Edge-colouring of joins of regular graphs, I

We prove that the edges of every even graph G=G ₁+G ₂ that is the join of two regular graphs G _i =(V _i ,E _i ) can be coloured with Δ(G) colours, whenever Δ(G)=Δ(G ₂)+|V ₁|. The proof of this result yields a combinatorial algorithm to optimally colour the edges of this type of graphs.     

Acyclic edge coloring of planar graphs without 4-cycles

An acyclic edge coloring of a graph G is a proper edge coloring such that no bichromatic cycles are produced. The acyclic chromatic index a′(G) of G is the smallest integer k such that G has an acyclic edge coloring using k colors. Fiam?ik (Math. Slovaca 28:139–145, 1978) and later Alon, Sudakov and Zaks (J. Graph Theory 37:157–167, 2001) conjectured that a′(G)≤Δ+2 for any simple graph G with maximum degree Δ. In this paper, we confirm this conjecture for planar graphs G with Δ≠4 and without 4-cycles.     

On total weight choosability of graphs

For a graph G with vertex set V and edge set E, a (k,k′)-total list assignment L of G assigns to each vertex v a set L(v) of k real numbers as permissible weights, and assigns to each edge e a set L(e) of k′ real numbers as permissible weights. If for any (k,k′)-total list assignment L of G, there exists a mapping f:V∪E→? such that f(y)∈L(y) for each y∈V∪E, and for any two adjacent vertices u and v, ∑ _y∈N(u) f(uy)+f(u)≠∑ _x∈N(v) f(vx)+f(v), then G is (k,k′)-total weight choosable. It is conjectured by Wong and Zhu that every graph is (2,2)-total weight choosable, and every graph with no isolated edges is (1,3)-total weight choosable. In this paper, it is proven that a graph G obtained from any loopless graph H by subdividing each edge with at least one vertex is (1,3)-total weight choosable and (2,2)-total weight choosable. It is shown that s-degenerate graphs (with s≥2) are (1,2s)-total weight choosable. Hence planar graphs are (1,10)-total weight choosable, and outerplanar graphs are (1,4)-total weight choosable. We also give a combinatorial proof that wheels are (2,2)-total weight choosable, as well as (1,3)-total weight choosable.     

L(2,1)-labelings of the edge-path-replacement of a graph

For two positive integers j and k with j≥k, an L(j,k)-labeling of a graph G is an assignment of nonnegative integers to V(G) such that the difference between labels of adjacent vertices is at least j, and the difference between labels of vertices that are distance two apart is at least k. The span of an L(j,k)-labeling of a graph G is the difference between the maximum and minimum integers used by it. The L(j,k)-labelings-number of G is the minimum span over all L(j,k)-labelings of G. This paper focuses on L(2,1)-labelings-number of the edge-path-replacement G(P _k ) of a graph G. Note that G(P ₃) is the incidence graph of G. L(2,1)-labelings of the edge-path-replacement G(P ₃) of a graph, called (2,1)-total labeling of G, was introduced by Havet and Yu in 2002 (Workshop graphs and algorithms, Dijon, France, 2003; Discrete Math. 308:498–513, 2008). They (Havet and Yu, Discrete Math. 308:498–513, 2008) obtain the bound $\Delta+1\leq\lambda^{T}_{2}(G)\leq2\Delta+1$ and conjectured $\lambda^{T}_{2}(G)\leq\Delta+3$ . In this paper, we obtain that λ(G(P _k ))≤Δ+2 for k≥5, and conjecture λ(G(P ₄))≤Δ+2 for any graph G with maximum degree Δ.     

Generalized perfect domination in graphs

Let k be a positive integer and G=(V,E) be a graph. A vertex subset D of a graph G is called a perfect k-dominating set of G, if every vertex v of G, not in D, is adjacent to exactly k vertices of D. The minimum cardinality of a perfect k-dominating set of G is the perfect k-domination number γ _kp (G). In this paper, we give characterizations of graphs for which γ _kp (G)=γ(G)+k?2 and prove that the perfect k-domination problem is NP-complete even when restricted to bipartite graphs and chordal graphs. Also, by using dynamic programming techniques, we obtain an algorithm to determine the perfect k-domination number of trees.     

On minimum balanced bipartitions of triangle-free graphs

A balanced bipartition of a graph G is a partition of V(G) into two subsets V ₁ and V ₂ that differ in cardinality by at most 1. A minimum balanced bipartition of G is a balanced bipartition V ₁, V ₂ of G minimizing e(V ₁,V ₂), where e(V ₁,V ₂) is the number of edges joining V ₁ and V ₂ and is usually referred to as the size of the bipartition. In this paper, we show that every 2-connected graph G admits a balanced bipartition V ₁,V ₂ such that the subgraphs of G induced by V ₁ and by V ₂ are both connected. This yields a good upper bound to the size of minimum balanced bipartition of sparse graphs. We also present two upper bounds to the size of minimum balanced bipartitions of triangle-free graphs which sharpen the corresponding bounds of Fan et al. (Discrete Math. 312:1077–1083, 2012).     

