Scheduling with release times and rejection on two parallel machines

In this paper we study scheduling with release times and job rejection on two parallel machines. In our scheduling model each job is either accepted and then processed by one of the two machines at or after its release time, or it is rejected and then a rejection penalty is paid. The objective is to minimize the makespan of the accepted job plus the total penalty of all rejected jobs. The scheduling problem is NP-hard in the ordinary sense. In this paper, we develop a \(1.5+\epsilon \)-approximation algorithm for the problem, where \(\epsilon \) is any given small positive constant.     

Online scheduling to minimize the total weighted completion time plus the rejection cost

We consider the online scheduling on a single machine, in which jobs are released over time and each job can be either accepted and scheduled on the machine or rejected under a certain rejection cost. The goal is to minimize the total weighted completion time of the accepted jobs plus the total rejection cost of the rejected jobs. For this problem, we provide an online algorithm with a best possible competitive ratio of 2.     

Approximation algorithm for the parallel-machine scheduling problem with release dates and submodular rejection penalties

In this paper, we consider the parallel-machine scheduling problem with release dates and submodular rejection penalties. In this problem, we are given m identical parallel machines and n jobs. Each job has a processing time and a release date. A job is either rejected, in which case a rejection penalty has to be paid, or accepted and processed on one of the m identical parallel machines. The objective is to minimize the sum of the makespan of the accepted jobs and the rejection penalty of the rejected jobs which is determined by a submodular function. Our main work is to design a 2-approximation algorithm based on the primal-dual framework.

     

MINIMIZING ABSOLUTE AND SQUARED DEVIATION OF COMPLETION TIMES FROM DUE DATES

This is a study of a single-machine scheduling problem with the objective of minimizing the sum of a function of earliness and tardiness called the earliness and tardiness (ET) problem. I will show that if priority weights of jobs are proportional to their processing times, and if earliness and tardiness cost functions are linear, the problem will be equivalent to the total weighted tardiness problem. This proves that the et problem is np -hard. In addition, I present a heuristic algorithm with worst case bound for the et problem based on the equivalence relation between the two. When earliness and tardiness cost functions are quadratic, I consider the problem for a common due date for all jobs and for different job due dates. In general, the et problem with quadratic earliness and tardiness cost functions and all job weights equal to one is np -hard. I show that in many cases, when weights of jobs are proportional to their processing times, the problem can be solved efficiently. In the published results on the et problem with quadratic earliness and tardiness cost functions other researchers have assumed a zero starting time for the schedule. I discuss the advantages of a nonzero starting time for the schedule.     

A tardiness-augmented approximation scheme for rejection-allowed multiprocessor rescheduling

In the multiprocessor scheduling problem to minimize the total job completion time, an optimal schedule can be obtained by the shortest processing time rule and the completion time of each job in the schedule can be used as a guarantee for scheduling revenue. However, in practice, some jobs will not arrive at the beginning of the schedule but are delayed and their delayed arrival times are given to the decision-maker for possible rescheduling. The decision-maker can choose to reject some jobs in order to minimize the total operational cost that includes three cost components: the total rejection cost of the rejected jobs, the total completion time of the accepted jobs, and the penalty on the maximum tardiness for the accepted jobs, for which their completion times in the planned schedule are their virtual due dates. This novel rescheduling problem generalizes several classic NP-hard scheduling problems. We first design a pseudo-polynomial time dynamic programming exact algorithm and then, when the tardiness can be unbounded, we develop it into a fully polynomial time approximation scheme. The dynamic programming exact algorithm has a space complexity too high for truthful implementation; we propose an alternative to integrate the enumeration and the dynamic programming recurrences, followed by a depth-first-search walk in the reschedule space. We implemented the alternative exact algorithm in C and conducted numerical experiments to demonstrate its promising performance.

