Paired-domination number of claw-free odd-regular graphs

A paired-dominating set of a graph G is a dominating set of vertices whose induced subgraph has a perfect matching, while the paired-domination number is the minimum cardinality of a paired-dominating set in the graph, denoted by \(\gamma _{pr}(G)\). Let G be a connected \(\{K_{1,3}, K_{4}-e\}\)-free cubic graph of order n. We show that \(\gamma _{pr}(G)\le \frac{10n+6}{27}\) if G is \(C_{4}\)-free and that \(\gamma _{pr}(G)\le \frac{n}{3}+\frac{n+6}{9(\lceil \frac{3}{4}(g_o+1)\rceil +1)}\) if G is \(\{C_{4}, C_{6}, C_{10}, \ldots , C_{2g_o}\}\)-free for an odd integer \(g_o\ge 3\); the extremal graphs are characterized; we also show that if G is a 2 -connected, \(\gamma _{pr}(G) = \frac{n}{3} \). Furthermore, if G is a connected \((2k+1)\)-regular \(\{K_{1,3}, K_4-e\}\)-free graph of order n, then \(\gamma _{pr}(G)\le \frac{n}{k+1} \), with equality if and only if \(G=L(F)\), where \(F\cong K_{1, 2k+2}\), or k is even and \(F\cong K_{k+1,k+2}\).     

On minimally 2-connected graphs with generalized connectivity $$\kappa _{3}=2$$

For \(S\subseteq G\), let \(\kappa (S)\) denote the maximum number r of edge-disjoint trees \(T_1, T_2, \ldots , T_r\) in G such that \(V(T_i)\cap V(T_j)=S\) for any \(i,j\in \{1,2,\ldots ,r\}\) and \(i\ne j\). For every \(2\le k\le n\), the k-connectivity of G, denoted by \(\kappa _k(G)\), is defined as \(\kappa _k(G)=\hbox {min}\{\kappa (S)| S\subseteq V(G)\ and\ |S|=k\}\). Clearly, \(\kappa _2(G)\) corresponds to the traditional connectivity of G. In this paper, we focus on the structure of minimally 2-connected graphs with \(\kappa _{3}=2\). Denote by \(\mathcal {H}\) the set of minimally 2-connected graphs with \(\kappa _{3}=2\). Let \(\mathcal {B}\subseteq \mathcal {H}\) and every graph in \(\mathcal {B}\) is either \(K_{2,3}\) or the graph obtained by subdividing each edge of a triangle-free 3-connected graph. We obtain that \(H\in \mathcal {H}\) if and only if \(H\in \mathcal {B}\) or H can be constructed from one or some graphs \(H_{1},\ldots ,H_{k}\) in \(\mathcal {B}\) (\(k\ge 1\)) by applying some operations recursively.     

On zero-sum $$\mathbb {Z}_{2j}^k$$-magic graphs

Let \(G = (V,E)\) be a finite graph and let \((\mathbb {A},+)\) be an abelian group with identity 0. Then G is \(\mathbb {A}\)-magic if and only if there exists a function \(\phi \) from E into \(\mathbb {A} - \{0\}\) such that for some \(c \in \mathbb {A}, \sum _{e \in E(v)} \phi (e) = c\) for every \(v \in V\), where E(v) is the set of edges incident to v. Additionally, G is zero-sum \(\mathbb {A}\)-magic if and only if \(\phi \) exists such that \(c = 0\). We consider zero-sum \(\mathbb {A}\)-magic labelings of graphs, with particular attention given to \(\mathbb {A} = \mathbb {Z}_{2j}^k\). For \(j \ge 1\), let \(\zeta _{2j}(G)\) be the smallest positive integer c such that G is zero-sum \(\mathbb {Z}_{2j}^c\)-magic if c exists; infinity otherwise. We establish upper bounds on \(\zeta _{2j}(G)\) when \(\zeta _{2j}(G)\) is finite, and show that \(\zeta _{2j}(G)\) is finite for all r-regular \(G, r \ge 2\). Appealing to classical results on the factors of cubic graphs, we prove that \(\zeta _4(G) \le 2\) for a cubic graph G, with equality if and only if G has no 1-factor. We discuss the problem of classifying cubic graphs according to the collection of finite abelian groups for which they are zero-sum group-magic.     

