Comment on “Issues Involved With the Seasonal Adjustment of Economic Time Series” by William R. Bell and Steven C. Hiilmer

This article investigates the existence of multiple regimes in the U.S. economy during the 1923—1991 period. A technique known as regression tree analysis is applied to search for splits in the data, if any exist, rather than choosing a splitting point a priori as has been done in previous work. Using this technique, strong evidence for the existence of nonlinear behavior of U.S. output is found over this period. Monte Carlo results are presented to assess the significance of the regime changes that are found.     

Estimating means when sampling gives probabilities as well as values or “Looking a gift horse in the mouth”

Consider the random sampling of a discrete population. The observations, as they are collected one by one, are enhanced in that the probability mass associated with each observation is also observed. The goal is to estimate the population mean. Without this extra information about probability mass, the best general purpose estimator is the arithmetic average of the observations, XBAR. The issue is whether or not the extra information can be used to improve on XBAR. This paper examines the issues and offers four new estimators, each with its own strengths and liabilities. Some comparative performances of the four with XBAR are made.The motivating application is a Monte Carlo simulation that proceeds in two stages. The first stage independently samples n characteristics to obtain a configuration of some kind, together with a configuration probability p obtained, if desired, as a product of n individual probabilities. A relatively expensive calculation then determines an output X as a function of the configuration. A random sample of X could simply be averaged to estimate the mean output, but there are possibly more efficient estimators on account of the known configuration probabilities.     

Comment on “recent developments in bootstrapping time series”

The paper develops a general framework for identification, estimation, and hypothesis testing in cointegrated systems when the cointegrating coefficients are subject to (possibly) non-linear and cross-equation restrictions, obtained from economic theory or other relevant a priori information. It provides a proof of the consistency of the quasi maximum likelihood estimators (QMLE), establishes the relative rates of convergence of the QMLE of the short-run and the long-run parameters, and derives their asymptotic distributions; thus generalizing the results already available in the literature for the linear case. The paper also develops tests of the over-identifying (possibly) non-linear restrictions on the cointegrating vectors. The estimation and hypothesis testing procedures are applied to an Almost Ideal Demand System estimated on U.K. quarterly observations. Unlike many other studies of consumer demand this application does not treat relative prices and real per capita expenditures as exogenously given.     

Comment on “a new statistic for testing suspected outliers”

A new statistic proposed by Tiku (1975) is compared with the Ferguson (1961) and Pearson-Chandra Sekar (1936) statistics. A simulation suggests that the new statistic is not superior to the Pearson-Chandra Sekar statistic when performance is assessed by the power of the test against the Dixon (1950) alternative.     

Comment on “modeling asset returns with alternative stable distributions”

This paper considers a modified CUSUM test, suggested by Dufour (1982) for parameter instability and structural change with an unknown change point in a linear model with serially correlated disturbances, in which a preliminary estimate of the autoregressive coefficient for the error process is obtained, and used to transform the data. Then the standard CUSUM statistic is calculated on the transformed data. This paper derives the asymptotic distribution of the modified CUSUM test. We show that the modified CUSUM test retains its asymptotic significance level, i.e., the modified CUSUM test has the same asymptotic distribution as the CUSUM test with serially uncorrelated errors.     

Comment on “Exact Bayesian variable sampling plans for the exponential distribution with progressive hybrid censoring”

Lin et al. [Exact Bayesian variable sampling plans for the exponential distribution with progressive hybrid censoring, J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 81 (2011), pp. 873–882] claimed to have derived exact Bayesian sampling plans for exponential distributions with progressive hybrid censoring. We comment on the accuracy of the design parameters of their proposed sampling plans and the associated Bayes risks given in tables of Lin et al. [Exact Bayesian variable sampling plans for the exponential distribution with progressive hybrid censoring, J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 81 (2011), pp. 873–882]. Counter-examples to their claim are provided.     

Comment “On the role of data,statistics and decisions in a pandemic” by Jahn et al.

AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis - We comment the paper by Jahn et al. (On the role of data, statistics and decisions in a pandemic, 2022).     

Underdispersion models: Models that are “under the radar”

The Poisson distribution is a benchmark for modeling count data. Its equidispersion constraint, however, does not accurately represent real data. Most real datasets express overdispersion; hence attention in the statistics community focuses on associated issues. More examples are surfacing, however, that display underdispersion, warranting the need to highlight this phenomenon and bring more attention to those models that can better describe such data structures. This work addresses various sources of data underdispersion and surveys several distributions that can model underdispersed data, comparing their performance on applied datasets.     

Comment on “ estimating systems of trending variables”: estimating pushing trends and pulling equilibria

This paper is a comment on Soren Johansen's (1994) paper on estimating systems of trending variables. The pedagogical and diagnostic value of using univariate time series methods is emphasized together with the use of small scale experiments that give insight into the sensitivity of unit root test procedures to misspecification of the deterministic components. The test statistics used in the likelihood approach advocated by Johansen are compared with several other test statistics, in particular, those of Box and Tiao (1977) and Stock and Vatson (1988). We also compare the corresponding methods to estimate pulling equilibria. We present the outcomes of two Zlonte Carlo experiments to illustrate some points.