共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
Jan C. Schmidt 《Poiesis & praxis》2011,7(4):249-274
Among others, the term “problem” plays a major role in the various attempts to characterize interdisciplinarity or transdisciplinarity,
as used synonymously in this paper. Interdisciplinarity (ID) is regarded as “problem solving among science, technology and
society” and as “problem orientation beyond disciplinary constraints” (cf. Frodeman et al.: The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity.
Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010). The point of departure of this paper is that the discourse and practice of ID have problems with the “problem”. The objective
here is to shed some light on the vague notion of “problem” in order to advocate a specific type of interdisciplinarity: problem-oriented interdisciplinarity. The outline is as follows: Taking an ex negativo approach, I will show what problem-oriented ID does not mean. Using references to well-established distinctions in philosophy of science, I will show three other types of ID that
should not be placed under the umbrella term “problem-oriented ID”: object-oriented ID (“ontology”), theory-oriented ID (epistemology),
and method-oriented ID (methodology). Different philosophical thought traditions can be related to these distinguishable meanings.
I will then clarify the notion of “problem” by looking at three systematic elements: an undesired (initial) state, a desired
(goal) state, and the barriers in getting from the one to the other. These three elements include three related kinds of knowledge:
systems, target, and transformation knowledge. This paper elaborates further methodological and epistemological elements of
problem-oriented ID. It concludes by stressing that problem-oriented ID is the most needed as well as the most challenging
type of ID. 相似文献
2.
Michael Lynch 《The American Sociologist》2012,43(1):67-75
This essay is an appreciation of Melvin Pollner’s distinctive sociological approach to topics that are usually associated
with philosophy. Pollner’s dissertation and early writings took up the theme of “mundane reason,” which he defined as an incorrigible
presumption of a real world that is implicit in everyday conduct. Pollner addressed mundane reason, and the reciprocal idea
of “reality disjunctures”—momentary divergences between perceptual accounts of the “same” mundane reality—by describing routine
exchanges in traffic court and confrontations between doctors and patients in psychiatric settings. Pollner’s work anticipated
current enthusiasms for developing novel “ontologies” in social and cultural studies of science, medicine, and other subjects.
Although he did attempt to locate metaphysics in the midst of everyday experience, this essay suggests that his “philosophy
on the ground” radically transformed philosophical ontology into an original and imaginative way to investigate constitutive
activities. 相似文献
3.
Nancy A. Naples 《Qualitative sociology》1996,19(1):83-106
This article draws upon findings from an ethnographic study of two towns in rural Iowa to examine the adequacy of the insider/outsider
distinction as a guideline for evaluating and conducting ethnographic research. Utilizing feminist standpoint and materialist
feminist theories, I start with the assumption that, rather than one “insider” or “outsider” position, we all begin our work
with different relationships to shifting aspects of social life and to particular knowers in the community and this contributes
to numerous dimensions through which we can relate to residents in various communities. “Outsiderness” and “insiderness” are
not fixed or static positions, rather they are ever-shifting and permeable social locations illustrated in this case study
by the “outsider phenomenon.” Community processes that reorganize and resituate race-ethnicity, gender and class relations
form some of the most salient aspects of the “outsider phenomenon.” These dynamic processes shaped our relationships with
residents as ethnographic identities were repositioned by shifts in constructions of “community” that accompanied ongoing
social, demographic, and political changes. 相似文献
4.
Lars Skov Henriksen Steven Rathgeb Smith Annette Zimmer 《Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations》2012,23(2):458-501
Increasing societal heterogeneity, changing demographics, and increasing public debt and fiscal constraints have recently
challenged traditional “regime” approaches to welfare state development. Some scholars argue, against this background, that
welfare states might plausibly move out of their “regime container” by opting in favor of similar solutions and responses.
This potential trend toward “convergence” might, furthermore, be facilitated by the widespread use of new public management
ideas and techniques for “reinventing government” by adopting market solutions to public problems. This article investigates
whether such trends of convergence can be identified by comparing three different countries each traditionally looked upon
as belonging to different welfare state regimes: Denmark, Germany, and the United States. More specifically the article looks
at one important segment of welfare state activity, namely social services and related health care. To further focus the analysis,
special attention is devoted to the changing role played by the third sector in delivering services. The research design,
thus, differs from most comparative welfare state research. Instead of analyzing a broad set of quantitative indicators in
a large number of countries, it is scrutinized how some of the same problem pressures and policy ideas are being interpreted
and implemented in a small number of countries within one policy area. The analysis reveals that trends of convergence—conceptualized
along four dimensions: ideas, regulation, mix of providers, and revenue mix—can be identified across the three cases, though
this does not mean that the market share of nonprofit providers becomes the same. The study also reveals that fundamental
aspects of state–nonprofit relations persist despite trends of convergence. 相似文献
5.
