Bayesian bandwidth estimation for a functional nonparametric regression model with mixed types of regressors and unknown error density

We investigate the issue of bandwidth estimation in a functional nonparametric regression model with function-valued, continuous real-valued and discrete-valued regressors under the framework of unknown error density. Extending from the recent work of Shang (2013 Shang, H.L. (2013), ‘Bayesian Bandwidth Estimation for a Nonparametric Functional Regression Model with Unknown Error Density’, Computational Statistics &; Data Analysis, 67, 185–198. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2013.05.006[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) [‘Bayesian Bandwidth Estimation for a Nonparametric Functional Regression Model with Unknown Error Density’, Computational Statistics &; Data Analysis, 67, 185–198], we approximate the unknown error density by a kernel density estimator of residuals, where the regression function is estimated by the functional Nadaraya–Watson estimator that admits mixed types of regressors. We derive a likelihood and posterior density for the bandwidth parameters under the kernel-form error density, and put forward a Bayesian bandwidth estimation approach that can simultaneously estimate the bandwidths. Simulation studies demonstrated the estimation accuracy of the regression function and error density for the proposed Bayesian approach. Illustrated by a spectroscopy data set in the food quality control, we applied the proposed Bayesian approach to select the optimal bandwidths in a functional nonparametric regression model with mixed types of regressors.     

Heteroskedasticity Robust Panel Unit Root Testing Under Variance Breaks in Pooled Regressions

Noting that many economic variables display occasional shifts in their second order moments, we investigate the performance of homogenous panel unit root tests in the presence of permanent volatility shifts. It is shown that in this case the test statistic proposed by Herwartz and Siedenburg (2008 Herwartz, H., Siedenburg, F. (2008). Homogenous panel unit root tests under cross-sectional dependence: Finite sample modifications and the wild bootstrap. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 53(1):137–150.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) is asymptotically standard Gaussian. By means of a simulation study we illustrate the performance of first and second generation panel unit root tests and undertake a more detailed comparison of the test in Herwartz and Siedenburg (2008 Herwartz, H., Siedenburg, F. (2008). Homogenous panel unit root tests under cross-sectional dependence: Finite sample modifications and the wild bootstrap. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 53(1):137–150.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) and its heteroskedasticity consistent Cauchy counterpart introduced in Demetrescu and Hanck (2012a Demetrescu, M., Hanck, C. (2012a). A simple nonstationary-volatility robust panel unit root test. Economics Letters 117(2):10–13.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). As an empirical illustration, we reassess evidence on the Fisher hypothesis with data from nine countries over the period 1961Q2–2011Q2. Empirical evidence supports panel stationarity of the real interest rate for the entire subperiod. With regard to the most recent two decades, the test results cast doubts on market integration, since the real interest rate is diagnosed nonstationary.     

A comparison of alternative methods to construct confidence intervals for the estimate of a break date in linear regression models

This article considers constructing confidence intervals for the date of a structural break in linear regression models. Using extensive simulations, we compare the performance of various procedures in terms of exact coverage rates and lengths of the confidence intervals. These include the procedures of Bai (1997 Bai, J. (1997). Estimation of a change point in multiple regressions. Review of Economics and Statistics 79:551–563.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) based on the asymptotic distribution under a shrinking shift framework, Elliott and Müller (2007 Elliott, G., Müller, U. (2007). Confidence sets for the date of a single break in linear time series regressions. Journal of Econometrics 141:1196–1218.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) based on inverting a test locally invariant to the magnitude of break, Eo and Morley (2015 Eo, Y., Morley, J. (2015). Likelihood-ratio-based confidence sets for the timing of structural breaks. Quantitative Economics 6:463–497.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) based on inverting a likelihood ratio test, and various bootstrap procedures. On the basis of achieving an exact coverage rate that is closest to the nominal level, Elliott and Müller's (2007 Elliott, G., Müller, U. (2007). Confidence sets for the date of a single break in linear time series regressions. Journal of Econometrics 141:1196–1218.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) approach is by far the best one. However, this comes with a very high cost in terms of the length of the confidence intervals. When the errors are serially correlated and dealing with a change in intercept or a change in the coefficient of a stationary regressor with a high signal-to-noise ratio, the length of the confidence interval increases and approaches the whole sample as the magnitude of the change increases. The same problem occurs in models with a lagged dependent variable, a common case in practice. This drawback is not present for the other methods, which have similar properties. Theoretical results are provided to explain the drawbacks of Elliott and Müller's (2007 Elliott, G., Müller, U. (2007). Confidence sets for the date of a single break in linear time series regressions. Journal of Econometrics 141:1196–1218.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) method.     

