演绎主义与经济学方法论

经济学作为一门实证科学,理应以实证方法为主对其进行研究,然而,新古典主义学派源于对古典经济学的经验方法、完全归纳法的改进,对劳动价值理论的批判等,他们逐渐发展了以抽泉分析、逻辑演绎为基本方法。该文旨在介绍演绎主义方法论在西方主流经济学中的生成与演进,并指出这种方法论发展到极至将导致经济学——作为一门实证科学——与其本质相背了。     

公司治理研究的均衡观及其意义

本文首先简要地回顾了近20年来公司治理机制和公司业绩之间实证研究的矛盾发现。提出导致这种结果的主要原因是已有的实证研究在方法论上存在缺欠;研究内容过于局限在对单一治理机制的作用进行分析,而对多种治理机制的互动性缺乏研究。本文倡导建立一种公司治理研究的“均衡观”。     

“黑板管理学”的3个来源——操作主义视角下管理理论与实践脱节问题分析

在国内外学术界,管理学研究都出现了某种程度的"黑板化"倾向.尽管关于管理理论与实践脱节的问题比较复杂,但其本质上是一个研究方法论问题.从布里奇曼的基于操作主义的实证研究方法论的视角来看,可以将管理理论与实践脱节的"黑板管理学"的来源总结为以下3个原因:概念没有很好定义导致无法测量的"泛量表式研究"、概念分解中的"伪还原"以及忽视研究结论可操作性的"管理解释学".     

积极领导:一种新型领导范式

"积极领导"(Positive Leadership)一词最初是由西方管理咨询和领导培训界人士出于市场开发的需要"突发奇想"出来的,未经科学的实证检验。真正将其上升为一个严格意义上的科学概念和领导学分支学科的,则是由笔者在经过长达5年的系统研究之后实现的。作为一个新型领导范式,积极领导从整体方法论出发,对     

浅析挣值分析法在项目成本管理中的应用

挣值分析法作为一种有效的项目成本管理方法,可以对项目实施进行实时地跟踪监控管理。它通过比较项目在某一阶段的计划值、实际值和挣值,对项目的进度,所耗的费用进行监控。挣值分析法在项目的进度管理和费用管理中具有重要的作用。本文介绍了挣值法的概念,分析指标,并结合具体实例对挣值分析法在项目成本管理中的应用作了实证研究。     

财务管理的研究方法

西方经济学的研究方法有实证分析法和规范分析法之分.财务管理活动作为经济活动的一种,可以借鉴其研究方法.而在实际的财务管理研究中,实证分析方法也越来越受到重视.本文介绍了财务管理的研究方法,并着重介绍了实证研究的特点、基本步骤及其存在的缺陷.     

人力资源管理的特征分析和实施对策

战略人力资源实证研究为我们提供了大量关于人力资源管理与企业绩效之间的关系的实证结论。为此,提供一种思路,来整合实证中获得的已有结论是十分必要的。战略人力资源管理的广泛应用引起了大家的关注,对于如何实施战略人力资源管理的相关问题成为了热点。文章主要从人力资源管理的特征分析和实施对策角度进行了分析阐述。     

基于知识图谱与扎根分析的中国管理理论构建范式研究述评

基于知识图谱理论和扎根理论的方法指导,以中文社会科学引文检索数据库收录的1998~2019年期间,与中国管理研究以及理论构建相关的561篇施引文献和7108篇被引文献作为研究对象。通过运用Citespace V可视化软件,进行中国管理研究与理论构建的知识基础、研究热点和主题演进脉络等的可视化分析与研究;并进一步精选了116篇科技文献为样本数据进行三级扎根编码,构建中国管理理论的研究框架模型。研究表明:中国管理研究目前聚焦于理论构建范式的研究主题,构建中国管理理论要直面实践导向,扎根传统文化,实现实践与文化的融合,要采用多元科学方法论与方法,辩证地使用实证研究方法。     

中国管理实践问题与管理的实证理论和规范理论

在经济学中,实证理论被认为是一种"科学",而规范理论是一种"艺术"。管理实证理论解释与预测管理现象,它回答管理科学问题;管理规范理论是为达到目标而提出的行动规则,它解决管理现实问题。规范理论因为要在各种复杂的条件下选择一种"可行"的方案,在很多情况下逼迫人们放弃"科学的方法"。仅有实证理论,管理学的框架就是支离破碎的,无法直接用于解决管理的现实问题,因此,管理规范研究和规范理论有其独立存在的价值。中国本土管理实践中的现实问题与矛盾的解决需要"规范研究",在实证至上的情境下谈理论与实践的脱节本身就是一个伪问题。由于实证研究以探索普遍规律为目的,因此实证研究也绝不可能产生中国本土管理学。中国本土管理理论一定是规范理论。     

