A one-sided test for testino homogeneity of scale parameters against simple ordered alternative

In an earlier paper the authors (1997) extended the results of Hayter (1990) to the two parameter exponential probability model. This paper addressee the extention to the scale parameter case under location-scale probability model. Consider k (k≧3) treatments or competing firms such that an observation from with treatment or firm follows a distribution with cumulative distribution function (cdf) F_i(x)=F[(x-μ_i)/Q_i], where F(·) is any absolutely continuous cdf, i=1,…,k. We propose a test to test the null hypothesis H₀:θ₁=…=θ_k against the simple ordered alternative H₁:θ₁≦…≦θ_k, with at least one strict inequality, using the data X_i,j, i=1,…k; j=1,…,n₁. Two methods to compute the critical points of the proposed test have been demonstrated by talking k two parameter exponential distributions. The test procedure also allows us to construct simultaneous one sided confidence intervals (SOCIs) for the ordered pairwise ratios θ_j/θ_i, 1≦i<j≦k. Statistical simulation revealed that: 9i) actual sizes of the critical points are almost conservative and (ii) power of the proposed test relative to some existing tests is higher.     

Locally best invariant and locally minimax test of independence

Let X₁ X₂ … X_N be independent normal p-vectors with common mean vector $$ = ($$) and common nonsingular covariance matrix $$ = Diag ($sG_i) [(1–p) I + pE] Diag ($sG_i), $sG_i> 0, i = 1… p, 1>p>=1/p–1. Write r_ij = sample correlation between the i th and the j th variable i j = 1,… p. It has been proved that for testing the hypothesis H₀ : p = 0 against the alternative H₁ : p>0 where $$ and $sG₁,…, $sG_p are unknown, the test which rejects H₀ for large value of $$ r_ij is locally best invariant for every $aL: 0 > $aL > 1 and locally minimax as p $$ 0 in the sense of Giri and Kiefer, 1964, for every $aL: 0 > $aL $$ $aL₀ > 1 where$aL₀ = P_p=0 $$.     

An exact decomposition for a class of exponential dispersion models: Application to sequential testing

We define the Wishart distribution on the cone of positive definite matrices and an exponential distribution on the Lorentz cone as exponential dispersion models. We show that these two distributions possess a property of exact decomposition, and we use this property to solve the following problem: given q samples (y_il,… y_iNj), i = l,…,q, from a N(μ_i,Σ_i,) distribution, test H:Σ₁ = Σ₂ = … = σ_q. Using the exact decomposition property, the classical test statistic for H, involving q parameters p_i = (N_i, - l)/2, i = 1,…,q, is replaced by a sequence of q - l test statistics for the sequence of tests H_i,:σ₁ =σ₂ = … =σ_i given that H_i-1 is true, i = 2,…,q. Each one of these test statistics involves two parameters only, p._i-1 = p₁ + … + p_i-1 and p_i. We also use the exact decomposition property to test equality of the “direction parameters” for q sample points from the exponential distribution on the Lorentz cone. We give a table of critical values for the distribution on the three-dimensional Lorentz cone. Tables of critical values in higher dimensions can easily be computed following the same method as in dimension three.     

ON ASYMPTOTIC OPTIMALITY OF SOME TESTS FOR EXPONENTIAL DISTRIBUTIONS

The probability density function (pdf) of a two parameter exponential distribution is given by f(x; p, s?) =s?^-1 exp {-(x - ρ)/s?} for x≥ρ and 0 elsewhere, where 0 < ρ < ∞ and 0 < s?∞. Suppose we have k independent random samples where the ith sample is drawn from the ith population having the pdf f(x; ρ_i, s?_i), 0 < ρ_i < ∞, 0 < s?_i < s?_i < and f(x; ρ, s?) is as given above. Let X_i1 < X_i2 <… < X_iri denote the first r_i order statistics in a random sample of size n_i, drawn from the ith population with pdf f(x; ρ_i, s?_i), i = 1, 2,…, k. In this paper we show that the well known tests of hypotheses about the parameters ρ_i, s?_i, i = 1, 2,…, k based on the above observations are asymptotically optimal in the sense of Bahadur efficiency. Our results are similar to those for normal distributions.     