Evaluating the relative merits of competing models based on empirical likelihood ratio test

Competing models arise naturally in many research fields, such as survival analysis and economics, when the same phenomenon of interest is explained by different researcher using different theories or according to different experiences. The model selection problem is therefore remarkably important because of its great importance to the subsequent inference; Inference under a misspecified or inappropriate model will be risky. Existing model selection tests such as Vuong's tests [26 Q.H. Vuong, Likelihood ratio test for model selection and non-nested hypothesis, Econometrica 57 (1989), pp. 307–333. doi: 10.2307/1912557[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]] and Shi's non-degenerate tests [21 X. Shi, A non-degenerate Vuong test, Quant. Econ. 6 (2015), pp. 85–121. doi: 10.3982/QE382[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]] suffer from the variance estimation and the departure of the normality of the likelihood ratios. To circumvent these dilemmas, we propose in this paper an empirical likelihood ratio (ELR) tests for model selection. Following Shi [21 X. Shi, A non-degenerate Vuong test, Quant. Econ. 6 (2015), pp. 85–121. doi: 10.3982/QE382[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]], a bias correction method is proposed for the ELR tests to enhance its performance. A simulation study and a real-data analysis are provided to illustrate the performance of the proposed ELR tests.     

Longitudinal profiles of bounded outcome scores as predictors for disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis patients: a joint modeling approach

A variety of statistical approaches have been suggested in the literature for the analysis of bounded outcome scores (BOS). In this paper, we suggest a statistical approach when BOSs are repeatedly measured over time and used as predictors in a regression model. Instead of directly using the BOS as a predictor, we propose to extend the approaches suggested in [16 E. Lesaffre, D. Rizopoulos, and R. Tsonaka, The logistics-transform for bounded outcome scores, Biostatistics 8 (2007), pp. 72–85. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxj034[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar],21 M. Molas and E. Lesaffre, A comparison of the three random effects approaches to analyse repeated bounded outcome scores with an application in a stroke revalidation study, Stat. Med. 27 (2008), pp. 6612–6633. doi: 10.1002/sim.3432[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar],28 R. Tsonaka, D. Rizopoulos, and E. Lesaffre, Power and sample size calculations for discrete bounded outcome scores, Stat. Med. 25 (2006), pp. 4241–4252. doi: 10.1002/sim.2679[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]] to a joint modeling setting. Our approach is illustrated on longitudinal profiles of multiple patients’ reported outcomes to predict the current clinical status of rheumatoid arthritis patients by a disease activities score of 28 joints (DAS28). Both a maximum likelihood as well as a Bayesian approach is developed.     

Likelihood-based panel cointegration test in the presence of a linear time trend and cross-sectional dependence

This article proposes a new likelihood-based panel cointegration rank test which extends the test of Örsal and Droge (2014 Örsal, D. D. K., Droge, B. (2014). Panel cointegration testing in the presence of a time trend. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 76:377–390.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) (henceforth panel SL test) to dependent panels. The dependence is modelled by unobserved common factors which affect the variables in each cross-section through heterogeneous loadings. The data are defactored following the panel analysis of nonstationarity in idiosyncratic and common components (PANIC) approach of Bai and Ng (2004 Bai, J., Ng, S. (2004). A PANIC attack on unit roots and cointegration. Econometrica 72(4):1127–1177.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) and the cointegrating rank of the defactored data is then tested by the panel SL test. A Monte Carlo study demonstrates that the proposed testing procedure has reasonable size and power properties in finite samples.     