Adjacent vertex-distinguishing edge coloring of graphs with maximum degree Δ

An adjacent vertex-distinguishing edge coloring, or avd-coloring, of a graph G is a proper edge coloring of G such that no pair of adjacent vertices meets the same set of colors. Let $\operatorname {mad}(G)$ and Δ(G) denote the maximum average degree and the maximum degree of a graph G, respectively. In this paper, we prove that every graph G with Δ(G)≥5 and $\operatorname{mad}(G) < 3-\frac {2}{\Delta}$ can be avd-colored with Δ(G)+1 colors. This completes a result of Wang and Wang (J. Comb. Optim. 19:471–485, 2010).     

Hardness results and approximation algorithm for total liar’s domination in graphs

In this paper, we initiate the study of total liar’s domination of a graph. A subset L?V of a graph G=(V,E) is called a total liar’s dominating set of G if (i) for all v∈V, |N _G (v)∩L|≥2 and (ii) for every pair u,v∈V of distinct vertices, |(N _G (u)∪N _G (v))∩L|≥3. The total liar’s domination number of a graph G is the cardinality of a minimum total liar’s dominating set of G and is denoted by γ _TLR (G). The Minimum Total Liar’s Domination Problem is to find a total liar’s dominating set of minimum cardinality of the input graph G. Given a graph G and a positive integer k, the Total Liar’s Domination Decision Problem is to check whether G has a total liar’s dominating set of cardinality at most k. In this paper, we give a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of a total liar’s dominating set in a graph. We show that the Total Liar’s Domination Decision Problem is NP-complete for general graphs and is NP-complete even for split graphs and hence for chordal graphs. We also propose a 2(lnΔ(G)+1)-approximation algorithm for the Minimum Total Liar’s Domination Problem, where Δ(G) is the maximum degree of the input graph G. We show that Minimum Total Liar’s Domination Problem cannot be approximated within a factor of $(\frac{1}{8}-\epsilon)\ln(|V|)$ for any ?>0, unless NP?DTIME(|V|^loglog|V|). Finally, we show that Minimum Total Liar’s Domination Problem is APX-complete for graphs with bounded degree 4.     

L(d,1)-labelings of the edge-path-replacement of a graph

For two positive integers j and k with j≥k, an L(j,k)-labeling of a graph G is an assignment of nonnegative integers to V(G) such that the difference between labels of adjacent vertices is at least j, and the difference between labels of vertices that are distance two apart is at least k. The span of an L(j,k)-labeling of a graph G is the difference between the maximum and minimum integers used by it. The L(j,k)-labelings-number of G is the minimum span over all L(j,k)-labelings of G. This paper focuses on L(d,1)-labelings-number of the edge-path-replacement G(P _k ) of a graph G. Note that G(P ₃) is the incidence graph of G. L(d,1)-labelings of the edge-path-replacement G(P _k ) of a graph, called (d,1)-total labeling of G, was introduced in 2002 by Havet and Yu (Workshop graphs and algorithms, 2003; Discrete Math 308:493–513, 2008). Havet and Yu (Discrete Math 308:498–513, 2008) obtained the bound $\Delta+ d-1\leq\lambda^{T}_{d}(G)\leq2\Delta+ d-1$ and conjectured $\lambda^{T}_{d}(G)\leq\Delta+2d-1$ . In (Lü in J Comb Optim, to appear; Zhejiang University, submitted), we worked on L(2,1)-labelings-number and L(1,1)-labelings-number of the edge-path-replacement G(P _k ) of a graph G, and obtained that λ(G(P _k ))≤Δ+2 for k≥5, and conjecture λ(G(P ₄))≤Δ+2 for any graph G with maximum degree Δ. In this paper, we will study L(d,1)-labelings-number of the edge-path-replacement G(P _k ) of a graph G for d≥3 and k≥4.     

On the total outer-connected domination in graphs

A set S of vertices of a graph G is a total outer-connected dominating set if every vertex in V(G) is adjacent to some vertex in S and the subgraph induced by V?S is connected. The total outer-connected domination number γ _toc (G) is the minimum size of such a set. We give some properties and bounds for γ _toc in general graphs and in trees. For graphs of order n, diameter 2 and minimum degree at least 3, we show that $\gamma_{toc}(G)\le \frac{2n-2}{3}$ and we determine the extremal graphs.     

