Small Area Estimation via Multivariate Fay–Herriot Models with Latent Spatial Dependence

The Fay–Herriot model is a standard model for direct survey estimators in which the true quantity of interest, the superpopulation mean, is latent and its estimation is improved through the use of auxiliary covariates. In the context of small area estimation, these estimates can be further improved by borrowing strength across spatial regions or by considering multiple outcomes simultaneously. We provide here two formulations to perform small area estimation with Fay–Herriot models that include both multivariate outcomes and latent spatial dependence. We consider two model formulations. In one of these formulations the outcome‐by‐space dependence structure is separable. The other accounts for the cross dependence through the use of a generalized multivariate conditional autoregressive (GMCAR) structure. The GMCAR model is shown, in a state‐level example, to produce smaller mean square prediction errors, relative to equivalent census variables, than the separable model and the state‐of‐the‐art multivariate model with unstructured dependence between outcomes and no spatial dependence. In addition, both the GMCAR and the separable models give smaller mean squared prediction error than the state‐of‐the‐art model when conducting small area estimation on county level data from the American Community Survey.     

Bayesian Estimators for Small Area Models Shrinking Both Means and Variances

For small area estimation of area‐level data, the Fay–Herriot model is extensively used as a model‐based method. In the Fay–Herriot model, it is conventionally assumed that the sampling variances are known, whereas estimators of sampling variances are used in practice. Thus, the settings of knowing sampling variances are unrealistic, and several methods are proposed to overcome this problem. In this paper, we assume the situation where the direct estimators of the sampling variances are available as well as the sample means. Using this information, we propose a Bayesian yet objective method producing shrinkage estimation of both means and variances in the Fay–Herriot model. We consider the hierarchical structure for the sampling variances, and we set uniform prior on model parameters to keep objectivity of the proposed model. For validity of the posterior inference, we show under mild conditions that the posterior distribution is proper and has finite variances. We investigate the numerical performance through simulation and empirical studies.     

Conditional Akaike information criterion in the Fay–Herriot model

The Fay–Herriot model, a popular approach in small area estimation, uses relevant covariates to improve the inference for quantities of interest in small sub-populations. The conditional Akaike information (AI) (Vaida and Blanchard, 2005 [23]) in linear mixed-effect models with i.i.d. errors can be extended to the Fay–Herriot model for measuring prediction performance. In this paper, we derive the unbiased conditional AIC (cAIC) for three popular approaches to fitting the Fay–Herriot model. The three cAIC have closed forms and are convenient to implement. We conduct a simulation study to demonstrate their accuracy in estimating the conditional AI and superior performance in model selection than the classic AIC. We also apply the cAIC in estimating county-level prevalence rates of obesity for working-age Hispanic females in California.     

Small area estimation of mean price of habitation transaction using time-series and cross-sectional area-level models

In this paper, a new small domain estimator for area-level data is proposed. The proposed estimator is driven by a real problem of estimating the mean price of habitation transaction at a regional level in a European country, using data collected from a longitudinal survey conducted by a national statistical office. At the desired level of inference, it is not possible to provide accurate direct estimates because the sample sizes in these domains are very small. An area-level model with a heterogeneous covariance structure of random effects assists the proposed combined estimator. This model is an extension of a model due to Fay and Herriot [5], but it integrates information across domains and over several periods of time. In addition, a modified method of estimation of variance components for time-series and cross-sectional area-level models is proposed by including the design weights. A Monte Carlo simulation, based on real data, is conducted to investigate the performance of the proposed estimators in comparison with other estimators frequently used in small area estimation problems. In particular, we compare the performance of these estimators with the estimator based on the Rao–Yu model [23]. The simulation study also accesses the performance of the modified variance component estimators in comparison with the traditional ANOVA method. Simulation results show that the estimators proposed perform better than the other estimators in terms of both precision and bias.     

An Applied Comparison of Area-Level Linear Mixed Models in Small Area Estimation

This article reviews four area-level linear mixed models that borrow strength by exploiting the possible correlation among the neighboring areas or/and past time periods. Its main goal is to study if there are efficiency gains when a spatial dependence or/and a temporal autocorrelation among random-area effects are included into the models. The Fay–Herriot estimator is used as benchmark. A design-based simulation study based on real data collected from a longitudinal survey conducted by a statistical office is presented. Our results show that models that explore both spatial and chronological association considerably improve the efficiency of small area estimates.     

