Linear statistical inference for global and local minimum variance portfolios

Traditional portfolio optimization has often been criticized for not taking estimation risk into account. Estimation risk is mainly driven by the parameter uncertainty regarding the expected asset returns rather than their variances and covariances. The global minimum variance portfolio has been advocated by many authors as an appropriate alternative to the tangential portfolio. This is because there are no expectations which have to be estimated and thus the impact of estimation errors can be substantially reduced. However, in many practical situations an investor is not willing to choose the global minimum variance portfolio but he wants to minimize the variance of the portfolio return under specific constraints for the portfolio weights. Such a portfolio is called local minimum variance portfolio. Small-sample hypothesis tests for global and local minimum variance portfolios are derived and the exact distributions of the estimated portfolio weights are calculated in the present work. The first two moments of the estimator for the expected portfolio returns are also provided and the presented instruments are illustrated by an empirical study.     

Comparison of different estimation techniques for portfolio selection

The main problem in applying the mean-variance portfolio selection consists of the fact that the first two moments of the asset returns are unknown. In practice the optimal portfolio weights have to be estimated. This is usually done by replacing the moments by the classical unbiased sample estimators. We provide a comparison of the exact and the asymptotic distributions of the estimated portfolio weights as well as a sensitivity analysis to shifts in the moments of the asset returns. Furthermore we consider several types of shrinkage estimators for the moments. The corresponding estimators of the portfolio weights are compared with each other and with the portfolio weights based on the sample estimators of the moments. We show how the uncertainty about the portfolio weights can be introduced into the performance measurement of trading strategies. The methodology explains the bad out-of-sample performance of the classical Markowitz procedures.     

How risky is the optimal portfolio which maximizes the Sharpe ratio?

In this paper, we investigate the properties of the optimal portfolio in the sense of maximizing the Sharpe ratio (SR) and develop a procedure for the calculation of the risk of this portfolio. This is achieved by constructing an optimal portfolio which minimizes the Value-at-Risk (VaR) and at the same time coincides with the tangent (market) portfolio on the efficient frontier which is related to the SR portfolio. The resulting significance level of the minimum VaR portfolio is then used to determine the risk of both the market portfolio and the corresponding SR portfolio. However, the expression of this significance level depends on the unknown parameters which have to be estimated in practice. It leads to an estimator of the significance level whose distributional properties are investigated in detail. Based on these results, a confidence interval for the suggested risk measure of the SR portfolio is constructed and applied to real data. Both theoretical and empirical findings document that the SR portfolio is very risky since the corresponding significance level is smaller than 90 % in most of the considered cases.     

Higher order moments of the estimated tangency portfolio weights

In this paper, we consider the estimated weights of the tangency portfolio. We derive analytical expressions for the higher order non-central and central moments of these weights when the returns are assumed to be independently and multivariate normally distributed. Moreover, the expressions for mean, variance, skewness and kurtosis of the estimated weights are obtained in closed forms. Later, we complement our results with a simulation study where data from the multivariate normal and t-distributions are simulated, and the first four moments of estimated weights are computed by using the Monte Carlo experiment. It is noteworthy to mention that the distributional assumption of returns is found to be important, especially for the first two moments. Finally, through an empirical illustration utilizing returns of four financial indices listed in NASDAQ stock exchange, we observe the presence of time dynamics in higher moments.     

基于投资者异质性的投资组合选择与证券市场价格

 马科维茨给出了风险规避型投资者最优投资组合的解,并论证了组合投资的风险分散功能。然而组合投资是否只是风险规避型投资者的“专利”呢？本文依据马科维茨均值-方差模型的研究范式,在充分讨论不同风险偏好投资者投资组合选择最优解的基础上,分别剖析了风险规避、中性、追求型三类投资者投资组合选择行为,以此为依据来探讨均衡条件下证券市场运行特征,并相应给出我国证券市场的经验证据。分析结果表明：无论哪类风险偏好型投资者,其都存在可供选择的最优投资组合方案,只是风险追求型投资者的最优解复杂一些罢了,风险中性型投资者将选择ETF工具代替市场组合,且他们的选择行为对市场运行不产生影响,市场运行完全由风险规避和风险追求型投资者的行为决定,虽然我们从投资组合选择的差异上无法区分个体投资者的风险偏好类型,但我国证券市场整体却表现出明显的风险追求型特征。     

Univariate and Multivariate Value-at-Risk: Application and Implication in Energy Markets

This study investigated the cross-markets price changes, volatility, and shock transmission mechanism among gasoline, crude oil, and diesel spot markets. An asymmetric time-varying volatility model is used to reveal the hidden dynamic shock transmission mechanism among the markets. An iterative optimization Newton–Raphson algorithm is used in the nonlinear estimation procedures by updating the outer product of the gradient vector. The estimated results are used in quantifying the cross-market risk, optimal portfolio holding, and hedging among the energy markets.     

