"大嘴美女"美在"真我"

1967年,一位长着一张大嘴巴的小女孩出生在了美国佐治亚州斯迈那市的一个演员家庭里,她的父母都是一线演员,拥有俊朗姣好的容貌,她还有一个名叫埃里克·罗伯茨哥哥,长得同样非常俊俏.但让人难以置信的是这个小女孩却又瘦又黑,最让人难以接受的是长在她那张瘦脸上的大嘴巴,这使她成为家里唯一的丑女.     

我的中国缘(英文)

陈黎阳是一位来自菲律宾的儿科医生。她于2004年3月同丈夫来到北京,供职于庇利积臣医疗中心。陈黎阳非常喜欢孩子,每个周日她都要到廊坊儿童村——美国菲利浦海德基金会在廊坊设立的救助孤儿中心,做咨询工作。当问起她对北京的感受,她说北京就是她的第二故乡。     

请原谅我不想去流浪

请原谅我不想去流浪文／黄文婷图／阿穗他是一家报社的编辑，偶然在某杂志看到一位女作者的文章，非常欣赏，于是便千方百计打听她的地址，并写信向她约稿，她被他的热情和诚意感动了。从此，她的芳名常常出现在他编的专栏里。他与她合作得很默契，可惜一直无缘相见。直到...     

“大嘴美女”美在“真我”

1967年,一位长着一张大嘴巴的小女孩出生在了美国佐治亚州斯迈那市的一个演员家庭里,她的父母都是一线演员,拥有俊朗姣好的容貌,她还有一个名叫埃里克·罗伯茨哥哥,长得同样非常俊俏。但让人难以置信的是这个小女孩却又瘦又黑,最让人难以接受的是长在她那张瘦脸上的大嘴巴,这使她成为家里唯一的丑女。     

请让我自首

请让我自首译编／阿颖图／笑留隐姓埋名、漂泊不定的生活压得她位携有武器并且非常危险的人物──喘不过气来。经过反复思索，这位失去了自己的年轻女人做出了决定。有多少次，连她自己也记不清，她小心地避开那些回忆，不去回头看。但这次终于不同了，这一次她要向过去挥...     

天上落馅饼,好职位来找我

她本是一名下岗职工、一个普通的裁缝,一位老板发现了她身上的闪光点和专业素质,经过3次别出心裁的考核后,她奇迹般地成为三星级大酒店年薪6万元的财务总监.     

李亚红:我不是李咏身边的花瓶

央视"非常6 1"有个非常主持李咏,李咏身边有个含而不露的非常美女,她的职责就是替热线观众摘取金蛋银蛋,每场节目只露3次面,不发一言一语,但她的一颦一笑却让人们印象深刻,观众对她的喜爱程度甚至超过李咏.     

我的身躯终有一天会老去,而我绝不会逃避

科室里面一堆80岁以上的老人.其中有一位很可爱,但是有点老年痴呆,不停问其他人：“这里是什么地方啊？”她儿子一边看报纸一边头也不抬地答曰：“医院.”老人说：“哦,吊完这瓶水我要回家了.”过了5分钟,再问,过了再问再问再问.我看着她两鬓斑白的儿子坐在阳光里耐心地一遍遍回复,因为不回答老人就会心慌害怕,辗转不安.     

只有你能欣赏我

第一次参加家长会,幼儿园的老师说:"你的儿子有多动症吧,在板凳上连三分钟都坐不住,你最好带他去医院看一看。"回家的路上,儿子问她老师说了什么,她鼻子一酸,差点流下泪来。因为全班30位小朋友,惟有他表现最差:惟有对他,老师表现出不屑。然而她告诉儿子:"老师表扬你了,说宝宝原来在板凳上坐不了一分钟,现在能坐三分钟了。其他的妈妈都非常羡慕妈妈,因为全班     

我所知道的李讷

第一次见到李讷,是在1964年.那年,我从山东大学中文系毕业,分配到中共中央办公厅秘书室工作.一个周末的上午,我和同事到瀛台散步回来,来到瀛台的桥上,从丰泽园走过来一位青年女子.同事告诉我:她是毛主席的女儿李讷,在北京大学历史系读书.     

Expanding Bowen's legacy to family therapy: a response to Horne and Hicks

In response to Horne and Hicks's critique of my 1994 revision of Bowen Theory, I present an updated rationale for my work. I argue that the primary difference in my construction of emotional differentiation rests in the way "self" is constructed. I suggest that many women, persons from less individualistic cultures, and very spiritual persons develop a "connected self" that is significantly different than Bowen's image of separate selves engaged with each other. I hold that Bowen Theory privileges individuality and ignores many of the positive aspects of togetherness. I put forth an inclusive model for differentiation that equally prioritizes each.     

A Quick Guide to Research Methods

In a hurry to understand that piece of research? Can't remember your undergraduate statistics lectures? Don't worry! Refer to this handy‐dandy quick reference for making sense of research design! Seriously. Too often when I am reading a research paper, terms are used which are either unfamiliar or ring only faint bells of recognition. I would like to have the capacity to remember everything I was taught, but apart from having a very bad memory, I am also beginning to suspect that it is actually better practice to check terms out even if I think that I remember what they mean.     