Total and forcing total edge-to-vertex monophonic number of a graph

For a connected graph \(G = \left( V,E\right) \), a set \(S\subseteq E(G)\) is called a total edge-to-vertex monophonic set of a connected graph G if the subgraph induced by S has no isolated edges. The total edge-to-vertex monophonic number \(m_{tev}(G)\) of G is the minimum cardinality of its total edge-to-vertex monophonic set of G. The total edge-to-vertex monophonic number of certain classes of graphs is determined and some of its general properties are studied. Connected graphs of size \(q \ge 3 \) with total edge-to-vertex monophonic number q is characterized. It is shown that for positive integers \(r_{m},d_{m}\) and \(l\ge 4\) with \(r_{m}< d_{m} \le 2 r_{m}\), there exists a connected graph G with \(\textit{rad}_ {m} G = r_{m}\), \(\textit{diam}_ {m} G = d_{m}\) and \(m_{tev}(G) = l\) and also shown that for every integers a and b with \(2 \le a \le b\), there exists a connected graph G such that \( m_{ev}\left( G\right) = b\) and \(m_{tev}(G) = a + b\). A forcing subset for S of minimum cardinality is a minimum forcing subset of S. The forcing total edge-to-vertex monophonic number of S, denoted by \(f_{tev}(S)\) is the cardinality of a minimum forcing subset of S. The forcing total edge-to-vertex monophonic number of G, denoted by \(f_{tev}(G) = \textit{min}\{f_{tev}(S)\}\), where the minimum is taken over all total edge-to-vertex monophonic set S in G. The forcing total edge-to-vertex monophonic number of certain classes of graphs are determined and some of its general properties are studied. It is shown that for every integers a and b with \(0 \le a \le b\) and \(b \ge 2\), there exists a connected graph G such that \(f_{tev}(G) = a\) and \( m _{tev}(G) = b\), where \( f _{tev}(G)\) is the forcing total edge-to-vertex monophonic number of G.     

Roman game domination number of a graph

The Roman game domination number of an undirected graph G is defined by the following game. Players \(\mathcal {A}\) and \(\mathcal {D}\) orient the edges of the graph G alternately, with \(\mathcal {D}\) playing first, until all edges are oriented. Player \(\mathcal {D}\) (frequently called Dominator) tries to minimize the Roman domination number of the resulting digraph, while player \(\mathcal {A}\) (Avoider) tries to maximize it. This game gives a unique number depending only on G, if we suppose that both \(\mathcal {A}\) and \(\mathcal {D}\) play according to their optimal strategies. This number is called the Roman game domination number of G and is denoted by \(\gamma _{Rg}(G)\). In this paper we initiate the study of the Roman game domination number of a graph and we establish some bounds on \(\gamma _{Rg}(G)\). We also determine the Roman game domination number for some classes of graphs.     

Improved upper bound for the degenerate and star chromatic numbers of graphs

Let \(G=G(V,E)\) be a graph. A proper coloring of G is a function \(f:V\rightarrow N\) such that \(f(x)\ne f(y)\) for every edge \(xy\in E\). A proper coloring of a graph G such that for every \(k\ge 1\), the union of any k color classes induces a \((k-1)\)-degenerate subgraph is called a degenerate coloring; a proper coloring of a graph with no two-colored \(P_{4}\) is called a star coloring. If a coloring is both degenerate and star, then we call it a degenerate star coloring of graph. The corresponding chromatic number is denoted as \(\chi _{sd}(G)\). In this paper, we employ entropy compression method to obtain a new upper bound \(\chi _{sd}(G)\le \lceil \frac{19}{6}\Delta ^{\frac{3}{2}}+5\Delta \rceil \) for general graph G.     

An upper bound on the double Roman domination number

A double Roman dominating function (DRDF) on a graph \(G=(V,E)\) is a function \(f : V \rightarrow \{0, 1, 2, 3\}\) having the property that if \(f(v) = 0\), then vertex v must have at least two neighbors assigned 2 under f or one neighbor w with \(f(w)=3\), and if \(f(v)=1\), then vertex v must have at least one neighbor w with \(f(w)\ge 2\). The weight of a DRDF f is the value \(f(V) = \sum _{u \in V}f(u)\). The double Roman domination number \(\gamma _{dR}(G)\) of a graph G is the minimum weight of a DRDF on G. Beeler et al. (Discrete Appl Math 211:23–29, 2016) observed that every connected graph G having minimum degree at least two satisfies the inequality \(\gamma _{dR}(G)\le \frac{6n}{5}\) and posed the question whether this bound can be improved. In this paper, we settle the question and prove that for any connected graph G of order n with minimum degree at least two, \(\gamma _{dR}(G)\le \frac{8n}{7}\).     

