Adaptive order selection for autoregressive models

Autoregressive model is a popular method for analysing the time dependent data, where selection of order parameter is imperative. Two commonly used selection criteria are the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC), which are known to suffer the potential problems regarding overfit and underfit, respectively. To our knowledge, there does not exist a criterion in the literature that can satisfactorily perform under various situations. Therefore, in this paper, we focus on forecasting the future values of an observed time series and propose an adaptive idea to combine the advantages of AIC and BIC but to mitigate their weaknesses based on the concept of generalized degrees of freedom. Instead of applying a fixed criterion to select the order parameter, we propose an approximately unbiased estimator of mean squared prediction errors based on a data perturbation technique for fairly comparing between AIC and BIC. Then use the selected criterion to determine the final order parameter. Some numerical experiments are performed to show the superiority of the proposed method and a real data set of the retail price index of China from 1952 to 2008 is also applied for illustration.     

Information criteria for inhomogeneous spatial point processes

The theoretical foundation for a number of model selection criteria is established in the context of inhomogeneous point processes and under various asymptotic settings: infill, increasing domain and combinations of these. For inhomogeneous Poisson processes we consider Akaike's information criterion and the Bayesian information criterion, and in particular we identify the point process analogue of ‘sample size’ needed for the Bayesian information criterion. Considering general inhomogeneous point processes we derive new composite likelihood and composite Bayesian information criteria for selecting a regression model for the intensity function. The proposed model selection criteria are evaluated using simulations of Poisson processes and cluster point processes.     

Efficient Regularization Parameter Selection Via Information Criteria

In a nonlinear regression model based on a regularization method, selection of appropriate regularization parameters is crucial. Information criteria such as generalized information criterion (GIC) and generalized Bayesian information criterion (GBIC) are useful for selecting the optimal regularization parameters. However, the optimal parameter is often determined by calculating information criterion for all candidate regularization parameters, and so the computational cost is high. One simple method by which to accomplish this is to regard GIC or GBIC as a function of the regularization parameters and to find a value minimizing GIC or GBIC. However, it is unclear how to solve the optimization problem. In the present article, we propose an efficient Newton–Raphson type iterative method for selecting optimal regularization parameters with respect to GIC or GBIC in a nonlinear regression model based on basis expansions. This method reduces the computational time remarkably compared to the grid search and can select more suitable regularization parameters. The effectiveness of the method is illustrated through real data examples.     

Probit and Logit Model Selection

Monte Carlo experiments are conducted to compare the Bayesian and sample theory model selection criteria in choosing the univariate probit and logit models. We use five criteria: the deviance information criterion (DIC), predictive deviance information criterion (PDIC), Akaike information criterion (AIC), weighted, and unweighted sums of squared errors. The first two criteria are Bayesian while the others are sample theory criteria. The results show that if data are balanced none of the model selection criteria considered in this article can distinguish the probit and logit models. If data are unbalanced and the sample size is large the DIC and AIC choose the correct models better than the other criteria. We show that if unbalanced binary data are generated by a leptokurtic distribution the logit model is preferred over the probit model. The probit model is preferred if unbalanced data are generated by a platykurtic distribution. We apply the model selection criteria to the probit and logit models that link the ups and downs of the returns on S&P500 to the crude oil price.     

Regression model selection—a residual likelihood approach

Summary. We obtain the residual information criterion RIC, a selection criterion based on the residual log-likelihood, for regression models including classical regression models, Box–Cox transformation models, weighted regression models and regression models with autoregressive moving average errors. We show that RIC is a consistent criterion, and that simulation studies for each of the four models indicate that RIC provides better model order choices than the Akaike information criterion, corrected Akaike information criterion, final prediction error, C _p and R _adj², except when the sample size is small and the signal-to-noise ratio is weak. In this case, none of the criteria performs well. Monte Carlo results also show that RIC is superior to the consistent Bayesian information criterion BIC when the signal-to-noise ratio is not weak, and it is comparable with BIC when the signal-to-noise ratio is weak and the sample size is large.     

On a method of identification of best subset model from full ar-model

An usual approach for selection of the best subset AR model of known maximal order is to use an appropriate information criterion, like AIC or SIC with an exhaustive selection of regressors and to choose the subset model that produces the optimum (minimum) value of AIC or SIC. This method is computationally intensive. Proposed is a method based on the use of singular value decomposition and QR with column pivoting factorization for extracting a reduced subset from the exhaustive candidate set of regressors and to use AIC or SIC on the reduced subset to obtain the best subset AR model. The result is substantially reduced domain of exhaustive search for the computation of the best subset AR model.     