Empirical Uncertain Bayes Methods in Area‐level Models

Random effects model can account for the lack of fitting a regression model and increase precision of estimating area‐level means. However, in case that the synthetic mean provides accurate estimates, the prior distribution may inflate an estimation error. Thus, it is desirable to consider the uncertain prior distribution, which is expressed as the mixture of a one‐point distribution and a proper prior distribution. In this paper, we develop an empirical Bayes approach for estimating area‐level means, using the uncertain prior distribution in the context of a natural exponential family, which we call the empirical uncertain Bayes (EUB) method. The regression model considered in this paper includes the Poisson‐gamma and the binomial‐beta, and the normal‐normal (Fay–Herriot) model, which are typically used in small area estimation. We obtain the estimators of hyperparameters based on the marginal likelihood by using a well‐known expectation‐maximization algorithm and propose the EUB estimators of area means. For risk evaluation of the EUB estimator, we derive a second‐order unbiased estimator of a conditional mean squared error by using some techniques of numerical calculation. Through simulation studies and real data applications, we evaluate a performance of the EUB estimator and compare it with the usual empirical Bayes estimator.     

Bayesian Estimators for Small Area Models when Auxiliary Information is Measured with Error

Small area estimators in linear models are typically expressed as a convex combination of direct estimators and synthetic estimators from a suitable model. When auxiliary information used in the model is measured with error, a new estimator, accounting for the measurement error in the covariates, has been proposed in the literature. Recently, for area‐level model, Ybarra & Lohr (Biometrika, 95, 2008, 919) suggested a suitable modification to the estimates of small area means based on Fay & Herriot (J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 74, 1979, 269) model where some of the covariates are measured with error. They used a frequentist approach based on the method of moments. Adopting a Bayesian approach, we propose to rewrite the measurement error model as a hierarchical model; we use improper non‐informative priors on the model parameters and show, under a mild condition, that the joint posterior distribution is proper and the marginal posterior distributions of the model parameters have finite variances. We conduct a simulation study exploring different scenarios. The Bayesian predictors we propose show smaller empirical mean squared errors than the frequentist predictors of Ybarra & Lohr (Biometrika, 95, 2008, 919), and they seem also to be more stable in terms of variability and bias. We apply the proposed methodology to two real examples.     

Accurate Confidence Interval Estimation of Small Area Parameters Under the Fay–Herriot Model

Small area estimation has long been a popular and important research topic due to its growing demand in public and private sectors. We consider here the basic area level model, popularly known as the Fay–Herriot model. Although much of current research is predominantly focused on second order unbiased estimation of mean squared prediction errors, we concentrate on developing confidence intervals (CIs) for the small area means that are second order correct. The corrected CI can be readily implemented, because it only requires quantities that are already estimated as part of the mean squared error estimation. We extend the approach to a CI for the difference of two small area means. The findings are illustrated with a simulation study.     

Tests for the variance parameter in the Fay–Herriot model

The Fay–Herriot model is a linear mixed model that plays a relevant role in small area estimation (SAE). Under the SAE set-up, tools for selecting an adequate model are required. Applied statisticians are often interested on deciding if it is worthwhile to use a mixed effect model instead of a simpler fixed-effect model. This problem is not standard because under the null hypothesis the random effect variance is on the boundary of the parameter space. The likelihood ratio test and the residual likelihood ratio test are proposed and their finite sample distributions are derived. Finally, we analyse their behaviour under simulated scenarios and we also apply them to real data.     

Small-area estimation by combining time-series and cross-sectional data

A model involving autocorrelated random effects and sampling errors is proposed for small-area estimation, using both time-series and cross-sectional data. The sampling errors are assumed to have a known block-diagonal covariance matrix. This model is an extension of a well-known model, due to Fay and Herriot (1979), for cross-sectional data. A two-stage estimator of a small-area mean for the current period is obtained under the proposed model with known autocorrelation, by first deriving the best linear unbiased prediction estimator assuming known variance components, and then replacing them with their consistent estimators. Extending the approach of Prasad and Rao (1986, 1990) for the Fay-Herriot model, an estimator of mean squared error (MSE) of the two-stage estimator, correct to a second-order approximation for a small or moderate number of time points, T, and a large number of small areas, m, is obtained. The case of unknown autocorrelation is also considered. Limited simulation results on the efficiency of two-stage estimators and the accuracy of the proposed estimator of MSE are présentés.     

Benchmarked linear shrinkage prediction in the Fay–Herriot small area model

The empirical best linear unbiased predictor (EBLUP) is a linear shrinkage of the direct estimate toward the regression estimate and useful for the small area estimation in the sense of increasing precision of estimation of small area means. However, one potential difficulty of EBLUP is that the overall estimate for a larger geographical area based on a sum of EBLUP is not necessarily identical to the corresponding direct estimate like the overall sample mean. To fix this problem, the paper suggests a new method for benchmarking EBLUP in the Fay–Herriot model without assuming normality of random effects and sampling errors. The resulting benchmarked empirical linear shrinkage (BELS) predictor has novelty in the sense that coefficients for benchmarking are adjusted based on the data from each area. To measure the uncertainty of BELS, the second-order unbiased estimator of the mean squared error is derived.     

