中国大地,反映中国人民意愿,适应中国和时代发展进步的科学社会主义,中国特色社会主义法治道路的总要求也是理所当然的事情。     

论当代中国六大法治主题的形成、逻辑和价值

当代中国的法治建设是伴随着民主政治诉求、市场经济转型、政府改革、执政党建设、社会建设以及文化强国的战略而一同向前推进的.在这一进程中,法治开始与民主政治、市场经济、政府、执政党、民生、文化深度结合,由此形成了民主法治、法治经济、法治政府、依法执政、民生法治、法治文化六大法治主题.六大法治主题的形成与演变体现了当代中国法治发展的历史逻辑、实践逻辑和整体性逻辑,表明当代中国重要的社会关系已被纳入法治轨道.这六大主题是当代中国法治建设的着力点.     

试析社会主义核心价值观的传统文化意蕴

社会主义核心价值观包括富强、民主、文明、和谐,自由、平等、公正、法治,以及爱国、敬业、诚信、友善,中国传统文化是社会主义核心价值观的重要理论来源和发展动力。社会主义核心价值观不但彰显和继承了中国传统文化,更以马克思主义理论为指导,以中国特色社会主义实践为依据,以国际格局和时代背景为视角,在扬弃的基础上对中国传统文化进行了提升与超越。     

关于法教育学的思考

法治从结构上可分为制度的法治与文化的法治,中国法治的关键在于实现文化的法治,即培育中国的权利文化,教育在现代文明发展中的特有功能将创造着中国的权利文化,这就是法教育学的主题。     

“有神”与“有魂”:从俄罗斯法治的精神文化面向到中国问题思考

俄罗斯法治在类型化上,受东正教神学中"权力观念"的影响,形成一种"权力法治"模式,这一模式从根本上说是一种"有神"的法治。当前中俄两国在法治发展道路选择上有高度的一致性,本土化与自主性特征明显,都经历了从文化自觉到自信的过程。当代俄罗斯的文化自觉与自信以东正教传统精神为纽带,在国家治理中充分发挥传统精神文化的凝结作用。当代中国文化自信理论的提出与阐发,给中国法治发展的精神文化面向指明了方向,它使中国法治在"伦理法治"的目标基础上成为"有魂"的法治。这个"魂"应当以中国文化为源头,在中国共产党领导下,立足中国传统文化精神,坚持中国化的马克思主义,塑造中国法治的精神之魂。     

The Rule of Law Model of Internet Governance*

The rule of law is the basic form of national governance and the rule of law model is the necessary direction for the governance of online society. Online society is in essence a new pattern of social relationships and structural forms comprising relationships among citizens, legal persons, organizational bodies, etc., formed and brought together on the basis of Internet technology; and also a reflection, expansion and expression, singly or in synthesis, of various relationships in the fields of the real economy, politics, culture, society and the environment. The rule of law model of Internet governance refers to governance theories, systems and practices that employ rule of law thinking and the rule of law model to bring the elements, structures, procedures and functions of Internet governance into the scope of the rule of law and its operational track. Reviewing the tortuous course of the development of rule of law Internet governance in China, summarizing useful experience in the construction of rule of law Internet governance, and reflecting on existing legislative, law enforcement and judicial dilemmas will enable us to build up a rule of law system of online governance with comprehensive norms, effective implementation, strict supervision and strong guarantees. This will be marked by Chinese characteristics and will ensure the application of rule of law thinking and the rule of law model in governing, operating, using and safeguarding the Internet, thus achieving sound and orderly Internet operation and development along the path of the rule of law and advancing the modernization of the Internet governance system and governance capability.     

论社会主义市场经济条件下“法治”与“德治”的辩证统一

从道德和法的辩证关系角度 ,论述在社会主义市场经济条件下 ,“德治与法治”的辩证统一要把法治和德治放在同等重要的地位 ,同步建设 ,同步发展 ,充分发挥各自优势 ,取长补短 ,从而更有效地推动市场经济健康有序发展和社会主义精神文明建设     

秦朝法治失败原因的理性思考

秦朝法治失败的原因既有法治观念上的偏颇也有法治实践中的失误。而封建专制主义的恶性膨胀以及对儒家法文化的摈弃 ,从而未能构建适合中国封建社会实践需要的法文化模式 ,则是其文化根源。     

International Rule of Law and Rule of Law Construction in China

The rule of law has international as well as domestic attributes, so it can be divided into two levels: the domestic rule of law and the international rule of law. Using the thinking behind the international rule of law to build the rule of law in China is both necessary and inevitable. China should put into practice the idea of the international rule of law at the institutional and the governance levels, and should at the same time participate in the UN’s rule of law activities and in international rule-making, thereby extending its rule of law discourse power and influence in the international sphere.     