Popular commentaries suggest that the movement against genetic engineering in agriculture (anti-GE movement) was born in Europe,
rooted in European cultural approaches to food, and sparked by recent food-safety scares such as “mad cow” disease. Yet few
realize that the anti-GE movement's origins date back thirty years, that opposition to agricultural biotechnology emerged
with the technology itself, and that the movement originated in the United States rather than Europe. We argue here that neither
the explosion of the GE food issue in the late 1990s nor the concomitant expansion of the movement can be understood without
recognizing the importance of the intellectual work carried out by a “critical community” of activists during the two-decade-long
period prior to the 1990s. We show how these early critics forged an oppositional ideology and concrete set of grievances
upon which a movement could later be built. Our analysis advances social movement theory by establishing the importance of
the intellectual work that activists engage in during the “proto-mobilizational” phase of collective action, and by identifying
the cognitive and social processes by which activists develop a critical, analytical framework. Our elaboration of four specific
dimensions of idea/ideology formation pushes the literature toward a more complete understanding of the role of ideas and
idea-makers in social movements, and suggests a process of grievance construction that is more “organic” than strategic (pace the framing literature).
Rachel Schurman is Associate Professor of Sociology and Global Studies at the University of Minnesota. Her research interests lie in the
areas of international political economy of food and agriculture, environmental sociology, and social movements. She is co-editor
of Engineering Trouble: Biotechnology and Its Discontents (University of California Press, 2003) and several articles and book chapters on the anti-genetic engineering movement. Her
current book project, with William Munro, explores how organized social resistance to GMOs has shaped the trajectory of agricultural
biotechnology.
William Munro is Associate Professor of Political Science and Director, International Studies Program, at Illinois Wesleyan University.
His research and writing focuses on the politics of agrarian change and state formation in Africa, as well as post-conflict
development. He is the author of The Moral Economy of the State: Conservation, Community Development and State-Making in Zimbabwe (Ohio University Press,1998). He is currently collaborating with Rachel Schurman on a book about social resistance to agricultural
biotechnology. 相似文献
6.
Neil McLaughlin 《The American Sociologist》2004,35(1):80-101
In response to the recent The American Sociologist special issue on Canadian sociology, this rejoinder dialogues with some of the perspectives offered there on the discipline
north of the border with an eye towards lessons that American sociologists might learn from the Canadian experience. My reflections
build on a larger analytic piece entitled “Canada’s Impossible Science: The Historical and Institutional Origins of the Coming
Crisis of Anglo-Canadian Sociology” to be published soon in The Canadian Journal Sociology. Particular attention is paid to the different institutional arrangements of higher education in Canada and the United States,
Anglo-Canadian reliance on the particularly English “weakness as strength” strategy for sociology, tensions between the cultural
values of populism, egalitarianism, and excellence, and the trade-offs between professional and public intellectual work.
A critique is offered of the “origin myth” of Canadian sociology as a particularly vibrant “critical sociology,” with discussion
of Dorothy Smith's influence on sociology in Canada.
His research interests are in sociological theory, the sociology of culture, and the study of intellectuals from the perspective
of the sociology of organisations and professions. He is studying Edward Said as a “global public intellectual” as part of
a Canadian government-funded interdisciplinary grant on “Globalization and Autonomy” at McMaster University. He is also working
“Canadian professors as public intellectuals,” a project also funded by the Social Science and Humanities Research Council
of Canada. 相似文献
7.
Suzanne Staggenborg 《The American Sociologist》1988,19(3):260-269
This article reconsiders the arguments of Roth (1966) concerning “hired band research.” Problems associated with different
types of employees, research tasks, and research organizations are distinguished. It is argued that researchers who hire assistants
can minimize the hired hand mentality by: 1) hiring persons who are able to stay on the job long enough to develop commitment
to the project; 2) involving both hired hand workers and researchers in the research process to the fullest extent possible;
3) designing a flexible research project; 4) justifying theoretically each variable, interview question, observation, etc.;
5) collecting qualitative as well as quantitative data; and 6) remaining highly involved in the research project.
