The monotone boundary property and the full coverage property of confidence intervals for a binomial proportion

The methodology for deriving the exact confidence coefficient of some confidence intervals for a binomial proportion is proposed in Wang [2007. Exact confidence coefficients of confidence intervals for a binomial proportion. Statist. Sinica 17, 361–368]. The methodology requires two conditions of confidence intervals: the monotone boundary property and the full coverage property. In this paper, we show that for some confidence intervals of a binomial proportion, the two properties hold for any sample size. Based on results presented in this paper, the procedure in Wang [2007. Exact confidence coefficients of confidence intervals for a binomial proportion. Statist. Sinica 17, 361–368] can be directly used to calculate the exact confidence coefficients of these confidence intervals for any fixed sample size.     

On Ranges of Confidence Coefficients for Confidence Intervals on Variance Components

The among variance component in the balanced one-factor nested components-of-variance model is of interest in many fields of application. Except for an artificial method that uses a set of random numbers which is of no use in practical situations, an exact-size confidence interval on the among variance has not yet been derived. This paper provides a detailed comparison of three approximate confidence intervals which possess certain desired properties and have been shown to be the better methods among many available approximate procedures. Specifically, the minimum and the maximum of the confidence coefficients for the one- and two-sided intervals of each method are obtained. The expected lengths of the intervals are also compared.     

Exact average coverage probabilities and confidence coefficients of confidence intervals for discrete distributions

For a confidence interval (L(X),U(X)) of a parameter θ in one-parameter discrete distributions, the coverage probability is a variable function of θ. The confidence coefficient is the infimum of the coverage probabilities, inf  _θ P _θ (θ∈(L(X),U(X))). Since we do not know which point in the parameter space the infimum coverage probability occurs at, the exact confidence coefficients are unknown. Beside confidence coefficients, evaluation of a confidence intervals can be based on the average coverage probability. Usually, the exact average probability is also unknown and it was approximated by taking the mean of the coverage probabilities at some randomly chosen points in the parameter space. In this article, methodologies for computing the exact average coverage probabilities as well as the exact confidence coefficients of confidence intervals for one-parameter discrete distributions are proposed. With these methodologies, both exact values can be derived.     

Confidence Intervals for Difference Between Two Poisson Rates

In this article, we develop four explicit asymptotic two-sided confidence intervals for the difference between two Poisson rates via a hybrid method. The basic idea of the proposed method is to estimate or recover the variances of the two Poisson rate estimates, which are required for constructing the confidence interval for the rate difference, from the confidence limits for the two individual Poisson rates. The basic building blocks of the approach are reliable confidence limits for the two individual Poisson rates. Four confidence interval estimators that have explicit solutions and good coverage levels are employed: the first normal with continuity correction, Rao score, Freeman and Tukey, and Jeffreys confidence intervals. Using simulation studies, we examine the performance of the four hybrid confidence intervals and compare them with three existing confidence intervals: the non-informative prior Bayes confidence interval, the t confidence interval based on Satterthwait's degrees of freedom, and the Bayes confidence interval based on Student's t confidence coefficient. Simulation results show that the proposed hybrid Freeman and Tukey, and the hybrid Jeffreys confidence intervals can be highly recommended because they outperform the others in terms of coverage probabilities and widths. The other methods tend to be too conservative and produce wider confidence intervals. The application of these confidence intervals are illustrated with three real data sets.     

Validation of tolerance interval

The tolerance interval receives very much attention in literature and is widely applied in industry. However, it is generally constructed through the criterion of minimum width by Eisenhart et al. (1947). Although effort for clarification of several prediction related intervals has been made recently by Huang et al. (2010), the appropriateness of the tolerance interval for its role in industry applications is insufficiently discussed. According to manufacturers' requests, a concept of admissibility of tolerance intervals is defined in this paper and we show that these types of tolerance intervals are not admissible due to short of confidence. We further prove that a 100(1−α)% confidence interval of a γ-coverage interval is admissible and is appropriate for use.     