The total domination subdivision number in graphs with no induced 3-cycle and 5-cycle

A set S of vertices of a graph G=(V,E) without isolated vertex is a total dominating set if every vertex of V(G) is adjacent to some vertex in S. The total domination number γ _t (G) is the minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of G. The total domination subdivision number $\mathrm{sd}_{\gamma_{t}}(G)$ is the minimum number of edges that must be subdivided (each edge in G can be subdivided at most once) in order to increase the total domination number. Favaron, Karami, Khoeilar and Sheikholeslami (J. Comb. Optim. 20:76–84, 2010a) conjectured that: For any connected graph G of order n≥3, $\mathrm{sd}_{\gamma_{t}}(G)\le \gamma_{t}(G)+1$ . In this paper we use matching to prove this conjecture for graphs with no 3-cycle and 5-cycle. In particular this proves the conjecture for bipartite graphs.     

Reconfiguration graphs for vertex colourings of chordal and chordal bipartite graphs

A k-colouring of a graph G=(V,E) is a mapping c:V→{1,2,…,k} such that c(u)≠c(v) whenever uv is an edge. The reconfiguration graph of the k-colourings of G contains as its vertex set the k-colourings of G, and two colourings are joined by an edge if they differ in colour on just one vertex of G. We introduce a class of k-colourable graphs, which we call k-colour-dense graphs. We show that for each k-colour-dense graph G, the reconfiguration graph of the ?-colourings of G is connected and has diameter O(|V|²), for all ?≥k+1. We show that this graph class contains the k-colourable chordal graphs and that it contains all chordal bipartite graphs when k=2. Moreover, we prove that for each k≥2 there is a k-colourable chordal graph G whose reconfiguration graph of the (k+1)-colourings has diameter Θ(|V|²).     

Three conjectures on the signed cycle domination in graphs

Let G=(V,E) be a graph, a function g:E→{?1,1} is said to be a signed cycle dominating function (SCDF for short) of G if ∑ _e∈E(C) g(e)≥1 holds for any induced cycle C of G. The signed cycle domination number of G is defined as γ _sc (G)=min{∑ _e∈E(G) g(e)∣g is an SCDF of G}. Xu (Discrete Math. 309:1007–1012, 2009) first researched the signed cycle domination number of graphs and raised the following conjectures: (1) Let G be a maximal planar graphs of order n≥3. Then γ _sc (G)=n?2; (2) For any graph G with δ(G)=3, γ _sc (G)≥1; (3) For any 2-connected graph G, γ _sc (G)≥1. In this paper, we present some results about these conjectures.     

Signed Roman domination in graphs

In this paper we continue the study of Roman dominating functions in graphs. A signed Roman dominating function (SRDF) on a graph G=(V,E) is a function f:V→{?1,1,2} satisfying the conditions that (i) the sum of its function values over any closed neighborhood is at least one and (ii) for every vertex u for which f(u)=?1 is adjacent to at least one vertex v for which f(v)=2. The weight of a SRDF is the sum of its function values over all vertices. The signed Roman domination number of G is the minimum weight of a SRDF in G. We present various lower and upper bounds on the signed Roman domination number of a graph. Let G be a graph of order n and size m with no isolated vertex. We show that $\gamma _{\mathrm{sR}}(G) \ge\frac{3}{\sqrt{2}} \sqrt{n} - n$ and that γ _sR(G)≥(3n?4m)/2. In both cases, we characterize the graphs achieving equality in these bounds. If G is a bipartite graph of order n, then we show that $\gamma_{\mathrm{sR}}(G) \ge3\sqrt{n+1} - n - 3$ , and we characterize the extremal graphs.     

Small grid drawings of planar graphs with balanced partition

In a grid drawing of a planar graph, every vertex is located at a grid point, and every edge is drawn as a straight-line segment without any edge-intersection. It is known that every planar graph G of n vertices has a grid drawing on an (n?2)×(n?2) or (4n/3)×(2n/3) integer grid. In this paper we show that if a planar graph G has a balanced partition then G has a grid drawing with small grid area. More precisely, if a separation pair bipartitions G into two edge-disjoint subgraphs G ₁ and?G ₂, then G has a max?{n ₁,n ₂}×max?{n ₁,n ₂} grid drawing, where n ₁ and n ₂ are the numbers of vertices in G ₁ and?G ₂, respectively. In particular, we show that every series-parallel graph G has a (2n/3)×(2n/3) grid drawing and a grid drawing with area smaller than 0.3941n ² (<(2/3)² n ²).     