Her recent writings include “The Consequences of Professionalization and Formalization in the Pro-Choice Movement” (American Sociological Review 1988) and “Organizational and Environmental Influences on the Development of the Pro-Choice Movement” (Social Forces, forthcoming). 相似文献
8.
Modernization theory posits a change from traditional or “collective” forms to modern or “reflective” forms of volunteering.
In a research project using a combined qualitative–quantitative approach, the motivation of 118 young Swiss adults who showed
an interest in international volunteering was investigated. Qualitative analysis revealed 12 different motives which could
be categorized into three different groups: A first group called “Achieving something positive for others,” a second group
named “Quest for the new,” and a third group of motives labeled “Quest for oneself.” Motivations of young Swiss adults for
international volunteering clearly show the characteristics of “reflexive” volunteers. Most respondents displayed a combination
of motives while for only 11% of them altruism (“Achieving something positive for others”) was the one and only driving force
behind their interest in international volunteering. The inductively constructed typology of motives can be a useful planning
device for organizations that run or intend to set up an international volunteering program for young adults. 相似文献
9.
Frédéric Gaspart 《Social Choice and Welfare》1997,15(1):95-112
The concern for measuring well-being objectively (as opposed to subjectively, that is, relying only on preferences) is found
in modern political philosophy, especially in J. Rawls’s, A. Sen’s and G. Cohen’s writings. This paper explains the implications
of using an objective well-being index as equalisandum or, close to the so-called “safety net preoccupation”, to guarantee a well-being lower bound. In the simple production model
studied here, five characterization results and two related theorems prove the convergence of both approaches. We come to
the conclusion that the Proportional Solution is the dominant solution according to “objectivist” axioms.
Received: 5 September 1994/Accepted: 29 June 1996 相似文献
10.
On the occasion of the re-publication of Erving Goffman’s Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order, including the remarkable appendix, “Insanity of Place,” the authors propose new ways of reading Goffman’s work in order
to highlight his attention to havoc and containment. Goffman’s “Insanity of Place,” explores the phenomenon of mental illness
by asserting that it is an instance of havoc, a symbolic and practical condition that disrupts the social order of life, and
one that must be contained. By situating this essay at the center of Goffman’s oeuvre they examine Goffman’s “philosophy of
containment,” and trace its trajectory from Asylums, Stigma and “The Insanity of Place” to its full crystallization in Frame Analysis. The authors offer a generative reading of havoc and containment in order to understand the incoherence, irrationality, unreason,
incomprehensibility and unbearableness of social life and the imperative to preserve social order from collapsing, dissolving
or imploding. This reading enables us to see the cracks in the social order and understand containment as the constant effort
exerted to recuperate transgressions and deviations back into that order. Goffman’s analysis becomes an opening into engagements
with the work of Judith Butler and Michel Foucault around the notion of the normative order and the issues of containment
and transgression. Thinking through Goffman’s philosophy of containment as the framework for an analysis of socialization,
normalization, and social ordering affords an approach to thinking macro-micro linkages of order and instability that confront
both our contemporary society and the discipline of sociology. 相似文献
11.
Keith Doubt 《The American Sociologist》1989,20(3):252-262
A short story titled “‘Color Trouble’” by Harold Garfinkel was published inOpportunity in 1940,The Best Short Stories 1941, andPrimer for White Folks in 1945. Garfinkel wrote this short story before World War II while a research fellow at the University of North Carolina,
Chapel Hill under Howard W. Odum, the founder ofSocial Forces “‘Color Trouble’” narrates poignantly the racial victimization of a young black woman traveling on a public bus through the
State of Virginia. The short story provides sociologists with a different medium through which to examine the seminal interests
of ethnomethodology’s founder. In a literary form, the short story depicts such ethnomethodological concepts as the breaching
experiment, the “et cetera clause,” “ad hocing,” and the status degradation ceremony. Garfinkel’s “‘Color Trouble’” also suggests
the way in which ethnomethodology overlaps with, as well as diverges from, Erving Goffman’s dramaturgical perspective.
