证券市场会计监管的博弈分析

会计信息是利益相关者决策及利益分配的重要依据,会计信息的内容和质量会影响到利益相关者的决策和企业的发展方向证券市场是资本市场的核心。本文运用了博弈模型分析了抑制上市公司会计造假的现象,对这一问题必须对证券市场加强会计监管。     

新会计准则对上市公司盈余管理的影响研究

一直以来,上市公司盈余管理不仅仅我国会计界关注的焦点问题,也是一个世界性的难题。在我国证券市场发展的早期,上市公司通过盈余管理手段影响报告收益的现象比较普遍,误导投资者和其他信息使用者的决策,造成社会资源的不合理配置,导致我国证券市场会计信息失真和社会诚信危机。尤其是我国很多中小股民素质不够高,财务知识有限,在投资决策时主要依赖的还是上市公司会计盈余信息,因此,加强上市公司盈余管理势在必行。     

基于BP神经网络方法的会计舞弊识别研究

规范的信息披露是维护证券市场公开、公平、公正的根本保证,而会计舞弊却是阻碍我国资本市场健康发展的"毒瘤".随着我国证券市场的日益完善和国内外舞弊丑闻的不断发生,会计舞弊识别问题受到越来越多的关注.本文以116家上市公司作为研究样本,通过分析舞弊案例及舞弊手段,构建了会计舞弊识别指标体系,并依据主成分分析法及BP神经网络,建立了会计舞弊识别模型,进行了实证分析.通过研究发现,这一模型对于会计舞弊的识别具有较高的准确率,是一种具有现实可操作性的舞弊识别方法.     

浅析上市公司会计舞弊

近年来,我国经济发展趋势良好,证券市场在国民经济中的地位也越来越重要,人们对会计信息质量的要求也随之越来越高.但与此同时越来越多的上市公司会计舞弊丑闻不断曝出,严重损害了社会公众、政府机关、投资者的利益,让人不得不质疑上市公司的盈利能力和会计师事务所的独立性,会计舞弊已不是纯粹的会计问题而是成为一个社会问题.分析上市公司会计舞弊的动机、手段及治理对策,对规范我国证券市场,保护股民和国家利益意义重大.     

浅谈我国会计监管现存问题与对策思考

随着市场经济的快速发展和我国企业制度危机逐渐被暴露,对我国的会计监管问题提出了新的挑战和要求。会计监管作为企业会计中最基本的部分之一,也是构成我国市场经济体系的一项重要因素。特别是近年来,随着企业中会计信息的失真化和会计制度的混乱化现象日益严重,使得我国会计监管问题成为企业的重中之重。因此,本文通过对我国会计监管问题现状分析,提出我国企业中现存的会计监管问题和缺点,从而对改善我国会计监管存在的问题提出一些对策和思考。     

上市企业会计舞弊原因及识别探析

因为市场经济制度的不完善，严重的财务报告舞弊事件经常发生，证券市场的上市企业的会计舞弊现象是比较严重。本文通过分析上市企业会计舞弊的原因，并针对根源运用有效的措施，这样才能从根本上控制并消除上市企业的会计舞弊现象。     

我国上市公司会计信息披露问题及对策研究

纵观我国上市公司会计信息披露存在不真实、不准确、不充分、不及时等主要问题,其原因主要有监管法规不完善、监督不到位和惩处无力度等外部因素以及公司利益驱动和公司治理结构不合理等内部原因。严重阻碍了证券市场的发展,给证券市场的正常运行造成了诸多不利的影响。在此文中对上市公司会计披露基本问题进行描述,对我国会计信息披露内容进行分析,从而提出需改正的问题及提出相应对策。     

浅析会计准则制定模式局限性对盈余管理的影响

盈余管理是企业管理当局在完全遵循会计准则的基础上，通过会计政策的选择对财务报表上的会计收益信息进行控制和调整的会计行为。我国证券市场经过十几年的发展，仍处于不很成熟的阶段，许多问题都有待解决。本文通过分析规则基础会计准则制定模式和原则基础会计准则制定模式对盈余管理的局限性，进而为我国会计准则的制定模式选择方向提出建议。     

资产托管会计对传统财务会计的继承与发展

资产托管的核心是会计,履行受托责任是重要内容;资产托管业务对我国经济的发展产生了重要作用,本文从会计理论、会计目标、会计假设几个方面入手,对资产托管会计对传统财务会计的继承与发展作出阐释。     

证券市场中现金流量对会计信息价值相关性的影响

随着我国证券市场的逐渐发展与完善。会计信息作为外界了解上市公司的重要途径之一，在相关部门对证券市场的有效监管以及投资者对证券市场的理性决策方面．发挥着越来越重要的作用。原因在于会计信息和股票收益率的价值相关性。一般地，会计信息与股票收益率之间的相关性研究主要着眼于会计盈余的价值相关性。     

Comments on globalization, interdisciplinary research, myopia and parochialism, government, convergence, and culture

Globalization presents social scientists with a wide variety of issues and challenges that cut across disciplinary boundaries. Disciplinary boundaries encourage specialization and advances in understanding aspects of social behavior, but specialization also creates barriers to more comprehensive understanding of social behavior such as globalization. Successful interdisciplinary efforts entail gains from trade across disciplinary specializations. The papers in this volume help outline an agenda for interdisciplinary investigation of globalization to knock down disciplinary boundaries and encourage gains from trade that further our understanding of globalization. But much work remains before we see real fruits from such efforts.     

