灾后重建过程中的社会工作介入

灾后重建工作是一项复杂的系统工程,社会工作以助人自助的专业价值理念,其服务领域相当广泛,灾害援救和灾后重建是社会工作介入的重要领域之一。社会工作运用专业方法对灾民进行科学的需求评估,确保灾民作为灾区重建的主体性地位;针对庞大的社会救助资源,社会工作合理统筹、整合资源,充当计划执行的协调者角色;针对灾区社会结构的破坏,通过社会工作的专业方法重建社会结构,重塑灾民场域。     

本土志愿者：灾后社会重建的重要内源力

灾后社会重建是一个长期复杂的过程,需要各方合力。来自灾区群众的本土志愿者,是灾后社会重建的重要内源力。本土志愿者队伍的培育,有利于发掘当地资源,带动受灾群众参与灾后重建,提升自我服务、自我管理能力,加快灾后重建进程。要多措并举,建立当地志愿者的社会支持系统、有效协调管理机制、运作机制和激励机制,保障志愿服务的可持续性、专业性和规范化发展。     

社会工作介入灾后特殊人群的专业角色

5·12汶川地震后的灾后重建工作,是一项长期而持久的工程。与医生、心理咨询师等职业各自担当的职责相较,灾后救助中的社会工作者专业特质在于整合灾民的环境资源、有效评估灾民需求、挖掘灾民的自身潜能、建立成熟的社会服务输送体系、     

灾后重建过程中的社会工作介入

灾后重建工作是一项复杂的系统工程,社会工作以“助人自助”的专业价值理念,其服务领域相当广泛,灾害援救和灾后重建是社会工作介入的重要领域之一。社会工作运用专业方法对灾民进行科学的需求评估,确保灾民作为灾区重建的主体性地位;针对庞大的社会救助资源,社会工作合理统筹、整合资源,充当计划执行的协调者角色;针对灾区社会结构的破坏,通过社会工作的专业方法重建社会结构,重塑灾民场域。     

社会工作介入灾后特殊人群的专业角色

5·12汶川地震后的灾后重建工作,是一项长期而持久的工程。与医生、心理咨询师等职业各自担当的职责相较,灾后救助中的社会工作者专业特质在于整合灾民的环境资源、有效评估灾民需求、挖掘灾民的自身潜能、建立成熟的社会服务输送体系、帮助恢复灾民的社会功能……等等。     

社会工作介入灾后特殊人群的专业角色

5·12汶川地震后的灾后重建工作,是一项长期而持久的工程。与医生、心理咨询师等职业各自担当的职责相较,灾后救助中的社会工作者专业特质在于整合灾民的环境资源、有效评估灾民需求、挖掘灾民的自身潜能、建立成熟的社会服务输送体系、帮助恢复灾民的社会功能……等等。     

社会工作介入灾后特殊人群的专业角色

5·12汶川地震后的灾后重建工作,是一项长期而持久的工程。与医生、心理咨询师等职业各自担当的职责相较,灾后救助中的社会工作者专业特质在于整合灾民的环境资源、有效评估灾民需求、挖掘灾民的自身潜能、建立成熟的社会服务输送体系、帮助恢复灾民的社会功能……等等。     

“青红社工”建构组织合法性的经验启示

距2008年5·12大地震已经有三年多时间，地震发生之后社会各界都给予灾区很大的关注，各类社会服务组织也奔赴四川等地开展服务工作。随着灾区建设稳步推进，一些社会组织也因种种原因逐步从灾区撤离。但部分服务机构仍坚守在灾区前线，与灾区人民一道，共同克服灾后重建过程中的困难。     

社会工作介入灾后特殊人群的专业角色

5·12汶川地震后的灾后重建工作,是一项长期而持久的工程。与医生、心理咨询师等职业各自担当的职责相较,灾后救助中的社会工作者专业物质在于整合灾民的环境资源、有效评估灾民需求、挖掘灾民的自身潜能、建立成熟的社会服务输送体系、帮助恢复灾民的社会功能……等等。     

社会工作介入灾后特殊人群的专业角色

5·12汶川地震后的灾后重建工作，是一项长期而持久的工程。与医生、心理咨询师等职业各自担当的职责相较，灾后救助中的社会工作者专业特质在于整合灾民的环境资源、有效评估灾民需求、挖掘灾民的自身。潜能、建立成熟的社会服务输送体系、帮助恢复灾民的社会功能……等等。     