Robust linear mixed models for Small Area Estimation

Hierarchical models are popular in many applied statistics fields including Small Area Estimation. One well known model employed in this particular field is the Fay–Herriot model, in which unobservable parameters are assumed to be Gaussian. In Hierarchical models assumptions about unobservable quantities are difficult to check. For a special case of the Fay–Herriot model, Sinharay and Stern [2003. Posterior predictive model checking in Hierarchical models. J. Statist. Plann. Inference 111, 209–221] showed that violations of the assumptions about the random effects are difficult to detect using posterior predictive checks. In this present paper we consider two extensions of the Fay–Herriot model in which the random effects are assumed to be distributed according to either an exponential power (EP) distribution or a skewed EP distribution. We aim to explore the robustness of the Fay–Herriot model for the estimation of individual area means as well as the empirical distribution function of their ‘ensemble’. Our findings, which are based on a simulation experiment, are largely consistent with those of Sinharay and Stern as far as the efficient estimation of individual small area parameters is concerned. However, when estimating the empirical distribution function of the ‘ensemble’ of small area parameters, results are more sensitive to the failure of distributional assumptions.     

Small area estimation under unit-level temporal linear mixed models

Data from past time periods and temporal correlation are rich sources of information for estimating small area parameters at the current period. This paper investigates the use of unit-level temporal linear mixed models for estimating linear parameters. Two models are considered, with domain and domain-time random effects. The first model assumes time independency and the second one AR(1)-type time correlation. They are fitted by a Fisher-scoring algorithm that calculates the residual maximum likelihood estimators of the model parameters. Based on the introduced models, empirical best linear unbiased predictors of small area linear parameters are studied, and analytic estimators for evaluating the performance of their mean squared errors are proposed. Three simulation experiments are carried out to study the behaviour of the fitting algorithm, the small area predictors and the estimators of the mean squared error. By using data of the Spanish surveys of income and living conditions of 2004–2008, an application to the estimation of 2008 average normalized net annual incomes in Spanish provinces by sex is given.     

Empirical best linear unbiased and empirical Bayes prediction in multivariate small area estimation

Small area estimation plays a prominent role in survey sampling due to a growing demand for reliable small area estimates from both public and private sectors. Popularity of model-based inference is increasing in survey sampling, particularly, in small area estimation. The estimates of the small area parameters can profitably ‘borrow strength’ from data on related multiple characteristics and/or auxiliary variables from other neighboring areas through appropriate models. Fay (1987, Small Area Statistics, Wiley, New York, pp. 91–102) proposed multivariate regression for small area estimation of multiple characteristics. The success of this modeling rests essentially on the strength of correlation of these dependent variables. To estimate small area mean vectors of multiple characteristics, multivariate modeling has been proposed in the literature via a multivariate variance components model. We use this approach to empirical best linear unbiased and empirical Bayes prediction of small area mean vectors. We use data from Battese et al. (1988, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 83, 28 –36) to conduct a simulation which shows that the multivariate approach may achieve substantial improvement over the usual univariate approach.     

Marginal zero-inflated regression models for count data

Data sets with excess zeroes are frequently analyzed in many disciplines. A common framework used to analyze such data is the zero-inflated (ZI) regression model. It mixes a degenerate distribution with point mass at zero with a non-degenerate distribution. The estimates from ZI models quantify the effects of covariates on the means of latent random variables, which are often not the quantities of primary interest. Recently, marginal zero-inflated Poisson (MZIP; Long et al. [A marginalized zero-inflated Poisson regression model with overall exposure effects. Stat. Med. 33 (2014), pp. 5151–5165]) and negative binomial (MZINB; Preisser et al., 2016) models have been introduced that model the mean response directly. These models yield covariate effects that have simple interpretations that are, for many applications, more appealing than those available from ZI regression. This paper outlines a general framework for marginal zero-inflated models where the latent distribution is a member of the exponential dispersion family, focusing on common distributions for count data. In particular, our discussion includes the marginal zero-inflated binomial (MZIB) model, which has not been discussed previously. The details of maximum likelihood estimation via the EM algorithm are presented and the properties of the estimators as well as Wald and likelihood ratio-based inference are examined via simulation. Two examples presented illustrate the advantages of MZIP, MZINB, and MZIB models for practical data analysis.     