在米其林三星餐厅做甜品

我叫袁望,目前在纽约曼哈顿第五大道从事时尚行业。我从小就坚信食物是传递情感的纽带,所以在工作之余,学习了烹饪和餐饮管理,成为纽约烹饪教育学院糕点烘焙和烹饪管理专业的优秀毕业生。毕业后,我曾加入纽约米其林餐厅Jean-Georges,专攻甜品。这是一段令我难忘的经历。     

Power and Shame: Reply to Mark Blechner and to Ruth Stein

I touch briefly on my own experience of shame as triggered by what my discussants have written. I look at how shame and power interact in psychoanalytic discourse, examine their play in relation to questions of aggression and activity, and refer as well to what I am calling “an ethics of relativism.” Cautioning against uncritical binary thinking, I conclude that, if we forget the intimacy of good and bad, we are going to write jouissance, that site of extremity and transcendence where pain and pleasure are indistinguishable, right out of our sexual lives. And, if we do that, we are once again going to write sexuality out of psychoanalysis.     

Reply to comments

Conclusion The comments can be ordered on a linear scale according to the amount of disagreement with my position. Roemer has virtually no quarrels with my position, which is why I have virtually nothing to say on his comment. Van Parijs is also fairly close to my view, even if we disagree about the nature and importance of the non-intentional mechanisms that can sustain functional explanations. With Cohen the disagreement goes deeper, because he argues that we can dispense with knowledge of the mechanism altogether, though I accept his criticism of my analysis of exploitation. Next on the scale, still further come Berger and Offe. We share an interest in the same problems, such as the nature of the capitalist state and the problem of collective action, but we use quite different conceptual tools to handle them. I feel very far from Giddens's position, to the extent that it is at all intelligible to me. Social theory in his hand becomes extremely abstract, without acquiring the precision for which one is sometimes prepared to pay a high price in terms of level of abstraction. Though, at the most general level, I symphatize with his objections to the dualism of choice versus structure, my agreement gives way to puzzlement when I try to understand how his views could make a difference for the working social scientist.     

伊莎白·克鲁克:见证中国百年巨变

“友谊勋章”获得者伊莎白·柯鲁克是新中国英语教学的拓荒者,为中国教育事业和对外友好交流、促进中国与加拿大民间友好交往做出了杰出贡献。她说:“我非常幸运,见证了这个伟大的时代。相信我深受的中国越来越好,祝福中国人民越来越幸福。”     

Response to Commentaries by Mitchell and by Butler

This paper is a response to a discussion of my work by Stephen Mitchell and Judith Butler. I treat number of issues raised by those writers. Chief among the issues raised by Mitchell are the status of drive theory and the interrelation of the intersubjective and the intrapsychic. I clarify that, although I do value the paradoxical tension between opposites in relation to many binaries, I do not aim to preserve Freud's instinct theory alongside current views of Object relations. However, I do believe that intersubjectivity theory should posit an inherent conflict in the mind that is not simply a reflection of Object relations, that is, experiences with outside others. Rather, the inherent difficulty in recognizing the other, and the attendant problems of splitting and destructiveness, are crucial aspects of intersubjective theory. Precisely for this reason I reject Butler's claim that my theory does not see destruction and breakdown as essential to the movement of recognition. I see my own intentions as closer to those expressed by Butler's own statements about the relation of destruction and recognition. However, the faith that the clinical endeavor can overcome destructiveness may be the real point of contention. Another important difference relates to the question of the triad and the third. I accept Butler's view that I emphasize the dyad over the triad and attempt to take up some of her questions about triadic relations and the nature of thirdness.     

From Clinician to Researcher: The Challenges and Rewards

After many enjoyable years of practice, I made a decision to retire, and felt the need for new but related interests. I knew it was going to be research because I have long considered the progress of my clinical work from that aspect. As a student, I had been trained in quantitative method, and I expected to experience a culture shock when ‘permitted’ to relax my previous research mode, with its dependence on statistical approaches based on preemptive hypotheses, to undertake a qualitative methodology novel to me.     

张伟丽:不设限的人生更精彩

2019年8月31日,在UFC(终极格斗冠军赛)格斗之夜压轴决战中,90后女孩张伟丽只用短短42秒,就TK0(技术性击倒)了巴西女拳王,成为亚洲首位UFC世界冠军。从一名普通的收银员,到成为“中国最能打的女人”,张伟丽用她执着圆梦的精神,完成了自己的人生逆袭之战。     

John Harsanyi's contributions to social choice and welfare economics

This article provides an overview of John Harsanyi's contributions to Social Choice and Welfare Economics.This article is a slightly expanded version of remarks I made on July 9, 1994 when I introduced John Harsanyi's address (which follows in this same issue) to the meetings of the Society for Social Choice and Welfare in Rochester, New York. In preparing my remarks for publication I have tried to keep the conversational tone of the original presentation but have added references for the reader's convenience. At the time of the meetings I had not anticipated publishing my introduction. When a few months later Maurice Salles asked if I would write up my remarks, I had to do so from memory, not having kept the notes I used to make my presentation. Subsequent to the Rochester meetings, Professor Harsanyi was awarded the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences and I am pleased to add my congratulations to him for this honour in the form of this introduction to his research in Social Choice and Welfare Economics. Research support from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada is gratefully acknowledged.