《管理工程学报》2009年总目录

非交易类虚拟社区成员参与动机：实证研究与管理启示……范晓屏（1） 三种类型系统方法论的比较研究及其启示……张彩江（7） 基于模糊集贴近度的文本信息分类器分辨率改进算法研究……李子叶 王亚刚 郭菊娥 席酉民（13）纵向合作中的共同R＆D投资机制研究……刘伟 张子健 张婉君（19）     

Interpersonal Emotion Regulation in the Workplace: A Conceptual and Operational Review and Future Research Agenda

Employees need to regulate their own emotions as well as the emotions of others to enhance the quality of interactions with their colleagues. How well this is achieved has important outcomes for both employees and the organizations in which they work. In the field of organizational science, however, differing approaches have emerged regarding the conceptualization and operationalization of emotion regulation (ER) particularly in terms of interpersonal interactions. The present review examines contemporary theoretical perspectives of ER and its measurement with a view to resolving the confusion that currently exists around interpersonal ER in a workplace context. To understand how this field of research has developed so diversely, the authors begin by demonstrating the influence of three major individual‐level ER models on interpersonal‐level approaches: (1) the ER process model; (2) emotional labor; and (3) emotional intelligence. Moreover, to make sense of the range of interpersonal‐level research underpinned by these theories, the authors present a 2×2 categorization, developed by Zaki and Williams (2013), which shows how workplace researchers have variously approached interpersonal ER as an intrinsic vs. extrinsic process, with activation of either response‐dependent or response‐independent categories. This categorization broadly shows interpersonal ER theory used in work contexts tends to fall into four groupings as: (1) a purely extrinsic process; (2) a differentiation of extrinsic interpersonal from intrinsic individual ER; (3) co‐occurring intrinsic and extrinsic interpersonal ER; or (4) interpersonal coregulation. This paper also discusses the measurement of interpersonal ER and concludes by highlighting emerging research directions.     

供应链风险管理中的几个重要问题

供应链风险管理是供应链管理领域一个新的热点研究方向,吸引了来自于运作管理、财务管理和战略管理等领域的研究人员和企业管理人员的极大关注.文章对有关供应链风险管理定量分析的一些主要工作进行评述,并讨论这一领域的几个重要研究方向,希望引起国内学术界的重视.     

中国管理实践研究的路径

研究中国管理实践具有重大的理论意义和实践意义,重点关注中国管理实践研究的路径:首先,在探讨中国管理实践研究路径时必须遵循2个原则:借鉴国际规范的研究方法和结合中国特殊的情境变量。在此基础上,对中国管理实践研究的路径进行了界定:从企业面临的实际问题出发提出研究问题;通过文献梳理的方式提出理论视角,并结合特殊的中国情境变量进行研究;采用案例研究的方法。最后,提出中国管理实践研究的3个阶段:零星研究阶段、系统研究阶段以及整合研究阶段。     

Comparative analysis of model management and relational database management

There has recently been considerable interest in research and practice that rely substantially on ideas from both model management and database management to solve problems that cannot be adequately addressed by either field alone. Following this frontier, this paper examines the essential nature of model management and relational database management, and discusses the validity of parallels which appear to exist between them. The characteristics of applications, functions, representations, utilizations, and research are used as a basis for conducting comparisons. Through these comparisons, the strengths and weaknesses of each field are evaluated, and significant similarities and differences are identified. An application for making use of the parallels identified is also presented in the paper. Rather than restricting the ideas and techniques applied within each field, this paper encourages the cross-fertilization of both model management and relational database management, in the hope that this may spawn creative ideas for research.     