     

A bicriteria approach to scheduling a single machine with job rejection and positional penalties

Single machine scheduling problems have been extensively studied in the literature under the assumption that all jobs have to be processed. However, in many practical cases, one may wish to reject the processing of some jobs in the shop, which results in a rejection cost. A solution for a scheduling problem with rejection is given by partitioning the jobs into a set of accepted and a set of rejected jobs, and by scheduling the set of accepted jobs among the machines. The quality of a solution is measured by two criteria: a scheduling criterion, F1, which is dependent on the completion times of the accepted jobs, and the total rejection cost, F2. Problems of scheduling with rejection have been previously studied, but usually within a narrow framework—focusing on one scheduling criterion at a time. This paper provides a robust unified bicriteria analysis of a large set of single machine problems sharing a common property, namely, all problems can be represented by or reduced to a scheduling problem with a scheduling criterion which includes positional penalties. Among these problems are the minimization of the makespan, the sum of completion times, the sum and variation of completion times, and the total earliness plus tardiness costs where the due dates are assignable. Four different problem variations for dealing with the two criteria are studied. The variation of minimizing F1+F2 is shown to be solvable in polynomial time, while all other three variations are shown to be $\mathcal{NP}$ -hard. For those hard problems we provide a pseudo polynomial time algorithm. An FPTAS for obtaining an approximate efficient schedule is provided as well. In addition, we present some interesting special cases which are solvable in polynomial time.     

Single-machine scheduling with periodic due dates to minimize the total earliness and tardy penalty

We consider a single-machine scheduling problem such that the due dates are assigned to each job depending on its order, and the lengths of the intervals between consecutive due dates are identical. The objective is to minimize the total penalty for the earliness and tardiness of each job. The early penalty proportionally increases according to the earliness amount, while the tardy penalty increases according to the step function. We show that the problem is strongly NP-hard, and furthermore, polynomially solvable if the two types of processing times exist.

     

Semi-online scheduling on two identical machines with rejection

In this paper we consider two semi-online scheduling problems with rejection on two identical machines. A sequence of independent jobs are given and each job is characterized by its size (processing time) and its penalty, in the sense that, jobs arrive one by one and can be either rejected by paying a certain penalty or assigned to some machine. No preemption is allowed. The objective is to minimize the sum of the makespan of schedule, which is yielded by all accepted jobs and the total penalties of all rejected ones. In the first problem one can reassign several scheduled jobs in rejection tache, in the second a buffer with length k is available in rejection tache. Two optimal algorithms both with competitive ratio $\frac{3}{2}$ are presented.     

A two-agent single machine scheduling problem with due-window assignment and a common flow-allowance

We study a single-machine scheduling model combining two competing agents and due-date assignment. The basic setting involves two agents who need to process their own sets of jobs, and compete on the use of a common processor. Our goal is to find the joint schedule that minimizes the value of the objective function of one agent, subject to an upper bound on the value of the objective function of the second agent. The scheduling measure considered in this paper is minimum total (earliness, tardiness and due-date) cost, based on common flow allowance, i.e., due-dates are defined as linear functions of the job processing times. We introduce a simple polynomial time solution for this problem (linear in the number of jobs), as well as to its extension to a multi-agent setting. We further extend the model to that of a due-window assignment based on common flow allowance.     

Single-machine batch delivery scheduling with an assignable common due window

This paper addresses a batch delivery single-machine scheduling problem in which jobs have an assignable common due window. Each job will incur an early (tardy) penalty if it is early (tardy) with respect to the common due window under a given schedule. There is no capacity limit on each delivery batch, and the cost per batch delivery is fixed and independent of the number of jobs in the batch. The objective is to find the optimal size and location of the window, the optimal dispatch date for each job, as well as an optimal job sequence to minimize a cost function based on earliness, tardiness, holding time, window location, window size, and batch delivery. We show that the problem can be optimally solved in O(n⁸)$O(n^8)$ time by a dynamic programming algorithm under a reasonable assumption on the relationships among the cost parameters. A computational experiment is also conducted to evaluate the performance of the proposed algorithm. We also show that some special cases of the problem can be optimally solved by lower order algorithms.     