On the b-coloring of tight graphs

A coloring c of a graph \(G=(V,E)\) is a b -coloring if for every color i there is a vertex, say w(i), of color i whose neighborhood intersects every other color class. The vertex w(i) is called a b-dominating vertex of color i. The b -chromatic number of a graph G, denoted by b(G), is the largest integer k such that G admits a b-coloring with k colors. Let m(G) be the largest integer m such that G has at least m vertices of degree at least \(m-1\). A graph G is tight if it has exactly m(G) vertices of degree \(m(G)-1\), and any other vertex has degree at most \(m(G)-2\). In this paper, we show that the b-chromatic number of tight graphs with girth at least 8 is at least \(m(G)-1\) and characterize the graphs G such that \(b(G)=m(G)\). Lin and Chang (2013) conjectured that the b-chromatic number of any graph in \(\mathcal {B}_{m}\) is m or \(m-1\) where \(\mathcal {B}_{m}\) is the class of tight bipartite graphs \((D,D{^\prime })\) of girth 6 such that D is the set of vertices of degree \(m-1\). We verify the conjecture of Lin and Chang for some subclass of \(\mathcal {B}_{m}\), and we give a lower bound for any graph in \(\mathcal {B}_{m}\).     

First-Fit colorings of graphs with no cycles of a prescribed even length

The First-Fit (or Grundy) chromatic number of a graph G denoted by \(\chi _{{_\mathsf{FF}}}(G)\), is the maximum number of colors used by the First-Fit (greedy) coloring algorithm when applied to G. In this paper we first show that any graph G contains a bipartite subgraph of Grundy number \(\lfloor \chi _{{_\mathsf{FF}}}(G) /2 \rfloor +1\). Using this result we prove that for every \(t\ge 2\) there exists a real number \(c>0\) such that in every graph G on n vertices and without cycles of length 2t, any First-Fit coloring of G uses at most \(cn^{1/t}\) colors. It is noted that for \(t=2\) this bound is the best possible. A compactness conjecture is also proposed concerning the First-Fit chromatic number involving the even girth of graphs.     

Nordhaus–Gaddum bounds for total Roman domination

A Nordhaus–Gaddum-type result is a lower or an upper bound on the sum or the product of a parameter of a graph and its complement. In this paper we continue the study of Nordhaus–Gaddum bounds for the total Roman domination number \(\gamma _{tR}\). Let G be a graph on n vertices and let \(\overline{G}\) denote the complement of G, and let \(\delta ^*(G)\) denote the minimum degree among all vertices in G and \(\overline{G}\). For \(\delta ^*(G)\ge 1\), we show that (i) if G and \(\overline{G}\) are connected, then \((\gamma _{tR}(G)-4)(\gamma _{tR}(\overline{G})-4)\le 4\delta ^*(G)-4\), (ii) if \(\gamma _{tR}(G), \gamma _{tR}(\overline{G})\ge 8\), then \(\gamma _{tR}(G)+\gamma _{tR}(\overline{G})\le 2\delta ^*(G)+5\) and (iii) \(\gamma _{tR}(G)+\gamma _{tR}(\overline{G})\le n+5\) and \(\gamma _{tR}(G)\gamma _{tR}(\overline{G})\le 6n-5\).     

Neighbor sum distinguishing total choosability of planar graphs

A total-k-coloring of a graph G is a mapping \(c: V(G)\cup E(G)\rightarrow \{1, 2,\dots , k\}\) such that any two adjacent or incident elements in \(V(G)\cup E(G)\) receive different colors. For a total-k-coloring of G, let \(\sum _c(v)\) denote the total sum of colors of the edges incident with v and the color of v. If for each edge \(uv\in E(G)\), \(\sum _c(u)\ne \sum _c(v)\), then we call such a total-k-coloring neighbor sum distinguishing. The least number k needed for such a coloring of G is the neighbor sum distinguishing total chromatic number, denoted by \(\chi _{\Sigma }^{''}(G)\). Pil?niak and Wo?niak conjectured \(\chi _{\Sigma }^{''}(G)\le \Delta (G)+3\) for any simple graph with maximum degree \(\Delta (G)\). In this paper, we prove that for any planar graph G with maximum degree \(\Delta (G)\), \(ch^{''}_{\Sigma }(G)\le \max \{\Delta (G)+3,16\}\), where \(ch^{''}_{\Sigma }(G)\) is the neighbor sum distinguishing total choosability of G.     

