Semiparametric Likelihood Based Method for Goodness of Fit Tests and Estimation in Upgraded Mixture Models

We use Owen's (1988, 1990) empirical likelihood method in upgraded mixture models. Two groups of independent observations are available. One is z ₁, ..., z _n which is observed directly from a distribution F ( z ). The other one is x ₁, ..., x _m which is observed indirectly from F ( z ), where the x _i s have density ∫ p ( x | z ) dF ( z ) and p ( x | z ) is a conditional density function. We are interested in testing H ₀: p ( x | z ) = p ( x | z ; θ ), for some specified smooth density function. A semiparametric likelihood ratio based statistic is proposed and it is shown that it converges to a chi-squared distribution. This is a simple method for doing goodness of fit tests, especially when x is a discrete variable with finitely many values. In addition, we discuss estimation of θ and F ( z ) when H ₀ is true. The connection between upgraded mixture models and general estimating equations is pointed out.     

Detecting changes in the mean of functional observations

Summary.  Principal component analysis has become a fundamental tool of functional data analysis. It represents the functional data as X _i ( t )= μ ( t )+Σ_{1≤ l <∞} η _{i ,  l} +  v _l ( t ), where μ is the common mean, v _l are the eigenfunctions of the covariance operator and the η _{i ,  l} are the scores. Inferential procedures assume that the mean function μ ( t ) is the same for all values of i . If, in fact, the observations do not come from one population, but rather their mean changes at some point(s), the results of principal component analysis are confounded by the change(s). It is therefore important to develop a methodology to test the assumption of a common functional mean. We develop such a test using quantities which can be readily computed in the R package fda. The null distribution of the test statistic is asymptotically pivotal with a well-known asymptotic distribution. The asymptotic test has excellent finite sample performance. Its application is illustrated on temperature data from England.     

Exact Slopes of Test Statistics for the Multivariate Exponential Family

The objective of this paper is to investigate exact slopes of test statistics { T_n } when the random vectors X ₁, ..., X_n are distributed according to an unknown member of an exponential family { P _θ; θ∈Ω. Here Ω is a parameter set. We will be concerned with the hypothesis testing problem of H ₀θ∈Ω₀ vs H ₁: θ∉Ω₀ where Ω₀ is a subset of Ω. It will be shown that for an important class of problems and test statistics the exact slope of { T_n } at η in Ω−Ω₀ is determined by the shortest Kullback–Leibler distance from {θ: T_n (λ(θ)) = T_n (λ(π))} to Ω₀, λ_θ = E _θ)( X ).     

On the effect of overdispersion on exact conditional tests

Let Y ₁, . . ., Y_n denote independent random variables such that Y_j has a one-parameter exponential family distribution with canonical parameter θ _j =λ+ψ X_j ; here X ₁, . . ., X_n are known constants. Consider a test of the null hypothesis ψ=0. Under the null hypothesis, A =Σ Y_j is sufficient for λ and, hence, a test of ψ=0 may be based on the conditional distribution of T =Σ X_j Y_j given A , which is independent of λ. In this paper, the effects of overdispersion due to a mixture model on the conditional distribution of T given A are considered.     

ε-Repetitions of the Maximum Residuals in an AR(1) Model

This paper considers record values of residuals or prediction errors in a one-parameter autoregressive process and the statistic Z _n = number of ε -repetitions of this record. When the parameter of the autoregression is unknown, the prediction errors, and therefore Z _n , are unobservable. Here an observable analogue ̂ n of Z _n is considered. It is proved that under special conditions the difference Z _n − unobservable. Here an observable analogue ̂ n converges to zero in probability and therefore that unobservable. Here an observable analogue ̂ n has the same asymptotic behaviour as Z _n .     