Scheduling with machine cost and rejection

In this paper we consider the scheduling problem with machine cost and rejection penalties. For this problem, we are given a sequence of independent jobs, each being characterized by its processing time (size) and its penalty. No machine is initially provided, and when a job is revealed the algorithm has the option to purchase new machines. Right when a new job arrives, we have the following choices: (i) reject it, in which case we pay its penalty; (ii) non-preemptively process it on an existing machine, which contributes to the machine load; (iii) purchase a new machine, and assign it to this machine. The objective is to minimize the sum of the makespan, the cost for purchasing machines, and the total penalty of all rejected jobs. For the small job case, (where all jobs have sizes no greater than the cost for purchasing one machine, and which is the generalization of the Ski-Rental Problem) we present an optimal online algorithm with a competitive ratio of 2.     

Optimal semi-online algorithm for scheduling with rejection on two uniform machines

In this paper we consider a semi-online scheduling problem with rejection on two uniform machines with speed 1 and s≥1, respectively. A sequence of independent jobs are given and each job is characterized by its size (processing time) and its penalty, in the sense that, jobs arrive one by one and can be either rejected by paying a certain penalty or assigned to some machine. No preemption is allowed. The objective is to minimize the sum of the makespan of schedule, which is yielded by all accepted jobs and the total penalties of all rejected ones. Further, two rejection strategies are permitted thus an algorithm can propose two different schemes, from which the better solution is chosen. For the above version, we present an optimal semi-online algorithm H that achieves a competitive ratio ρ _H (s) as a piecewise function in terms of the speed ratio s.     

New results on two-machine flow-shop scheduling with rejection

In this paper, we consider the off-line and on-line two-machine flow-shop scheduling problems with rejection. The objective is to minimize the sum of the makespan of accepted jobs and the total rejection penalty of rejected jobs. For the off-line version, Shabtay and Gasper (Comput Oper Res 39:1087–1096, 2012) showed that this problem is NP-hard and then provided a pseudo-polynomial-time algorithm, two 2-approximation algorithms and a fully polynomial-time approximation scheme. We further study some special cases in this paper. We show that this problem is still NP-hard even when all jobs have the same processing time on one of the machines or all jobs have the same rejection penalty. Furthermore, we also showed that this problem can be solved in polynomialtime algorithm when all jobs satisfy the agreeable condition on their processing times and rejection penalties. For the on-line version without rejection, Chen and Woeginger [in: Du DZ, Pardalos PM (eds.) Minimax and Applications, 1995] showed that the competitive ratio of any determined on-line algorithm is at least 2. We further show that the competitive ratio of any determined on-line algorithm is at least 2 even when all jobs have the same processing time on the first machine. Finally, for the on-line version with rejection, we present a class of on-line algorithms with the best-possible competitive ratio 2.     

Online scheduling with rejection and reordering: exact algorithms for unit size jobs

We study an online scheduling problem with rejection on \(m\ge 2\) identical machines, in which we deal with unit size jobs. Each arriving job has a rejection value (a rejection cost or penalty for minimization problems, and a rejection profit for maximization problems) associated with it. A buffer of size \(K\) is available to store \(K\) jobs. A job which is not stored in the buffer must be either assigned to a machine or rejected. Upon the arrival of a new job, the job can be stored in the buffer if there is a free slot (possibly created by evicting other jobs and assigning or rejecting every evicted job). At termination, the buffer must be emptied. We study four variants of the problem, as follows. We study the makespan minimization problem, where the goal is to minimize the sum of the makespan and the penalty of rejected jobs, and the \(\ell _p\) norm minimization problem, where the goal is to minimize the sum of the \(\ell _p\) norm of the vector of machine completion times and the penalty of rejected jobs. We also study two maximization problems, where the goal in the first version is to maximize the sum of the minimum machine load (the cover value of the machines) and the total rejection profit, and in the second version the goal is to maximize a function of the machine completion times (which measures the balance of machine loads) and the total rejection profit. We show that an optimal solution (an exact solution for the offline problem) can always be obtained in this environment, and determine the required buffer size. Specifically, for all four variants we present optimal algorithms with \(K=m-1\) and prove that in each case, using a buffer of size at most \(m-2\) does not allow the design of an optimal algorithm, which makes our algorithms optimal in this respect as well. The lower bounds hold even for the special case where the rejection value is equal for all input jobs.     