The Identification of Potential Longitudinal Biomarkers and Measurements of Effectiveness for Biomarkers as Surrogates in Multivariate Survival Data

A proposed method based on frailty models is used to identify longitudinal biomarkers or surrogates for a multivariate survival. This method is an extention of earlier models by Wulfsohn and Tsiatis (1997 Wulfsohn , M. S. , Tsiatis , A. A. ( 1997 ). A joint model for survival and longitudinal data measured with error . Biometrics 53 ( 1 ): 330 – 339 .[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) and Song et al. (2002 Song , X. , Davidian , M. , Tsiatis , A. A. ( 2002 ). A Semiparametric likelihood approach to joint modeling of longitudinal and time-to-event data . Biometrics 58 ( 4 ): 742 – 753 .[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). In this article, similar to Henderson et al. (2002 Henderson , R. , Diggle , P. J. , Dobson , A. ( 2002 ). Identification and efficacy of longitudinal markers for survival . Biostatistics 3 ( 1 ): 33 – 50 .[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), a joint likelihood function combines the likelihood functions of the longitudinal biomarkers and the multivariate survival times. We use simulations to explore how the number of individuals, the number of time points per individual and the functional form of the random effects from the longitudianl biomarkers influence the power to detect the association of a longitudinal biomarker and the multivariate survival time. The proposed method is illustrate by using the gastric cancer data.     

Bivariate Continuous Distributions with Specified Conditional Hazard Functions

Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) is the standard procedure for comparing several treatments when the response variable depends on one or more covariates. We consider the problem of testing the equality of treatment effects when the variances are not assumed to be equal. It is well known that classical F test is not robust with respect to the assumption of equal variances and may lead to misleading conclusions if the variances are not equal. Ananda (1998 Ananda , M. M. A. ( 1998 ). Bayesian and non-Bayesian solutions to analysis of covariance models under heteroscedasticity . J. Econometrics 86 : 177 – 192 .[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) developed a generalized F test for testing the equality of treatment effects. However, simulation studies show that the actual size of this test can be much higher than the nominal level when the sample sizes are small, particularly when the number of treatments is large. In this article, we develop a test using the parametric bootstrap approach of Krishnamoorthy et al. (2007 Krishnamoorthy , K. , Lu , F. , Mathew , T. ( 2007 ). A parametric bootstrap approach for ANOVA with unequal variances: Fixed and random models . Computat. Statist. Data Anal. 51 : 5731 – 5742 .[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). Our simulations show that the actual size of our proposed test is close to the nominal level, irrespective of the number of treatments and sample sizes. Our simulations also indicate that our proposed PB test is more robust, with respect to the assumption of normality, than the generalized F test. Therefore, our proposed PB test provides a satisfactory alternative to the generalized F test.     

Testing for sphericity in a two-way error components panel data model

This article is concerned with sphericity test for the two-way error components panel data model. It is found that the John statistic and the bias-corrected LM statistic recently developed by Baltagi et al. (2011 Baltagi, B. H., Feng, Q., Kao, C. (2011). Testing for sphericity in a fixed effects panel data model. Econometrics Journal 14:25–47.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar])Baltagi et al. (2012 Baltagi, B. H., Feng, Q., Kao, C. (2012). A Lagrange multiplier test for cross-sectional dependence in a fixed effects panel data model. Journal of Econometrics 170:164–177.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar], which are based on the within residuals, are not helpful under the present circumstances even though they are in the one-way fixed effects model. However, we prove that when the within residuals are properly transformed, the resulting residuals can serve to construct useful statistics that are similar to those of Baltagi et al. (2011 Baltagi, B. H., Feng, Q., Kao, C. (2011). Testing for sphericity in a fixed effects panel data model. Econometrics Journal 14:25–47.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar])Baltagi et al. (2012 Baltagi, B. H., Feng, Q., Kao, C. (2012). A Lagrange multiplier test for cross-sectional dependence in a fixed effects panel data model. Journal of Econometrics 170:164–177.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). Simulation results show that the newly proposed statistics perform well under the null hypothesis and several typical alternatives.     