He received his doctoral degree from the graduate program in sociology at York University, Toronto, Ontario. His article “Autonomy
and Responsibility in Social Theory” will appear inCurrent Perspectives in Social Theory, Volume 10. 相似文献
12.
Gunnar L. H. Svendsen 《Theory and Society》2006,35(1):39-70
In recent years, the concept of social capital – broadly defined as co-operative networks based on regular, personal contact
and trust – has been widely applied within cross-disciplinary human science research, primarily by economists, political scientists
and sociologists. In this article, I argue why and how fieldwork anthropologists should fill a gap in the social capital literature
by highlighting how social capital is being built in situ. I suggest that the recent inventions of “bridging” and “bonding” social capital, e.g., inclusive and exclusive types of
social capital, are fruitful concepts to apply in an anthropological fieldwork setting. Thus, my case study on the relationship
between local people and newcomers in the rural Danish marginal municipality of Ravnsborg seeks to reveal processes of bridging/bonding
social capital building. Such a case study at the micro level has general policy implications for a cultural clash between
two different groups by demonstrating the complexity of a social capital mix where bonding social capital strongly prevails.
This ultimately leads to a “social trap” (Rothstein 2005), implying widespread distrust and serious social and economic costs
for a whole population.
Gunnar Lind Haase Svendsen is Senior Researcher, at the Institute of Rural Research and Development, Southern University of Denmark. He is the co-author,
with G. T. Svendsen, of The Creation and Destruction of Social Capital: Entrepreneurship, Co-operative Movements and Institutions (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 2004, Paperback edition, October 2005); and author of Samarbejde og konfrontation. Opbygning og nedbrydning af social kapital i de danske landdistrikter 1864–2003 [Cooperation and Confrontation. The Creation and Destruction of Social Capital in Rural Denmark 1864–2003], Ph.D. dissertation,
University of Sourthern Denmark, Esbjerg, 2004: http://www.humaniora.sdu.dk/phd/dokumenter/filer/Afhandlinger-30.pdfg. Gunnar
Svendsen's scholarly interests include Bourdieusian Economics (new socioeconomics), capital theory, social capital, rural
civic movements, and rural discourses. He has recently finished a research project for the Danish Ministry of the Interior
about the role of intangible assets (culture, networks, and historical traditions) for differences in economic performance
(DEP) among four Danish local communities. 相似文献
13.
Matilda White Riley 《The American Sociologist》1997,28(2):54-60
Rational choice is contrasted with the sociology of age as two broad frameworks to aid the search for conceptual models to
integrate our fragmented discipline. Some suggestive differences and convergences between them point to the desirability of
a more dynamic emphasis in rational choice theory, and to consideration of the philosophical and moral assumptions underlying
the “purpose” of action in the sociology of age.
Senior Social Scientist at the National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health.
This article is adapted from the panel discussion, “The Place of Rational Choice in Sociology,” organized by Guillermina Jasso
for the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association in Los Angeles, August 6, 1994. 相似文献
14.
Norman Schofield 《Social Choice and Welfare》1999,16(3):445-470
This paper defines a fine C
1-topology for smooth preferences on a “policy space”, W, and shows that the set of convex preference profiles contains open sets in this topology.
It follows that if the dimension(W)≤v(?)−2 (where v(?) is the Nakamura number of the voting rule, ?), then the core of ? cannot be generically empty. For higher dimensions,
an “extension” of the voting core, called the heart of ?, is proposed. The heart is a generalization of the “uncovered set”.
It is shown to be non-empty and closed in general. On the C
1-space of convex preference profiles, the heart is Paretian. Moreover, the heart correspondence is lower hemi-continuous and
admits a continuous selection. Thus the heart converges to the core when the latter exists. Using this, an aggregator, compatible
with ?, can be defined and shown to be continuous on the C
1-space of smooth convex preference profiles.
Received: 3 April 1995/Accepted: 8 April 1998 相似文献
15.
Cihan Tuğal 《Theory and Society》2009,38(5):423-458
The Islamist movement in Turkey bases its mobilization strategy on transforming everyday practices. Public challenges against
the state do not form a central part of its repertoire. New Social Movement theory provides some tools for analyzing such
an unconventional strategic choice. However, as Islamist mobilization also seeks to reshape the state in the long run, New
Social Movement theory (with its focus on culture and society and its relative neglect of the state) needs to be complemented
by more institutional analyses. A hegemonic account of mobilization, which incorporates tools from theories of everyday life
and identity-formation, as well as from state-centered approaches, is offered as a way to grasp the complexity of Islamism.