Complexity,simplicity, simplexity

“In the midst of order, there is chaos; but in the midst of chaos, there is order”, John Gribbin wrote in his book Deep Simplicity (p. 76). In this dialectical spirit, we discuss the generative tension between complexity and simplicity in the theory and practice of management and organization. Complexity theory suggests that the relationship between complex environments and complex organizations advanced by the well-known Ashby’s law, may be reconsidered: only simple organization provides enough space for individual agency to match environmental turbulence in the form of complex organizational responses. We suggest that complex organizing may be paradoxically facilitated by a simple infrastructure, and that the theory of organizations may be viewed as resulting from the dialectical interplay between simplicity and complexity.     

Flexibility, Hierarchy, Markets

The conclusion that organizations need to become more strategically flexible as a response to increasing environmental dynamism and uncertainty has been an important feature of recent contingency theories of organization design. In this literature organizations have been analysed from the perspective of the development of networks of organizations concentrating on their core competencies and contracting among themselves on a stable long-term basis. This model of inter-firm relationships provides an alternative mode of organizational structuring to that arising from vertical integration, which, by contrast, is seen as fostering strategic inflexibility. In the literature on corporate restructuring and changes in ownership form arising from the markets and hierarchies perspective, we see a similar emphasis on the dysfunctional consequences of large-scale bureaucratic organization. Changes in ownership form are seen as a major means of providing more effective managerial control. In this paper we argue that linking the literature on flexibility emanating from contingency theories of organizational design and the markets and hierarchies perspective provides important new insights into current and emerging forms of organization.     

GMM,GEL, Serial Correlation,and Asymptotic Bias

For stationary time series models with serial correlation, we consider generalized method of moments (GMM) estimators that use heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent (HAC) positive definite weight matrices and generalized empirical likelihood (GEL) estimators based on smoothed moment conditions. Following the analysis of Newey and Smith (2004) for independent observations, we derive second order asymptotic biases of these estimators. The inspection of bias expressions reveals that the use of smoothed GEL, in contrast to GMM, removes the bias component associated with the correlation between the moment function and its derivative, while the bias component associated with third moments depends on the employed kernel function. We also analyze the case of no serial correlation, and find that the seemingly unnecessary smoothing and HAC estimation can reduce the bias for some of the estimators.     

Trust, confidence, procedural fairness, outcome fairness, moral conviction, and the acceptance of GM field experiments

In 2005, Swiss citizens endorsed a moratorium on gene technology, resulting in the prohibition of the commercial cultivation of genetically modified crops and the growth of genetically modified animals until 2013. However, scientific research was not affected by this moratorium, and in 2008, GMO field experiments were conducted that allowed us to examine the factors that influence their acceptance by the public. In this study, trust and confidence items were analyzed using principal component analysis. The analysis revealed the following three factors: "economy/health and environment" (value similarity based trust), "trust and honesty of industry and scientists" (value similarity based trust), and "competence" (confidence). The results of a regression analysis showed that all the three factors significantly influenced the acceptance of GM field experiments. Furthermore, risk communication scholars have suggested that fairness also plays an important role in the acceptance of environmental hazards. We, therefore, included measures for outcome fairness and procedural fairness in our model. However, the impact of fairness may be moderated by moral conviction. That is, fairness may be significant for people for whom GMO is not an important issue, but not for people for whom GMO is an important issue. The regression analysis showed that, in addition to the trust and confidence factors, moral conviction, outcome fairness, and procedural fairness were significant predictors. The results suggest that the influence of procedural fairness is even stronger for persons having high moral convictions compared with persons having low moral convictions.     

Bacon, Boole, the EPA, and Scientific Standards

The scientific standards of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) include the use of retrospective meta-analysis. This analysis entails a use of the theory of probability that is only a simulation and cannot accurately measure the confidence that should be placed in the results. The uncertainty necessary for probability is, in a retrospective study, simulated rather than real. There are three logical forms for establishing a proposition. In the logic of the syllogism, a proposition is established by deduction from assumed propositions. In the logic of the physical sciences, a proposition is established by its ability to predict the outcomes of future experiments. In the logic of the courtroom, a proposition is established by its ability to explain past events. The logic of the courtroom operates under the handicap of working with nonrepeatable events. It is more subject to the preferences of the judge than the logic of the physical sciences or that of the syllogism. Because the logic of the courtroom is less reliable than either the logic of the physical sciences or that of the syllogism, it is the logic of last resort, i.e., it is used only when the other two are not applicable. Under the EPA scientific standards, the logic of the courtroom is accepted for establishing propositions about the physical world. As the logic of the courtroom is less reliable than that of the physical sciences, this practice increases the likelihood of errors.