A NOTE ON THE MULTIVARIATE LINEAR MODEL WITH CONSTRAINTS ON THE DEPENDENT VECTOR

It is shown that the least squares estimators of B and Σ in the multivariate linear model {E Y _i= X ₁ B , D ( Y _i) =Σ, 1 ≤ i ≤ n , Y ₁ Y _n uncorrelated} subject to the constraints Y _i M = X _i N are just the usual least squares estimators = ( X'X )-¹ X'Y and ΣC = 1/n( Y-X )( Y-X ) in the unconstrained model where Σ has full rank. Tests of hypotheses concerning B are discussed for situations in which each Y _i has a multivariate normal distribution, and examples of the applicability of the model reviewed.     

Penalized Projection Estimator for Volatility Density

Abstract.  In this paper, we consider a stochastic volatility model ( Y _t , V _t ), where the volatility (V _t ) is a positive stationary Markov process. We assume that ( ln V _t ) admits a stationary density f that we want to estimate. Only the price process Y _t is observed at n discrete times with regular sampling interval Δ . We propose a non-parametric estimator for f obtained by a penalized projection method. Under mixing assumptions on ( V _t ), we derive bounds for the quadratic risk of the estimator. Assuming that Δ=Δ _n tends to 0 while the number of observations and the length of the observation time tend to infinity, we discuss the rate of convergence of the risk. Examples of models included in this framework are given.     

A NOTE ON CONFIDENCE BOUNDS FOR CERTAIN RATIOS OF CHARACTERISTIC ROOTS OF COVARIANCE MATRICES

Let σ₁, …, σ_k be the covariance matrices of k p -variate normal populations. Let Λ_ij be the j th largest characteristic root of σ_i (j=1, …, p; i=1, …, k). In this note we obtain simultaneous confidence intervals on (i)Λ_{i+1, p}/Λ_ipand by using methods similar to those of Khatri (1965).     

Likelihood Ratio Tests Under Local and Fixed Alternatives in Monotone Function Problems

Abstract.  We focus on a class of non-standard problems involving non-parametric estimation of a monotone function that is characterized by n ^1/3 rate of convergence of the maximum likelihood estimator, non-Gaussian limit distributions and the non-existence of     -regular estimators. We have shown elsewhere that under a null hypothesis of the type ψ ( z ₀) =  θ ₀ ( ψ being the monotone function of interest) in non-standard problems of the above kind, the likelihood ratio statistic has a 'universal' limit distribution that is free of the underlying parameters in the model. In this paper, we illustrate its limiting behaviour under local alternatives of the form ψ _n ( z ), where ψ _n (·) and ψ (·) vary in O ( n ^−1/3) neighbourhoods around z ₀ and ψ _n converges to ψ at rate n ^1/3 in an appropriate metric. Apart from local alternatives, we also consider the behaviour of the likelihood ratio statistic under fixed alternatives and establish the convergence in probability of an appropriately scaled version of the same to a constant involving a Kullback–Leibler distance.     

Computation of the Generalized F Distribution

Exact expressions for the cumulative distribution function of a random variable of the form ( α ₁ X ₁+ α ₂ X ₂)/ Y are given where X ₁, X ₂ and Y are independent chi-squared random variables. The expressions are applied to the detection of joint outliers and Hotelling's mis-specified T ² distribution.     

On Statistical Models for d-Dimensional Stable Processes, and Some Generalizations

In statistical models where jumps of a d -dimensional stable process ( S _t ) _{t ≥0} are observed in windows with certain asymptotic properties, and where parameters appearing in the Levy measure of S are to be estimated, we have asymptotically efficient estimators. If Poisson random measure μ on (0, ∞) × ( R ^d \{0}) with intensity dt Λ( dx ) replaces the jump measure of S , where Λ is a ε-finite measure on R ^d \{0} admitting tail parameters in a suitable sense, we specify a notion of neighbourhood which allows to treat efficiency in statistical experiments of the second type by switching to accompanying sequences of the stable process type considered first.     

