A moment test to identify uniformity

An omnibus test of uniformity based upon the ratios of sample moments and population moments is introduced. Results of a monte carlo power study show that for two types of alternatives considered, the proposed test has good power in comparison with Neyman's test N ₂Greenwood's test, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, and Chi-squared test.     

A unified approach to proving parametric bootstrap consistency for some goodness-of-fit tests

Because model misspecification can lead to inconsistent and inefficient estimators and invalid tests of hypotheses, testing for misspecification is critically important. We focus here on several general purpose goodness-of-fit tests which can be applied to assess the adequacy of a wide variety of parametric models without specifying an alternative model. Parametric bootstrap is the method of choice for computing the p-values of these tests however the proof of its consistency has never been rigourously shown in this setting. Using properties of locally asymptotically normal parametric models, we prove that under quite general conditions, the parametric bootstrap provides a consistent estimate of the null distribution of the statistics under investigation.     

New Developments in Statistical Computing: Short Notices and Reviews of New Program Packages,other Sources of Information,and New Products

Graphs are presented on which the empirical distribution function can be plotted to test the assumption of normality by the Lilliefors test. A second set of graphs is presented for using the Lilliefors test on exponential distributions. The graphs allow for tests at the 10 percent, 5 percent, and 1 percent levels of significance. Use of these graphs makes it easy for students in a first course in statistics to test normal and exponential distributions without having to unravel the mystery associated with putting together a chi-squared goodness-of-fit test.     

Goodness-of-fit tests based on maximum correlations and their orthogonal decompositions

Summary. We propose a goodness-of-fit statistic Q _n based on the Hoeffding maximum correlation for testing uniformity and we show its relationship to Gini's mean difference. We compute exact and asymptotic critical values and study the power of the test proposed against a representative set of alternatives.     

Likelihood ratio tests for multivariate normality

This paper presents some powerful omnibus tests for multivariate normality based on the likelihood ratio and the characterizations of the multivariate normal distribution. The power of the proposed tests is studied against various alternatives via Monte Carlo simulations. Simulation studies show our tests compare well with other powerful tests including multivariate versions of the Shapiro–Wilk test and the Anderson–Darling test.     

Powerful goodness-of-fit tests based on the likelihood ratio

Summary. A new approach of parameterization is proposed to construct a general goodness-of-fit test. It can not only generate traditional tests (including the Kolmogorov–Smirnov, Cramér–von Mises and Anderson–Darling tests) but also produce new types of omnibus tests, which are generally much more powerful than the old ones.     

A note on the fit for the levy distribution

The problem of testing the fit of the Levy distribution with unknown scale parameter is addressed. The corresponding empirical process is analysed, and the Cramer-von Mises W² and the Anderson-Darling's A² statistics are used. Well known results regarding the relationship between the Levy distribution and the gamma and inverse Gaussian are exploited. Some remarks are made regarding the use of the Rao-Blackwell estimator of the distribution function in the empirical process.     

Comparisons of tests of distributional assumption in Poisson regression model

Count data consists of discrete non-negative integer values. Poisson regression model is one of the most popular model used to model count data. This model assumes that response variable has Poisson distribution. The purpose of this article is to assess distributional assumption of this model by using some goodness of fit tests. These tests are compared in respect to type I error and power rates of tests with different samples, parameters and sample sizes. Simulation study suggests that the most powerful tests are generally Dean–Lawless and Cameron–Trivedi score tests.     

Measures of lack of fit from tests of chi-squared type

If X² is the Pearson chi-squared statistic for testing fit, then $\text{X}{}^2\text{n}$ has long been considered an associated measure of the degree of lack of fit. Here we consider two classes of statistics of chi-squared type, each having X² as a member. The first is a class of directed divergence statistics discussed by Cressie and Read, the second consists of nonnegative definite quadratic forms in the standardized cell frequencies. We investigate the large sample behavior of $\text{T}\text{n}$, where T is any of these statistics. A number of auxiliary results on the Cressie-Read statistics are also obtained. The measures are illustrated by application to data from classical physics compiled by Stigler.     

Empirical-distribution-function goodness-of-fit tests for discrete models

We present a simple framework for studying empirical-distribution-function goodness-of-fit tests for discrete models. A key tool is a weak-convergence result for an estimated discrete empirical process, regarded as a random element in some suitable sequence space. Special emphasis is given to the problem of testing for a Poisson model and for the geometric distribution. Simulations show that parametric bootstrap versions of the tests maintain a nominal level of significance very closely even for small samples where reliance upon asymptotic critical values is doubtful.     