Some locally optimal subset selection rules for comparison with a control

Let π₀,π₁,…,π_k be k+1 independent populations. For i=0,1,…,k,π_i has the densit f(x,θ_i), where the (unknown) parameter θ_i belongs to an interval of the real line. Our goal is to select from π₁,… π_k (experimental treatments) those populations, if any, that are better (suitably defined) than π₀ which is the control population. A locally optimal rule is derived in the class of rules for which Pr(π_i is selected)γ_i, i=1,…,k, when θ₀=θ₁=?=θ_k. The criterion used for local optimality amounts to maximizing the efficiency in a certain sense of the rule in picking out the superior populations for specific configurations of θ=(θ₀,…,θ_k) in a neighborhood of an equiparameter configuration. The general result is then applied to the following special cases: (a) normal means comparison — common known variance, (b) normal means comparison — common unknown variance, (c) gamma scale parameters comparison — known (unequal) shape parameters, and (d) comparison of regression slopes. In all these cases, the rule is obtained based on samples of unequal sizes.     

ON TESTING AGAINST RESTRICTED ALTERNATIVES FOR THE VARIANCES OF GAUSSIAN MODELS

Let π₁,…,π_p be p independent normal populations with means μ₁…, μ_p and variances σ²₁,…, σ²_p respectively. Let X(n_i) be a simple random sample of size n_i from π_i, i = 1,…,p. Given the simple random samples X(n₁),…, X(n_p) from π₁,…,π_p respectively, a test has been proposed for testing the homogeneity of variances H₀: σ²₁=…σ²_p, against the restricted alternative, H₁: σ²₁≥…≥σ²_p, with at least one strict inequality. Some properties of the test are discussed and critical values are tabulated.     

A note on the admissibility of hammersley's estimator of an integer mean

Let X₁, X₂, …, X_n be identically, independently distributed N(i,1) random variables, where i = 0, ±1, ±2, … Hammersley (1950) showed that d = [X?_n], the nearest integer to the sample mean, is the maximum likelihood estimator of i. Khan (1973) showed that d is minimax and admissible with respect to zero-one loss. This note now proves a conjecture of Stein to the effect that in the class of integer-valued estimators d is minimax and admissible under squared-error loss.     

Optimal linear combinations using householder transformations

In pattern classification of sampled vector valued random variables it is often essential, due to computational and accuracy considerations, to consider certain measurable transformations of the random variable. These transformations are generally of a dimension-reducing nature. In this paper we consider the class of linear dimension reducing transformations, i.e., the k × n matrices of rank k where k < n and n is the dimension of the range of the sampled vector random variable.

In this connection, we use certain results (Decell and Quirein, 1973), that guarantee, relative to various class separability criteria, the existence of an extremal transformation. These results also guarantee that the extremal transformation can be expressed in the form (I_k∣ Z)U where I_k is the k × k identity matrix and U is an orthogonal n × n matrix. These results actually limit the search for the extremal linear transformation to a search over the obviously smaller class of k × n matrices of the form (I_k ∣Z)U. In this paper these results are refined in the sense that any extremal transformation can be expressed in the form (I_K∣Z)H_p … H₁ where p ≤ min{k, n?k} and H_i is a Householder transformation i=l,…, p, The latter result allows one to construct a sequence of transformations (L_K∣ Z)H₁, (I_K Z)H₂H₁ … such that the values of the class separability criterion evaluated at this sequence is a bounded, monotone sequence of real numbers. The construction of the i-th element of the sequence of transformations requires the solution of an n-dimensional optimization problem. The solution, for various class separability criteria, of the optimization problem will be the subject of later papers. We have conjectured (with supporting theorems and empirical results) that, since the bounded monotone sequence of real class separability values converges to its least upper bound, this least upper bound is an extremal value of the class separability criterion.

Several open questions are stated and the practical implications of the results are discussed.     