Empirical Likelihood for Non-Smooth Criterion Functions

Abstract.  Suppose that X ₁ ,…,  X _n is a sequence of independent random vectors, identically distributed as a d -dimensional random vector X . Let     be a parameter of interest and     be some nuisance parameter. The unknown, true parameters ( μ ₀ , ν ₀ ) are uniquely determined by the system of equations E { g ( X , μ ₀ , ν ₀ )} =   0 , where g  =  ( g ₁ ,…, g _{p + q} ) is a vector of p + q functions. In this paper we develop an empirical likelihood (EL) method to do inference for the parameter μ ₀ . The results in this paper are valid under very mild conditions on the vector of criterion functions g . In particular, we do not require that g ₁ ,…, g _{p + q} are smooth in μ or ν . This offers the advantage that the criterion function may involve indicators, which are encountered when considering, e.g. differences of quantiles, copulas, ROC curves, to mention just a few examples. We prove the asymptotic limit of the empirical log-likelihood ratio, and carry out a small simulation study to test the performance of the proposed EL method for small samples.     

Ordering of Sequentially Sampled Exponential Experiments

Let X ₁, X ₂, ... be a sequence of i.i.d. random variables, X _i∼ F _θ, θ∈Θ. Let N ₁ and N ₂ be two stopping rules. For a class of exponential families { F _θ: θ∈Θ} we show that the experiment Y ₁ = ( X ₁, ..., X _N1) carries more statistical information than Y ₂ = ( X ₁, ..., x _N2) only if N ₁ is stochastically larger then N ₂     

Stepwise likelihood ratio statistics in sequential studies

Summary.  It is well known that in a sequential study the probability that the likelihood ratio for a simple alternative hypothesis H ₁ versus a simple null hypothesis H ₀ will ever be greater than a positive constant c will not exceed 1/ c under H ₀. However, for a composite alternative hypothesis, this bound of 1/ c will no longer hold when a generalized likelihood ratio statistic is used. We consider a stepwise likelihood ratio statistic which, for each new observation, is updated by cumulatively multiplying the ratio of the conditional likelihoods for the composite alternative hypothesis evaluated at an estimate of the parameter obtained from the preceding observations versus the simple null hypothesis. We show that, under the null hypothesis, the probability that this stepwise likelihood ratio will ever be greater than c will not exceed 1/ c . In contrast, under the composite alternative hypothesis, this ratio will generally converge in probability to ∞. These results suggest that a stepwise likelihood ratio statistic can be useful in a sequential study for testing a composite alternative versus a simple null hypothesis. For illustration, we conduct two simulation studies, one for a normal response and one for an exponential response, to compare the performance of a sequential test based on a stepwise likelihood ratio statistic with a constant boundary versus some existing approaches.     

Estimation of Diffusion Processes by Simulated Moment Methods

We consider the parameter estimation of a diffusion process and we suppose that the trend and the diffusion coefficient depend on the parameter θ. The process is observed at time ( t_i ) _{i =0,..., n} with Δ = t_{i +1}− t_i fixed and we propose here to estimate θ from simulated moment methods.     

IMPROVING UPON THE BEST INVARIANT ESTIMATOR IN MULTIVARIATE LOCATION PROBLEMS

We are concerned with estimators which improve upon the best invariant estimator, in estimating a location parameter θ. If the loss function is L(θ - a) with L convex, we give sufficient conditions for the inadmissibility of δ₀(X) = X. If the loss is a weighted sum of squared errors, we find various classes of estimators δ which are better than δ₀. In general, δ is the convolution of δ₁ (an estimator which improves upon δ₀ outside of a compact set) with a suitable probability density in R^p. The critical dimension of inadmissibility depends on the estimator δ₁ We also give several examples of estimators δ obtained in this way and state some open problems.     

Rejoinder to 'Ahmed, M.S. (1998). A note on regression-type estimators using multiple auxiliary information.'

