An Experimental Analysis of Capacity-Sensitive Setup Parameters for MRP Lot Sizing

Most material requirements planning (MRP) systems apply standard costing (absorption costing) approaches to define setup costs that are used as fixed (time invariant) setup parameters in single-level lot-sizing methods. This paper presents a computationally simple approach for estimating more appropriate setup parameters based on estimates of work-center shadow prices. These setup parameters then are used in traditional single-level MRP lot-sizing procedures. The shadow price of capacity at each work center is calculated as the increase in the overall inventory carrying cost for each additional hour of capacity lost to setups. The opportunity cost of a setup for an order subsequently is determined based on the routing information for each order and is used by traditional MRP lot-sizing procedures to calculate lot sizes. A simulation experiment compares the performance period order quantity lot sizing with capacity-sensitive setup parameters with the fixed accounting-based setup parameters. The simulation replicates the planning and control functions of a typical MRP system. The results of the experiment show that capacity-sensitive setup parameters can make significant reductions in both carrying cost and lateness and can achieve many of the benefits of optimized production technology in the context of an MRP system.     

Replanning the Master Production Schedule for a Capacity-Constrained Job Shop

This research examines the use of both frozen and replanning intervals for planning the master production schedule (MPS) for a capacity-constrained job shop. The results show that forecast error, demand lumpiness, setup time, planned lead time, and order size have a greater impact on the mean total backlog, total inventory, and number of setups than the frozen and replanning intervals. The study also shows that a repetitive lot dispatching rule reduces the importance of lot sizing, and a combination of repetitive lot dispatching rule and single-period order size consistently produces the lowest mean total backlog and total inventory. The results also indicate that rescheduling the open orders every period produces a lower mean total backlog and total inventory when the forecast errors are large relative to the order sizes. This result suggests that the due date of an open order should be updated only when a significant portion of the order is actually needed on the new due date.     

An Empirical Investigation of Costs in Batching Decisions*

This paper examines the use of costs and cost functions to model lot‐sizing decisions in batch manufacturing. The cost functions used to model a wide variety of manufacturing systems are typically derived from average cost models of unconstrained inventory problems. The use of setups and average inventories as the basis for modeling the economics of a typical batch manufacturing cell is shown to be inadequate. An alternative physical model that focuses on lead times provides a model that more closely represents the underlying value of such a cell.     

The resource constrained single-item inventory problem with demand-dependent unit cost

In this paper, we present an economic order quantity (EOQ) with both demand-dependent unit cost and restrictions. An analytical solution of the EQO is derived using a recent and simple method, which isthe geometric programming approach. The EOQ inventory model with demand-dependent unit cost without any restriction and the classical EOQ inventory model are obtained.     

Economic Manufacturing Quantity and Its Integrating Implications

Several contradictions are noted among the Economic Order Quantity (EOQ), Just‐In‐Time (JIT), and Optimized Production Technology (OPT) approaches and the economic framework for profit maximization. A fundamental model referred to as the Economic Manufacturing Quantity (EMO) is developed and examined for its integrating implications for the three approaches. An implication for the classic EOQ approach is that the balance between setup and inventory carrying costs is valid when a production facility is operating at or below a certain critical level but not when operating above that level. An implication for the JIT approach is that one must reduce setup cost at non‐bottlenecks and setup time at bottlenecks to reduce inventory. An implication for the OPT approach is that trade‐offs between setup and inventory carrying costs may indeed be ignored while determining process batch sizes, provided each facility in a production system is operating at or above Its critical level. Economic theoretic analysis of the EMO model provides a basis for unification of JIT which advocates stability in operating level as a key to improved productivity and quality, and OPT that advocates maximizing operating level with resultant emphasis on bottlenecks as a key to increased profits. This unifying basis states that a profit‐maximizing production facility or system will operate at the full and stable level as long as market demand remains relatively sensitive to price and operating at the full (maximum) level provides positive unit contribution.     

Optimizing multi-stage production with constant lot size and varying number of unequal sized batches

This paper describes a model for a multi-stage production/inventory system in which a uniform lot size is produced through all stages with a single setup and without interruption at each stage. Partial lots, called batches, may be transported to the next stage upon completion. The number of the unequal sized batches may differ across stages. Considering setup costs, inventory holding costs, and transportation costs, an optimization method is developed to determine the economic lot size and the optimal batch sizes for each stage. The method is illustrated by a computational example and further numerical simulations.     

A COMPARISON OF DIRECT COST SAVINGS BETWEEN FLEXIBLE AUTOMATION AND LABOR WITH LEARNING

This paper compares flexible automation with labor‐intensive manufacturing processes in a batch production environment and considers learning, forgetting, inventory carrying costs, setup costs, production demand volume, previous production experience, and the proportion of material to labor cost. While flexible automation typically can reduce setup times, and therefore inventory carrying costs through smaller optimal batch sizes, the results of this research show that the effect of forgetting on relative cost savings is difficult to predict in some situations. When using optimal lot sizes in both the automated and labor environments, cost savings from flexible automation may be smaller than expected or may occur in different ways than anticipated.     