What Level of Statistical Model Should We Use in Small Area Estimation?

If unit‐level data are available, small area estimation (SAE) is usually based on models formulated at the unit level, but they are ultimately used to produce estimates at the area level and thus involve area‐level inferences. This paper investigates the circumstances under which using an area‐level model may be more effective. Linear mixed models (LMMs) fitted using different levels of data are applied in SAE to calculate synthetic estimators and empirical best linear unbiased predictors (EBLUPs). The performance of area‐level models is compared with unit‐level models when both individual and aggregate data are available. A key factor is whether there are substantial contextual effects. Ignoring these effects in unit‐level working models can cause biased estimates of regression parameters. The contextual effects can be automatically accounted for in the area‐level models. Using synthetic and EBLUP techniques, small area estimates based on different levels of LMMs are investigated in this paper by means of a simulation study.     

On the Computation and Finite Sample Behavior of the Constrained M-Estimates for Multivariate Location and Scatter

Abstract

Constrained M (CM) estimates of multivariate location and scatter [Kent, J. T., Tyler, D. E. (1996). Constrained M-estimation for multivariate location and scatter. Ann. Statist. 24:1346–1370] are defined as the global minimum of an objective function subject to a constraint. These estimates combine the good global robustness properties of the S estimates and the good local robustness properties of the redescending M estimates. The CM estimates are not explicitly defined. Numerical methods have to be used to compute the CM estimates. In this paper, we give an algorithm to compute the CM estimates. Using the algorithm, we give a small simulation study to demonstrate the capability of the algorithm finding the CM estimates, and also to explore the finite sample behavior of the CM estimates. We also use the CM estimators to estimate the location and scatter parameters of some multivariate data sets to see the performance of the CM estimates dealing with the real data sets that may contain outliers.     

Estimation of nonlinear CUB models via numerical optimization and EM algorithm

The analysis of human perceptions is often carried out by resorting to surveys and questionnaires, where respondents are asked to express ratings about the objects being evaluated. A class of mixture models, called CUB (Combination of Uniform and shifted Binomial), has been recently proposed in this context. This article focuses on a model of this class, the Nonlinear CUB, and investigates some computational issues concerning parameter estimation, which is performed by Maximum Likelihood. More specifically, we consider two main approaches to optimize the log-likelihood: the classical numerical methods of optimization and the EM algorithm. The classical numerical methods comprise the widely used algorithms Nelder–Mead, Newton–Raphson, Broyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shanno (BFGS), Berndt–Hall–Hall–Hausman (BHHH), Simulated Annealing, Conjugate Gradients and usually have the advantage of a fast convergence. On the other hand, the EM algorithm deserves consideration for some optimality properties in the case of mixture models, but it is slower. This article has a twofold aim: first we show how to obtain explicit formulas for the implementation of the EM algorithm in nonlinear CUB models and we formally derive the asymptotic variance–covariance matrix of the Maximum Likelihood estimator; second, we discuss and compare the performance of the two above mentioned approaches to the log-likelihood maximization.     

On Measuring Uncertainty of Benchmarked Predictors with Application to Disease Risk Estimate

Empirical Bayes (EB) estimates in general linear mixed models are useful for the small area estimation in the sense of increasing precision of estimation of small area means. However, one potential difficulty of EB is that the overall estimate for a larger geographical area based on a (weighted) sum of EB estimates is not necessarily identical to the corresponding direct estimate such as the overall sample mean. Another difficulty is that EB estimates yield over‐shrinking, which results in the sampling variance smaller than the posterior variance. One way to fix these problems is the benchmarking approach based on the constrained empirical Bayes (CEB) estimators, which satisfy the constraints that the aggregated mean and variance are identical to the requested values of mean and variance. In this paper, we treat the general mixed models, derive asymptotic approximations of the mean squared error (MSE) of CEB and provide second‐order unbiased estimators of MSE based on the parametric bootstrap method. These results are applied to natural exponential families with quadratic variance functions. As a specific example, the Poisson‐gamma model is dealt with, and it is illustrated that the CEB estimates and their MSE estimates work well through real mortality data.     

Small sample comparison of six bivariate survival curve estimators 1

We study the performance of six proposed bivariate survival curve estimators on simulated right censored data. The performance of the estimators is compared for data generated by three bivariate models with exponential marginal distributions. The estimators are compared in their ability to estimate correlations and survival functions probabilities. Simulated data results are presented so that the proposed estimators in this relatively new area of analysis can be explicitly compared to the known distribution of the data and the parameters of the underlying model. The results show clear differences in the performance of the estimators.