A tool for systematically comparing the power of tests for normality

In this article, we describe a new approach to compare the power of different tests for normality. This approach provides the researcher with a practical tool for evaluating which test at their disposal is the most appropriate for their sampling problem. Using the Johnson systems of distribution, we estimate the power of a test for normality for any mean, variance, skewness, and kurtosis. Using this characterization and an innovative graphical representation, we validate our method by comparing three well-known tests for normality: the Pearson χ² test, the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, and the D'Agostino–Pearson K ² test. We obtain such comparison for a broad range of skewness, kurtosis, and sample sizes. We demonstrate that the D'Agostino–Pearson test gives greater power than the others against most of the alternative distributions and at most sample sizes. We also find that the Pearson χ² test gives greater power than Kolmogorov–Smirnov against most of the alternative distributions for sample sizes between 18 and 330.     

Cramér-von Mises tests of fit for the Poisson distribution

Goodness-of-fit tests based on the Cramér-von Mises statistics are given for the Poisson distribution. Power comparisons show that these statistics, particularly A², give good overall tests of fit. The statistic A² will be particularly useful for detecting distributions where the variance is close to the mean, but which are not Poisson.     

New tests based on Rubin's empirical distribution function

In this paper we derive some new tests for goodness-of-fit based on Rubin's empirical distribution function (EDF). Substituting Rubin's EDF for the classical EDF in the Kolmogorov–Smirnov, Cramér–von Mises, Anderson–Darling statistics, since Rubin's EDF for a given sample is a randomized distribution function, randomized statistics are derived, of which the qth quantile and the expectation are chosen as test statistics. We show that the new tests are consistent under simple hypothesis. Several power comparisons are also performed to show that the new tests are generally more powerful than the classical ones.     

Goodness of fit tests for Nakagami distribution based on smooth tests

ABSTRACT

Nakagami distribution is one of the most common distributions used to model positive valued and right skewed data. In this study, we interest goodness of fit problem for Nakagami distribution. Thus, we propose smooth tests for Nakagami distribution based on orthonormal functions. We also compare these tests with some classical goodness of fit tests such as Cramer–von Mises, Anderson–Darling, and Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests in respect to type-I error rates and powers of tests. Simulation study indicates that smooth tests give better results than these classical tests give in respect to almost all cases considered.     

BIVARIATE DISTRIBUTION WITH TRUNCATED POISSON MARGINAL DISTRIBUTIONS

ABSTRACT

A bivariate distribution, whose marginal distributions are truncated Poisson distributions, is developed as a product of truncated Poisson distributions and a multiplicative factor. The multiplicative factor takes into account the correlation, either positive or negative, between the two random variables. The distributional properties of this model are studied and the model is fitted to a real life bivariate data.     

On the influence of misclassified data on results of goodness of fit testing

In this paper we focus on the chi-square test of goodness of fit, which compares an observed discrete distribution to an expected known one. We show that the results of this test, using the common Pearson statistic, are very sensitive to misclassified observations between two or more categories. We also propose a general rule of thumb for analysing data set stability with respect to such classification errors. Practical analysis of a real example illustrates our purpose.     

A Correlation Test for Normality Based on the Lévy Characterization

A powerful test of fit for normal distributions is proposed. Based on the Lévy characterization, the test statistic is the sample correlation coefficient of normal quantiles and sums of pairs of observations from a random sample. Since the test statistic is location-scale invariant, critical values can be obtained by simulation without estimating any parameters. It is proved that this test is consistent. A power comparison study including some directed tests shows that the proposed test is competitive, it is more powerful than the well-known Jarque–Bera test, and it is comparable to Shapiro–Wilk test against a number of alternatives.     

A note on model selection using information criteria for general linear models estimated using REML

It is common practice to compare the fit of non‐nested models using the Akaike (AIC) or Bayesian (BIC) information criteria. The basis of these criteria is the log‐likelihood evaluated at the maximum likelihood estimates of the unknown parameters. For the general linear model (and the linear mixed model, which is a special case), estimation is usually carried out using residual or restricted maximum likelihood (REML). However, for models with different fixed effects, the residual likelihoods are not comparable and hence information criteria based on the residual likelihood cannot be used. For model selection, it is often suggested that the models are refitted using maximum likelihood to enable the criteria to be used. The first aim of this paper is to highlight that both the AIC and BIC can be used for the general linear model by using the full log‐likelihood evaluated at the REML estimates. The second aim is to provide a derivation of the criteria under REML estimation. This aim is achieved by noting that the full likelihood can be decomposed into a marginal (residual) and conditional likelihood and this decomposition then incorporates aspects of both the fixed effects and variance parameters. Using this decomposition, the appropriate information criteria for model selection of models which differ in their fixed effects specification can be derived. An example is presented to illustrate the results and code is available for analyses using the ASReml‐R package.