Calculating the density and distribution function for the singly and doubly noncentral F

Simple, closed form saddlepoint approximations for the distribution and density of the singly and doubly noncentral F distributions are presented. Their overwhelming accuracy is demonstrated numerically using a variety of parameter values. The approximations are shown to be uniform in the right tail and the associated limitating relative error is derived. Difficulties associated with some algorithms used for exact computation of the singly noncentral F are noted.     

Saddlepoint approximations for subordinator processes

ABSTRACT

We develop the saddlepoint approximations in obtaining the transition functions for general subordinator processes. We derive explicit expressions of the first- and second-order approximations. Specifically, we consider some particular classes of subordinators including the Poisson processes, the Gamma processes, the α-stable subordinators, and the Poisson random integrals. We test this technique on the Poisson and Gamma processes, which have closed-form transition functions. Outcomes show that the approximate expressions are consistent with the true transition functions. We then use this method to predict transition density functions for the α-stable subordinator processes. Finally, we calculate approximated transition densities for some Poisson random integrations. Numerical analysis shows the perfect ability of the saddlepoint approximations to predict the transition densities of the α-stable processes and the Poisson random integrations.     

Approximate and estimated saddlepoint approximations

Classical saddlepoint methods, which assume that the cumulant generating function is known, result in an approximation to the distribution that achieves an error of order O(n^?1). The authors give a general theorem to address the accuracy of saddlepoint approximations in which the cumulant generating function has been estimated or approximated. In practice, the resulting saddlepoint approximations are typically of the order O(n^?1/2). The authors give simulation results for small sample examples to compare estimated saddlepoint approximations.     

Saddlepoint p-values for a class of tests for comparing competing risks with censored data

One of the general problems in clinical trials and mortality rates is the comparison of competing risks. Most of the test statistics used for independent and dependent risks with censored data belong to the class of weighted linear rank tests in its multivariate version. In this paper, we introduce the saddlepoint approximations as accurate and fast approximations for the exact p-values of this class of tests instead of the asymptotic and permutation simulated calculations. Real data examples and extensive simulation studies showed the accuracy and stability performance of the saddlepoint approximations over different scenarios of lifetime distributions, sample sizes and censoring.     

Saddlepoint density and distribution functions for the ratio of two linear functions and the product of generalized gamma variates

The generalized gamma distribution is a flexible and attractive distribution because it incorporates several well-known distributions, i.e., gamma, Weibull, Rayleigh, and Maxwell. This article derives saddlepoint density and distribution functions for the ratio of two linear functions of generalized gamma variables and the product of n independent generalized gamma variables. Simulation studies are used to evaluate the accuracy of the saddlepoint approximations. The saddlepoint approximations are fast, easy, and very accurate.     

Bayesian prediction of waiting times in stochastic models

The authors show how saddlepoint techniques lead to highly accurate approximations for Bayesian predictive densities and cumulative distribution functions in stochastic model settings where the prior is tractable, but not necessarily the likelihood or the predictand distribution. They consider more specifically models involving predictions associated with waiting times for semi‐Markov processes whose distributions are indexed by an unknown parameter θ. Bayesian prediction for such processes when they are not stationary is also addressed and the inverse‐Gaussian based saddlepoint approximation of Wood, Booth & Butler (1993) is shown to accurately deal with the nonstationarity whereas the normal‐based Lugannani & Rice (1980) approximation cannot, Their methods are illustrated by predicting various waiting times associated with M/M/q and M/G/1 queues. They also discuss modifications to the matrix renewal theory needed for computing the moment generating functions that are used in the saddlepoint methods.     

Bivariate symmetry tests for complete and competing risks data: a saddlepoint approach

A class of bivariate symmetry tests for complete data and competing risks data is considered. Saddlepoint approximation for the exact p-values of the underlying permutation distribution of these tests is derived. Several simulation studies are conducted to evaluate the performance of the saddlepoint approximation and the asymptotic approximation. The saddlepoint approximation was found to be highly accurate and superior to the asymptotic approximations in replicating the exact permutation significance.     

Saddlepoint approximations for nonlinear statistics

It is well known that saddlepoint expansions lead to accurate approximations to the cumulative distributions and densities of a sample mean and other simple linear statistics. The use of such expansions is explored in a broader situation. The saddlepoint formula for the tail probability of a certain type of nonlinear statistic is derived. The relative error of O(n^–1), as in the linear case, is retained. A simple example is considered, to illustrate the great accuracy of the approximation.     