Algorithmic aspects of <Emphasis Type="Italic">b</Emphasis>-disjunctive domination in graphs

For a fixed integer \(b>1\), a set \(D\subseteq V\) is called a b-disjunctive dominating set of the graph \(G=(V,E)\) if for every vertex \(v\in V{\setminus }D\), v is either adjacent to a vertex of D or has at least b vertices in D at distance 2 from it. The Minimum b-Disjunctive Domination Problem (MbDDP) is to find a b-disjunctive dominating set of minimum cardinality. The cardinality of a minimum b-disjunctive dominating set of G is called the b-disjunctive domination number of G, and is denoted by \(\gamma _{b}^{d}(G)\). Given a positive integer k and a graph G, the b-Disjunctive Domination Decision Problem (bDDDP) is to decide whether G has a b-disjunctive dominating set of cardinality at most k. In this paper, we first show that for a proper interval graph G, \(\gamma _{b}^{d}(G)\) is equal to \(\gamma (G)\), the domination number of G for \(b \ge 3\) and observe that \(\gamma _{b}^{d}(G)\) need not be equal to \(\gamma (G)\) for \(b=2\). We then propose a polynomial time algorithm to compute a minimum cardinality b-disjunctive dominating set of a proper interval graph for \(b=2\). Next we tighten the NP-completeness of bDDDP by showing that it remains NP-complete even in chordal graphs. We also propose a \((\ln ({\varDelta }^{2}+(b-1){\varDelta }+b)+1)\)-approximation algorithm for MbDDP, where \({\varDelta }\) is the maximum degree of input graph \(G=(V,E)\) and prove that MbDDP cannot be approximated within \((1-\epsilon ) \ln (|V|)\) for any \(\epsilon >0\) unless NP \(\subseteq \) DTIME\((|V|^{O(\log \log |V|)})\). Finally, we show that MbDDP is APX-complete for bipartite graphs with maximum degree \(\max \{b,4\}\).     

Sparse multipartite graphs as partition universal for graphs with bounded degree

For graphs G and H, let \(G\rightarrow (H,H)\) signify that any red/blue edge coloring of G contains a monochromatic H as a subgraph. Denote \(\mathcal {H}(\Delta ,n)=\{H:|V(H)|=n,\Delta (H)\le \Delta \}\). For any \(\Delta \) and n, we say that G is partition universal for \(\mathcal {H}(\Delta ,n)\) if \(G\rightarrow (H,H)\) for every \(H\in \mathcal {H}(\Delta ,n)\). Let \(G_r(N,p)\) be the random spanning subgraph of the complete r-partite graph \(K_r(N)\) with N vertices in each part, in which each edge of \(K_r(N)\) appears with probability p independently and randomly. We prove that for fixed \(\Delta \ge 2\) there exist constants r, B and C depending only on \(\Delta \) such that if \(N\ge Bn\) and \(p=C(\log N/N)^{1/\Delta }\), then asymptotically almost surely \(G_r(N,p)\) is partition universal for \(\mathcal {H}(\Delta ,n)\).     

On the algorithmic aspects of strong subcoloring

A partition of the vertex set V(G) of a graph G into \(V(G)=V_1\cup V_2\cup \cdots \cup V_k\) is called a k-strong subcoloring if \(d(x,y)\ne 2\) in G for every \(x,y\in V_i\), \(1\le i \le k\) where d(x, y) denotes the length of a shortest x-y path in G. The strong subchromatic number is defined as \(\chi _{sc}(G)=\text {min}\{ k:G \text { admits a }k\)-\(\text {strong subcoloring}\}\). In this paper, we explore the complexity status of the StrongSubcoloring problem: for a given graph G and a positive integer k, StrongSubcoloring is to decide whether G admits a k-strong subcoloring. We prove that StrongSubcoloring is NP-complete for subcubic bipartite graphs and the problem is polynomial time solvable for trees. In addition, we prove the following dichotomy results: (i) for the class of \(K_{1,r}\)-free split graphs, StrongSubcoloring is in P when \(r\le 3\) and NP-complete when \(r>3\) and (ii) for the class of H-free graphs, StrongSubcoloring is polynomial time solvable only if H is an induced subgraph of \(P_4\); otherwise the problem is NP-complete. Next, we consider a lower bound on the strong subchromatic number. A strong set is a set S of vertices of a graph G such that for every \(x,y\in S\), \(d(x,y)= 2\) in G and the cardinality of a maximum strong set in G is denoted by \(\alpha _{s}(G)\). Clearly, \(\alpha _{s}(G)\le \chi _{sc}(G)\). We consider the complexity status of the StrongSet problem: given a graph G and a positive integer k, StrongSet asks whether G contains a strong set of cardinality k. We prove that StrongSet is NP-complete for (i) bipartite graphs and (ii) \(K_{1,4}\)-free split graphs, and it is polynomial time solvable for (i) trees and (ii) \(P_4\)-free graphs.     