灾区学校恢复重建与学校社会工作的有效介入——以重庆工商大学社工团队赴广元市嘉陵一中志愿服务为个案

地震灾区学校的恢复重建是眼前一项重要而紧迫的任务,学校社工的专业优势能够为灾区学校提供有品质的服务,促进灾后学校重建与发展。灾后学校社工志愿服务项目实施具有开创性和探索性,确保项目的服务品质,对于促进中国社会工作事业的发展具有极其深远的意义。文章以参与直接服务的经验,以被援助学校的工作实务为个案,探索有效介入灾后希望学校开展学校社工志愿服务和确保服务品质的方法。     

The impact of social transformation on the non-government welfare sector and the social work profession

This article examines changes to non-government social welfare, their impact on service delivery and on the social work profession. To redress the legacy of the past and the consequent inequalities in social welfare, in the first decade of democracy the government allocated the bulk of its welfare resources to transforming the social security system at the expense of social service delivery. As a result, South Africa has a costly social security budget with social services on the brink of collapse, leaving social workers and other social service professionals with low morale in the face of the huge challenge of providing welfare services with scarce resources, especially in the non-government sector. Nevertheless, social work remains an important role player in social development. From its marginalised position in the first decade of democracy, in the second decade it is repositioning itself as a recognised contributor to reconstruction and development in South Africa.     

Who Leaves Social Work?

Summary Turnover and wastage rates among social work staff are highand subject to marked variation between grades, locations andlocal authorities. Such high rates have a number of deleteriouseffects on the quality of social work, and consequently on clients,on the costs of delivering personal social services and on thegeneral administration and organization of social care. Employingdata on 13,750 basic grade field social workers employed byEnglish and Welsh local authority social services departmentsin 1974–75, turnover and wastage rates were predictedusing information on the personal characteristics of employeesand the workplace locations. The analyses revealed the importanceof age, sex, educational background, social work qualifications,length of service and workplace in determining the probabilitiesof changing social work jobs and leaving social work completely.     

Limits to professional practice in decentralized systems

The decentralization of welfare systems and the introduction of “community social work” may confront social workers with tasks they were not trained for and limit their ability to function professionally. The experience of other countries may be relevant to the debate about localism in Britain. In Israel, the publicly directed local community centres have shifted their focus from leisure to welfare services. Trained social workers were employed to initiate and implement personal, group and other local services using local resources and charging fees for services. They reported having difficulties in defining local needs and wants, and in finding congruent solutions for these needs. They also found it difficult to negotiate with community politicians and work with them. This paper describes the Israeli system of community service centres and indicates some obstacles concerning the knowledge, skills, and attitudes of social workers functioning in an independent, decentralized practice. It also raises some selected issues for future social policy and service administration.     

医务社会工作在构建医院人文服务体系中的作用

医务社会工作是体现医院人文服务的重要途径。以个案、小组、社区、义工等服务形式为主体的医务社会工作关注患者的心理情绪困扰,着重解决患者因疾病引起的各类心理与社会问题,实现真正意义上的"全人关怀"。构建医院人文服务体系是当前医院服务改革的方向,应把握医务社会工作的特点和医院人文服务体系的发展方向,发挥医务社会工作在构建医院人文服务体系中的重要作用。     

Family‐centered kindergarten social work services in Hong Kong: A pilot project

Social work services at schools in Hong Kong will begin a new chapter in kindergartens in 2018–2019 school year. Early childhood professionals have long considered family‐centered service delivery best practice. This paper reports a pioneer project on a family‐centered approach in kindergarten social work services in Hong Kong. The project was illustrated according to the following family‐centered principles: (a) The family as the unit of attention, (b) Linking families with community resources, (c) Flexible and individualized service provision, and (d) Creating partnerships and supportive relationships. The value and contributions of family‐centered social work services in kindergartens and implications for social work training in Hong Kong are discussed.     

农村民政社会工作的优势

民政社会工作是民政工作中具有社会工作意蕴的相关工作,以政府的行政性手段实施社会福利政策与社会福利服务。它在利他主义的发扬、信任关系的建立、乡土知识的运用、社会资源的引入等方面具有明显的优势,在农村社会工作专业化的过程中应得到继承和发展。     

社会工作督导：有效且必需

社会工作督导是社会工作的一种间接服务方法。社会服务机构的非营利性及其公信力需要社会服务机构对其员工进行行政性督导、教育性督导以及支持性督导，以促进机构目标的实现，服务质量的提高。