Generalized mean squared error properties of regression estimators

Theobald (1974) compares Ordinary Least Squares and Ridge Regression estimators of regression parameters using a generalized mean squared error criterion. This paper presents the generalized mean squared error of a Principal Components Regression estimator and comparisons are made with each of the above estimators. In general the choice of which estimator to use depends on the magnitude and the orientation of the unknown parameter vector.     

Some Asymptotic Properties of Ridge Regression in a System of Seemingly Unrelated Regression Equations

A discussion is made of asymptotic properties of an Operational Ordinary Ridge Regression estimator and comparison is made with the Operational Generalized Least Squares estimator. Also, some simulation experiments are carried showing efficiency gains can be made through the use of de Ridge estimator.     

A non stochastic ridge regression estimator and comparison with the James-Stein estimator

Abstract

This article presents a non-stochastic version of the Generalized Ridge Regression estimator that arises from a discussion of the properties of a Generalized Ridge Regression estimator whose shrinkage parameters are found to be close to their upper bounds. The resulting estimator takes the form of a shrinkage estimator that is superior to both the Ordinary Least Squares estimator and the James-Stein estimator under certain conditions. A numerical study is provided to investigate the range of signal to noise ratio under which the new estimator dominates the James-Stein estimator with respect to the prediction mean square error.     

Study of partial least squares and ridge regression methods

This article considers both Partial Least Squares (PLS) and Ridge Regression (RR) methods to combat multicollinearity problem. A simulation study has been conducted to compare their performances with respect to Ordinary Least Squares (OLS). With varying degrees of multicollinearity, it is found that both, PLS and RR, estimators produce significant reductions in the Mean Square Error (MSE) and Prediction Mean Square Error (PMSE) over OLS. However, from the simulation study it is evident that the RR performs better when the error variance is large and the PLS estimator achieves its best results when the model includes more variables. However, the advantage of the ridge regression method over PLS is that it can provide the 95% confidence interval for the regression coefficients while PLS cannot.     

A Novel Regression Approach: Least Squares Ratio

Regression Analysis (RA) is one of the frequently used tool for forecasting. The Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) Technique is the basic instrument of RA and there are many regression techniques based on OLS. This paper includes a new regression approach, called Least Squares Ratio (LSR), and comparison of OLS and LSR according to mean square errors of estimation of theoretical regression parameters (mse ß) and dependent value (mse y).     

Bias in the ordinary least squares estimator in the dynamic linear regression model with autocorrelated disturbances

We consider the bias in the Ordinary Least Squares estimator in the linear regression model with a lagged dependent variable as regressor. Results are obtained with independent and auto-correlated disturbances. Asymptotic results are obtained analytically, and finite sample results based on a Monte Carlo study. The substantial biases found suggest the need for an alternative estimator to Ordinary Least Squares and powerful tests for autocorrelated disturbances in the dynamic model.     

Comparison of estimators for heteroskedastic models

Ordinary least squares (OLS) yield inefficient parameter estimates and inconsistent estimates of the covariance matrix in case of heteroskedastic errors. Robinson's adaptive estimator and the Cragg estimator avoid any explicit parameterization of heteroskedasticity, and reduce the danger of misspecification. A small Monte Carlo experiment is performed to compare the behavior of the adaptive estimator with the performance of the Cragg estimator. The Monte Carlo experiment includes simulations of the Generalized Least Squares (GLS) estimator. Indeed, an interesting question is how more sophisticated techniques, like the adaptive estimator, compare with GLS when the latter relies on an incorrect specification of the heteroskedastic process. It turns out that the regression parameters, when estimated adaptively, display small mean squared errors and great efficiency in case of medium or high heteroskedasticity. The covariance matrix, instead, is better estimated by the Cragg estimator or by GLS based on a misspecified error term, since the adaptive estimator overpredicts the standard errors of the regression parameters.     

A comparison of six methods of analysing row-column designs with inter-block information

Six methods of obtaining estimates of treatment effects in a row-column design are considered. Five methods use estimates of inter-row and inter-column variation, and the remaining method is Ordinary Least Squares. Using simulation, these methods are examined to see which are most appropriate for minimising the sum of the squared differences between the estimates of the elementary treatment contrasts and their true values. Recommendations are made of which methods to use.     

Estimating the duration of dynamic effects with temporally aggregated observations

This paper discusses how an Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) estimator can be used to obtain reasonably accurate estimates of the duration of dynamic effects in a Koyck model framework without knowledge of the true level of temporal aggregation of the data. With proper changes in the analytic derivation, the approach can be extended to other dynamic models.     

On the asymptotic bias of OLS in dynamic regression models with autocorrelated errors

It is well-known that Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) yields inconsistent estimates if applied to a regression equation with lagged dependent variables and correlated errors. Bias expressions which appear in the literature usually assume the exogenous variables to be non-stochastic. Due to this assumption the numerical sizes of these expressions cannot be determined. Further, the analysis is mostly restricted to very simple models. In this paper the problem of calculating the asymptotic bias of OLS is generalized to stationary dynamic regression models, where the errors follow a stationary ARMA process. A general bias expression is derived and a method is introduced by which its actual size can be computed numerically.     

More Efficient Tests Robust to Heteroskedasticity of Unknown Form

In the presence of heteroskedasticity of unknown form, the Ordinary Least Squares parameter estimator becomes inefficient, and its covariance matrix estimator inconsistent. Eicker (1963) and White (1980) were the first to propose a robust consistent covariance matrix estimator, that permits asymptotically correct inference. This estimator is widely used in practice. Cragg (1983) proposed a more efficient estimator, but concluded that tests basd on it are unreliable. Thus, this last estimator has not been used in practice. This article is concerned with finite sample properties of tests robust to heteroskedasticity of unknown form. Our results suggest that reliable and more efficient tests can be obtained with the Cragg estimators in small samples.     

