A REVIEW OF SYSTEMS COINTEGRATION TESTS

The literature on systems cointegration tests is reviewed and the various sets of assumptions for the asymptotic validity of the tests are compared within a general unifying framework. The comparison includes likelihood ratio tests, Lagrange multiplier and Wald type tests, lag augmentation tests, tests based on canonical correlations, the Stock-Watson tests and Bierens' nonparametric tests. Asymptotic results regarding the power of these tests and previous small sample simulation studies are discussed. Further issues and proposals in the context of systems cointegration tests are also considered briefly. New simulations are presented to compare the tests under uniform conditions. Special emphasis is given to the sensitivity of the test performance with respect to the trending properties of the DGP.     

Some count-based nonparametric tests for circular symmetry of a bivariate distribution

In this paper, we revisit the problem of testing of the hypothesis of circular symmetry of a bivariate distribution. We propose some nonparametric tests based on sector counts. These include tests based on chi-square goodness-of-fit test, the classical likelihood ratio, mean deviation, and the range. The proposed tests are easy to implement and the exact null distributions for small sample sizes of the test statistics are obtained. Two examples with small and large data sets are given to illustrate the application of the tests proposed. For small and moderate sample sizes, the performances of the proposed tests are evaluated using empirical powers (empirical sizes are also reported). Also, we evaluate the performance of these count-based tests with adaptations of several well-known tests such as the Kolmogorov–Smirnov-type tests, tests based on kernel density estimator, and the Wilcoxon-type tests. It is observed that among the count-based tests the likelihood ratio test performs better.     

Combining asymptotically normal tests: case studies in comparison of two groups

When several candidate tests are available for a given testing problem, and each has nice properties with respect to different criteria such as efficiency and robustness, it is desirable to combine them. We discuss various combined tests based on asymptotically normal tests. When the means of two standardized tests under contiguous alternatives are close, we show that the maximum of the two tests appears to have an overall best performance compared with other forms of combined tests considered, and that it retains most power compared with the better one of the two tests combined. As an application, for testing zero location shift between two groups, we studied the normal, Wilcoxon, median tests and their combined tests. Because of their structural differences, the joint convergence and the asymptotic correlation of the tests are not easily derived from the usual asymptotic arguments of the tests. We developed a novel application of martingale theory to obtain the asymptotic correlations and their estimators. Simulation studies were also performed to examine the small sample properties of these combined tests. Finally we illustrate the methods by a real data example.     

Comparing Nonparametric Tests of Equality of Means for Randomized Block Designs

A number of nonparametric tests are compared empirically for a randomized block layout. We assess tests appropriate for when the data are not consistent with normality or when outliers invalidate traditional analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests. The objective is to assess, within this setting, tests that use ranks within blocks, the rank transform procedure that ranks the complete sample and continuous analogs of the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel tests. The usual linear model is assumed, and our primary foci are tests of equality of means and component tests that assess linear and quadratic trends in the means. These tests include the traditional Page and Friedman tests. We conclude that the rank transform tests have competitive power and warrant greater use than is currently apparent.     

Simple Tests for Exogeneity of a Binary Explanatory Variable in Count Data Regression Models

This article investigates power and size of some tests for exogeneity of a binary explanatory variable in count models by conducting extensive Monte Carlo simulations. The tests under consideration are Hausman contrast tests as well as univariate Wald tests, including a new test of notably easy implementation. Performance of the tests is explored under misspecification of the underlying model and under different conditions regarding the instruments. The results indicate that often the tests that are simpler to estimate outperform tests that are more demanding. This is especially the case for the new test.     

Unconditional analogues of Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel tests

The Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel tests are a suite of tests that are usually defined as conditional tests, tests that assume all marginal totals are known before sighting the data. Here unconditional analogues of these tests are defined for the more usual situation when the marginal totals are not known before sighting the data.     

