General formulae for expectations, variances and covariances of the mean squares for staggered nested designs

Staggered nested experimental designs are the most popular class of unbalanced nested designs. Using a special notation which covers the particular structure of the staggered nested design, this paper systematically derives the canonical form for the arbitrary m-factors. Under the normality assumption for every random variable, a vector comprising m canonical variables from each experimental unit is normally independently and identically distributed. Every sum of squares used in the analysis of variance (ANOVA) can be expressed as the sum of squares of the corresponding canonical variables. Hence, general formulae for the expectations, variances and covariances of the mean squares are directly obtained from the canonical form. Applying the formulae, the explicit forms of the ANOVA estimators of the variance components and unbiased estimators of the ratios of the variance components are introduced in this paper. The formulae are easily applied to obtain the variances and covariances of any linear combinations of the mean squares, especially the ANOVA estimators of the variance components. These results are eff ectively applied for the standardization of measurement methods.     

Comparison of designs for the three-fold nested random model

The quality of estimation of variance components depends on the design used as well as on the unknown values of the variance components. In this article, three designs are compared, namely, the balanced, staggered, and inverted nested designs for the three-fold nested random model. The comparison is based on the so-called quantile dispersion graphs using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and maximum likelihood (ML) estimates of the variance components. It is demonstrated that the staggered nested design gives more stable estimates of the variance component for the highest nesting factor than the balanced design. The reverse, however, is true in case of lower nested factors. A comparison between ANOVA and ML estimation of the variance components is also made using each of the aforementioned designs.     

The present status of confidence interval estimation on variance components in balanced and unbalanced random models

Much research has been conducted to develop confidence Intervals on linear combinations and ratios of variance components in balanced and unbalanced random models.This paper first presents confidence intervals on functions of variance components in balanced designs.These results assume that classical analysis of variance sums of squares are independent and have exact scaled chi-squared distributions.In unbalanced designs, either one or both of these assumptions are violated, and modifications to the balanced model intervals are required.We report results of some recent work that examines various modifications for some particular unbalanced designs.     

Statistical tests for random effects in staggered nested designs

In this paper, we present certain statistical tests under a staggered nested design set-up, for the hypotheses that certain variance components are zero. To do so, the particular variance-covariance, structure induced by the staggering is exploited and certain results of multivariate analysis are used. In most problems, the test statistics can be easily computed. An example is provided for illustration and some power computations for comparison of test statistics are shown.     

Search for optimal designs in a three stagenested random model

In this paper we define a class of unbalanced designs, denoted by C_k,s,t, for estimating the components of variance in a k-stage nested random effects linear model. This class contains many of the designs proposed in the literature for nested components of variance models. We focus on the three-state model and discuss the determination of locally optimal designs within this class using a systematic computer search. For large sample sizes we show that approximate optimal designs may be obtained using a limit argument combined with numerical optimization. A comparison of our designs with previously published designs suggests that, in many cases, our designs result in substantial gains in efficiency.     

Estimating standard error of intra-class correlation coefficients up to three level unbalanced nested clinical trials

ABSTRACT

Very often researchers plan a balanced design for cluster randomization clinical trials in conducting medical research, but unavoidable circumstances lead to unbalanced data. By adopting three or more levels of nested designs, they usually ignore the higher level of nesting and consider only two levels, this situation leads to underestimation of variance at higher levels. While calculating the sample size for three-level nested designs, in order to achieve desired power, intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) at individual level as well as higher levels need to be considered and must be provided along with respective standard errors. In the present paper, the standard errors of analysis of variance (ANOVA) estimates of ICCs for three-level unbalanced nested design are derived. To conquer the strong appeal of distributional assumptions, balanced design, equality of variances between clusters and large sample, general expressions for standard errors of ICCs which can be deployed in unbalanced cluster randomization trials are postulated. The expressions are evaluated on real data as well as highly unbalanced simulated data.     

Estimation of variance components in staggered nested designs

SUMMARY Variance components are estimated by two different methods for a general p stage random-effects staggered nested design. In addition to estimation from an analysis of variance, a new approach is introduced. The main features of this new technique are its simplicity and its ability to yield non-negative estimates of the variance components. The performances of the two procedures are compared using simulation and the meansquared-error criterion.     

Interblock information in multidimensional block designs

In many experimental situations, d-way heterogeneity among experimental units may be controlled through use of multiple blocking criteria. In some cases it is reasonable to regard some or all of the block effects as random. Then the model is mixed and observations within blocks are correlated. Very general estimators of treatment effects and their dispersion matrix with recovery of interblock information are provided. They apply to designs with d > 1 blocking criteria that may be crossed, nested, or a combination thereof. These general results may be specialized to provide analyses of new classes of MBD's or used directly for numerical analyses of designs in the general class, perhaps through use as the basis for very general computer programs. Estimation of variance components is discussed, and an example is provided to illustrate adaptation of the general results.     