Production lot sizing model with insufficient production capacity

A mathematical model is developed for determining the optimal number of batches for the production lot sizing problem where the production capacity is lower than the annual demand requirement. Setup time is included and it is assumed that consumption begins only after the entire batch is produced. The model is illustrated through an example.     

A simulation of single-level MRP lot sizing heuristics: an analysis of performance by rule

This paper presents the results of a large-scale computer simulation of 12 of the standard single-level, discrete demand lot sizing heuristics. The authors present the results in 3-D illustrations which depict the performance of these heuristics on 15 individual demand patterns. This information is prefaced by a brief review of the method used to perform the simulation. The performance of each of the 12 heuristics was evaluated for 51 sets of cost parameters for each of 15 different demand patterns. This has resulted in the analysis of 9180 combinations of heuristic, demand pattern, and cost parameters. The authors believe that this, by far, represents the largest digital simulation of single-level lot sizing rules completed to date. During the past two decades, a significant amount of research investigating the economics of lot sizing single-level discrete demand patterns has been conducted. However, many of the conclusions reached by individual research efforts on this subject have differed. At various times a lot sizing heuristic has performed best in one study, only to have findings refuted in a later analysis. Overall, this has led to a certain degree of confusion and mistrust of the heuristics themselves. The authors believe that there are three major reasons why previous research efforts have reached various conclusions. First, previous studies have included only subset of the possible heuristics. Second, previous studies have used different methods of calculating holding costs. Finally, previous studies have used demand patterns so short that a large percentage of transient noise is contained in the performance data.     

A joint economic lot size model for raw material ordering,manufacturing setup,and finished goods delivering

In this research we consider a single-manufacturer single-buyer supply chain problem where the manufacturer orders raw materials from its supplier, then using its manufacturing processes converts the raw materials to finished goods, and finally delivers the finished goods to its customer. The manufacturer produces the product in batches at a finite rate and periodically delivers the finished goods at a fixed lot size to its customer, who has a constant demand rate. An integrated inventory control model, making joint economic lot sizes of manufacturer's raw material ordering, production batch, and buyer's ordering, is developed to minimize the mean total cost per unit time of the raw materials ordering and holding, manufacturer's setup and finished goods holding, the buyer's ordering, and inventory holding. Numerical examples are also setup to illustrate that jointly considering the inventory costs above results in less mean total cost than that of considering them separately.     

Lot sizing in workload control systems

An important basis for workload control (WLC) is the existence of functional relationships between the mean level of work-in-process (WIP) and the values of important goal variables, like average flow time, capacity utilization, etc. These functional relationships are largely influenced by the lot sizes. This means that the usual objective of lot sizing must be supplemented by considering the impact of lot sizes on the relationships between WIP and the other goal variables. Here it is shown that this insight leads to flow time oriented lot sizing models. This type of lot sizing models is analysed. It is argued that the derivation of simple rules for lot sizing is an important research topic, and a model for deriving such rules is presented. Some rules are derived from the model, assuming that the batches are processed by an M/G/1 server, and it is shown that these rules support insights based on simulation in the 1980s. Topics for future research are outlined as well.     

Multi-item EOQ inventory model with varying holding cost under two restrictions: A geometric programming approach

In this paper we provide a simple method to determine the inventory policy of multiple items having varying holding cost using a geometric programming approach. The varying holding cost is considered to be a continuous function of the order quantity. The EOQ inventory model with constant holding cost and the classical EOQ inventory model without constraints are derived.     

供需不确定下基于MOI和VMI模式的供应链协同比较研究

为分析供应链运作机制对降低随机供应商产出和随机需求的影响,对比研究了两供应商-单制造商系统在MOI和VMI两种模式下的供应链协同模型。MOI模式下,制造商管理并持有库存,提出了供应风险共享的协同机制;VMI模式下,供应商管理并持有库存,提出了收益共享与额外惩罚的协同机制。分析了集中决策、MOI和VMI模式下的最优批量决策,证明了VMI模式下存在唯一的纳什均衡。研究还发现,VMI模式更容易协调供应链,有效降低供需不确定的影响。MOI模式下的供应链可实现帕累托改进,但不能实现协调;而当参数满足一定关系时,VMI模式下供应链的期望利润可达到集中决策。     

A Model for Resource Constrained Production and Inventory Management

We present a general model for multi-item production and inventory management problems that include a resource restriction. The decision variables in the model can take on a variety of interpretations, but will typically represent cycle times, production batch sizes, number of production runs, or order quantities for each item. We consider environments where item demand rates are approximately constant and performing an activity such as producing a batch of a product or placing an order results in the consumption of a scarceresource that is shared among the items. Some examples of shared resources include limited machine capacity, a restriction on the amount of money that can be tied up in stock, orlimited storage capacity. We focus on the case where the decision variables must be integer valued or selected from a discrete set of choices, such as when an integer number of production runs is desired for each item, or in order quantity problems where the items come in pack sizes containing more than one unit and, therefore, the order quantities must be an integer multiple of the pack sizes. We develop a heuristic and a branch and bound algorithm for solving the problem. The branch and bound algorithm includes reoptimization procedures and the heuristic to improve its performance. Computational testing indicates that the algorithms are effective for solving the general model.     

