Comparison of Interval Estimators of Pr(X < Y) in the Two-parameter Exponential Distribution

We consider confidence intervals for the stress–strength reliability Pr(X< Y) in the two-parameter exponential distribution. We have derived the Bayesian highest posterior density interval using non-informative prior distributions. We have compared its performance with the intervals based on the generalized pivot variable intervals in terms of their coverage probabilities and expected lengths. Our simulation study shows that the Bayesian interval performs better according to the criteria used, especially when the sample sizes are very small. An example is given.     

OPTIMALITY OF NONPARAMETRIC TESTS FOR ASSOCIATION BETWEEN SURVIVAL TIME AND CONTINUOUS COVARIATES

Abstract

Recently, Chen (Chen, Z. (2000 Chen, Z. 2000. A new two-parameter lifetime distribution with bathtub-shape or increasing failure rate function. Statistics &; Probability Letters, 49: 155–161. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). A new two-parameter lifetime distribution with bathtub-shape or increasing failure rate function. Statistics &; Probability Letters 49:155–161.) proposed a two-parameter model that can be used to model bathtub-shaped failure rate. Although this model has several interesting properties, it does not contain a scale parameter and hence not flexible in modeling real data. A generalized model including the scale parameter has shown to be interesting and it has the traditional Weibull distribution as an asymptotic case. In this article, a detailed analysis of this model is presented. Shapes of the density and failure rate function are studied. The asymptotic confidence intervals for the parameters are also derived from the Fisher information matrix. The likelihood ratio test is applied to test the goodness of fit of Weibull extension model. Some examples are shown to illustrate the application of the model and analysis.     

Joint distribution of simultaneous exposures to several carcinogens in a case–control study: sample size determination

Consider a population of individuals who are free of a disease under study, and who are exposed simultaneously at random exposure levels, say X,Y,Z,… to several risk factors which are suspected to cause the disease in the populationm. At any specified levels X=x, Y=y, Z=z, …, the incidence rate of the disease in the population ot risk is given by the exposure–response relationship r(x,y,z,…) = P(disease|x,y,z,…). The present paper examines the relationship between the joint distribution of the exposure variables X,Y,Z, … in the population at risk and the joint distribution of the exposure variables U,V,W,… among cases under the linear and the exponential risk models. It is proven that under the exponential risk model, these two joint distributions belong to the same family of multivariate probability distributions, possibly with different parameters values. For example, if the exposure variables in the population at risk have jointly a multivariate normal distribution, so do the exposure variables among cases; if the former variables have jointly a multinomial distribution, so do the latter. More generally, it is demonstrated that if the joint distribution of the exposure variables in the population at risk belongs to the exponential family of multivariate probability distributions, so does the joint distribution of exposure variables among cases. If the epidemiologist can specify the differnce among the mean exposure levels in the case and control groups which are considered to be clinically or etiologically important in the study, the results of the present paper may be used to make sample size determinations for the case–control study, corresponding to specified protection levels, i.e., size α and 1–β of a statistical test. The multivariate normal, the multinomial, the negative multinomial and Fisher's multivariate logarithmic series exposure distributions are used to illustrate our results.     

Estimation of system reliability

In this paper, we estimate the reliability of a system with k components. The system functions when at least s (1≤s≤k) components survive a common random stress. We assume that the strengths of these k components are subjected to a common stress which is independent of the strengths of these k components. If (X ₁,X ₂,…,X _k ) are strengths of k components subjected to a common stress (Y), then the reliability of the system or system reliability is given byR=P[Y<X _(k−s+1)] whereX _(k−s+1) is (k−s+1)-th order statistic of (X ₁,…,X _k ). We estimate R when (X ₁,…,X _k ) follow an absolutely continuous multivariate exponential (ACMVE) distribution of Hanagal (1993) which is the submodel of Block (1975) and Y follows an independent exponential distribution. We also obtain the asymptotic normal (AN) distribution of the proposed estimator.     

Interval estimation of the stress–strength reliability in the two-parameter exponential distribution based on records

We consider interval estimation of the stress–strength reliability in the two-parameter exponential distribution based on records. We constructed Bayesian intervals, Bootstrap intervals and intervals using the generalized pivot variable. A simulation study is conducted to investigate and compare the performance of the intervals in terms of their coverage probability and expected length. An example is given.     

Optimal linear combinations using householder transformations

In pattern classification of sampled vector valued random variables it is often essential, due to computational and accuracy considerations, to consider certain measurable transformations of the random variable. These transformations are generally of a dimension-reducing nature. In this paper we consider the class of linear dimension reducing transformations, i.e., the k × n matrices of rank k where k < n and n is the dimension of the range of the sampled vector random variable.