Efficiency analysis of ten estimation procedures for quantitative linear models with autocorrelated errors

Many estimation procedures for quantitative linear models with autocorrelated errors have been proposed in the literature. A number of these procedures have been compared in various ways for different sample sizes and autocorrelation parameters values and for structured or random explanatory vaiables. In this paper, we revisit three situations that were considered to some extent in previous studies, by comparing ten estimation procedures: Ordinary Least Squares (OLS), Generalized Least Squares (GLS), estimated Generalized Least Squares (six procedures), Maximum Likelihood (ML), and First Differences (FD). The six estimated GLS procedures and the ML procedure differ in the way the error autocovariance matrix is estimated. The three situations can be defined as follows: Case 1, the explanatory variable x in the simple linear regression is fixed; Case 2,x is purely random; and Case 3x is first-order autoregressive. Following a theoretical presentation, the ten estimation procedures are compared in a Monte Carlo study conducted in the time domain, where the errors are first-order autoregressive in Cases 1-3. The measure of comparison for the estimation procedures is their efficiency relative to OLS. It is evaluated as a function of the time series length and the magnitude and sign of the error autocorrelation parameter. Overall, knowledge of the model of the time series process generating the errors enhances efficiency in estimated GLS. Differences in the efficiency of estimation procedures between Case 1 and Cases 2 and 3 as well as differences in efficiency among procedures in a given situation are observed and discussed.     

Spurious Instrumental Variables

Spurious regression phenomenon has been recognized for a wide range of Data Generating Processes: driftless unit roots, unit roots with drift, long memory, trend and broken-trend stationarity, etc. The usual framework is Ordinary Least Squares. We show that the spurious phenomenon also occurs in Instrumental Variables estimation when using non stationary variables, whether the non stationarity component is stochastic or deterministic. Finite sample evidence supports the asymptotic results.     

Bootstrap confidence intervals for smoothing splines and their comparison to bayesian confidence intervals

We construct bootstrap confidence intervals for smoothing spline estimates based on Gaussian data, and penalized likelihood smoothing spline estimates based on data from .exponential families. Several vari- ations of bootstrap confidence intervals are considered and compared. We find that the commonly used ootstrap percentile intervals are inferior to the T intervals and to intervals based on bootstrap estimation of mean squared errors. The best variations of the bootstrap confidence intervals behave similar to the well known Bayesian confidence intervals. These bootstrap confidence intervals have an average coverage probability across the function being estimated, as opposed to a pointwise property.     

Higher order generalisation of first order autoregressive tests

Higher order analogues of currently favoured tests for autocorrelated dicturbances are presented. Comparisons of power, against autoregressive disturbances of a range of orders considered likely in practice, favour a version of a test originally proposed by King (1985). This superiority is particularly marked with regressors for which Ordinary Least Squares is least efficient and thus testing most crucial. Selected significance bounds are tabulated for the twelfth order analogue of this test statistic for use with monthly data.     

A simulation study on SPSS ridge regression and ordinary least squares regression procedures for multicollinearity data

This study compares the SPSS ordinary least squares (OLS) regression and ridge regression procedures in dealing with multicollinearity data. The LS regression method is one of the most frequently applied statistical procedures in application. It is well documented that the LS method is extremely unreliable in parameter estimation while the independent variables are dependent (multicollinearity problem). The Ridge Regression procedure deals with the multicollinearity problem by introducing a small bias in the parameter estimation. The application of Ridge Regression involves the selection of a bias parameter and it is not clear if it works better in applications. This study uses a Monte Carlo method to compare the results of OLS procedure with the Ridge Regression procedure in SPSS.     

OLS与ML：回归模型两种参数估计方法的比较研究

最小二乘法(OLS)和最大似然法(ML)是回归模型参数估计的两种最重要的方法。 但二者有着明显的差别,本文就二者之间的有关差别进行比较。     

Nonlinear unbiased estimation in the linear regression model with nonnormal disturbances

In the application of the linear regression model there continues to be wide-spread use of the Least Squares Estimator (LSE) due to its theoretical optimality. For example, it is well known that the LSE is the best unbiased estimator under normality while it remains best linear unbiased estimator (BLUE) when the normality assumption is dropped. In this paper we extend an approach given in Knautz (1993) that allows improvement of the LSE in the context of nonnormal and nonsymmetric error distributions. It will be shown that there exist linear plus quadratic (LPQ) estimators, consisting of linear and quadratic terms in the dependent variable, which dominate the LS estimator, depending on second, third and fourth moments of the error distribution. A simulation study illustrates that this remains true if the moments have to be estimated from the data. Computation of confidence intervals using bootstrap methods reveal significant improvement compared with inference based on the LS especially for nonsymmetric distributions of the error term.     

On construction of asymptotically correct confidence intervals

In this paper we discuss constructing confidence intervals based on asymptotic generalized pivotal quantities (AGPQs). An AGPQ associates a distribution with the corresponding parameter, and then an asymptotically correct confidence interval can be derived directly from this distribution like Bayesian or fiducial interval estimates. We provide two general procedures for constructing AGPQs. We also present several examples to show that AGPQs can yield new confidence intervals with better finite-sample behaviors than traditional methods.