EOQ FORMULA: IS IT VALID UNDER INFLATIONARY CONDITIONS?

The classical analysis of the economic order quantity (EOQ) problem ignores the effect of inflation. When a firm's cost factors are expected to rise at an annual rate of 10 percent or more, what adjustments in order quantities should the firm make to control its lot-size inventory (or cycle stock)? Using a model that includes both inflationary trends and time discounting, it is concluded that inflation brings no incentive either to increase or to decrease order quantities. In addition, order quantities can be computed using the classical EOQ formula under inflationary conditions, provided that the cost of capital invested in inventory is interpreted as an inflation-free cost. This interpretation implies that changes in the inflation rate should not affect the cost of capital that is utilized in the EOQ formula for determining order quantities.     

Inventory‐Based Dynamic Pricing with Costly Price Adjustment

We study an average‐cost stochastic inventory control problem in which the firm can replenish inventory and adjust the price at anytime. We establish the optimality to change the price from low to high in each replenishment cycle as inventory is depleted. With costly price adjustment, scale economies of inventory replenishment are reflected in the cycle time instead of lot size—An increased fixed ordering cost leads to an extended replenishment cycle but does not necessarily increase the order quantity. A reduced marginal cost of ordering calls for an increased order quantity, as well as speeding up product selling within a cycle. We derive useful properties of the profit function that allows for reducing computational complexity of the problem. For systems requiring short replenishment cycles, the optimal solution can be easily computed by applying these properties. For systems requiring long replenishment cycles, we further consider a relaxed problem that is computational tractable. Under this relaxation, the sum of fixed ordering cost and price adjustment cost is equal to (greater than, less than) the total inventory holding cost within a replenishment cycle when the inventory holding cost is linear (convex, concave) in the stock level. Moreover, under the optimal solution, the time‐average profit is the same across all price segments when the inventory holding cost is accounted properly. Through a numerical study, we demonstrate that inventory‐based dynamic pricing can lead to significant profit improvement compared with static pricing and limited price adjustment can yield a benefit that is close to unlimited price adjustment. To be able to enjoy the benefit of dynamic pricing, however, it is important to appropriately choose inventory levels at which the price is revised.     

回收物流库存控制研究

本文探讨了包含回收品的库存系统。回收物流库存中既有一般生产过程的新产品,也有经再制造的回收品,使其最优库存策略非常复杂,论文推导出不同控制方式下的EOQ模型,以确定最优生产和再制造批量。此外,还对求得的最优批量进行适当的调整,以确保在循环周期中的定货次数为整数。该模型形式、结构简单易于在实践中应用。     

INVESTMENT IN SETUP COST,LEAD TIME,AND DEMAND PREDICTABILITY IMPROVEMENT IN THE EOQ MODEL

We study an economic order quantity/reorder point (EOQ/ROP) model with stochastic demand and backorders where options of investing in reducing setup cost, lead time, and variance of demand forecast errors are available. The model is quite comprehensive relative to previous models since it simultaneously addresses the strategic decisions associated with these three investment opportunities as well as the tactical decisions of determining both the lot size and the safety stock. We develop a simple search procedure to obtain the optimal values of setup cost, lead time, variance of demand forecast errors, order quantity, and safety stock multiplier. Computational studies are performed to determine the sensitivity of the optimal solution of the model to changes in the model's parameters.     

WIP inventories in the simultaneous determination of optimal production and purchase lot sizes

This paper studies an integrated production and purchasing lot sizing model with work-in-process WIP inventory. In this model, the single product is made in a multiprocess manufacturing system. The raw materials are procured from outside sources and are converted gradually into the product. A solution procedure is developed to simultaneously find the optimal lot sizes for the product and its raw materials and the corresponding total relevant cost. It is shown that if the cost of WIP inventory is considered in the production lot size computation, the optimal lot sizes of the product as well as those of the raw materials could be altered significantly.     

THE PERFORMANCE OF A SIMPLE INCREMENTAL LOT-SIZING RULE IN A MULTILEVEL INVENTORY ENVIRONMENT

A simple incremental cost approach to lot sizing was tested in a multilevel inventory environment. The incremental approach has not previously been tested in a large-scale study involving multiple product-structure levels. Using the Wagner-Whitin (WW) algorithm as a benchmark, the simple incremental rule (IPPA) was compared to three heuristic procedures (LFL, EOQ, and POQ) frequently used in material requirements planning (MRP) lot-sizing research. The incremental rule consistently generated lower total order/setup and carrying costs than the three heuristics across the 3,200 multilevel test situations examined. In many of the test situations, the incremental rule also outperformed the WW benchmark.