New characteristics for portfolio surveillance

This paper elaborates the tools for the surveillance of the global minimum variance portfolio weights. Golosnoy and Schmid [V. Golosnoy and W. Schmid, EWMA control charts for optimal portfolio weights, Sequential Anal. 26 (2007), pp. 195–224] introduced exponentially weighted moving average-type control charts for this task based on the processes of the estimated weights as well as of their first differences. This paper proposes the new approximations to these processes exhibiting better stochastic properties for sequential monitoring purposes. The control schemes for the new processes are compared for different types of economically relevant changes using Monte Carlo simulations. The suggested procedures appear to be superior for the considered performance measures.     

A descent algorithm for constrained LAD-Lasso estimation with applications in portfolio selection

To improve the out-of-sample performance of the portfolio, Lasso regularization is incorporated to the Mean Absolute Deviance (MAD)-based portfolio selection method. It is shown that such a portfolio selection problem can be reformulated as a constrained Least Absolute Deviance problem with linear equality constraints. Moreover, we propose a new descent algorithm based on the ideas of ‘nonsmooth optimality conditions’ and ‘basis descent direction set’. The resulting MAD-Lasso method enjoys at least two advantages. First, it does not involve the estimation of covariance matrix that is difficult particularly in the high-dimensional settings. Second, sparsity is encouraged. This means that assets with weights close to zero in the Markovwitz's portfolio are driven to zero automatically. This reduces the management cost of the portfolio. Extensive simulation and real data examples indicate that if the Lasso regularization is incorporated, MAD portfolio selection method is consistently improved in terms of out-of-sample performance, measured by Sharpe ratio and sparsity. Moreover, simulation results suggest that the proposed descent algorithm is more time-efficient than interior point method and ADMM algorithm.     

Stress testing correlation matrix: a maximum empirical likelihood approach

ABSTRACT

Stress testing correlation matrix is a challenging exercise for portfolio risk management. Most existing methods directly modify the estimated correlation matrix to satisfy stress conditions while maintaining positive semidefiniteness. The focus lies on technical optimization issues but the resultant stressed correlation matrices usually lack statistical interpretations. In this article, we suggest a novel approach using Empirical Likelihood method to modify the probability weights of sample observations to construct a stressed correlation matrix. The resultant correlations correspond to a stress scenario that is nearest to the observed scenario in a Kullback–Leibler divergence sense. Besides providing a clearer statistical interpretation, the proposed method is non-parametric in distribution, simple in computation and free from subjective tunings. We illustrate the method through an application to a portfolio of international assets.     

基于VaR风险控制的半log-最优资产组合模型

通过建立基于VaR风险控制下的单周期半log-最优资产组合数学模型,证明了最优解的存在性与唯一性。利用遗传算法对半log-最优资产组合模型进行了实例计算与分析,并与log-最优资产组合模型进行了比较,结果表明半log-最优资产组合模型具有计算方便的特征。     

金融危机传染效应的资产动态组合视角解析

由金融危机三阶段视角透视跨国投资组合供需动态变化过程中金融危机的传染特性。以跨国投资者投资决策与投资业绩互动为突破点,剖析在金融危机三阶段内调整跨国资产组合配置的微观交易行为所引致的金融危机传染性。经由9个国家金融危机期间基金交易数据的计量检验得出：金融危机中跨国投资者资产组合再分配是金融危机重要的传染渠道;与金融危机发源国分享风险偏好型跨国投资者的国家最容易被危机感染;金融危机三阶段传染效应的强度呈动态变化;金融市场上投资者的信息搜集在化解市场风险方面具有重要作用。     

Multiple Regression Model Averaging and the Focused Information Criterion With an Application to Portfolio Choice

ABSTRACT

We consider multiple regression (MR) model averaging using the focused information criterion (FIC). Our approach is motivated by the problem of implementing a mean-variance portfolio choice rule. The usual approach is to estimate parameters ignoring the intention to use them in portfolio choice. We develop an estimation method that focuses on the trading rule of interest. Asymptotic distributions of submodel estimators in the MR case are derived using a localization framework. The localization is of both regression coefficients and error covariances. Distributions of submodel estimators are used for model selection with the FIC. This allows comparison of submodels using the risk of portfolio rule estimators. FIC model averaging estimators are then characterized. This extension further improves risk properties. We show in simulations that applying these methods in the portfolio choice case results in improved estimates compared with several competitors. An application to futures data shows superior performance as well.     

Bayesian Portfolio Selection: An Empirical Analysis of the S&P 500 Index 1970–1996

In this article we present a technique for implementing large-scale optimal portfolio selection. We use high-frequency daily data to capture valuable statistical information in asset returns. We describe several statistical issues involved in quantitative approaches to portfolio selection. Our methodology applies to large-scale portfolio-selection problems in which the number of possible holdings is large relative to the estimation period provided by historical data. We illustrate our approach on an equity database that consists of stocks from the Standard and Poor's index, and we compare our portfolios to this benchmark index. Our methodology differs from the usual quadratic programming approach to portfolio selection in three ways: (1) We employ informative priors on the expected returns and variance-covariance matrices, (2) we use daily data for estimation purposes, with upper and lower holding limits for individual securities, and (3) we use a dynamic asset-allocation approach that is based on reestimating and then rebalancing the portfolio weights on a prespecified time window. The key inputs to the optimization process are the predictive distributions of expected returns and the predictive variance-covariance matrix. We describe the statistical issues involved in modeling these inputs for high-dimensional portfolio problems in which our data frequency is daily. In our application, we find that our optimal portfolio outperforms the underlying benchmark.     