A Comparative Study of Model-based Tests of Independence for Ordinal Data Using the Bootstrap

When analyzing categorical data using loglinear models in sparse contingency tables, asymptotic results may fail. In this paper the empirical properties of three commonly used asymptotic tests of independence, based on the uniform association model for ordinal data, are investigated by means of Monte Carlo simulation. Five different bootstrapped tests of independence are presented and compared to the asymptotic tests. The comparisons are made with respect to both size and power properties of the tests. Results indicate that the asymptotic tests have poor size control. The test based on the estimated association parameter is severely conservative and the two chi-squared tests (Pearson, likelihood-ratio) are both liberal. The bootstrap tests that either use a parametric assumption or are based on non-pivotal test statistics do not perform better than the asymptotic tests in all situations. The bootstrap tests that are based on approximately pivotal statistics provide both adjustment of size and enhancement of power. These tests are therefore recommended for use in situations similar to those included in the simulation study.     

Confidence intervals and tests on the variance ratio in random models with two variance components

The LM test is modified to test any value of the ratio of two variance components in a mixed effects linear model with two variance components. The test is exact, so it can be used to construct exact confidence intervals on this ratio.Exact Neyman-Pearson (NP) tests on the variance ratio are described.Their powers provide attainable upper bounds on powers of tests on the variance ratio.Efficiencies of LM tests, which include ANOVA tests, and NP tests are compared for unbalanced, random, one-way ANOVA models.Confidence intervals corresponding to LM tests and NP tests are described.     

Comparison of Nonparametric and Parametric Methods in Repeated Measures Designs - A Simulation Study

This study investigates the performance of parametric and nonparametric tests to analyze repeated measures designs. Both multivariate normal and exponential distributions were simulated for varying values of the correlation and ten or twenty subjects within each cell. For multivariate normal distributions, the type I error rates were lower than the usual 0.05 level for nonparametric tests, whereas the parametric tests without the Greenhouse-Geisser or the Huynh-Feldt adjustment produced slightly higher type I error rates. Type I error rates for nonparametric tests, for multivariate exponential distributions, were more stable than parametric, Greenhouse-Geisser or Huynh-Feldt adjusted tests. For ten subjects within each cell, the parametric tests were more powerful than nonparametric tests. For twenty subjects per cell, the power of the nonparametric and parametric tests was comparable.     

Nonparametric tests for multivariate multi-sample locations based on data depth

Several nonparametric tests for multivariate multi-sample location problem are proposed in this paper. These tests are based on the notion of data depth, which is used to measure the centrality/outlyingness of a given point with respect to a given distribution or a data cloud. Proposed tests are completely nonparametric and implemented through the idea of permutation tests. Performance of the proposed tests is compared with existing parametric test and nonparametric test based on data depth. An extensive simulation study reveals that proposed tests are superior to the existing tests based on data depth with regard to power. Illustrations with real data are provided.     

The effect of rounding on sequential and fixed size sample hypothesis tests

In previous literature the effects of rounding on fixed sample hypothesis tests have been considered. However sequential tests have received little attention. In this paper the robustness of these tests under rounding is considered. The results indicate that in terms of significance level and power the sequential tests were less affected by rounding than the fixed sample tests.     

Tests for Equality of Survival Distributions Against Non-Location Alternatives

We propose new two andk-sample tests for evaluating the equality of survival distributions against alternatives that include crossing of survival functions, and proportional and monotone hazard ratios. The tests allow for right censored data. The asymptotic power against local alternatives is investigated. Simulation results demonstrate that the new tests are more powerful than known tests when survival functions cross. We apply the tests to a well known study of chemo- and radio-therapy conducted by the Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group. TheP-values for both proposed tests are much smaller than for other known tests.     

Lack of fit tests based on sums of ordered residuals for linear models

Christensen & Lin ( 2015 ) suggested two lack of fit tests to assess the adequacy of a linear model based on partial sums of residuals. In particular, their tests evaluated the adequacy of the mean function. Their tests relied on asymptotic results without requiring small sample normality. We propose four new tests, find their asymptotic distributions, and propose an alternative simulation method for defining tests that is remarkably robust to the distribution of the errors. To assess their strengths and weaknesses, the Christensen & Lin ( 2015 ) tests and the new tests were compared in different scenarios by simulation. In particular, the new tests include two based on partial sums of absolute residuals. Previous partial sums of residuals tests have used signed residuals whose values when summed can cancel each other out. The use of absolute residuals requires small sample normality, but allows detection of lack of fit that was previously not possible with partial sums of residuals.     