A modified harmonic mean test procedure for variance components

A complete class of tests of variance components is characterized within the class of tests statistics of the form of a ratio of a linear combination of chi-squared random variables to an independent chi-squared random variable. This result is used in the context of general unbalanced mixed models to show that the harmonic mean method results in an inadmissible test of the random treatment effects. The harmonic mean procedure is then modified in such a way that the modified test uniformly dominates the original test. Two competitive tests are the LMP (locally most powerful) and Wald's tests, which have optimal power properties against small and large alternatives, respectively. A Monte Carlo simulation study reveals that the modified test outperforms both the LMP and Wald's tests in badly unbalanced designs and that it is a viable alternative in less unbalanced designs.     

Extension of Central Composite Design for Second-Order Response Surface Model Building

The central composite design (CCD) is perhaps the most popular class of second-order response surface designs. Even though the CCDs are popular for response surface designs, this class of design has some limitations such as it does not sometimes possess good statistical properties, and it does not fit complicated models well. In this article, we propose extended central composite designs (ECCDs) to overcome these limitations. We compare ECCDs with CCDs in terms of average prediction variance, and find that ECCDs are better than CCDs.     

Interpretation of the four types of analysis of variance tables in sas

Various computational methods exist for generating sums of squares in an analysis of variance table. When the ANOVA design is balanced, most of these computational methods will produce equivalent sums of squares for testing the significance of the ANOVA model parameters. However, when the design is unbalanced, as is frequently the case in practice, these sums of squares depend on the computational method used.- The basic reason for the difference in these sums of squares is that different hypotheses are being tested. The purpose of this paper is to describe these hypotheses in terms of population or cell means. A numerical example is given for the two factor model with interaction. The hypotheses that are tested by the four computational methods of the SAS general linear model procedure are specified.

Although the ultimate choice of hypotheses should be made by the researcher before conducting the experiment, this paper

PENDLETON,VON TRESS,AND BREMER

presents the following guidelines in selecting these hypotheses:

When the design is balanced, all of the SAS procedures will agree.

In unbalanced ANOVA designs when there are no missing cells. SAS Type III should be used. SAS Type III tests an unweighted hypothesis about cell means. SAS Types I and II test hypotheses that are functions of the ceil frequencies. These frequencies are often merely arti¬facts of the experimental process and not reflective of any underlying frequencies in the population.

When there are missing cells, i.e. no observations for some factor level combinations. Type IV should be used with caution. SAS Type IV tests hypotheses which depend     

Nested Latin Hypercube Designs with Sliced Structures

In computer experiments, space-filling designs with a sliced structure or nested structure have received much recent interest and been studied separately. However, it is likely that designs with both structures are needed in some situations, but there are no suitable designs so far. In this paper, we construct a special class of nested Latin hypercube designs with sliced structures, in such a design, a small sliced Latin hypercube design is nested within a large one. The construction method is easy to implement and the number of factors is flexible. Numerical simulations show the usefulness of the newly proposed designs.     

The three-fold nested random effects model

Estimation of the variance components and the mean of the balanced and unbalanced threefold nested design is considered. The relative merits of the following procedures are evaluated: Analysis of variance (ANOVA), maximum likelihood (ML), restricted maximum likelihood (REML), and minimum variance quadratic unbiased estimator (MIVQUE). A new procedure called the weighted analysis of means (WAM) estimator which utilizes prior information on the variance components is proposed. It is found to have optimum properties similar to the REML and MIVQUE, and it is also computationally simpler. For the mean, the overall sample average, grand mean, unweighted mean, and generalized least-squares (GLS) estimator with its weights obtained from the above estimators for the variance components are considered. Comparisons of the above procedures for the variance components and the mean are made from exact expressions for the biases and mean square errors (MSEs) of the estimators and from empirical investigations.     

Description and evaluation of a nested cube experimental design

An incomplete factorial design based on an extension of the Fawiliar 2^kfactorial called a nested cube is proposed for use in response surface investigationso The simplicity and general efficiency of the nested cube suggest its suitability to many areas of research, especially that repeated at many locations orconductea over a long period. Comparisons to potentially competing designs are provided for bias in response estination due to fitting an ioappropriate model and for profiles of variance. merits of the nested cube are (1) a level of relative bias and variance judged to be favorable though not optimal, (2) an ability to utilize a minimum blag estimator not available to competing designs, and (3) a simplicity associated with use of equal spacing

and nearly equal replication on the margin for each factor level.     

