Estimation of population mean and variance in flock management: a ranked set sampling approach in a finite population setting

Ranked set sampling is a sampling technique that provides substantial cost efficiency in experiments where a quick, inexpensive ranking procedure is available to rank the units prior to formal, expensive and precise measurements. Although the theoretical properties and relative efficiencies of this approach with respect to simple random sampling have been extensively studied in the literature for the infinite population setting, the use of ranked set sampling methods has not yet been explored widely for finite populations. The purpose of this study is to use sheep population data from the Research Farm at Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey, to demonstrate the practical benefits of ranked set sampling procedures relative to the more commonly used simple random sampling estimation of the population mean and variance in a finite population. It is shown that the ranked set sample mean remains unbiased for the population mean as is the case for the infinite population, but the variance estimators are unbiased only with use of the finite population correction factor. Both mean and variance estimators provide substantial improvement over their simple random sample counterparts.     

Invariance principles for jackknifing U-statistics for finite population sampling and some applications

For simple random sampling (without replacement) from a finite population, suitable stochastic processes are constructed from the entire sequence of jackknife estimators based on smooth functions of U-statistics and these are approximated (in distributions) by some Brownian bridge processes. Strong convergence of the Tukey estimator of the variance of a jackknife U-statistic has been interpreted suitably and established. Some applications of these results in sequential analysis relating to finite population sampling are also considered.     

Design effect of randomized systematic sampling

In statistical practice, systematic sampling (SYS) is used in many modifications due to its simple handling. In addition, SYS may provide efficiency gains if it is well adjusted to the structure of the population under study. However, if SYS is based on an inappropriate picture of the population a high decrease of efficiency, i.e. a high increase in variance may result by changing from simple random sampling to SYS. In the context of two-stage designs SYS so far seems often in use for subsampling within the primary units. As an alternative to this practice, we propose to randomize the order of the primary units, then to select systematically a number of primary units and, thereafter, to draw secondary units by simple random sampling without replacement within the primary units selected. This procedure is more efficient than simple random sampling with replacement from the whole population of all secondary units, i.e. the variance of an adequate estimator for a total is never increased by changing from simple random sampling to randomized SYS whatever be the values associated by a characteristic with the secondary units, while there are values for which the variance decreases for the change mentioned. This result should hold generally, even if our proof, so far, is not complete for general sample sizes.     

The significance of the sample lead:alternative proof

This paper presents an alternative derivation of the expected value and variance of the sample lead to the one given in a previous paper. It deals with the case of random sampling from infinite population without replacement or from finite population with replacement. The derivation involves the use of the moment- and cumulant-generating functions, but is shorter and simpler than the original proofs.     

Randomized nomination sampling for finite populations

We propose a randomized minima–maxima nomination (RMMN) sampling design for use in finite populations. We derive the first- and second-order inclusion probabilities for both with and without replacement variations of the design. The inclusion probabilities for the without replacement variation are derived using a non-homogeneous Markov process. The design is simple to implement and results in simple and easy to calculate estimators and variances. It generalizes maxima nomination sampling for use in finite populations and includes some other sampling designs as special cases. We provide some optimality results and show that, in the context of finite population sampling, maxima nomination sampling is not generally the optimum design to follow. We also show, through numerical examples and a case study, that the proposed design can result in significant improvements in efficiency compared to simple random sampling without replacement designs for a wide choice of population types. Finally, we describe a bootstrap method for choosing values of the design parameters.     

Finite Population Variance Estimation Under LSS with Multiple Random Starts

In this article, an unbiased estimator for finite population variance is developed under linear systematic sampling with two random starts and an explicit expression for its variance is also obtained. The study is supported by two real life situations. A detailed numerical comparative study has been carried out to compare its average variance with the average variance of the conventional unbiased estimator for finite population variance under simple random sampling for a wide variety of populations. Results based on the study strongly favor the use of the developed estimator for such populations.     

Two-Stage Cluster Sampling with Ranked Set Sampling in the Secondary Sampling Frame

Motivated by a real-life problem, we develop a Two-Stage Cluster Sampling with Ranked Set Sampling (TSCRSS) design in the second stage for which we derive an unbiased estimator of population mean and its variance. An unbiased estimator of the variance of mean estimator is also derived. It is proved that the TSCRSS is more efficient—in the sense of having smaller variance—than the conventional two-stage cluster simple random sampling in which the second-stage sampling is with replacement. Using a simulation study on a real-life population, we show that the TSCRSS is more efficient than the conventional two-stage cluster sampling when simple random sampling without replacement is used in both stages.     

On the Evaluation of the Kolmogorov Statistic

At least two computer program packages, SPSS and STRATA, use simulated Bernoulli trials to draw (without replacement) a random sample of records from a finite population of records. Therefore, the size of the sample is a random variable. Two estimators of a population total under this sampling procedure are compared with the usual estimator under simple random sampling. Conditions under which the Bernoulli sampling estimators have almost the same mean squared error as the simple random-sample estimator are illustrated.     

Design-based random permutation models with auxiliary information

We extend the random permutation model to obtain the best linear unbiased estimator of a finite population mean accounting for auxiliary variables under simple random sampling without replacement (SRS) or stratified SRS. The proposed method provides a systematic design-based justification for well-known results involving common estimators derived under minimal assumptions that do not require specification of a functional relationship between the response and the auxiliary variables.     