Goodness of fit tests for Nakagami distribution based on smooth tests

ABSTRACT

Nakagami distribution is one of the most common distributions used to model positive valued and right skewed data. In this study, we interest goodness of fit problem for Nakagami distribution. Thus, we propose smooth tests for Nakagami distribution based on orthonormal functions. We also compare these tests with some classical goodness of fit tests such as Cramer–von Mises, Anderson–Darling, and Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests in respect to type-I error rates and powers of tests. Simulation study indicates that smooth tests give better results than these classical tests give in respect to almost all cases considered.     

Tests for Detecting Overdispersion in the Positive Poisson Regression Model

This article derives score tests for extra-Poisson variation in the positive or truncated-at-zero Poisson regression model against truncated-at-zero negative binomial family alternatives. It also develops size-corrected tests of overdispersion that are expected to improve their small-sample properties. Further, small-sample performance of the tests is investigated by means of Monte Carlo experiments. As an illustration, the proposed tests are applied to a model of strikes in U.S. manufacturing. The proposed tests have an interpretation as conditional moment tests and require only the positive Poisson model to be estimated. It is shown that most of the tests for overdispersion in the regular Poisson model given in the econometric and statistical literature can be obtained as special cases of the tests developed in this article. Monte Carlo experiments indicate that the size correction, based on the asymptotic expansions of the score function, is effective in improving the accuracy of the size and power of the tests in small samples.     

Saddlepoint approximations to exact tests and improved likelihood ratio tests for the gamma distribution

For the most common one-sample and two-sample tests in the gamma distribution we derive the log likelihood ratio tests and the improved versions obtained by a Bartlett adjustment. For most of these tests an exact test exists and we give the saddlepoint approximation to the latter. The tests are compared with previously published tests and a small simulation study is included.     

Permutation tests for homogeneity based on some characterizations

In this work, non parametric tests are proposed for testing the homogeneity of two or more populations. The tests are based on recently obtained characterizations. The test procedure is based on the permutation bootstrap technique. For the two-sample case the new tests are compared with permutation tests based on the empirical characteristic function and some other tests. The comparison is fulfilled via a Monte Carlo simulation.     

Multivariate two‐sample permutation tests for trials with multiple time‐to‐event outcomes

Clinical trials involving multiple time‐to‐event outcomes are increasingly common. In this paper, permutation tests for testing for group differences in multivariate time‐to‐event data are proposed. Unlike other two‐sample tests for multivariate survival data, the proposed tests attain the nominal type I error rate. A simulation study shows that the proposed tests outperform their competitors when the degree of censored observations is sufficiently high. When the degree of censoring is low, it is seen that naive tests such as Hotelling's T² outperform tests tailored to survival data. Computational and practical aspects of the proposed tests are discussed, and their use is illustrated by analyses of three publicly available datasets. Implementations of the proposed tests are available in an accompanying R package.     

Linear rank tests for homogeneity against ordered alternatives in anova and anocova

A unified method of constructing rank tests for homogeneity against ordered alternatives in unbalanced analysis of variance and analysis of covariance is considered. The relationship between these tests with some of the existing methods are studied. The normal theory likelihood ratio tests are also derived and the asymptotic relative efficiency comparisons, in Pitman sense, of the rank tests with respect to the likelihood ratio tests are carried out.     

A K-SAMPLE EXTENSION TO FLIGNER'S CLASS OF TESTS FOR SCALE

The parameteric tests for equality of variance are well known. The classical F-test is typically used to test the hypothesis of equality of two variances, while tests such as those developed by Bartlett (1937) are commonly used for the k-sample hypothesis. These tests assume an underlying normal distribution and are quite sensitive to departures from normality (Box, 1953). Thus, when considering data that are from non-normal distributions, alternative nonparametric tests must be employed.
Fligner (1979) has proposed a class of two-sample distribution-free tests which possess very desirable properties and are attractive alternatives to other nonparametric tests for scale. The present paper extends the Fligner class of tests to the more general k-sample case.