Model selection criteria for the varying-coefficient modelling via regularized basis expansions

Varying-coefficient models (VCMs) are useful tools for analysing longitudinal data. They can effectively describe the relationship between predictors and responses repeatedly measured. VCMs estimated by regularization methods are strongly affected by values of regularization parameters, and therefore selecting these values is a crucial issue. In order to choose these parameters objectively, we derive model selection criteria for evaluating VCMs from the viewpoints of information-theoretic and Bayesian approach. Models are estimated by the method of regularization with basis expansions, and then they are evaluated by model selection criteria. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed criteria through Monte Carlo simulations and real data analysis.     

PREDICTION-FOCUSED MODEL SELECTION FOR AUTOREGRESSIVE MODELS

In order to make predictions of future values of a time series, one needs to specify a forecasting model. A popular choice is an autoregressive time‐series model, for which the order of the model is chosen by an information criterion. We propose an extension of the focused information criterion (FIC) for model‐order selection, with emphasis on a high predictive accuracy (i.e. the mean squared forecast error is low). We obtain theoretical results and illustrate by means of a simulation study and some real data examples that the FIC is a valid alternative to the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) for selection of a prediction model. We also illustrate the possibility of using the FIC for purposes other than forecasting, and explore its use in an extended model.     

Model selection for factor analysis: Some new criteria and performance comparisons

This paper derives Akaike information criterion (AIC), corrected AIC, the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) and Hannan and Quinn’s information criterion for approximate factor models assuming a large number of cross-sectional observations and studies the consistency properties of these information criteria. It also reports extensive simulation results comparing the performance of the extant and new procedures for the selection of the number of factors. The simulation results show the di?culty of determining which criterion performs best. In practice, it is advisable to consider several criteria at the same time, especially Hannan and Quinn’s information criterion, Bai and Ng’s IC_p2 and BIC₃, and Onatski’s and Ahn and Horenstein’s eigenvalue-based criteria. The model-selection criteria considered in this paper are also applied to Stock and Watson’s two macroeconomic data sets. The results differ considerably depending on the model-selection criterion in use, but evidence suggesting five factors for the first data and five to seven factors for the second data is obtainable.     

On Variational Bayes Estimation and Variational Information Criteria for Linear Regression Models

Variational Bayes (VB) estimation is a fast alternative to Markov Chain Monte Carlo for performing approximate Baesian inference. This procedure can be an efficient and effective means of analyzing large datasets. However, VB estimation is often criticised, typically on empirical grounds, for being unable to produce valid statistical inferences. In this article we refute this criticism for one of the simplest models where Bayesian inference is not analytically tractable, that is, the Bayesian linear model (for a particular choice of priors). We prove that under mild regularity conditions, VB based estimators enjoy some desirable frequentist properties such as consistency and can be used to obtain asymptotically valid standard errors. In addition to these results we introduce two VB information criteria: the variational Akaike information criterion and the variational Bayesian information criterion. We show that variational Akaike information criterion is asymptotically equivalent to the frequentist Akaike information criterion and that the variational Bayesian information criterion is first order equivalent to the Bayesian information criterion in linear regression. These results motivate the potential use of the variational information criteria for more complex models. We support our theoretical results with numerical examples.     

The performances of several modified CIC criteria for working intra-cluster correlation structure selection in GEE analysis

Based on various improved robust covariance estimators in the literature, several modified versions of the well-known correlated information criterion (CIC) for working intra-cluster correlation structure (ICS) selection are proposed. Performances of these modified criteria are examined and compared to the CIC via simulations. When the response is Gaussian, binary, or Poisson, the modified criteria are demonstrated to have higher detection rates when the true ICS is exchangeable, while the CIC would perform better when the true ICS is AR(1). An application of the criteria is made to a real dataset.     

Consistent Bayesian information criterion based on a mixture prior for possibly high-dimensional multivariate linear regression models

In the problem of selecting variables in a multivariate linear regression model, we derive new Bayesian information criteria based on a prior mixing a smooth distribution and a delta distribution. Each of them can be interpreted as a fusion of the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC). Inheriting their asymptotic properties, our information criteria are consistent in variable selection in both the large-sample and the high-dimensional asymptotic frameworks. In numerical simulations, variable selection methods based on our information criteria choose the true set of variables with high probability in most cases.     

Selecting the regularization parameters in high-dimensional panel data models: Consistency and efficiency

This article considers panel data models in the presence of a large number of potential predictors and unobservable common factors. The model is estimated by the regularization method together with the principal components procedure. We propose a panel information criterion for selecting the regularization parameter and the number of common factors under a diverging number of predictors. Under the correct model specification, we show that the proposed criterion consistently identifies the true model. If the model is instead misspecified, the proposed criterion achieves asymptotically efficient model selection. Simulation results confirm these theoretical arguments.     