In this connection, we use certain results (Decell and Quirein, 1973), that guarantee, relative to various class separability criteria, the existence of an extremal transformation. These results also guarantee that the extremal transformation can be expressed in the form (I_k∣ Z)U where I_k is the k × k identity matrix and U is an orthogonal n × n matrix. These results actually limit the search for the extremal linear transformation to a search over the obviously smaller class of k × n matrices of the form (I_k ∣Z)U. In this paper these results are refined in the sense that any extremal transformation can be expressed in the form (I_K∣Z)H_p … H₁ where p ≤ min{k, n?k} and H_i is a Householder transformation i=l,…, p, The latter result allows one to construct a sequence of transformations (L_K∣ Z)H₁, (I_K Z)H₂H₁ … such that the values of the class separability criterion evaluated at this sequence is a bounded, monotone sequence of real numbers. The construction of the i-th element of the sequence of transformations requires the solution of an n-dimensional optimization problem. The solution, for various class separability criteria, of the optimization problem will be the subject of later papers. We have conjectured (with supporting theorems and empirical results) that, since the bounded monotone sequence of real class separability values converges to its least upper bound, this least upper bound is an extremal value of the class separability criterion.

Several open questions are stated and the practical implications of the results are discussed.     

Bayesian inference for the generalized exponential distribution

The two-parameter generalized exponential (GE) distribution was introduced by Gupta and Kundu [Gupta, R.D. and Kundu, D., 1999, Generalized exponential distribution. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics, 41(2), 173–188.]. It was observed that the GE can be used in situations where a skewed distribution for a nonnegative random variable is needed. In this article, the Bayesian estimation and prediction for the GE distribution, using informative priors, have been considered. Importance sampling is used to estimate the parameters, as well as the reliability function, and the Gibbs and Metropolis samplers data sets are used to predict the behavior of further observations from the distribution. Two data sets are used to illustrate the Bayesian procedure.     

Structural properties and estimation in m|EK| 1 queue

In this paper we study the distribution of the number of customers served in a busy period in the framework of modified power series distribution introduced by Gupta (197U) and obtain the moments and probability generating function of this distribution. We also study the maximum likelihood estimation of the parameter θand the variance and the asymptotic bias of the MLE are also obtained. The minimum variance unbiased estimate of θ^ris investigated and an estimate of the probabilities is given.     

Multiple decision rules for comparing several populations with a fixed known standard

Independent observations are available from k univariate distributions indexed by a real parameter θ. It is desired to select that distribution with the largest parameter value unless this value is smaller than some fixed standard θ₀ in which case no distribution is to be selected. Various single-stage procedures for this (k+l)-decision problem are discussed, using indifference zone, decision theoretic, Bayesian, and subset selection approaches.     

On a conjecture of Kakosyan,Klebanov and Melamed

Suppose X₁, X₂, ..., X_m is a random sample of size m from a population with probability density function f(x), x>0 and let X_1,m<...m,m be the corresponding order statistics. We assume m as an integer valued random variable with P(m=k)=p(1?p)^k?1, k=1, 2, ... and 0 and n X_1,n for fixed n characterizes the exponential distribution. In this paper we prove that under the assumption of monotone hazard rate the identical distribution of and (n?r+1) (X_r,n?X_r?1,n) for some fixed r and n with 1≤r≤n, n≥2, X_0,n=0, characterizes the exponential distribution. Under the assumption of monotone hazard rate the conjecture of Kakosyan, Klebanov and Melamed follows from the above result with r=1.     

Exact Inference for the pth-Quantile and the Reliability of the Two-Parameter Exponential Distribution with Singly Type II Censoring: A Standard Approach

Starting from a standard pivot, exact inference for the pth-quantile and for the reliability of the two-parameter exponential distribution in case of singly Type II censored samples is developed in this article. Fernandez (2007 Fernandez , A. J. ( 2007 ). On calculating generalized confidence intervals for the two-parameter exponential reliability function . Statistics 41 : 129 – 135 .[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) first obtained some of the results proposed in this article, but, differently from what are proposed here, and developed his theory starting from a generalized pivot. An illustrative example shows that, with the expressions proposed in this article, it is also possible to overcome some shortcomings raising from the formulas by Fernandez (2007 Fernandez , A. J. ( 2007 ). On calculating generalized confidence intervals for the two-parameter exponential reliability function . Statistics 41 : 129 – 135 .[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). Finally, a new expression for the moments of the pivot is obtained.     

Tests for multiple upper or lower outliers in an exponential sample

SUMMARY T = \[x + ... + x ]/ Sigma x (T*= \[x + ... + x ] Sigma x ) is the max k (n- k+ 1 ) (n) i k ( 1 ) (k) i imum likelihood ratio test statistic for k upper ( lower ) outliers in an exponential sample x , ..., x . The null distributions of T for k= 1,2 were given by Fisher and by Kimber 1 n k and Stevens , while those of T*(k= 1,2) were given by Lewis and Fieller . In this paper , k the simple null distributions of T and T* are found for all possible values of k, and k k percentage points are tabulated for k= 1, 2, ..., 8. In addition , we find a way of determining k, which can reduce the masking or ' swamping ' effects .     