On the odd girth and the circular chromatic number of generalized Petersen graphs

A class \(\mathcal{G}\) of simple graphs is said to be girth-closed (odd-girth-closed) if for any positive integer g there exists a graph \(\mathrm {G} \in \mathcal{G}\) such that the girth (odd-girth) of \(\mathrm {G}\) is \(\ge g\). A girth-closed (odd-girth-closed) class \(\mathcal{G}\) of graphs is said to be pentagonal (odd-pentagonal) if there exists a positive integer \(g^*\) depending on \(\mathcal{G}\) such that any graph \(\mathrm {G} \in \mathcal{G}\) whose girth (odd-girth) is greater than \(g^*\) admits a homomorphism to the five cycle (i.e. is \(\mathrm {C}_{_{5}}\)-colourable). Although, the question “Is the class of simple 3-regular graphs pentagonal?” proposed by Ne?et?il (Taiwan J Math 3:381–423, 1999) is still a central open problem, Gebleh (Theorems and computations in circular colourings of graphs, 2007) has shown that there exists an odd-girth-closed subclass of simple 3-regular graphs which is not odd-pentagonal. In this article, motivated by the conjecture that the class of generalized Petersen graphs is odd-pentagonal, we show that finding the odd girth of generalized Petersen graphs can be transformed to an integer programming problem, and using the combinatorial and number theoretic properties of this problem, we explicitly compute the odd girth of such graphs, showing that the class is odd-girth-closed. Also, we obtain upper and lower bounds for the circular chromatic number of these graphs, and as a consequence, we show that the subclass containing generalized Petersen graphs \(\mathrm {Pet}(n,k)\) for which either k is even, n is odd and \(n\mathop {\equiv }\limits ^{k-1}\pm 2\) or both n and k are odd and \(n\ge 5k\) is odd-pentagonal. This in particular shows the existence of nontrivial odd-pentagonal subclasses of 3-regular simple graphs.     

Total coloring of planar graphs without adjacent short cycles

In the study of computer science, optimization, computation of Hessians matrix, graph coloring is an important tool. In this paper, we consider a classical coloring, total coloring. Let \(G=(V,E)\) be a graph. Total coloring is a coloring of \(V\cup {E}\) such that no two adjacent or incident elements (vertex/edge) receive the same color. Let G be a planar graph with \(\varDelta \ge 8\). We proved that if for every vertex \(v\in V\), there exists two integers \(i_v,j_v\in \{3,4,5,6,7\}\) such that v is not incident with adjacent \(i_v\)-cycles and \(j_v\)-cycles, then the total chromatic number of graph G is \(\varDelta +1\).     

Neighbor sum distinguishing list total coloring of subcubic graphs

Let \(G=(V, E)\) be a simple graph and denote the set of edges incident to a vertex v by E(v). The neighbor sum distinguishing (NSD) total choice number of G, denoted by \(\mathrm{ch}_{\Sigma }^{t}(G)\), is the smallest integer k such that, after assigning each \(z\in V\cup E\) a set L(z) of k real numbers, G has a total coloring \(\phi \) satisfying \(\phi (z)\in L(z)\) for each \(z\in V\cup E\) and \(\sum _{z\in E(u)\cup \{u\}}\phi (z)\ne \sum _{z\in E(v)\cup \{v\}}\phi (z)\) for each \(uv\in E\). In this paper, we propose some reducible configurations of NSD list total coloring for general graphs by applying the Combinatorial Nullstellensatz. As an application, we present that \(\mathrm{ch}^{t}_{\Sigma }(G)\le \Delta (G)+3\) for every subcubic graph G.     