Cihan Tuğal is an Assistant Professor of Sociology at UC Berkeley. He is the author of Passive Revolution: Absorbing the Islamic Challenge to Capitalism (Stanford University Press, 2009). His previous research was published in Economy and Society (“Islamism in Turkey: Beyond Instrument and Meaning,” 2002), the New Left Review (“NATO’s Islamists: Hegemony and Americanization in Turkey,” 2007, and “The Greening of Istanbul,” 2008), and the Sociological Quarterly (“The Appeal of Islamic Politics: Ritual and Dialogue in a Poor District of Turkey,” 2006). He is currently working on the development of neo-liberal Islamic ethics in Turkey, Egypt, and Iran. 相似文献
Cihan TuğalEmail: |
Cihan Tuğal is an Assistant Professor of Sociology at UC Berkeley. He is the author of Passive Revolution: Absorbing the Islamic Challenge to Capitalism (Stanford University Press, 2009). His previous research was published in Economy and Society (“Islamism in Turkey: Beyond Instrument and Meaning,” 2002), the New Left Review (“NATO’s Islamists: Hegemony and Americanization in Turkey,” 2007, and “The Greening of Istanbul,” 2008), and the Sociological Quarterly (“The Appeal of Islamic Politics: Ritual and Dialogue in a Poor District of Turkey,” 2006). He is currently working on the development of neo-liberal Islamic ethics in Turkey, Egypt, and Iran. 相似文献
16.
Matthew W. Finkin 《Journal of Labor Research》2005,26(4):711-723
Bruce Kobayashi and Larry Ribstein apply the “theory of the firm” to worker privacy with specific application to the employer’s
ability to monitor employee performance and behavior. They take the theory to drive toward a much reduced role for law in
favor of regulation by contract. This essay unpacks their theory. It faults the theory for its failure to come to grips with
the possibility of monopsony in the labor market, its failure to appreciate the “public goods” nature of privacy policies
and the related assumption that the employer’s ability to adopt and apply privacyinvasive policies is invariably a product
of a consensual armslength bargain.
This essay is revised and expanded from the author’s Introduction to the 2003 Supplement to Matthew Finkin, Privacy in Employment Law (2d ed. 2003) 2003 Supplement. 相似文献
17.
Two main problems in the sociology of morality 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
Gabriel Abend 《Theory and Society》2008,37(2):87-125
Sociologists often ask why particular groups of people have the moral views that they do. I argue that sociology’s empirical
research on morality relies, implicitly or explicitly, on unsophisticated and even obsolete ethical theories, and thus is
based on inadequate conceptions of the ontology, epistemology, and semantics of morality. In this article I address the two
main problems in the sociology of morality: (1) the problem of moral truth, and (2) the problem of value freedom. I identify
two ideal–typical approaches. While the Weberian paradigm rejects the concept of moral truth, the Durkheimian paradigm accepts
it. By contrast, I argue that sociology should be metaphysically agnostic, yet in practice it should proceed as though there
were no moral truths. The Weberians claim that the sociology of morality can and should be value free; the Durkheimians claim
that it cannot and it should not. My argument is that, while it is true that factual statements presuppose value judgments,
it does not follow that sociologists are moral philosophers in disguise. Finally, I contend that in order for sociology to
improve its understanding of morality, better conceptual, epistemological, and methodological foundations are needed.
Gabriel Abend is a PhD candidate in sociology at Northwestern University. He works in the fields of economic sociology, culture and morality, theory, comparative and historical sociology, and the sociology of science and knowledge. In his dissertation, he investigates the social, cultural, and institutional history of business ethics since the late eighteenth century. In particular, he examines historical variations in conceptions of business ethics, and, more generally, in the boundary between “the economic” and “the moral.” His publications include: “Styles of Sociological Thought: Sociologies, Epistemologies, and the Mexican and US Quests for Truth” (Sociological Theory 24(1):1–41 March 2006); and “The Meaning of ‘Theory’” (Sociological Theory, forthcoming). 相似文献
Gabriel AbendEmail: |
Gabriel Abend is a PhD candidate in sociology at Northwestern University. He works in the fields of economic sociology, culture and morality, theory, comparative and historical sociology, and the sociology of science and knowledge. In his dissertation, he investigates the social, cultural, and institutional history of business ethics since the late eighteenth century. In particular, he examines historical variations in conceptions of business ethics, and, more generally, in the boundary between “the economic” and “the moral.” His publications include: “Styles of Sociological Thought: Sociologies, Epistemologies, and the Mexican and US Quests for Truth” (Sociological Theory 24(1):1–41 March 2006); and “The Meaning of ‘Theory’” (Sociological Theory, forthcoming). 相似文献
18.