Confidence Intervals for the Median of a Finite Population Based on the Sign Test

This article presents methods for constructing confidence intervals for the median of a finite population under simple random sampling without replacement, stratified random sampling, and cluster sampling. The confidence intervals, as well as point estimates and test statistics, are derived from sign estimating functions which are based on the well-known sign test. Therefore, a unified approach for inference about the median of a finite population is given.     

Moments and efficiency of the median and trimmed mean for finite populations

Exact formulas for the expected value and variance of the median and trimmed mean are found as functions of the elements of a finite population under simple random sampling. A simulation study is performed to compare the performance of the median and trimmed mean versus the mean when sampling from various simulated finite populations. Finally, the asymptotic performance of these estimators, when sampling from infinite populations, is compared with the finite populations results.     

Comparison of Efficiency of Stratified and Unequal Probability Sampling

In this article, a choice of the optimum sampling design to study a finite population is studied. Three sampling schemes are compared, viz., Sunter's procedure of unequal probability sampling, stratified sampling under optimum stratification, and simple random sampling without replacement. The comparison is made against a background of various correlation between stratification and survey variables and various variability in the variables. Under weak correlation and large variability, stratification appeared to be more efficient than Sunter's procedure. Under strong correlation and/or low variability in the variables, the latter procedure was the most efficient. Simple random sampling was usually the least efficient.     

A MODEL OF SYSTEMATIC SAMPLING WITH UNEQUAL PROBABILITIES

A new method is described of drawing, without replacement, two sample units per stratum from any population. The method is developed from a consideration of the asymptotic properties of systematic sampling with unequal probabilities, as the sizes of the population units tend to zero. The essential properties of this method are very easily analysed. They also converge, over a large number of strata, to those of systematic sampling from the same strata with their population units arranged in random order. In proving this, the assumption is made that the underlying population is of the type to which it is appropriate to apply ratio estimation. The sampling method described is, however, simple enough to commend itself as an alternative to systematic sampling when the underlying population is not of this type. Consideration is given to the case where the sizes of some of the population units exceed the skip interval.     

A note on the determination of sample sizes for hypergeometric distributions

Sample size determination for testing the hypothesis of equality of two proportions against an alternative with specified type I and type II error probabilities is considered for two finite populations. When two finite populations involved are quite different in sizes, the equal size assumption may not be appropriate. In this paper, we impose a balanced sampling condition to determine the necessary samples taken without replacement from the finite populations. It is found that our solution requires smaller samples as compared to those using binomial distributions. Furthermore, our solution is consistent with the sampling with replacement or when population size is large. Finally, three examples are given to show the application of the derived sample size formula.     

Sequential point estimation of the means of u-statistics in finite population sampling

In simple random sampling without replacement from a finite population, sequential point estimators of the means of U-statistics are proposed. The proposed procedure is shown to be asymptotically risk efficient in the sense of Starr (Ann. Math. Statist. (1966), 1173-1185)     

Star-Type Systematic Sampling Schemes for Finite Populations

Two new sampling schemes namely, Star-Type Systematic (STS) sampling without replacement and Modified Star-Type Systematic (MSTS) sampling without replacement for estimation of finite population means are introduced. The relative performances of the proposed star-type systematic sample means along with those of the simple random and systematic sample means are assessed for a hypothetical population with a linear trend and also for certain natural populations. Furthermore, the usefulness of the proposed sampling schemes in quality control and for constructing partial diallel crosses in mating designs are briefly break discussed.     

Bayes and minimax estimators for two-stage sampling from a finite population under measurement error models

We consider Bayes and Minimax estimates of population mean in sampling from a finite population in two-stages using simple random sampling without replacement at each stage, when the true values of the characteristic cannot be observed but only the values mixed with some measurement errors are observed. Minimax values of sample sizes have been found in case of equal-sized clusters and equal-sized second stage samples.     

Some unbiased estimators versus mean per unit and ratio estimators in finite population sample surveys

We present some unbiased estimators at the population mean in a finite population sample surveys with simple random sampling design where information on an auxiliary variance x positively correlated with the main variate y is available. Exact variance and unbiased estimate of the variance are computed for any sample size. These estimators are compared for their precision with the mean per unit and the ratio estimators. Modifications of the estimators are suggested to make them more precise than the mean per unit estimator or the ratio estimator regardless of the value of the population correlation coefficient between the variates x and y. Asymptotic distribution of our estimators and confidnece intervals for the population mean are also obtained.     

Estimation of finite population kurtosis under two-phase sampling for nonresponse

In this paper an estimator of finite population kurtosis computed under the two-phase sampling for nonresponse is proposed. The formulas characterizing its asymptotic properties are derived using Taylor linearization technique for the general situation of arbitrary sampling designs in both phases and stochastic nonresponse represented by arbitrary response distribution. An important special case of simple random sampling without replacement and deterministic nonresponse is also considered.     

Variance Estimation under Two‐Phase Sampling

We consider the variance estimation of the weighted likelihood estimator (WLE) under two‐phase stratified sampling without replacement. Asymptotic variance of the WLE in many semiparametric models contains unknown functions or does not have a closed form. The standard method of the inverse probability weighted (IPW) sample variances of an estimated influence function is then not available in these models. To address this issue, we develop the variance estimation procedure for the WLE in a general semiparametric model. The phase I variance is estimated by taking a numerical derivative of the IPW log likelihood. The phase II variance is estimated based on the bootstrap for a stratified sample in a finite population. Despite a theoretical difficulty of dependent observations due to sampling without replacement, we establish the (bootstrap) consistency of our estimators. Finite sample properties of our method are illustrated in a simulation study.