管理从心灵开始——重视心理效应在学生管理中的应用

技工学校是我国职业教育体系的重要组成部分,运用心理学理论拓展新思路,探索新模式和新方法已成为教育教学活动中不可缺少的环节。下面以几个心理效应为例,谈谈心理效应在教育教学中的作用。     

浅谈如何抓好典型教育和警示教育

抓好典型教育和警示教育。运用廉政典型进行导向示范教育，大力宣传廉政先进典型，用以鼓舞教育党员干部。运用案例进行警示教育，以典型案例开展以案说纪活动，深刻剖析各类典型案件，挖根源，找规律，讲危害，以案明纪，警钟长鸣。运用廉政谈话形式进行预防教育。对于新提拔任职和新调整到重要岗位的领导人员，在任职前进行廉政谈话，上好任职前的廉政课；与群众有反映的党员干部进行诫勉谈话，督促他们讲清问题，敲响警钟；与有不廉洁行为的党员干部谈话，限期进行整改，使干部及时纠正错误，不犯大的错误。     

论高校廉政文化建设的四个维度

高校廉政文化建设是指在学校文化建设中围绕廉政主题,以传播廉政知识、树立廉政理念、建立廉政机制、培养廉政精神为目标,通过各种途径陶冶全体师生的道德情操,培育崇尚廉政的校园风气,营造公平、公正的育人环境,为社会的廉政文化发展起带头作用。本文主要从学校环境、教师引导、学生参与和课堂教学四个维度去探讨加强高校廉政文化建设的途径和方法。     

“五化”打造高校心理育人体系

通过三年的探索,作为所在高校心理咨询中心的管理行政和教学团队,以品牌化、社会化、公益化、专业化和多元化的工作方式逐步建立了较为完善的院—系—班三级心理育人体系,学校心理育人体系得到了质的改变,学生从被动接受心理健康教育到主动参与心理活动和寻求心理咨询,学生对于参与心理学习的兴趣和热情得到了很大的提高。心理健康教育的方式也从单纯的教师向学生传授转变为发挥学生主观能动性,激发了学生学习心理咨询技术和实操的兴趣氛围,争相参与同辈心理咨询员和心灵学长学姐的相关培训,学生间形成了互助的环境。     

高校廉政风险防控体制机制研究

随着人才强国战略和科技强国战略的部署，我国的高等教育也随之蓬勃发展，接踵而来的就是在高校教育发展中如何预防腐败，加强高校廉政风险的预警、排查和防控，将其腐败的风险扼杀在摇篮之中是我们廉政风险防控工作的趋势，也是重点。高校构建廉政风险防控体制机制，是对高校廉政风险防控工作的积极探索，是加强腐败的源头治理，根治高校腐败土壤的重要途径，是探索降低廉政风险，预防腐败的长效机制。     

大学生廉政教育研究

对大学生进行廉政教育是一项从源头上遏制腐败现象的前瞻性工作,同时也是塑造大学生人格、保证其能够健康成长的必要举措。高校作为大学生思想政治教育的主阵地,需尽快加强大学生的廉政教育,紧紧围绕立德树人的根本任务,把廉政教育作为思想政治教育重要内容,坚持将廉政教育内容融入理论学习、融入社会实践、融入校园文化中。通过完善大学生廉政教育课程体系,改进大学生廉政教育内容与方法,完善大学生廉政教育评价体系,提升高校教师的廉政素养,加强校园廉政文化建设等途径加强大学生廉政教育。     

互联网时代学生厌学情绪教育策略研究

学生厌学心理一直困扰着家长和教师，严重影响着学校、班级管理和教育教学质量的提升，要改变这种现状，就必须学校、教师、家长三方通力协作，探索出一套行之有效的方法和措施。本文针对中职造价班级学生厌学,个案进行研究通过分析中职生厌学问题的心理及家庭成因够提供一定的帮助。     

从临床心理学的角度探讨学校心理辅导模式

近年来,随着青少年心理问题发生率的上升,国家对于学校心理辅导工作日益重视,然而在防范学生心理问题方面尚存在一些问题,本文从临床心理学意义的角度探询预防学生心理问题,学校心理辅导工作中应注意的一些问题,以促进青少年心理健康教育工作的开展。     

从传统廉政文化视角探析廉政教育的新思路

历史是一面镜子,我们可以从中得到启迪和定力。中国传统廉政文化底蕴深厚,深刻体现了古代廉政核心价值,为后世留下了宝贵的精神财富。新时代,从我国优秀传统廉政文化中汲取智慧和经验,能够为营造风清气正的社会风气、推动党风廉政建设工作走向纵深提供参考借鉴。因此,为牢牢巩固党员领导干部的思想防线,使廉政教育的形式更加丰富、方法更加有效、载体更加多元,实现“警钟长鸣、警笛不响”,必须深入挖掘、积极借鉴我国古代优秀廉政文化,探索廉政教育新路径,开创管党治党的新局面。     