Approximations for marginal densities of M-estimators

We develop a saddle-point approximation for the marginal density of a real-valued function p(), where is a general M-estimator of a p-dimensional parameter, that is, the solution of the system {n^-1_ljl (Y_l,) = 0}_j=1,…,p. The approximation is applied to several regression problems and yields very good accuracy for small samples. This enables us to compare different classes of estimators according to their finite-sample properties and to determine when asymptotic approximations are useful in practice.     

NON-EXISTENCE OF AN EXACT β-CONFIDENCE INTERVAL FOR A SCALE PARAMETER*

Abstract There are given k (≥22) independent distributions with c.d.f.'s F(x;θ_j) indexed by a scale parameter θ_j, j = 1,…, k. Let θ_[i] (i = 1,…, k) denote the ith smallest one of θ₁,…, θ_k. In this paper we wish to show that, under some regularity conditions, there does not exist an exact β-level (0≤β1) confidence interval for the ith smallest scale parameter θ_i based on k independent samples. Since the log transformation method may not yield the desired results for the scale parameter problem, we will treat the scale parameter case directly without transformation. Application is considered for normal variances. Two conservative one-sided confidence intervals for the ith smallest normal variance and the percentage points needed to actually apply the intervals are provided.     

Asymptotic expaxsioxs for the joint distribution of cirrelated hotellings t2 statlstics under normality

Let T² _i=z′_iS^?1z_i, i==,…k be correlated Hotelling's T² statistics under normality. where z=(z′_i,…,z′_k)′ and nS are independently distributed as N_kp((O,ρ?∑) and Wishart distribution W_p(∑, n), respectively. The purpose of this paper is to study the distribution function F(x₁,…,x_k) of (T² _i,…,T² _k) when n is large. First we derive an asymptotic expansion of the characteristic function of (T² _i,…,T² _k) up to the order n^?2. Next we give asymptotic expansions for (T² _i,…,T² _k) in two cases (i)ρ=I_k and (ii) k=2 by inverting the expanded characteristic function up to the orders n^?2 and n^?1, respectively. Our results can be applied to the distribution function of max (T² _i,…,T² _k) as a special case.     

Nonparametric Estimation of a Regression Function: Limiting Distribution2

Consider the regression model Y_i= g(x_i) + e_i, i = 1,…, n, where g is an unknown function defined on [0, 1], 0 = x₀ < x₁ < … < x_n≤ 1 are chosen so that max_1≤i≤n(x_i-x_{i- 1}) = 0(n^-1), and where {e_i} are i.i.d. with Ee₁= 0 and Var e₁ - s?². In a previous paper, Cheng & Lin (1979) study three estimators of g, namely, g_1n of Cheng & Lin (1979), g_2n of Clark (1977), and g_3n of Priestley & Chao (1972). Consistency results are established and rates of strong uniform convergence are obtained. In the current investigation the limiting distribution of &_in, i = 1, 2, 3, and that of the isotonic estimator g**_n are considered.     

Admissible tests for the mean with additional information

Let X be a po-normal random vector with unknown µ and unknown covariance matrix ∑ and let X be partitioned as X = (X^′ ₍₁₎, …, X^′ _(r))′ where X_(j)is a subvector of X with dimension p_jsuch that ∑^r _j=1Pj = P0. Some admissible tests are derived for testing H₀: μ = 0 versus H₁: μ ¦0 based on a sample drawn from the whole vector X of dimension p and r additional samples drawn from X₍₁₎, X₍₂₎, …, X(r) respectively, All (r+1) samples are assumed to be independent. The distribution of some of the tests' statistics involved are also derived.     

Adaptive parametric test in a semiparametric regression model

Consider the semiparametric regression model Y_i = x′_iβ +g(t_i)+e_i for i=1,2, …,n. Here the design points (x_i,t_i) are known and nonrandom and the e_i are iid random errors with Ee₁ = 0 and Ee² ₁ = α²<∞. Based on g(.) approximated by a B-spline function, we consider using atest statistic for testing H₀ : β = 0. Meanwhile, an adaptive parametric test statistic is constructed and a large sample study for this adaptive parametric test statistic is presented.     

