Fractional principal components regression: a general approach to biased estimators

Several biased estimators have been proposed as alternatives to the least squares estimator when multicollinearity is present in the multiple linear regression model. The ridge estimator and the principal components estimator are two techniques that have been proposed for such problems. In this paper the class of fractional principal component estimators is developed for the multiple linear regression model. This class contains many of the biased estimators commonly used to combat multicollinearity. In the fractional principal components framework, two new estimation techniques are introduced. The theoretical performances of the new estimators are evaluated and their small sample properties are compared via simulation with the ridge, generalized ridge and principal components estimators     

A characteristic function approach to the biased sampling model,with application to robust logistic regression

Many sampling problems from multiple populations can be considered under the semiparametric framework of the biased, or weighted, sampling model. Included under this framework is logistic regression under case–control sampling. For any model, atypical observations can greatly influence the maximum likelihood estimate of the parameters. Several robust alternatives have been proposed for the special case of logistic regression. However, some current techniques can exhibit poor behavior in many common situations. In this paper a new family of procedures are constructed to estimate the parameters in the semiparametric biased sampling model. The procedures incorporate a minimum distance approach, but are instead based on characteristic functions. The estimators can also be represented as the minimizers of quadratic forms in simple residuals, thus yielding straightforward computation. For the case of logistic regression, the resulting estimators are shown to be competitive with the existing robust approaches in terms of both robustness and efficiency, while maintaining affine equivariance. The approach is developed under the case–control sampling scheme, yet is shown to be applicable under prospective sampling logistic regression as well.     

Goodness-of-fit tests for parametric regression with selection biased data

Consider the nonparametric location-scale regression model Y=m(X)+σ(X)ε$Y=m(X)+\sigma (X)\epsilon$, where the error ε$\epsilon$ is independent of the covariate X$X$, and m$m$ and σ$\sigma$ are smooth but unknown functions. The pair (X,Y)$(X,Y)$ is allowed to be subject to selection bias. We construct tests for the hypothesis that m(·)$m(·)$ belongs to some parametric family of regression functions. The proposed tests compare the nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator (NPMLE) based on the residuals obtained under the assumed parametric model, with the NPMLE based on the residuals obtained without using the parametric model assumption. The asymptotic distribution of the test statistics is obtained. A bootstrap procedure is proposed to approximate the critical values of the tests. Finally, the finite sample performance of the proposed tests is studied in a simulation study, and the developed tests are applied on environmental data.     

Latent root regression: a biased regression methodology for use with collinear predictor variables

Many different biased regression techniques have been proposed for estimating parameters of a multiple linear regression model when the predictor variables are collinear. One particular alternative, latent root regression analysis, is a technique based on analyzing the latent roots and latent vectors of the correlation matrix of both the response and the predictor variables. It is the purpose of this paper to review the latent root regression estimator and to re-examine some of its properties and applications. It is shown that the latent root estimator is a member of a wider class of estimators for linear models     

An improved and efficient biased estimation technique in logistic regression model

Abstract

In this article, we propose a new improved and efficient biased estimation method which is a modified restricted Liu-type estimator satisfying some sub-space linear restrictions in the binary logistic regression model. We study the properties of the new estimator under the mean squared error matrix criterion and our results show that under certain conditions the new estimator is superior to some other estimators. Moreover, a Monte Carlo simulation study is conducted to show the performance of the new estimator in the simulated mean squared error and predictive median squared errors sense. Finally, a real application is considered.     

On identification of transfer function models by biased regression methods

This paper investigates a biased regression approach to the preliminary estimation of the Box-Jenkins transfer function weights. Using statistical simulation to generate time series, 14 estimators (various OLS, ridge and principal components estimators) are compared in terms of MSE and standard error of the weight estimators. The estimators are investigated for different levels of multicollinearity, signal-to-noise ratio, number of independent variables, length of time series and number of lags included in the estimation. The results show that the ridge estimators nearly always give lower MSE than the OLS estimator, and in the computationally difficult cases give much lower MSE than the OLS estimator. The principal components estimators can give lower MSE than the OLS, but also higher values. All biased estimators nearly always give much lower estimated standard error than OLS when estimating the weights.     

Minimax weights for generalised M‐estimation in biased regression models

The authors consider the construction of weights for Generalised M‐estimation. Such weights, when combined with appropriate score functions, afford protection from biases arising through incorrectly specified response functions, as well as from natural variation. The authors obtain minimax fixed weights of the Mallows type under the assumption that the density of the independent variables is correctly specified, and they obtain adaptive weights when this assumption is relaxed. A simulation study indicates that one can expect appreciable gains in precision when the latter weights are used and the various sources of model uncertainty are present.     

A simulation study of five biased estimators for straight line regression

Five biased estimators of the slope in straight line regression are considered. For each, the estimate of the “bias parameter”, k, is a function of N, the number of observations, and [rcirc]² , the square of the least squares estimate of the standardized slope, β. The estimators include that of Farebrother, the ridge estimator of Hoerl, Kennard, and Baldwin, Vinod's shrunken estimators., and a new modification of one of the latter. Properties of the estimators are studied for 13 combinations of N and 3. Results of simulation experiments provide empirical evidence concerning the values of means and variances of the biased estimators of the slope and estimates of the “bias parameter”, the mean square errors of the estimators, and the frequency of improvement relative to least squares. Adjustments to degrees of freedom in the biased regression analysis of variance table are also considered. An extension of the new modification to the case of p> 1 independent variables is presented in an Appendix.     