情感体验学习法在中职数学教学中的应用

本文主要探索在社会转型期中职学校数学教学中应用情感体验学习法,研究学生在课堂学习中的心理感受和情感变化,以期使学生愉快地接受教育,改变当前学生厌学的状况。     

青年网络参与和科学传播公共空间的构建

当前,食品安全事故频发、农产品工业化之殇引起公众对于科学的信任危机。科学与社会互动的"发声"与"呛声"呈现协同演化趋势,在"意见的公开广场"上各方力量交锋更为激烈。Web2.0赋权当代青年参与科学传播,网络青年自组织创造了多个情境化版本。在"有反思的科学传播"发展阶段,对话是必由之路。媒介社区青年想象共同体以廓清环境为己任,调动公众参与,期望重建安全与信任;为对话协商、营造共识氛围、重构理性、建设公共空间提供了可能。互联网领域的科学传播充满意识形态之争,需要调整、规范各个多元化利益主体的行动框架,共建科学传播的良性治理结构。当前我国科学传播处于渐进式、不均衡发展状态,要把科学传播纳入公益救助,探索公益和商业的多元化发展模式。     

A Study on Dialogic Communication,Trust, and Distrust: Testing a Scale for Measuring Organization–Public Dialogic Communication (OPDC)

Although there is a wide range of discussion on dialogic communication, or dialogue, in the field of public relations, little research has dealt with the empirical measurement of organization–public dialogue. The primary purpose of this study was to test the proposed scale for measuring organization–public dialogic communication (OPDC). Additionally, this study aimed to demonstrate the link between dialogic communication and trust/distrust between organizations studied and their publics. For the research purpose, two anonymous online surveys were used to collect the data. The participants were American consumers randomly selected from a representative research panel of online survey participants (N = 704). According to the results, the proposed 2-factor, 28-item scale of OPDC was valid and reliable. Also, for further empirical validation, this study found that the proposed scale of OPDC is significantly related to public trust and distrust. Given the scarcity of the empirical research on OPDC, the results of this study can contribute to further research in communication management.     

“We are people,not transactions”: Trust as a precursor to dialogue with LGBTQ publics

This research focuses on trust as a precursor to dialogic communication with diverse publics. Through a grounded theory approach, this research explicates the concept of trust in dialogue within organization-public relations to refine and advance research about enhancing dialogue and trust in diverse societies. Based on in-depth interviews with 33 LGBTQ communication professionals, findings suggest that trust is a precursor to dialogue and is impacted by cultural competency, organizational congruency, authenticity, and stakeholder empowerment.     

How responsiveness works in mainland China: Effects on institutional trust and political participation

This study investigated whether and how institutional responsiveness, a constitutive element of dialogic communication, influences institutional trust and political participation among members of the public in mainland China. A total of 4068 respondents from mainland China completed questionnaires. Results demonstrated that institutional responsiveness indirectly reduced publics’ destructive non-institutional political participation by building institutional trust. Extending the public relations literature on dialogue, we found that this indirect relationship is conditional on online political information seeking rather than online political expression among members of the public. For people who frequently use the Internet to seek political information, institutional responsiveness is more likely to boost institutional trust, which decreases the likelihood of participation in offline political activities.     

Mandating dialogue? International perspectives on differences between theory and practice

This paper replicates an Australian study (Lane, 2018) into how public relations practitioners understand dialogue in practice. The original study found practitioners believed they were carrying out dialogue legally required by government, but what they were doing was no more than two-way communication. It also found practitioners’ operating environments meant they could never actually undertake dialogue, even if mandated to do so. These empirically-based insights revealed the existence of gaps between theory and practice in dialogue in public relations. The study was repeated in Austria to determine if these findings were consistent internationally, and to consider what this might mean for the place of dialogue in public relations. Examples of so-called mandated ‘dialogue’ provided by Austrian public relations practitioners in semi-structured interviews were analyzed using Kent and Taylor’s (2002) five principles of dialogue. This analysis showed that despite the Austrian practitioners’ familiarity with the work of Habermas on dialogue, the mandated communication they carried out was not dialogue. The Austrian experience also showed that the nature of the underlying context of mandated communication—the need to achieve agreement between parties in varying levels of conflict; and conducting communication within boundaries of time and non-negotiable pre-existing decisions—meant dialogue could never occur. Comparing the two studies demonstrated high levels of similarity between the countries’ results, which we hope can provide the starting point for the development of a longitudinal and international perspective. This paper concludes that the place of dialogue in the theory and practice of public relations is dependent on the education of practitioners in its implementation; and a re-thinking of the role of the aspirational in situations where it can never be attained.     