A note on the unification of the Akaike information criterion

To measure the distance between a robust function evaluated under the true regression model and under a fitted model, we propose generalized Kullback–Leibler information. Using this generalization we have developed three robust model selection criteria, AICR*, AICCR* and AICCR, that allow the selection of candidate models that not only fit the majority of the data but also take into account non-normally distributed errors. The AICR* and AICCR criteria can unify most existing Akaike information criteria; three examples of such unification are given. Simulation studies are presented to illustrate the relative performance of each criterion.     

Forecasting time series of economic processes by model averaging across data frames of various lengths

This paper presents an extension of mean-squared forecast error (MSFE) model averaging for integrating linear regression models computed on data frames of various lengths. Proposed method is considered to be a preferable alternative to best model selection by various efficiency criteria such as Bayesian information criterion (BIC), Akaike information criterion (AIC), F-statistics and mean-squared error (MSE) as well as to Bayesian model averaging (BMA) and naïve simple forecast average. The method is developed to deal with possibly non-nested models having different number of observations and selects forecast weights by minimizing the unbiased estimator of MSFE. Proposed method also yields forecast confidence intervals with a given significance level what is not possible when applying other model averaging methods. In addition, out-of-sample simulation and empirical testing proves efficiency of such kind of averaging when forecasting economic processes.     

Forecasting ARMA models: a comparative study of information criteria focusing on MDIC

This paper deals with the implementation of model selection criteria to data generated by ARMA processes. The recently introduced modified divergence information criterion is used and compared with traditional selection criteria like the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Schwarz information criterion (SIC). The appropriateness of the selected model is tested for one- and five-step ahead predictions with the use of the normalized mean squared forecast errors (NMSFE).     

Simple Formula for Calculating Bias‐corrected AIC in Generalized Linear Models

In real‐data analysis, deciding the best subset of variables in regression models is an important problem. Akaike's information criterion (AIC) is often used in order to select variables in many fields. When the sample size is not so large, the AIC has a non‐negligible bias that will detrimentally affect variable selection. The present paper considers a bias correction of AIC for selecting variables in the generalized linear model (GLM). The GLM can express a number of statistical models by changing the distribution and the link function, such as the normal linear regression model, the logistic regression model, and the probit model, which are currently commonly used in a number of applied fields. In the present study, we obtain a simple expression for a bias‐corrected AIC (corrected AIC, or CAIC) in GLMs. Furthermore, we provide an ‘R’ code based on our formula. A numerical study reveals that the CAIC has better performance than the AIC for variable selection.     

Conditional Akaike Information Criteria for a Class of Poisson Mixture Models with Random Effects

Focusing on the model selection problems in the family of Poisson mixture models (including the Poisson mixture regression model with random effects and zero‐inflated Poisson regression model with random effects), the current paper derives two conditional Akaike information criteria. The criteria are the unbiased estimators of the conditional Akaike information based on the conditional log‐likelihood and the conditional Akaike information based on the joint log‐likelihood, respectively. The derivation is free from the specific parametric assumptions about the conditional mean of the true data‐generating model and applies to different types of estimation methods. Additionally, the derivation is not based on the asymptotic argument. Simulations show that the proposed criteria have promising estimation accuracy. In addition, it is found that the criterion based on the conditional log‐likelihood demonstrates good model selection performance under different scenarios. Two sets of real data are used to illustrate the proposed method.     

Forecasting Performance of Information Criteria with Many Macro Series

Stock & Watson (1999) consider the relative quality of different univariate forecasting techniques. This paper extends their study on forecasting practice, comparing the forecasting performance of two popular model selection procedures, the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC). This paper considers several topics: how AIC and BIC choose lags in autoregressive models on actual series, how models so selected forecast relative to an AR(4) model, the effect of using a maximum lag on model selection, and the forecasting performance of combining AR(4), AIC, and BIC models with an equal weight.     

Focused Information Criterion for Capture–Recapture Models for Closed Populations

Abstract. We propose a criterion for selecting a capture–recapture model for closed populations, which follows the basic idea of the focused information criterion (FIC) of Claeskens and Hjort. The proposed criterion aims at selecting the model which, among the available models, leads to the smallest mean‐squared error (MSE) of the resulting estimator of the population size and is based on an index which, up to a constant term, is equal to the asymptotic MSE of the estimator. Two alternative approaches to estimate this FIC index are proposed. We also deal with multimodel inference; in this case, the population size is estimated by using a weighted average of the estimates coming from different models, with weights chosen so as to minimize the MSE of the resulting estimator. The proposed model selection approach is compared with more common approaches through a series of simulations. It is also illustrated by an application based on a dataset coming from a live‐trapping experiment.