Short confidence intervals for variance components

Four approximate methods are proposed to construct confidence intervals for the estimation of variance components in unbalanced mixed models. The first three methods are modifications of the Wald, arithmetic and harmonic mean procedures, see Harville and Fenech (1985), while the fourth is an adaptive approach, combining the arithmetic and harmonic mean procedures. The performances of the proposed methods were assessed by a Monte Carlo simulation study. It was found that the intervals based on Wald's method maintained the nominal confidence levels across all designs and values of the parameters under study. On the other hand, the arithmetic (harmonic) mean method performed well for small (large) values of the variance component, relative to the error variance component. The adaptive procedure performed rather well except for extremely unbalanced designs. Further, compared with equal tails intervals, the intervals which use special tables, e.g., Table 678 of Tate and Klett (1959), provided adequate coverage while having much shorter lengths and are thus recommended for use in practice.     

THE ROBUSTNESS OF BINARY AND NON-BINARY BALANCED NESTED ROW-COLUMN DESIGNS UNDER THE UNAVAILABILITY OF BLOCKS: A COMPARISON

In cases where both exist, the balanced, binary nested row-column designs are known to be inferior to a class of balanced non-binary designs. However, if it is possible for blocks of observations to become unavailable after an experiment has commenced, a binary nested row-column design may possibly be better than a non-binary one. This paper investigates the robustness of binary and non-binary variance-balanced nested row-column designs to the unavailability of one or more blocks of observations. Robustness is measured through the C-matrices of the designs resulting from removing blocks, using optimality criteria such as A-, D-, E- and MV-optimality.     

Some Recent Developments in the Analysis and Design of Quantitative Genetic Experiments

The design and analysis of experiments to estimate heritability when data are available on both parents and progeny and the offspring have a hierarchical structure is considered. The method of analysis is related to a multivariate analysis of variance and to weighted least squares. It is shown that genetical theory gives a simple interpretation of both maximum likelihood (ML) and Rao's minimum norm quadratic unbiased (MINQUE) methods of estimation of variance components in unbalanced designs.     

Adaptive interval estimation in one-way random effects models

Two-stage procedures are introduced to control the width and coverage (validity) of confidence intervals for the estimation of the mean, the between groups variance component and certain ratios of the variance components in one-way random effects models. The procedures use the pilot sample data to estimate an “optimal” group size and then proceed to determine the number of groups by a stopping rule. Such sampling plans give rise to unbalanced data, which are consequently analyzed by the harmonic mean method. Several asymptotic results concerning the proposed procedures are given along with simulation results to assess their performance in moderate sample size situations. The proposed procedures were found to effectively control the width and probability of coverage of the resulting confidence intervals in all cases and were also found to be robust in the presence of missing observations. From a practical point of view, the procedures are illustrated using a real data set and it is shown that the resulting unbalanced designs tend to require smaller sample sizes than is needed in a corresponding balanced design where the group size is arbitrarily pre-specified.     

Minimax A-, c-, and I-optimal regression designs for models with heteroscedastic errors

It is well known that it is difficult to construct minimax optimal designs. Furthermore, since in practice we never know the true error variance, it is important to allow small deviations and construct robust optimal designs. We investigate a class of minimax optimal regression designs for models with heteroscedastic errors that are robust against possible misspecification of the error variance. Commonly used A-, c-, and I-optimality criteria are included in this class of minimax optimal designs. Several theoretical results are obtained, including a necessary condition and a reflection symmetry for these minimax optimal designs. In this article, we focus mainly on linear models and assume that an approximate error variance function is available. However, we also briefly discuss how the methodology works for nonlinear models. We then propose an effective algorithm to solve challenging nonconvex optimization problems to find minimax designs on discrete design spaces. Examples are given to illustrate minimax optimal designs and their properties.     

On the role of minque in testing of hypotheses under hiked linear models

Testing of hypotheses under balanced ANOVA models is fairly simple and generally based on the usual ANOVA sums of squares. Difficulties may arise in special cases when these sums of squares do not form a complete sufficient statistic. There is a huge literature on this subject which was recently surveyed in Seifert's contribution to the book of Mumak (1904). But there are only a few results about unbalanced models. In such models the consideration of likelihood ratios leads to more complex sums of squares known from MINQUE theory.

Uniform optimality of testsusually reduces to local optimality. Here we prespnt a small review of methods proposed for testing of hypotheses in unbalanced models. where MINQUEI playb a major role. We discuss the use of iterated MINQUE for the construction of asymptotically optimal tests described in Humak (1984) and approximate tests based on locally uncorrelated linear combinations of MINQUE estimators by Seifert (1985), We show that the latter tests coincide with robust locally optimal invariant tests proposeci by Kariya and Sinha and Das and Sinha, if the number of variance components is two. Explicit expressions for corresponding tests are given for the unbalanced two-way cross classification random model, which covers some other models as special cases. A simulation study under lines the relevance of MINQUE for testing of hypotheses problems.