Fitting a multiple regression function

Consider the p-dimensional unit cube [0,1]^p, p≥1. Partition [0, 1]^p into n regions, R_1,n,…,R_n,n such that the volume Δ(R_j,n) is of order n^?1,j=1,…,n. Select and fix a point in each of these regions so that we have x⁽ⁿ⁾₁,…,x⁽ⁿ⁾_n. Suppose that associated with the j-th predictor vector x⁽ⁿ⁾_j there is an observable variable Y⁽ⁿ⁾_j, j=1,…,n, satisfying the multiple regression model $\text{Y}{}^{\mathrm{(n)}}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{=g(}\text{x}{}^{\mathrm{(n)}}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{)+e}{}^{\mathrm{(n)}}{}_{\mathrm{j}}$, where g is an unknown function defined on [0, 1]^pand {e⁽ⁿ⁾_j} are independent identically distributed random variables with Ee⁽ⁿ⁾₁=0 and Var e⁽ⁿ⁾₁=σ²<∞. This paper proposes as an estimator of g(x), where k(u) is a known p-dimensional bounded density and {a_n} is a sequence of reals converging to 0 asn→∞. Weak and strong consistency of g_n(x) and rates of convergence are obtained. Asymptoticnormality of the estimator is established. Also proposed is $\text{σ}{}^2{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{=n}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{Σ}{}^{\mathrm{n}}{}_{\mathrm{j=1}}\text{(Y}{}^{\mathrm{(n)}}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?g}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{(}\text{x}{}^{\mathrm{(n)}}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{))}{}^2$ as a consistent estimate of σ².     

Exact distributions associated with an i×j×k contingency table

In this paper an exact distributional framework is developed for analysing an IxJxK contingency table. It is shown that for the case of hypotheses H₀:P_ijk=P_i..P._j./K and H₀:P_ijk =P_i..P._j.P.._k the exact distributional results do not follow as simple extensions of the corresponding results obtained for an I×J table under the hypothesis of independence. From the factorial moment generating functions, expressions for the covariance matrices in terms of the Kronecker products of matrices, are presented. These expressions give indications whether or not Pearson's chi-square statistic should be corrected by the factor (n?1)/n or not. Marginal and conditional distributions are considered briefly and important differences with regard to the resuits for marginal and conditional distributions for an IxJ table are mentioned.     

Rate of consistency of one sample tests of location

Let X₁,…,X_n be a sample from a population with continuous distribution function F(x?θ) such that F(x)+F(-x)=1 and 0<F(x)<1, x?R¹. It is shown that the power- function of a monotone test of H: θ=θ₀ against K: θ>θ₀ cannot tend to 1 as θ?θ₀ → ∞ more than n times faster than the tails of F tend to 0. Some standard as well as robust tests are considered with respect to this rate of convergence.     

Nonparametric statistical procedures for the changepoint problem

Let X₁,…,X_r?1,X_r,X_r+1,…,X_n be independent, continuous random variables such that X_i, i = 1,…,r, has distribution function F(x), and X_i, i = r+1,…,n, has distribution function F(x?Δ), with -∞ <Δ< ∞. When the integer r is unknown, this is refered to as a change point problem with at most one change. The unknown parameter Δ represents the magnitude of the change and r is called the changepoint. In this paper we present a general review discussion of several nonparametric approaches for making inferences about r and Δ.     

Maximum likelihood estimation in the presence of outiliers

This paper deals with the maximum likelihood estimation of parameters when the sample (x₁…x_n ) may heve k spuriously generated observations from another distribution, say G≠F, where F is the distribution of the target population. If G is stochastically larger than F, then these k observations may give rise to k extreme observations or ‘outliers’. This situation is often described by a so-called ‘k-outlier model’ in which in addition to the parameters involved in F and G, the set ν={ν₁,…,ν_k} of indices, for which x_νj , j=1,…,k, come from G, is also unknow.