Perfect graphs involving semitotal and semipaired domination

Let G be a graph with vertex set V and no isolated vertices, and let S be a dominating set of V. The set S is a semitotal dominating set of G if every vertex in S is within distance 2 of another vertex of S. And, S is a semipaired dominating set of G if S can be partitioned into 2-element subsets such that the vertices in each 2-set are at most distance two apart. The semitotal domination number \(\gamma _\mathrm{t2}(G)\) is the minimum cardinality of a semitotal dominating set of G, and the semipaired domination number \(\gamma _\mathrm{pr2}(G)\) is the minimum cardinality of a semipaired dominating set of G. For a graph without isolated vertices, the domination number \(\gamma (G)\), the total domination \(\gamma _t(G)\), and the paired domination number \(\gamma _\mathrm{pr}(G)\) are related to the semitotal and semipaired domination numbers by the following inequalities: \(\gamma (G) \le \gamma _\mathrm{t2}(G) \le \gamma _t(G) \le \gamma _\mathrm{pr}(G)\) and \(\gamma (G) \le \gamma _\mathrm{t2}(G) \le \gamma _\mathrm{pr2}(G) \le \gamma _\mathrm{pr}(G) \le 2\gamma (G)\). Given two graph parameters \(\mu \) and \(\psi \) related by a simple inequality \(\mu (G) \le \psi (G)\) for every graph G having no isolated vertices, a graph is \((\mu ,\psi )\)-perfect if every induced subgraph H with no isolated vertices satisfies \(\mu (H) = \psi (H)\). Alvarado et al. (Discrete Math 338:1424–1431, 2015) consider classes of \((\mu ,\psi )\)-perfect graphs, where \(\mu \) and \(\psi \) are domination parameters including \(\gamma \), \(\gamma _t\) and \(\gamma _\mathrm{pr}\). We study classes of perfect graphs for the possible combinations of parameters in the inequalities when \(\gamma _\mathrm{t2}\) and \(\gamma _\mathrm{pr2}\) are included in the mix. Our results are characterizations of several such classes in terms of their minimal forbidden induced subgraphs.     

On the difference of two generalized connectivities of a graph

The concept of k-connectivity \(\kappa '_{k}(G)\) of a graph G, introduced by Chartrand in 1984, is a generalization of the cut-version of the classical connectivity. Another generalized connectivity of a graph G, named the generalized k-connectivity \(\kappa _{k}(G)\), mentioned by Hager in 1985, is a natural generalization of the path-version of the classical connectivity. In this paper, we get the lower and upper bounds for the difference of these two parameters by showing that for a connected graph G of order n, if \(\kappa '_k(G)\ne n-k+1\) where \(k\ge 3\), then \(0\le \kappa '_k(G)-\kappa _k(G)\le n-k-1\); otherwise, \(-\lfloor \frac{k}{2}\rfloor +1\le \kappa '_k(G)-\kappa _k(G)\le n-k\). Moreover, all of these bounds are sharp. Some specific study is focused for the case \(k=3\). As results, we characterize the graphs with \(\kappa '_3(G)=\kappa _3(G)=t\) for \(t\in \{1, n-3, n-2\}\), and give a necessary condition for \(\kappa '_3(G)=\kappa _3(G)\) by showing that for a connected graph G of order n and size m, if \(\kappa '_3(G)=\kappa _3(G)=t\) where \(1\le t\le n-3\), then \(m\le {n-2\atopwithdelims ()2}+2t\). Moreover, the unique extremal graph is given for the equality to hold.     

Upper bounds on the chromatic number of triangle-free graphs with a forbidden subtree

Gyárfás conjectured that for a given forest F, there exists an integer function f(F, x) such that \(\chi (G)\le f(F,\omega (G))\) for each F-free graph G, where \(\omega (G)\) is the clique number of G. The broom B(m, n) is the tree of order \(m+n\) obtained from identifying a vertex of degree 1 of the path \(P_m\) with the center of the star \(K_{1,n}\). In this note, we prove that every connected, triangle-free and B(m, n)-free graph is \((m+n-2)\)-colorable as an extension of a result of Randerath and Schiermeyer and a result of Gyárfás, Szemeredi and Tuza. In addition, it is also shown that every connected, triangle-free, \(C_4\)-free and T-free graph is \((p-2)\)-colorable, where T is a tree of order \(p\ge 4\) and \(T\not \cong K_{1,3}\).