Assessing a hypothesis test for the difference between two quantiles from independent populations

An empirical distribution function estimator for the difference of order statistics from two independent populations can be used for inference between quantiles from these populations. The inferential properties of the approach are evaluated in a simulation study where different sample sizes, theoretical distributions, and quantiles are studied. Small to moderate sample sizes, tail quantiles, and quantiles which do not coincide with the expectation of an order statistic are identified as problematic for appropriate Type I error control.     

On estimating the difference of location parameters of two negative exponential distributions

Fixed-width confidence intervals for the difference of location parameters of two negative-exponential distributions have been constructed through two-stage and purely sequential schemes. The two cases when the scale parameters are equal but unknown, and unequal but unknown, have been dealt with separately. Our two-stage procedures guarantee the exact confidence coefficient to be at least the nominal prescribed level. Various second-order expansions are also considered when sequential procedures are proposed. It is noted that no new tables are needed to implement these procedures in practice.     

Bayesian estimation of the difference between two proportions

This paper is concerned with the problem of allocating a fixed number of trials between two independent binomial populations with unknown success probabilities θ₁ and θ₂, in order to estimate θ₁ - θ₂ with squared error loss. Introducing independent beta priors on θ₁ and θ₂, a heuristic allocation procedure is introduced and compared both with the optimal and with the best fixed allocation procedure. Numerical and asymptotic results of these comparisons are given and seem to indicate that there are situations when the best fixed allocation procedure performs almost as well as the optimal procedure.     

Variance of the difference between two estimated responses

Minimization of the maximum and average variance of the difference between estimated responses are taken as design criteria for univariate polynomial regression models. An optimal design under the first criterion is derived for the second-order model and a class of designs nearly optimal under the second criterion is obtained for the general polynomial models.     

Testing the difference between two independent regression models

ABSTRACT

In some situations, for example, in biology or psychology studies, we wish to determine whether the linear relationship between response variable and predictor variables differs in two populations. The analysis of the covariance (ANCOVA) or, equivalently, the partial F-test approaches are the commonly used methods. In this study, the asymptotic distribution for the difference between two independent regression coefficients was established. The proposed method was used to derive the asymptotic confidence set for the difference between coefficients and hypothesis testing for the equality of the two regression models. Then a simulation study was conducted to compare the proposed method with the partial F method. The performance of the new method was comparable with that of the partial F method.     

Designs for estimating the difference between two responses

In this paper the problem of designing experiments for estimating the difference between responses at two arbitrary points in the region of interest is considered. Under the average mean squared error criterion the design moment conditions have been worked out. The results have been applied to the class of central composite designs.     

Reduced-rank estimation of the difference between two covariance matrices

We consider m×m$m\times m$ covariance matrices, _Σ1${\Sigma }_1$ and _Σ2${\Sigma }_2$, which satisfy _Σ2-_Σ1=Δ${\Sigma }_2-{\Sigma }_1=\Delta$, where Δ$\Delta$ has a specified rank. Maximum likelihood estimators of _Σ1${\Sigma }_1$ and _Σ2${\Sigma }_2$ are obtained when sample covariance matrices having Wishart distributions are available and rank(Δ)$\text{rank}(\Delta )$ is known. The likelihood ratio statistic for a test about the value of rank(Δ)$\text{rank}(\Delta )$ is also given and some properties of its null distribution are obtained. The methods developed in this paper are illustrated through an example.     

Assessing the association between two spatial or temporal sequences

This paper deals with the codispersion coefficient for spatial and temporal series. We present some results and simulations concerning the codispersion coefficient in the context of spatial models. The results obtained are immediate consequences of the asymptotic normality of the sample codispersion coefficient and show certain limitations of the coefficient. New simulation studies provide information about the performance of the coefficient with respect to other coefficients of spatial association. The behavior of the codispersion coefficient under additively contaminated processes is also studied via Monte Carlo simulations. In the context of time series, explicit expressions for the asymptotic variance of the sample version of the coefficient are given for autoregressive and moving average processes. Resampling methods are used to compute the variance of the coefficient. A real data example is presented to explore how well the codispersion coefficient captures the comovement between two time series in practice.     

Inferences on the difference between future observations for comparing two treatments

The comparison of two treatments with normally distributed data is considered. Inferences are considered based upon the difference between single potential future observations from each of the two treatments, which provides a useful and easily interpretable assessment of the difference between the two treatments. These methodologies combine information from a standard confidence interval analysis of the difference between the two treatment means, with information available from standard prediction intervals of future observations. Win-probabilities, which are the probabilities that a future observation from one treatment will be superior to a future observation from the other treatment, are a special case of these methodologies. The theoretical derivation of these methodologies is based upon inferences about the non-centrality parameter of a non-central t-distribution. Equal and unequal variance situations are addressed, and extensions to groups of future observations from the two treatments are also considered. Some examples and discussions of the methodologies are presented.     