Public relations,indigeneity and colonization: Indigenous resistance as dialogic anchor

Cultural communication has been put forth in the context of globalization and the emergence of Indigenous movements as a framework for dialogue to be carried out by organizations (Love & Tilley, 2014). Concepts of Māori communication for instance have been foregrounded in the public relations literature to anchor strategies of effective engagement through dialogue, leading to the building of trust in Indigenous communities (Love & Tilley, 2014). Similarly, Indigenous engagement has been foregrounded as a key resource in achieving global sustainable development (Dutta, 2013, 2019). This turn to Indigenous cultural communication is broadly situated in the framing of indigeneity as a category to be developed within frameworks of dialogue and engagement, constituted within the structures of transnational capitalism (Dutta, 2019).Drawing from Dutta’s (2008) theorizing of the cultural sensitivity and culture-centered approaches to communication, we critically interrogate the hegemony of Indigenous dialogue as a strategy deployed by dominant organizations. Whereas cultural sensitivity incorporates cultural characteristics to serve organizational goals, cultural-centering serves as an anchor for collaborating with cultural communities at the margins in building “communicative infrastructures” for voice. Arguing that superficial markers of culture incorporated into engagement is a communicative inversion that serves the colonizing tools of transnational capital, we attend to culturally centered communication strategies of engagement that are grounded in resistance and emerge from within the voices of Indigenous movements that are increasingly threatened by ever-expanding colonial missions of globalization.Comparing across two case studies, one about the struggle of the Dongria Kondh in the Odisha state of Eastern India against mining capitalism, and the other a critical review of the use of Māori cultural knowledge in the public relations literature, we articulate indigeneity as a site of resistance within the meta-theoretical framework of the culture-centered approach (Dutta, 2008, 2011). In conceptualizing Indigenous resistance as an agonistic anchor to communication, we attend to the impossibilities of dialogue, and simultaneously to the role of communicative infrastructures in inverting neoliberal hegemony. Dialogue is radically transformed, not in generating consensus but rather in its capacity to disrupt the neoliberal status quo through the presence of Indigenous voices. Indigenous resistance “renders impure” the ontological category of dialogue, on one hand, attending to the limits of dialogue, and on the other hand, turns dialogic tools into the hands of Indigenous social movements. Dialogue as a communication infrastructure located materially within Indigenous resistance movements turns the power of communication into the hands of Indigenous communities.     

Revisiting the concept “dialogue” in public relations

This paper follows a critical approach in exploring the philosophical underpinnings and key features of dialogue in public relations practice and thinking. It argues that dialogue has been uncritically equated to two-way symmetrical communication, which has not done justice to the nature of dialogue, and has effectively stifled concrete development of a dialogic theory in public relations. The paper draws from a range of literature, including mainstream public relations and communication philosophy—in particular the philosophy of Martin Buber. The purpose of this paper is to inform public relations thinking by encouraging debate rather than proposing a new theoretical approach. As such, it sets out to explore the concept of dialogue and its philosophical underpinning, considers its practical application and suggests that it should not be seen as superior to persuasion.     

Organizational listening: Addressing a major gap in public relations theory and practice

An extensive body of literature theorizes public relations as two-way communication, dialogue, and relationships between organizations and their publics. Although there are alternative views, including public relations as advocacy, most theories emphasize dialogue, co-orientation, and relationships incorporating satisfaction, trust, and control mutuality—even to the extent of symmetry. Critical perspectives propose a sociocultural turn that further emphasizes stakeholders’ and societal interests. This analysis draws on a three-country study that reveals a major theory-practice gap and proposes a significant expansion of public relations theory in relation to listening to realize normative notions of public relations and give effect to claims of dialogue and engagement.     

Toward a dialogic theory of public relations

This essay clarifies the concept of dialogue in public relations. As public relations theory and research move toward a two-way relational communication model, many scholars and practitioners are increasingly using the terms “dialogic” and “dialogue” to describe ethical and practical approaches to public relations. The concept of dialogue is deeply rooted in philosophy and relational communication theory. Its inclusion in the public relations vocabulary is an important step toward understanding how organizations can build relationships that serve both organizational and public interests. This essay traces the roots of dialogue, identifies several over-arching tenets, and provides three ways that organizations can incorporate dialogue into their communication with publics.     

Dialogic Engagement: Clarifying Foundational Concepts

The principle of engagement underlies much of the relational and organization–public communication research. Unfortunately, the principle of engagement suffers from a lack of clarity in the public relations literature. Use of the term engagement varies widely. This article clarifies the principle of engagement by positioning it within dialogue theory. We posit a conceptualization of engagement as: Engagement is part of dialogue and through engagement, organizations and publics can make decisions that create social capital. Engagement is both an orientation that influences interactions and the approach that guides the process of interactions among groups.