Covariance Matrix Formula for Exponential Family Nonlinear Models

This article gives a matrix formula for second-order covariances of maximum likelihood estimators in exponential family nonlinear models, thus generalizing the result of Cordeiro (2004 Cordeiro , G. M. ( 2004 ). Second-order covariance matrix of maximum likelihood estimates in generalized linear models . Statist. Probab. Lett. 66 : 153 – 160 .[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) valid for generalized linear models with known dispersion parameter. Some simulations show that the second-order covariances for exponential family nonlinear models can be quite pronounced in small to moderate sample sizes.     

Optimal network design for Bayesian spatial prediction of multivariate non-Gaussian environmental data

This paper deals with the problem of increasing air pollution monitoring stations in Tehran city for efficient spatial prediction. As the data are multivariate and skewed, we introduce two multivariate skew models through developing the univariate skew Gaussian random field proposed by Zareifard and Jafari Khaledi [21 H. Zareifard and M. Jafari Khaledi, Non-Gaussian modeling of spatial data using scale mixing of a unified skew Gaussian process, J. Multivariate Anal. 114 (2013), pp. 16–28. doi: 10.1016/j.jmva.2012.07.003[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]]. These models provide extensions of the linear model of coregionalization for non-Gaussian data. In the Bayesian framework, the optimal network design is found based on the maximum entropy criterion. A Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm is developed to implement posterior inference. Finally, the applicability of two proposed models is demonstrated by analyzing an air pollution data set.     

A Bayesian approach to analyse overdispersed longitudinal count data

In this paper, we consider a model for repeated count data, with within-subject correlation and/or overdispersion. It extends both the generalized linear mixed model and the negative-binomial model. This model, proposed in a likelihood context [17 G. Molenberghs, G. Verbeke, and C.G.B. Demétrio, An extended random-effects approach to modeling repeated, overdispersion count data, Lifetime Data Anal. 13 (2007), pp. 457–511.[Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar],18 G. Molenberghs, G. Verbeke, C.G.B. Demétrio, and A. Vieira, A family of generalized linear models for repeated measures with normal and conjugate random effects, Statist. Sci. 25 (2010), pp. 325–347. doi: 10.1214/10-STS328[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]] is placed in a Bayesian inferential framework. An important contribution takes the form of Bayesian model assessment based on pivotal quantities, rather than the often less adequate DIC. By means of a real biological data set, we also discuss some Bayesian model selection aspects, using a pivotal quantity proposed by Johnson [12 V.E. Johnson, Bayesian model assessment using pivotal quantities, Bayesian Anal. 2 (2007), pp. 719–734. doi: 10.1214/07-BA229[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]].     

Stochastic Comparisons and Optimal Allocation for Policy Limits and Deductibles

In this article, we discuss about the stochastic comparisons and optimal allocation for policy limits and deductibles. We order the total retained losses of a policyholder in the usual stochastic order under more general conditions of X _i (i = 1,…, n), based on which the optimal allocation of policy limits and deductibles are achieved in some special cases. Several results in Cheung (2007 Cheung , K. C. ( 2007 ). Optimal allocation of policy limits and deductibles . Insur. Math. Econ. 41 : 291 – 382 .[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) and Lu and Meng (2011 Lu , Z. , Meng , L. ( 2011 ). Stochastic comparisons for allocations of policy limits and deductibles with applications . Insur. Math. Econ. 48 : 338 – 343 .[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) are generalized here.     