Assessing the bias of maximum likelihood estimates of contaminated garch models

It is well known that Gaussian maximum likelihood estimates of time series models are not robust. In this paper we prove this is also the case for the Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedastic (GARCH) models. By expressing the Gaussian maximum likelihood estimates as Ψ estimates and by assuming the existence of a contaminated process, we prove they possess zero breakdown point and unbounded influence curves. By simulating GARCH processes under several proportions of contaminations we assess how much biased the maximum likelihood estimates may become and compare these results to a robust alternative. The t-student maximum likelihood estimates of GARCH models are also considered.     

Computing uncertainty measures of location estimates for autonomous vehicles

Determining the location of an autonomous vehicle is an important problem in navigating the vehicle in an unstructured environment. The vehicle controller estimates the vehicle's location and calculates the covariance matrix as an uncertainty measure for the location estimate. The real-time implementation of the controller makes the calculation of the covariance matrix an important issue. There is no exact method for calculating the covariance matrix because of the nonlinear nature of the location estimator. Approximations are needed. In this article, several approximation methods are compared through simulation. The comparisons are focused on each incremental change and on the cummulative effects of the trajectory-following of a path. The robustness of approximations is also studied by investigating the behavior of approximations under different distributional assumptions for measurement models. The results are useful for finding the scopes and limits of applicability of the approximation     

New approximate confidence intervals for the difference between two Poisson means and comparison

The problem of estimating the difference between two Poisson means is considered. A new moment confidence interval (CI), and a fiducial CI for the difference between the means are proposed. The moment CI is simple to compute, and it specializes to the classical Wald CI when the sample sizes are equal. Numerical studies indicate that the moment CI offers improvement over the Wald CI when the sample sizes are different. Exact properties of the CIs based on the moment, fiducial and hybrid methods are evaluated numerically. Our numerical study indicates that the hybrid and fiducial CIs are in general comparable, and the moment CI seems to be the best when the expected total counts from both distributions are two or more. The interval estimation procedures are illustrated using two examples.     

A note on the difference between two likelihood based methods in growth curves

A new result is proved on the difference between ML and REML in the classical growth curve model, concerning the estimated variances of the regression coefficients. Simulations indicate that REML provides estimated variances closer to their true corresponding values, giving confidence intervals which are not misleadingly short.     

A new confidence interval for the difference between two binomial proportions of paired data

Motivated by a study on comparing sensitivities and specificities of two diagnostic tests in a paired design when the sample size is small, we first derived an Edgeworth expansion for the studentized difference between two binomial proportions of paired data. The Edgeworth expansion can help us understand why the usual Wald interval for the difference has poor coverage performance in the small sample size. Based on the Edgeworth expansion, we then derived a transformation based confidence interval for the difference. The new interval removes the skewness in the Edgeworth expansion; the new interval is easy to compute, and its coverage probability converges to the nominal level at a rate of O(n^−1/2). Numerical results indicate that the new interval has the average coverage probability that is very close to the nominal level on average even for sample sizes as small as 10. Numerical results also indicate this new interval has better average coverage accuracy than the best existing intervals in finite sample sizes.     

Confidence intervals for the difference between two median survival times for clustered survival data

Clustered survival data arise often in clinical trial design, where the correlated subunits from the same cluster are randomized to different treatment groups. Under such design, we consider the problem of constructing confidence interval for the difference of two median survival time given the covariates. We use Cox gamma frailty model to account for the within-cluster correlation. Based on the conditional confidence intervals, we can identify the possible range of covariates over which the two groups would provide different median survival times. The associated coverage probability and the expected length of the proposed interval are investigated via a simulation study. The implementation of the confidence intervals is illustrated using a real data set.     

Bayesian analysis of the difference of two proportions

In this article we give the expression of the prior distribution of p₁-P₂, where P₁ and P₂ and independent proportions with a beta prior each. The expression derived for the posterior distribution of P₁-P₂ then shows the closure of the beta-difference family for independent dual Bernoulli samples. Other bayesian results are also presented.     

Equality of two blues and ridge-type estimates

Equality is shown of the g-inverse and Moore-Penrose inverse representation of the BLUE in the general linear model. The proof is based on a matrix identity which allows also to establish a functional relationship between the BLUE and Ridge-type estimates.     

Statistical inference for the difference of two Lorenz curves

Testing the Lorenz dominance is of importance in economic and social sciences. In this article, we propose new tools to do inferences for the difference of two Lorenz curves. The asymptotic normality of the proposed smoothed nonparametric estimator is proved. We also propose a smoothed jackknife empirical likelihood (JEL) method which avoids to estimate the complicate asymptotic variance. It is proved that the proposed JEL ratio statistics converge to the standard chi-square distribution. Simulation studies and real data analysis are also conducted, and show encouraging finite-sample performance.