Computation of the Generalized F Distribution

Exact expressions for the cumulative distribution function of a random variable of the form ( α ₁ X ₁+ α ₂ X ₂)/ Y are given where X ₁, X ₂ and Y are independent chi-squared random variables. The expressions are applied to the detection of joint outliers and Hotelling's mis-specified T ² distribution.     

Test of Association Between Two Ordinal Variables While Adjusting for Covariates

We propose a new set of test statistics to examine the association between two ordinal categorical variables X and Y after adjusting for continuous and/or categorical covariates Z. Our approach first fits multinomial (e.g., proportional odds) models of X and Y, separately, on Z. For each subject, we then compute the conditional distributions of X and Y given Z. If there is no relationship between X and Y after adjusting for Z, then these conditional distributions will be independent, and the observed value of (X, Y) for a subject is expected to follow the product distribution of these conditional distributions. We consider two simple ways of testing the null of conditional independence, both of which treat X and Y equally, in the sense that they do not require specifying an outcome and a predictor variable. The first approach adds these product distributions across all subjects to obtain the expected distribution of (X, Y) under the null and then contrasts it with the observed unconditional distribution of (X, Y). Our second approach computes "residuals" from the two multinomial models and then tests for correlation between these residuals; we define a new individual-level residual for models with ordinal outcomes. We present methods for computing p-values using either the empirical or asymptotic distributions of our test statistics. Through simulations, we demonstrate that our test statistics perform well in terms of power and Type I error rate when compared to proportional odds models which treat X as either a continuous or categorical predictor. We apply our methods to data from a study of visual impairment in children and to a study of cervical abnormalities in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected women. Supplemental materials for the article are available online.     

NON-EXISTENCE OF AN EXACT β-CONFIDENCE INTERVAL FOR A SCALE PARAMETER*

Abstract There are given k (≥22) independent distributions with c.d.f.'s F(x;θ_j) indexed by a scale parameter θ_j, j = 1,…, k. Let θ_[i] (i = 1,…, k) denote the ith smallest one of θ₁,…, θ_k. In this paper we wish to show that, under some regularity conditions, there does not exist an exact β-level (0≤β1) confidence interval for the ith smallest scale parameter θ_i based on k independent samples. Since the log transformation method may not yield the desired results for the scale parameter problem, we will treat the scale parameter case directly without transformation. Application is considered for normal variances. Two conservative one-sided confidence intervals for the ith smallest normal variance and the percentage points needed to actually apply the intervals are provided.     

On the bounded regret of empirical bayes estimators

Let (θ₁,x₁),…,(θ_n,x_n) be independent and identically distributed random vectors with E(xθ) = θ and Var(x|θ) = a + bθ + cθ². Let t_i be the linear Bayes estimator of θ_i and θ~_i be the linear empirical Bayes estimator of θ_i as proposed in Robbins (1983). When Ex and Var x are unknown to the statistician. The regret of using θ~_i instead of t_i because of ignorance of the mean and the variance is r_i = E(θ_i ? θ_i)² ?E(t_i ?θ_i)². Under appropriate conditions cumulative regret R_n = r₁+…r_n is shown to have a finite limit even when n tends to infinity. The limit can be explicitly computed in terms of a,b,c and the first four moments of x.     

Exponential family distribution with unknown truncation parameter: two sample problem

The uniformly most powerful unbiased tests are formulated for two sample problem of a given continuous distribution belonging to the exponential family with unknown scale and truncation parameters. The two-parameter exponential and Paretc distributions are considered in examples.     

Probability generating function of GPED<Subscript>2</Subscript>

The Probability generating function of a random variable which has Generalized Polya Eggenberger Distribution of the second kind (GPED ₂) is obtained. The probability density function of the range R, in random sampling from a uniform distribution on (k, l) and exponential distribution with parameter λ is obtained, when the sample size is a random variable from GPED ₂. The results of Bazargan-Lari (2004) follow as special cases.     

Logistic regression with a partially observed covariate

We present results of a Monte Carlo study comparing four methods of estimating the parameters of the logistic model logit (pr (Y = 1 | X, Z)) = α₀ + α ₁ X + α ₂ Z where X and Z are continuous covariates and X is always observed but Z is sometimes missing. The four methods examined are 1) logistic regression using complete cases, 2) logistic regression with filled-in values of Z obtained from the regression of Z on X and Y, 3) logistic regression with filled-in values of Z and random error added, and 4) maximum likelihood estimation assuming the distribution of Z given X and Y is normal. Effects of different percent missing for Z and different missing value mechanisms on the bias and mean absolute deviation of the estimators are examined for data sets of N = 200 and N = 400.