First difference transformation in panel VAR models: Robustness,estimation, and inference

This article considers estimation of Panel Vector Autoregressive Models of order 1 (PVAR(1)) with focus on fixed T consistent estimation methods in First Differences (FD) with additional strictly exogenous regressors. Additional results for the Panel FD ordinary least squares (OLS) estimator and the FDLS type estimator of Han and Phillips (2010 Han, C., Phillips, P. C. B. (2010). Gmm estimation for dynamic panels with fixed effects and strong instruments at unity. Econometric Theory 26:119–151.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) are provided. Furthermore, we simplify the analysis of Binder et al. (2005 Binder, M., Hsiao, C., Pesaran, M. H. (2005). Estimation and inference in short panel vector autoregressions with unit root and cointegration. Econometric Theory 21:795–837.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) by providing additional analytical results and extend the original model by taking into account possible cross-sectional heteroscedasticity and presence of strictly exogenous regressors. We show that in the three wave panel the log-likelihood function of the unrestricted Transformed Maximum Likelihood (TML) estimator might violate the global identification assumption. The finite-sample performance of the analyzed methods is investigated in a Monte Carlo study.     

Empirical Likelihood Ratio for Linear Transformation Models with Doubly Censored Data

Double censoring arises when T represents an outcome variable that can only be accurately measured within a certain range, [L, U], where L and U are the left- and right-censoring variables, respectively. When L is always observed, we consider the empirical likelihood inference for linear transformation models, based on the martingale-type estimating equation proposed by Chen et al. (2002 Chen , K. , Jin , Z. , Ying , Z. ( 2002 ). Semiparametric analysis of transformation models with censored data . Biometrika 89 : 659 – 668 .[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). It is demonstrated that both the approach of Lu and Liang (2006 Lu , W. , Liang , Y. ( 2006 ). Empirical likelihood inference for linear transformation models . Journal of Multivariate Analysis 97 : 1586 – 1599 .[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) and that of Yu et al. (2011 Yu , W. , Sun , Y. , Zheng , M. ( 2011 ). Empirical likelihood method for linear transformation models . Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 63 : 331 – 346 .[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) can be extended to doubly censored data. Simulation studies are conducted to investigate the performance of the empirical likelihood ratio methods.     

MSE Performance of a Heterogeneous Pre-Test Ridge Regression Estimator

This article describes how diagnostic procedures were derived for symmetrical nonlinear regression models, continuing the work carried out by Cysneiros and Vanegas (2008 Cysneiros , F. J. A. , Vanegas , L. H. ( 2008 ). Residuals and their statistical properties in symmetrical nonlinear models . Statist. Probab. Lett. 78 : 3269 – 3273 .[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) and Vanegas and Cysneiros (2010 Vanegas , L. H. , Cysneiros , F. J. A. ( 2010 ). Assesment of diagnostic procedures in symmetrical nonlinear regression models . Computat. Statist. Data Anal. 54 : 1002 – 1016 .[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), who showed that the parameters estimates in nonlinear models are more robust with heavy-tailed than with normal errors. In this article, we focus on assessing if the robustness of this kind of models is also observed in the inference process (i.e., partial F-test). Symmetrical nonlinear regression models includes all symmetric continuous distributions for errors covering both light- and heavy-tailed distributions such as Student-t, logistic-I and -II, power exponential, generalized Student-t, generalized logistic, and contaminated normal. Firstly, a statistical test is shown to evaluating the assumption that the error terms all have equal variance. The results of simulation studies which describe the behavior of the test for heteroscedasticity proposed in the presence of outliers are then given. To assess the robustness of inference process, we present the results of a simulation study which described the behavior of partial F-test in the presence of outliers. Also, some diagnostic procedures are derived to identify influential observations on the partial F-test. As ilustration, a dataset described in Venables and Ripley (2002 Venables , W. N. , Ripley , B. D. ( 2002 ). Modern Applied with S. , 4th ed. New York : Springer .[Crossref] , [Google Scholar]), is also analyzed.     