A generalized pivotal quantity approach to portfolio selection

The major problem of mean–variance portfolio optimization is parameter uncertainty. Many methods have been proposed to tackle this problem, including shrinkage methods, resampling techniques, and imposing constraints on the portfolio weights, etc. This paper suggests a new estimation method for mean–variance portfolio weights based on the concept of generalized pivotal quantity (GPQ) in the case when asset returns are multivariate normally distributed and serially independent. Both point and interval estimations of the portfolio weights are considered. Comparing with Markowitz's mean–variance model, resampling and shrinkage methods, we find that the proposed GPQ method typically yields the smallest mean-squared error for the point estimate of the portfolio weights and obtains a satisfactory coverage rate for their simultaneous confidence intervals. Finally, we apply the proposed methodology to address a portfolio rebalancing problem.     

Estimation of the optimal portfolio weights by shrinking the mean vector towards a linear subspace

To obtain estimators of mean-variance optimal portfolio weights, Stein-type estimators of the mean vector that shrink a sample mean towards the grand mean have been applied. However, the dominance of these estimators has not been shown under the loss function used in the estimation problem of the mean-variance optimal portfolio weights, which is different than the quadratic function for the case in which the covariance matrix is unknown. We analytically give the conditions for Stein-type estimators that shrink towards the grand mean, or more generally, towards a linear subspace, to improve upon the classical estimators, which are obtained by simply plugging in sample estimates. We also show the dominance when there are linear constraints on portfolio weights.     

The portfolio choice problem: comparison of certainty equivalence and optimal Bayes portfolios

For the portfolio problem with unknown parameter values, we compare the conventional certainty equivalence portfolio choice with the optimal Bayes portfolio. In the important single risky asset case a diffuse Bayes rule leads to portfolios that differ significantly from those suggested by a certainty equivalence rule which we show are inadmissible relative to a quadratic utility function for the range of parameters we consider. These results are invariant to arbitrary changes in the utility function parameters. We illustrate the results using a simple mutual fund example.     

投资组合动态VaR风险度量

投资组合的VaR风险度量依赖于投资组合中金融资产间联合分布函数的确定，随着投资组合规模的扩大，其VaR的计算难度也不断加大。利用ICA可以将多元联合概率分布函数转化为一元概率分布函数乘积实现简化计算的特点，基于ICA的投资组合动态VaR风险度量方法和计算步骤，克服了多元非正态条件下VaR测算上的困难。实证研究表明，与EWMA模型法、MGARCH模型法相比，ICA法能够准确地度量投资组合动态VaR。     

Sequential monitoring of minimum variance portfolio

This paper evaluates the economic effect of monitoring the minimum variance portfolio weights, which depend solely on the covariance matrix of returns. The investor decides whether the portfolio composition providing the smallest portfolio variance remains optimal at the beginning of every new investment period. For this purpose changes in the optimal weights are sequentially detected by means of EWMA control charts. Signals obtained from monitoring are used for improvement of the covariance matrix estimation procedure. The investment strategy exploiting signals from control charts is compared with a number of alternative approaches in the empirical study.     

On the existence of unbiased estimators for the portfolio weights obtained by maximizing the Sharpe ratio

We consider the problem of estimating the portfolio weights obtained by maximizing the Sharpe ratio. Assuming that the underlying asset returns are independent and multivariate normally distributed, Okhrin and Schmid (J. Econom. 134:235–256, 2006) showed that the frequently used sample estimators of these weights do not have a first moment. This paper proves that an unbiased estimator of the Sharpe ratio portfolio weights does not exist at all. Moreover, we show that there is no asymptotically unbiased estimator of these weights within the family of estimators which are bounded by cylinder functions.     

稳健高维协方差矩阵估计及其投资组合应用——基于中心正则化算法

高维协方差矩阵的估计问题现已成为大数据统计分析中的基本问题,传统方法要求数据满足正态分布假定且未考虑异常值影响,当前已无法满足应用需要,更加稳健的估计方法亟待被提出。针对高维协方差矩阵,一种稳健的基于子样本分组的均值-中位数估计方法被提出且简单易行,然而此方法估计的矩阵并不具备正定稀疏特性。基于此问题,本文引进一种中心正则化算法,弥补了原始方法的缺陷,通过在求解过程中对估计矩阵的非对角元素施加L1范数惩罚,使估计的矩阵具备正定稀疏的特性,显著提高了其应用价值。在数值模拟中,本文所提出的中心正则稳健估计有着更高的估计精度,同时更加贴近真实设定矩阵的稀疏结构。在后续的投资组合实证分析中,与传统样本协方差矩阵估计方法、均值-中位数估计方法和RA-LASSO方法相比,基于中心正则稳健估计构造的最小方差投资组合收益率有着更低的波动表现。