Paired versus double domination in K 1,r -free graphs

A vertex in G is said to dominate itself and its neighbors. A subset S of vertices is a dominating set if S dominates every vertex of G. A paired-dominating set is a dominating set whose induced subgraph contains a perfect matching. The paired-domination number of a graph G, denoted by γ _pr(G), is the minimum cardinality of a paired-dominating set in G. A subset S?V(G) is a double dominating set of G if S dominates every vertex of G at least twice. The minimum cardinality of a double dominating set of G is the double domination number γ _×2(G). A claw-free graph is a graph that does not contain K _1,3 as an induced subgraph. Chellali and Haynes (Util. Math. 67:161–171, 2005) showed that for every claw-free graph G, we have γ _pr(G)≤γ _×2(G). In this paper we extend this result by showing that for r≥2, if G is a connected graph that does not contain K _1,r as an induced subgraph, then $\gamma_{\mathrm{pr}}(G)\le ( \frac{2r^{2}-6r+6}{r(r-1)} )\gamma_{\times2}(G)$ .     

On cubic 2-independent Hamiltonian connected graphs

A graph G=(V,E) is Hamiltonian connected if there exists a Hamiltonian path between any two vertices in G. Let P ₁=(u ₁,u ₂,…,u _|V|) and P ₂=(v ₁,v ₂,…,v _|V|) be any two Hamiltonian paths of G. We say that P ₁ and P ₂ are independent if u ₁=v ₁,u _|V|=v _|V|, and u _i ≠v _i for 1<i<|V|. A cubic graph G is 2-independent Hamiltonian connected if there are two independent Hamiltonian paths between any two different vertices of G. A graph G is 1-Hamiltonian if G−F is Hamiltonian for any F⊆V∪E with |F|=1. A graph G is super 3^*-connected if there exist i internal disjoint paths spanning G for i=1,2,3. It is proved that every super 3^*-connected graph is 1-Hamiltonian. In this paper, we prove that every cubic 2-independent Hamiltonian connected graph is also 1-Hamiltonian. We present some cubic 2-independent Hamiltonian connected graphs that are super 3^*-connected, some cubic 2-independent Hamiltonian connected graphs that are not super 3^*-connected, some super 3^*-connected graphs that are not 2-independent Hamiltonian connected, and some cubic 1-Hamiltonian graphs that are Hamiltonian connected but neither 2-independent Hamiltonian connected nor super 3^*-connected. Dedicated to Professor Frank K. Hwang on the occasion of his 65th birthday. This work was supported in part by the National Science Council of the Republic of China under Contract NSC 94-2213-E-233-011.     

On the mod sum number of H m,n

Let N denote the set of all positive integers. The sum graph G ⁺(S) of a finite subset S?N is the graph (S,E) with uv∈E if and only if u+v∈S. A graph G is said to be an mod sum graph if it is isomorphic to the sum graph of some S?Z _M \{0} and all arithmetic performed modulo M where M≥|S|+1. The mod sum number ρ(G) of G is the smallest number of isolated vertices which when added to G result in a mod sum graph. It is known that the graphs H _m,n (n>m≥3) are not mod sum graphs. In this paper we show that H _m,n are not mod sum graphs for m≥3 and n≥3. Additionally, we prove that ρ(H _m,3)=m for m≥3, H _m,n ∪ρK ₁ is exclusive for m≥3 and n≥4 and $m(n-1) \leq \rho(H_{m,n})\leq \frac{1}{2} mn(n-1)$ for m≥3 and n≥4.     

A two-phase optimization method for a multiobjective vehicle relocation problem in electric carsharing systems

A spanning subgraph F of a graph G is called an even factor of G if each vertex of F has even degree at least 2 in F. It was conjectured that if a graph G has an even factor, then it has an even factor F with \(|E(F)|\ge {4\over 7}(|E(G)| + 1)+ {2\over 7}|V_2(G)|\), where \(V_2(G)\) is the set of vertices of degree 2 in G. We note that the conjecture is false if G is a triangle. In this paper, we confirm the conjecture for all graphs on at least 4 vertices, and moreover, we prove that if \(|E(H)|\le {4\over 7}(|E(G)| + 1)+ {2\over 7}|V_2(G)|\) for every even factor H of G, then every maximum even factor of G is a 2-factor consisting of even circuits.     

Perfect matchings in paired domination vertex critical graphs

A vertex subset S of a graph G=(V,E) is a paired dominating set if every vertex of G is adjacent to some vertex in S and the subgraph induced by S contains a perfect matching. The paired domination number of G, denoted by γ _pr (G), is the minimum cardinality of a paired dominating set of?G. A?graph with no isolated vertex is called paired domination vertex critical, or briefly γ _pr -critical, if for any vertex v of G that is not adjacent to any vertex of degree one, γ _pr (G?v)<γ _pr (G). A?γ _pr -critical graph G is said to be k-γ _pr -critical if γ _pr (G)=k. In this paper, we firstly show that every 4-γ _pr -critical graph of even order has a perfect matching if it is K _1,5-free and every 4-γ _pr -critical graph of odd order is factor-critical if it is K _1,5-free. Secondly, we show that every 6-γ _pr -critical graph of even order has a perfect matching if it is K _1,4-free.