Maximum simulated likelihood estimation of the panel sample selection model

Heckman's (1976 Heckman, J. J. (1976). The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement 15:475–492. [Google Scholar], 1979 Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1):153–161.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) sample selection model has been employed in many studies of linear and nonlinear regression applications. It is well known that ignoring the sample selectivity may result in inconsistency of the estimator due to the correlation between the statistical errors in the selection and main equations. In this article, we reconsider the maximum likelihood estimator for the panel sample selection model in Keane et al. (1988 Keane, M., Moffitt, R., Runkle, D. (1988). Real wages over the business cycle: Estimating the impact of heterogeneity with micro data. Journal of Political Economy 96:1232–1266.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). Since the panel data model contains individual effects, such as fixed or random effects, the likelihood function is more complicated than that of the classical Heckman model. As an alternative to the existing derivation of the likelihood function in the literature, we show that the conditional distribution of the main equation follows a closed skew-normal (CSN) distribution, of which the linear transformation is still a CSN. Although the evaluation of the likelihood function involves high-dimensional integration, we show that the integration can be further simplified into a one-dimensional problem and can be evaluated by the simulated likelihood method. Moreover, we also conduct a Monte Carlo experiment to investigate the finite sample performance of the proposed estimator and find that our estimator provides reliable and quite satisfactory results.     

Random Effects,Fixed Effects and Hausman's Test for the Generalized Mixed Regressive Spatial Autoregressive Panel Data Model

This article suggests random and fixed effects spatial two-stage least squares estimators for the generalized mixed regressive spatial autoregressive panel data model. This extends the generalized spatial panel model of Baltagi et al. (2013 Baltagi, B. H., Egger, P., Pfaffermayr, M. (2013). A generalized spatial panel data model with random effects. Econometric Reviews 32:650–685.[Taylor &; Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) by the inclusion of a spatial lag term. The estimation method utilizes the Generalized Moments method suggested by Kapoor et al. (2007 Kapoor, M., Kelejian, H. H., Prucha, I. R. (2007). Panel data models with spatially correlated error components. Journal of Econometrics 127(1):97–130.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) for a spatial autoregressive panel data model. We derive the asymptotic distributions of these estimators and suggest a Hausman test a la Mutl and Pfaffermayr (2011 Mutl, J., Pfaffermayr, M. (2011). The Hausman test in a Cliff and Ord panel model. Econometrics Journal 14:48–76.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) based on the difference between these estimators. Monte Carlo experiments are performed to investigate the performance of these estimators as well as the corresponding Hausman test.     

Forward Moving Average Representations for MA Processes of Finite Order: Multivariate Stationary and Periodically Correlated

Soltani and Mohammadpour (2006 Soltani , A. R. , Mohammadpour , M. (2006). Moving average representations for multivariate stationary processes. J. Time Ser. Anal. 27(6):831–841.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) observed that in general the backward and forward moving average coefficients, correspondingly, for the multivariate stationary processes, unlike the univariate processes, are different. This has stimulated researches concerning derivations of forward moving average coefficients in terms of the backward moving average coefficients. In this article we develop a practical procedure whenever the underlying process is a multivariate moving average (or univariate periodically correlated) process of finite order. Our procedure is based on two key observations: order reduction (Li, 2005 Li , L. M. ( 2005 ). Factorization of moving average spectral densities by state space representations and stacking . J. Multivariate Anal. 96 : 425 – 438 .[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) and first-order analysis (Mohammadpour and Soltani, 2010 Mohammadpour , M. , Soltani , A. R. ( 2010 ). Forward moving average representation for multivariate MA(1) processes . Commun. Statist. Theory Meth. 39 : 729 – 737 .[Taylor &; Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]).