A comparison of biased regression estimators using a pitman nearness criterion

Biased regression estimators have traditionally benn studied using the Mean Square Error (MSE) criterion. Usually these comparisons have been based on the sum of the MSE's of each of the individual parameters, i.e., a scaler valued measure that is the trace of the MSE matrix. However, since this summed MSE does not consider the covariance structure of the estimators, we propose the use of a Pitman Measure of Closeness (PMC) criterion (Keating and Gupta, 1984; Keating and Mason, 1985). In this paper we consider two versions of PMC. One of these compares the estimates and the other compares the resultant predicted values for 12 different regression estimators. These estimators represent three classes of estimators, namely, ridge, shrunken, and principal component estimators. The comparisons of these estimators using the PMC criteria are contrasted with the usual MSE criteria as well as the prediction mean square error. Included in the estimators is a relatively new estimator termed the generalized principal component estimator proposed by Jolliffe. This estimator has previously received little attention in the literature.     

Non parametric regression estimations over Lp risk based on biased data

Using a wavelet basis, Chesneau and Shirazi study the estimation of one-dimensional regression functions in a biased non parametric model over L² risk (see Chesneau, C and Shirazi, E. Non parametric wavelet regression based on biased data, Communication in Statistics – Theory and Methods, 43: 2642–2658, 2014). This article considers d-dimensional regression function estimation over L^p?(1 ? p < ∞) risk. It turns out that our results reduce to the corresponding theorems of Chesneau and Shirazi’s theorems, when d = 1 and p = 2.     

An evaluation of biased estimators of regression coefficients—A simulation study

Different versions of generalized and ordinary ridge estimators and shrinkage estimators of regression coefficients are studied in comparison with least squares estimators using simulations. The results show that some of the biased estimators considered are better than the least squares estimator in general and the improvement is substantial in some cases.     

A new kind of stochastic restricted biased estimator for logistic regression model

In the logistic regression model, the variance of the maximum likelihood estimator is inflated and unstable when the multicollinearity exists in the data. There are several methods available in literature to overcome this problem. We propose a new stochastic restricted biased estimator. We study the statistical properties of the proposed estimator and compare its performance with some existing estimators in the sense of scalar mean squared criterion. An example and a simulation study are provided to illustrate the performance of the proposed estimator.KEYWORDS: Logistic regression, maximum likelihood estimator, mean squared error matrix, ridge regression, simulation study, stochastic restricted estimatorMathematics Subject Classifications: Primary 62J05, Secondary 62J07     

Robust extrapolation designs and weights for biased regression models with heteroscedastic errors

We consider the construction of designs for the extrapolation of regression responses, allowing both for possible heteroscedasticity in the errors and for imprecision in the specification of the response function. We find minimax designs and correspondingly optimal estimation weights in the context of the following problems: (1) for ordinary least squares estimation, determine a design to minimize the maximum value of the integrated mean squared prediction error (IMSPE), with the maximum being evaluated over both types of departure; (2) for weighted least squares estimation, determine both weights and a design to minimize the maximum IMSPE; (3) choose weights and design points to minimize the maximum IMSPE, subject to a side condition of unbiasedness. Solutions to (1) and (2) are given for multiple linear regression with no interactions, a spherical design space and an annular extrapolation space. For (3) the solution is given in complete generality; as one example we consider polynomial regression. Applications to a dose-response problem for bioassays are discussed. Numerical comparisons, including a simulation study, indicate that, as well as being easily implemented, the designs and weights for (3) perform as well as those for (1) and (2) and outperform some common competitors for moderate but undetectable amounts of model bias.     

Simulation-based consistent inference for biased working model of non-sparse high-dimensional linear regression

Variable selection in regression analysis is of importance because it can simplify model and enhance predictability. After variable selection, however, the resulting working model may be biased when it does not contain all of significant variables. As a result, the commonly used parameter estimation is either inconsistent or needs estimating high-dimensional nuisance parameter with very strong assumptions for consistency, and the corresponding confidence region is invalid when the bias is relatively large. We in this paper introduce a simulation-based procedure to reformulate a new model so as to reduce the bias of the working model, with no need to estimate high-dimensional nuisance parameter. The resulting estimators of the parameters in the working model are asymptotic normally distributed whether the bias is small or large. Furthermore, together with the empirical likelihood, we build simulation-based confidence regions for the parameters in the working model. The newly proposed estimators and confidence regions outperform existing ones in the sense of consistency.     

New biased estimators under the LINEX loss function

In this paper, using the asymmetric LINEX loss function we derive the risk function of the generalized Liu estimator and almost unbiased generalized Liu estimator. We also examine the risk performance of the feasible generalized Liu estimator and feasible almost unbiased generalized Liu estimator when the LINEX loss function is used.     

The unreasonable effectiveness of a biased logistic regression procedure in the analysis of pair-matched case-control studies

We examine the rationale of prospective logistic regression analysis for pair-matched case-control data using explicit, parametric terms for matching variables in the model. We show that this approach can yield inconsistent estimates for the disease-exposure odds ratio, even in large samples. Some special conditions are given under which the bias for the disease-exposure odds ratio is small. It is because these conditions are not too uncommon that this flawed analytic method appears to possess an (unreasonable) effectiveness.