On empirical likelihood for linear models with missing responses

Suppose that we have a linear regression model Y=X^′β+_ν0(X)ε$Y=X^{\prime }\beta +{\nu }_0(X)\epsilon$ with random error ε$\epsilon$, where X is a random design variable and is observed completely, and Y is the response variable and some Y-values are missing at random (MAR). In this paper, based on the ‘complete’ data set for Y after inverse probability weighted imputation, we construct empirical likelihood statistics on EY   and β$\beta$ which have the χ²${\chi }^2$-type limiting distributions under some new conditions compared with Xue (2009). Our results broaden the applicable scope of the approach combined with Xue (2009).     

Confidence intervals for P(Y

《Statistical Methodology》2012,9(3):445-455

Rates of convergence for the k-nearest neighbor estimators with smoother regression functions

Let (X, Y  ) be a R^d×R-valued${\mathbb{R}}^d\times \mathbb{R}\mathrm{-}\mathrm{valued}$ random vector. In regression analysis one wants to estimate the regression function m(x)?E(Y|X=x)$m(x)?\mathbf{E}(Y|X=x)$ from a data set. In this paper we consider the rate of convergence for the k-nearest neighbor estimators in case that X   is uniformly distributed on [0,1]^d$[\mathrm{0,1}{]}^d$, Var(Y|X=x)$\mathbf{Var}(Y|X=x)$ is bounded, and m is (p, C)-smooth. It is an open problem whether the optimal rate can be achieved by a k  -nearest neighbor estimator for 1<p≤1.5$1<p\le 1.5$. We solve the problem affirmatively. This is the main result of this paper. Throughout this paper, we assume that the data is independent and identically distributed and as an error criterion we use the expected L₂ error.     

Representations of moments using lower-order conditional moments

Moments and central moments of a random variable X   are expressed as integrals of functions of lower-order conditional moments and the cumulative distribution of X$X$. In particular, sample central moments of order 2k$2k$ are expressed as the sum of between groups variations, providing an analogue to the analysis of variance. Similar expressions are obtained for the expectations of real-valued and measurable functions of X$X$.     

Analytic bounds on causal risk differences in directed acyclic graphs involving three observed binary variables

We apply a linear programming approach which uses the causal risk difference (R_DC)$(R{D}_C)$ as the objective function and provides minimum and maximum values that R_DC$R{D}_C$ can achieve under any set of linear constraints on the potential response type distribution. We consider two scenarios involving binary exposure X, covariate Z and outcome Y. In the first, Z is not affected by X, and is a potential confounder of the causal effect of X on Y. In the second, Z is affected by X and intermediate in the causal pathway between X and Y. For each scenario we consider various linear constraints corresponding to the presence or absence of arcs in the associated directed acyclic graph (DAG), monotonicity assumptions, and presence or absence of additive-scale interactions. We also estimate Z-stratum-specific bounds when Z is a potential effect measure modifier and bounds for both controlled and natural direct effects when Z is affected by X  . In the absence of any additional constraints deriving from background knowledge, the well-known bounds on R_Dc$R{D}_c$ are duplicated: -Pr(Y≠X)?R_DC?Pr(Y=X)$-\mathit{Pr}(Y\ne X)?R{D}_C?\mathit{Pr}(Y=X)$. These bounds have unit width, but can be narrowed by background knowledge-based assumptions. We provide and compare bounds and bound widths for various combinations of assumptions in the two scenarios and apply these bounds to real data from two studies.