管理理论的实践相关性问题研究综述

介绍了管理理论缺乏实践相关性问题产生的历史背景以及其主要证据,并从管理理论传播过程、管理理论生产过程、管理研究方法论和管理理论框架、管理学者的价值观和管理学院追求的目标4个方面,对问题的原因进行了综述和分析,最后提出了需要进一步研究的几个问题。     

How Does Performance Management Affect Workers? Beyond Human Resource Management and Its Critique

While performance management (PM) is pervasive across contemporary workplaces, extant research into how performance management affects workers is often indirect or scattered across disciplinary silos. This paper reviews and synthesizes this research, identifies key gaps and explores ‘recognition theory’ as a nascent framework that can further develop this important body of knowledge. The paper develops in three main stages. The first stage reviews ‘mainstream’ human resource management (HRM) research. While this research analyses workers’ reactions to performance management in some depth, its focus on serving organizational goals marginalizes extra‐organizational impacts. The second stage reviews more critical HRM research, which interprets performance management as a disciplinary, coercive or inequitable management device. While this literature adds an important focus on organizational power, there is scope to analyse further how PM affects workers’ well‐being. To develop this strand of PM research, the third stage turns to the emerging field of recognition theory independently developed by Axel Honneth and Christophe Dejours. The authors focus especially on recognition theory's exploration of how (in)adequate acknowledgement of workers’ contributions can significantly affect their well‐being at the level of self‐conception. Although recognition theory is inherently critical, the paper argues that it can advance both mainstream and critical performance management research, and also inform broader inquiry into recognition and identity at work.     

The community of practice-based management model

This conceptual paper offers the convergence between two concepts now separated in the literature: the community of practice and the management model. The paper introduces the results of the theoretical research on the community of practice-based management model, the self-managing, human-friendly, knowledge sharing and innovativeness-supporting management model with high potential for the changeable environment. The research objective to analyse and explain the relationship between the concept of communities of practice and the management model is specified in two research questions: ‘How are the concepts of CoPs and management model connected in the community of practice-based management model?’ and ‘How do CoP-based management models work? What are their characteristics, advantages and disadvantages?’ The paper provides two examples of companies that combined both concepts in the community of practice-based management model and provides a discussion on the specifics of this unique model. The paper fills the research gap in the field of the theory of management – the community of practice-based management model, even though adopted by organisations in practice, still lacks adequate attention in the theoretical literature.     

新兴技术管理研究综述

20世纪90年代后期以来,新兴技术管理正在成为国际学术研究的新兴领域,我国也正在蓬勃展开这方面的研究.文章对该领域的研究进行了扫描.从理论渊源入手,通过对新兴技术的概念及其不确定性和创造性毁灭特征、新兴技术管理的概念和特征的讨论,认为新兴技术管理是与技术管理、技术创新管理同源异质的新兴学科领域;分别从新兴技术演化及评估、新兴市场识别及拓展、新兴技术战略研究、新兴技术管理的组织创新、新兴技术的融投资管理、新兴技术的知识管理等方面,介绍了目前新兴技术管理研究的领域、内容、观点和成果;从新兴技术聚群创新、新兴技术边缘竞争、新兴技术管理研究方法等方面,展望了新兴技术管理的研究领域.     

Mode 2 Management Research

The terminology of mode 2 knowledge production has become increasingly prominent in discussions on the nature and purpose of management research. This paper attempts to move our understanding of this terminology forward, by providing a detailed exposition of the five features of mode 2 knowledge production in the context of management research and by offering an empirical account of a research project conducted in mode 2. The paper relates the established problem–solving management research traditions of action research, cooperative inquiry, grounded theory and clinical method to the conceptual territory of mode 2. It then considers a specific form of knowledge production where all five features of mode 2 appear simultaneously. The paper demonstrates how the terminology of mode 2 might provide a useful basis for dialogue between management researchers from different methodological traditions. Moreover, the paper concludes that the specific form of mode 2 where all five features are present (called here 5mode2) does differ, in both its conduct and the character of its output, from any of the established approaches considered in this paper.     

The evolution and problems of model management research

Models are a key resource for organizational decision making. The diversity, complexity, and reusability of this resource result in the need for model management systems. The construction of a model management system involves a modeling task dimension and a design level dimension. The modeling task dimension consists of model formulation, model representation, and model processing. The design level dimension addresses the architectural requirements of a system from a user's standpoint and a computer system's standpoint.The numerous architectures suggested in the model management systems literature address isolated areas identified by these dimensions. The research surveyed in this paper indicates that the primary focus has been on the system view of model representation. Before model management systems can be widely used in organizations, model management researchers must explore systems that address all areas of the task and design level dimensions.In this paper, we identify and justify the necessary dimensions of model management research. Next, the existing model management research is critically reviewed. Finally, neglected research areas are discussed, and investigations necessary for the development of integrated model management systems are suggested.