Minmax common flow-allowance problems with convex resource allocation and position-dependent workloads

We study minmax due-date based on common flow-allowance assignment and scheduling problems on a single machine, and extend known results in scheduling theory by considering convex resource allocation. The total cost function of a given job consists of its earliness, tardiness and flow-allowance cost components. Thus, the common flow-allowance and the actual jobs’ processing times are decision variables, implying that the due-dates and actual processing times can be controlled by allocating additional resource to the job operations. Consequently, our goal is to optimize a cost function by seeking the optimal job sequence, the optimal job-dependent due-dates along with the actual processing times. In all addressed problems we aim to minimize the maximal cost among all the jobs subject to a constraint on the resource consumption. We start by analyzing and solving the problem with position-independent workloads and then proceed to position-dependent workloads. Finally, the results are generalized to the method of common due-window. For all studied problems closed form solutions are provided, leading to polynomial time solutions.

     

A FRAMEWORK FOR MACHINE SCHEDULING PROBLEMS WITH CONTROLLABLE PROCESSING TIMES

This is a study of single and parallel machine scheduling problems with controllable processing time for each job. The processing time for job j depends on the position of the job in the schedule and is a function of the number of resource units allocated to its processing. Processing time functions and processing cost functions are allowed to be nonlinear. The scheduling problems considered here have important applications in industry and include many of the existing scheduling models as special cases. For the single machine problem, the objective is minimization of total compression costs plus a scheduling measure. The scheduling measures include makespan, total flow time, total differences in completion times, total differences in waiting times, and total earliness and tardiness with a common due date for all jobs. Except when the total earliness and tardiness measure is involved, each case the problem is solved efficiently. Under an assumption typically satisfied in just-in-time systems, the problem with total earliness and tardiness measure is also solved efficiently. Finally, for a large class of processing time functions; parallel machine problems with total flow time and total earliness and tardiness measures are solved efficiently. In each case we reduce the problem to a transportation problem.     

Minimization of maximum lateness under linear deterioration

This paper considers a single-machine scheduling problem to minimize the maximum lateness. The processing time of each job is a linear function of the time when the job starts processing. This problem is known to be -hard in the literature. In this paper, we design a branch-and-bound algorithm for deriving exact solutions by incorporating several properties concerning dominance relations and lower bounds. These properties produce synergic effects in accelerating the solution finding process such that the algorithm can solve problems of 100 jobs within 1 min on average. To compose approximate solutions, we revise a heuristic algorithm available in the literature and propose several hybrid variants. Numerical results evince that the proposed approaches are very effective in successfully reporting optimal solutions for most of the test cases.     

Single machine scheduling problems with subcontracting options

In this paper, we study a scheduling model as follows: there are n jobs which can be processed in house on a single machine or subcontracted to a subcontractor. If a job is subcontracted, its processing cost is different from the in-house cost and its delivery lead time is a stepwise function of the total processing time of outsourced jobs. Two objective functions are studied (1) to minimize the weighted sum of the maximal completion time and the total processing cost and (2) to minimize the weighted sum of the number of tardy jobs and the total processing cost. For the first problem, we prove that it is NP-hard and get a pseudo-polynomial time algorithm. For the second problem, we prove that it is NP-hard and get a pseudo-polynomial time algorithm for a special case.     

Optimal Policy for a Stochastic Scheduling Problem with Applications to Surgical Scheduling

We consider the stochastic, single‐machine earliness/tardiness problem (SET), with the sequence of processing of the jobs and their due‐dates as decisions and the objective of minimizing the sum of the expected earliness and tardiness costs over all the jobs. In a recent paper, Baker ( 2014 ) shows the optimality of the Shortest‐Variance‐First (SVF) rule under the following two assumptions: (a) The processing duration of each job follows a normal distribution. (b) The earliness and tardiness cost parameters are the same for all the jobs. In this study, we consider problem SET under assumption (b). We generalize Baker's result by establishing the optimality of the SVF rule for more general distributions of the processing durations and a more general objective function. Specifically, we show that the SVF rule is optimal under the assumption of dilation ordering of the processing durations. Since convex ordering implies dilation ordering (under finite means), the SVF sequence is also optimal under convex ordering of the processing durations. We also study the effect of variability of the processing durations of the jobs on the optimal cost. An application of problem SET in surgical scheduling is discussed.