Westermeyer J Canive J Thuras P Thompson J Kim SW Crosby RD Garrard J 《Journal of gambling studies / co-sponsored by the National Council on Problem Gambling and Institute for the Study of Gambling and Commercial Gaming》2008,24(2):193-205
Goal This analysis was undertaken to assess the demographic and mental health characteristics of “normal” or non-problem gamblers
versus non-gamblers in a representative community sample. Sample Study participants consisted of 557 North Central American Indian veterans. Data collection included a demographic and trauma questionnaire, a computer-based Diagnostic Interview Schedule for DSM-III-R, and a treatment
history algorithm. Findings Univariate analyses revealed that gamblers had greater social competence (i.e., higher education, living with a spouse) and
higher lifetime psychiatric morbidity. Binary regression analysis revealed that, compared to non-gamblers, gamblers were older,
more highly educated, and more apt to be married. More gamblers showed evidence for lifetime risk-taking as evidenced by Antisocial
Personality Disorder and Tobacco Dependence. Conclusions Social achievement and disposable income function as prerequisites for “normal” gambling in this population, although “externalizing”
or “risk-taking” disorders also serve as independent contributors to at least some gambling. The increased rate of “internalizing”
or emotional disorders are only indirectly related to gambling, perhaps through increasing age or through the “externalizing”
disorders. 相似文献
19.
We develop a theory of representation of interdependent preferences that reflect the widely acknowledged phenomenon of keeping up with the Joneses (i.e. of those preferences which maintain that well-being depend on “relative standing” in the society as well as on material
consumption). The principal ingredient of our analysis is the assumption that individuals desire to occupy a (subjectively)
better position than their peers. This is quite a primitive starting point in that it does not give any reference to what
is actually regarded as “status” in the society. We call this basic postulate negative interdependence, and study its implications. In particular, combining this assumption with some other basic postulates that are widely used
in a number of other branches of the theory of individual choice, we axiomatize the relative income hypothesis, and obtain
an operational representation of interdependent preferences.
Received: 7 December 1998/Accepted: 24 August 1999 相似文献
20.
While the problem of intersubjectivity has motivated a great deal of sociological research, there has been little consideration
of the relationship between intersubjectivity-sustaining practices and the physical environment in which these are enacted.
The Museum of Jurassic Technology (MJT) is a strategic site for exploring this relationship. With its labyrinthine layout
and bewildering exhibits, the MJT provides a natural “breaching experiment” in which concrete elements of the space disrupt
normal competencies for sustaining presumptions of intersubjectivity. Using ethnographic data on visitor interaction, this
article specifies two disruptive aspects of the physical environment and identifies four methods of repair on which visitors
rely to reestablish presumptions of intersubjectivity. The analysis of spatially situated processes of intersubjective disruption
and repair in an extreme case such as the MJT is a first step toward “emplacing” the intersubjectivity problem in more everyday
settings.
Robert S. Jansen is a Ph.D. candidate in Sociology at the University of California, Los Angeles. His interests include culture, nationalism, social movements, and the state. He is currently completing a dissertation on populism in Latin America and has recently published an article on memory entrepreneurship in the American Journal of Sociology entitled “Resurrection and Appropriation: Reputational Trajectories, Memory Work, and the Political Use of Historical Figures” (2007). 相似文献
Robert S. JansenEmail: |
Robert S. Jansen is a Ph.D. candidate in Sociology at the University of California, Los Angeles. His interests include culture, nationalism, social movements, and the state. He is currently completing a dissertation on populism in Latin America and has recently published an article on memory entrepreneurship in the American Journal of Sociology entitled “Resurrection and Appropriation: Reputational Trajectories, Memory Work, and the Political Use of Historical Figures” (2007). 相似文献