Saddlepoint <Emphasis Type="Italic">p</Emphasis>-values and confidence intervals for a class of two sample permutation tests for current status and panel count data

The current status and panel count data frequently arise from cancer and tumorigenicity studies when events currently occur. A common and widely used class of two sample tests, for current status and panel count data, is the permutation class. We manipulate the double saddlepoint method to calculate the exact mid-p-values of the underlying permutation distributions of this class of tests. Permutation simulations are replaced by analytical saddlepoint computations which provide extremely accurate mid-p-values that are exact for most practical purposes and almost always more accurate than normal approximations. The method is illustrated using two real tumorigenicity panel count data. To compare the saddlepoint approximation with the normal asymptotic approximation, a simulation study is conducted. The speed and accuracy of the saddlepoint method facilitate the calculation of the confidence interval for the treatment effect. The inversion of the mid-p-values to calculate the confidence interval for the mean rate of development of the recurrent event is discussed.     

Log‐rank permutation tests for trend: saddlepoint p‐values and survival rate confidence intervals

Suppose p + 1 experimental groups correspond to increasing dose levels of a treatment and all groups are subject to right censoring. In such instances, permutation tests for trend can be performed based on statistics derived from the weighted log‐rank class. This article uses saddlepoint methods to determine the mid‐P‐values for such permutation tests for any test statistic in the weighted log‐rank class. Permutation simulations are replaced by analytical saddlepoint computations which provide extremely accurate mid‐P‐values that are exact for most practical purposes and almost always more accurate than normal approximations. The speed of mid‐P‐value computation allows for the inversion of such tests to determine confidence intervals for the percentage increase in mean (or median) survival time per unit increase in dosage. The Canadian Journal of Statistics 37: 5‐16; 2009 © 2009 Statistical Society of Canada     

Implementation of saddlepoint approximations in resampling problems

In many situations saddlepoint approximations can replace the Monte Carlo simulation typically used to find the bootstrap distribution of a statistic. We explain how bootstrap and permutation distributions can be expressed as conditional distributions and how methods for linear programming and for fitting generalized linear models can be used to find saddlepoint approximations to these distributions. The ideas are illustrated using an example from insurance.     

Allowance for skewness in maximum-likelihood estimation with application to the location-scale model

The use of maximum-likelihood estimation as discussed by Sprott and Viveros (1984) is extended to include the log F distribution to accommodate skewness. The role played by linear pivotals in relation to likelihood and efficiency is discussed. Normal, t, and log F likelihoods are defined and used to generate possible normal, t, and log F linear pivotal quantities. The results are applied to the location-scale family, where exact results are available to assess the numerical accuracy of the proposed procedure. Refinements using saddlepoint approximations are obtained.     

A Practical Procedure to Find Matching Priors for Frequentist Inference

We present a practical way to find matching priors via the use of saddlepoint approximations and obtain p-values of tests of an interest parameter in the presence of nuisance parameters. The advantages of our procedure are the flexibility in choosing different initial conditions so that one may adjust the performance of a test, and the less intensive computational efforts compared to a Markov Chain Monto Carlo method.     

Saddlepoint-Based Bootstrap Inference for Quadratic Estimating Equations

Abstract.  We propose an easy to implement method for making small sample parametric inference about the root of an estimating equation expressible as a quadratic form in normal random variables. It is based on saddlepoint approximations to the distribution of the estimating equation whose unique root is a parameter's maximum likelihood estimator (MLE), while substituting conditional MLEs for the remaining (nuisance) parameters. Monotoncity of the estimating equation in its parameter argument enables us to relate these approximations to those for the estimator of interest. The proposed method is equivalent to a parametric bootstrap percentile approach where Monte Carlo simulation is replaced by saddlepoint approximation. It finds applications in many areas of statistics including, nonlinear regression, time series analysis, inference on ratios of regression parameters in linear models and calibration. We demonstrate the method in the context of some classical examples from nonlinear regression models and ratios of regression parameter problems. Simulation results for these show that the proposed method, apart from being generally easier to implement, yields confidence intervals with lengths and coverage probabilities that compare favourably with those obtained from several competing methods proposed in the literature over the past half-century.     