In the estimators t ₃ , t ₄ , t ₅ of Mukerjee, Rao & Vijayan (1987), b _{y x} and b _{y z} are partial regression coefficients of y on x and z , respectively, based on the smaller sample. With the above interpretation of b _{y x} and b _{y z} in t ₃ , t ₄ , t ₅ , all the calculations in Mukerjee at al. (1987) are correct. In this connection, we also wish to make it explicit that b _{x z} in t ₅ is an ordinary and not a partial regression coefficient. The 'corrected' MSEs of t ₃ , t ₄ , t ₅ , as given in Ahmed (1998 Section 3) are computed assuming that our b _{y x} and b _{y z} are ordinary and not partial regression coefficients. Indeed, we had no intention of giving estimators using the corresponding ordinary regression coefficients which would lead to estimators inferior to those given by Kiregyera (1984). We accept responsibility for any notational confusion created by us and express regret to readers who have been confused by our notation. Finally, in consideration of the above, it may be noted that Tripathi & Ahmed's (1995) estimator t ₀ , quoted also in Ahmed (1998), is no better than t ₅ of Mukerjee at al. (1987).     

Bayesian model selection for join point regression with application to age-adjusted cancer rates

Summary.  The method of Bayesian model selection for join point regression models is developed. Given a set of K +1 join point models M ₀,  M ₁, …,  M _K with 0, 1, …,  K join points respec-tively, the posterior distributions of the parameters and competing models M _k are computed by Markov chain Monte Carlo simulations. The Bayes information criterion BIC is used to select the model M _k with the smallest value of BIC as the best model. Another approach based on the Bayes factor selects the model M _k with the largest posterior probability as the best model when the prior distribution of M _k is discrete uniform. Both methods are applied to analyse the observed US cancer incidence rates for some selected cancer sites. The graphs of the join point models fitted to the data are produced by using the methods proposed and compared with the method of Kim and co-workers that is based on a series of permutation tests. The analyses show that the Bayes factor is sensitive to the prior specification of the variance σ ², and that the model which is selected by BIC fits the data as well as the model that is selected by the permutation test and has the advantage of producing the posterior distribution for the join points. The Bayesian join point model and model selection method that are presented here will be integrated in the National Cancer Institute's join point software ( http://www.srab.cancer.gov/joinpoint/ ) and will be available to the public.     

Goodness-of-fit Tests for Semi-Markov and Markov Survival Models with One Intermediate State

Survival data with one intermediate state are described by semi-Markov and Markov models for counting processes whose intensities are defined in terms of two stopping times T ₁< T ₂. Problems of goodness-of-fit for these models are studied. The test statistics are proposed by comparing Nelson–Aalen estimators for data stratified according to T ₁. Asymptotic distributions of these statistics are established in terms of the weak convergence of some random fields. Asymptotic consistency of these test statistics is also established. Simulation studies are included to indicate their numerical performance.     

MINIMAX ESTIMATION OF A MULTIVARIATE NORMAL MEAN UNDER A CONVEX LOSS FUNCTION

Let X = (X₁, - X_p)prime; ˜ N_p (μ, Σ) where μ= (μ₁, -, μ_p)' and Σ= diag (Σ²₁, -, Σ²_p) are both unknown and p3. Let (n_i - 2) w_i/Σ²_i! X²_ni, independent. of w_i (I ≠ j = 1, -, p). Assume that (w₁, -, w_p) and X are independent. Define W = diag (w₁, -, w_p) and ¶ X ¶²_w= X'W^-1Q^-1W^-1X where Q = diag (q₁, -,n q_p), q_i > 0, i = 1, -, p. In this paper, the minimax estimator of Berger & Bock (1976), given by δ (X, W) = [I_p - r(X, W) ¶ X ¶^-2_w Q^-1W^-1] X, is shown to be minimax relative to the convex loss (δ - μ)'[αQ + (1 - α) Σ^-1] δ - μ)/C, where C =α tr (Σ) + (1 - α)p and 0 α 1, under certain conditions on r(X, W). This generalizes the above mentioned result of Berger & Bock.