Rule of Law Construction and Assessment at the Local Level

Going beyond the analytical model of the holistic state in rule of law discussion, we can classify the rule of law into national and local levels based on the stages and increments of its execution. The phenomenon of the local rule of law reflects the stages and incremental progress of building a rule of law China. It has a realistic foundation in society and a profound basis in legal theory. Comprehensively advancing the rule of law in China necessitates giving encouragement and support to construction of the rule of law at the local level. The attempts and experiments of local government enable us to explore and innovate the developmental model of the socialist rule of law with Chinese characteristics. The rule of law at the local level is embodied in three dimensions: “text—action—concept.” Assessment mechanisms and indicators for the local construction of the rule of law should also be established in accordance with this framework. The building of the rule of law at the local level should be synchronized with assessment of the rule of law. We need to optimize top-level design, conduct evaluations of local legislation, improve local rule of law work performance assessment and use a rule of law index to assess the local rule of law in an overall manner.     

How to Evaluate Government Performance while Building a Rule of Law Government in China*

Building a law-based government is a central element of the comprehensive framework for promoting the rule of law in China, while using evaluation to catalyze growth is in line with the incentive principle of management studies. Since China started to implement reform and opening up over thirty years ago, rule of law development and organizational evaluation have gone through several stages, each with different characteristics. Efforts to build a law-based government have met with success, but what the country now has is essentially still goal-oriented assessment. At present, this suffers from the lack of a clear goal orientation or definition of functions, an imperfect technical system and unsound motivation mechanisms, not to mention the practical problems of each government department going its own way, duplicating evaluations or being left rudderless. Drawing on a combination of value rationality and instrumental rationality and using government performance evaluation to promote the building of a law-based government not only conforms to the spirit of the rule of law and value rationality in government performance, but also strengthens the role of evaluation as an instrument for organizational management. Therefore, we need to create new evaluation theories, expand public participation, introducing diversified evaluating entities, improve technical systems, strengthen institutional buildup, and foster a performance-based culture. In addition, replacing goal-oriented assessment with performance evaluation will help the emergence of a new discipline—the performance evaluation of rule of law government, thus promoting multidisciplinary efforts to integrate and create new public administration theories in China.     

International Rule of Law and Methodological Innovation

The practice of the international rule of law needs a theoretical guide, and the formulation of the theory of international law has to depend upon practice, which imposes new requirement upon the methodology of international law. Traditional research into legal doctrine is unfavorable to the creative exertion of international jurisprudence, and the research methods of social sciences are playing an increasingly important role in the methodological innovation of international law. From the perspective of promotion of the international rule of law, the study of international law needs to deep research a State’s motives, cause and innate logic in observing international aw, and law and economics can show its capability in this field. For the international rule of law, basic research needs to be carried about such social surroundings as where the rules are produced and applied and exerting influences. The research method of the sociology of law exactly hits the point. The application of empirical and experimental research methods offers a beforehand “rehearsal” chance for the process of the rule of law to grasp the pros and cons in the planning and practice of the rule of law. The cooperation between the research methods of social science and the traditional research method of international law can reasonably interpret the phenomena of international relations and promote the international rule of law.     

试论“以德治国”方略的历史沿革

"以德治国"是江泽民提出的一项重要的治国方略。社会主义道德是中国特色社会主义文化的重要组成部分。分辨、理顺德治与法治的关系,评析甄别传统道德与传统美德的功过,科学界定社会主义道德与共产主义道德的异同等,对于我们充分认识"以德治国"的方略,全面理解"先进文化"的蕴含,都具有十分重要的意义。     

多元权利基础、公权力权威与良法之治

推进中国法治进程 ,并不仅仅是法律制度的简单植入或法律体系的建构 ,也不仅仅是“依法治理”对秩序的促动 ,而关键在于重构国家与市民社会的良性互动关系。即大力推进市民社会自主性 ,以多元社会权利来平衡和制约国家权力 ,缩减国家权力职能和建立其合法性权威 ,并弘扬正义法精神以实现良法之治。只有这样 ,以权力制约和权利保障为核心取向的法治秩序才能最终确立起来。     

International Law as the Law of Domestic Governance: China’s Propositions and Institutional Practice

Like domestic law, international law can be used in domestic governance, where it can become an important instrument assisting China’s Party and government to rule the country and manage state affairs. Incorporating part of international law into domestic law and comprehensively advancing the rule of law in accord with the principle of national sovereignty demonstrate the openness and international vision of China’s rule of law construction. Translating these propositions into concrete institutional practice will be of vital significance for improving the socialist rule of law with Chinese characteristics, advancing the international rule of law and promoting world peace.