General saddlepoint approximations and normalizing transformations for multivariate statistics

The use of general saddlepoint approximations is investigated for the problem of approximating the tail probabilities of statistics in multivariate analysis. A method based on normalizing transformations is proposed to prevent po¬tential deficiencies in general saddlepoint approximations. The efficiency of the proposed method is illustrated through examples of the sample correlation     

Saddlepoint Approximations for Stopped-Sum Distributions

One of the common used classes of distributions is the stopped-sum class. This class includes Hermite distribution, Polya–Aeppli distribution, Poisson-Gamma distribution, and Neyman type A. This article introduces the saddlepoint approximations to the stopped-sum class in continuous and discrete settings. We discuss approximations for mass/density and cumulative distribution functions of stopped-sum distributions. Examples of continuous and discrete distributions from the Poisson stopped-sum class are presented. Comparisons between saddlepoint approximations and the exact calculations show the great accuracy of the saddlepoint methods.     

Saddlepoint Approximations for the Difference of Order Statistics and Studentized Sample Quantiles

For a sample from a given distribution the difference of two order statistics and the Studentized quantile are statistics whose distribution is needed to obtain tests and confidence intervals for quantiles and quantile differences. This paper gives saddlepoint approximations for densities and saddlepoint approximations of the Lugannani–Rice form for tail probabilities of these statistics. The relative errors of the approximations are n ⁻¹ uniformly in a neighbourhood of the parameters and this uniformity is global if the densities are log-concave.     

Improved Measures of the Spread of Data for Some Unknown Complex Distributions Using Saddlepoint Approximations

Measures of the spread of data for random sums arise frequently in many problems and have a wide range of applications in real life, such as in the insurance field (e.g., the total claim size in a portfolio). The exact distribution of random sums is extremely difficult to determine, and normal approximation usually performs very badly for this complex distributions. A better method of approximating a random-sum distribution involves the use of saddlepoint approximations.

Saddlepoint approximations are powerful tools for providing accurate expressions for distribution functions that are not known in closed form. This method not only yields an accurate approximation near the center of the distribution but also controls the relative error in the far tail of the distribution.

In this article, we discuss approximations to the unknown complex random-sum Poisson–Erlang random variable, which has a continuous distribution, and the random-sum Poisson-negative binomial random variable, which has a discrete distribution. We show that the saddlepoint approximation method is not only quick, dependable, stable, and accurate enough for general statistical inference but is also applicable without deep knowledge of probability theory. Numerical examples of application of the saddlepoint approximation method to continuous and discrete random-sum Poisson distributions are presented.     

Small sample confidence intervals for survival functions under the proportional hazards model

We develop a saddlepoint-based method for generating small sample confidence bands for the population surviival function from the Kaplan-Meier (KM), the product limit (PL), and Abdushukurov-Cheng-Lin (ACL) survival function estimators, under the proportional hazards model. In the process we derive the exact distribution of these estimators and developed mid-ppopulation tolerance bands for said estimators. Our saddlepoint method depends upon the Mellin transform of the zero-truncated survival estimator which we derive for the KM, PL, and ACL estimators. These transforms are inverted via saddlepoint approximations to yield highly accurate approximations to the cumulative distribution functions of the respective cumulative hazard function estimators and these distribution functions are then inverted to produce our saddlepoint confidence bands. For the KM, PL and ACL estimators we compare our saddlepoint confidence bands with those obtained from competing large sample methods as well as those obtained from the exact distribution. In our simulation studies we found that the saddlepoint confidence bands are very close to the confidence bands derived from the exact distribution, while being much easier to compute, and outperform the competing large sample methods in terms of coverage probability.     

An empirical saddlepoint approximation based method for smoothing survival functions under right censoring

The Kaplan–Meier (KM) estimator is ubiquitously used for estimating survival functions, but it provides only a discrete approximation at the observation times and does not deliver a proper distribution if the largest observation is censored. Using KM as a starting point, we devise an empirical saddlepoint approximation‐based method for producing a smooth survival function that is unencumbered by choice of tuning parameters. The procedure inverts the moment generating function (MGF) defined through a Riemann–Stieltjes integral with respect to an underlying mixed probability measure consisting of the discrete KM mass function weights and an absolutely continuous exponential right‐tail completion. Uniform consistency, and weak and strong convergence results are established for the resulting MGF and its derivatives, thus validating their usage as inputs into the saddlepoint routines. Relevant asymptotic results are also derived for the density and distribution function estimates. The performance of the resulting survival approximations is examined in simulation studies, which demonstrate a favourable comparison with the log spline method (Kooperberg & Stone, 1992) in small sample settings. For smoothing survival functions we argue that the methodology has no immediate competitors in its class, and we illustrate its application on several real data sets. The Canadian Journal of Statistics 47: 238–261; 2019 © 2019 Statistical Society of Canada