Improved Confidence Statements for the Binomial Parameter

In the computation of two-sided confidence intervals for the binomial parameter p (using the binomial mass function), it is known that such intervals achieve a confidence coefficient that in general is not equal to the confidence level 1 – α, say. In this article we present some general results on the confidence coefficient and tabulate them for selected pairs (α, n = number of trials). We treat only the nominal equal tail probability case because it is the most commonly taught and used.     

A Primer on Visualizations for Comparing Populations,Including the Issue of Overlapping Confidence Intervals

In comparing a collection of K populations, it is common practice to display in one visualization confidence intervals for the corresponding population parameters θ₁, θ₂, …, θ_K. For a pair of confidence intervals that do (or do not) overlap, viewers of the visualization are cognitively compelled to declare that there is not (or there is) a statistically significant difference between the two corresponding population parameters. It is generally well known that the method of examining overlap of pairs of confidence intervals should not be used for formal hypothesis testing. However, use of a single visualization with overlapping and nonoverlapping confidence intervals leads many to draw such conclusions, despite the best efforts of statisticians toward preventing users from reaching such conclusions. In this article, we summarize some alternative visualizations from the literature that can be used to properly test equality between a pair of population parameters. We recommend that these visualizations be used with caution to avoid incorrect statistical inference. The methods presented require only that we have K sample estimates and their associated standard errors. We also assume that the sample estimators are independent, unbiased, and normally distributed.     

Comparison of Poisson Confidence Intervals

Abstract

The standard method of obtaining a two-sided confidence interval for the Poisson mean produces an interval which is exact but can be shortened without violating the minimum coverage requirement. We classify the intervals proposed as alternatives to the standard method interval. We carry out the classification using two desirable properties of two-sided confidence intervals.     

Bootstrap confidence intervals for the coefficient of quartile variation

ABSTRACT

In non-normal populations, it is more convenient to use the coefficient of quartile variation rather than the coefficient of variation. This study compares the percentile and t-bootstrap confidence intervals with Bonett's confidence interval for the quartile variation. We show that empirical coverage of the bootstrap confidence intervals is closer to the nominal coverage (0.95) for small sample sizes (n = 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 15) for most distributions studied. Bootstrap confidence intervals also have smaller average width. Thus, we propose using bootstrap confidence intervals for the coefficient of quartile variation when the sample size is small.     

New bootstrap confidence intervals for means of positively skewed distributions

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we consider the problem of constructing non parametric confidence intervals for the mean of a positively skewed distribution. We suggest calibrated, smoothed bootstrap upper and lower percentile confidence intervals. For the theoretical properties, we show that the proposed one-sided confidence intervals have coverage probability α + O(n^{? 3/2}). This is an improvement upon the traditional bootstrap confidence intervals in terms of coverage probability. A version smoothed approach is also considered for constructing a two-sided confidence interval and its theoretical properties are also studied. A simulation study is performed to illustrate the performance of our confidence interval methods. We then apply the methods to a real data set.     

Interval Estimation for the Correlation Coefficient

ABSTRACT

The correlation coefficient (CC) is a standard measure of a possible linear association between two continuous random variables. The CC plays a significant role in many scientific disciplines. For a bivariate normal distribution, there are many types of confidence intervals for the CC, such as z-transformation and maximum likelihood-based intervals. However, when the underlying bivariate distribution is unknown, the construction of confidence intervals for the CC is not well-developed. In this paper, we discuss various interval estimation methods for the CC. We propose a generalized confidence interval for the CC when the underlying bivariate distribution is a normal distribution, and two empirical likelihood-based intervals for the CC when the underlying bivariate distribution is unknown. We also conduct extensive simulation studies to compare the new intervals with existing intervals in terms of coverage probability and interval length. Finally, two real examples are used to demonstrate the application of the proposed methods.     

Confidence Intervals on Regression Models with Censored Data

Stute (1993, Consistent estimation under random censorship when covariables are present. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 45, 89–103) proposed a new method to estimate regression models with a censored response variable using least squares and showed the consistency and asymptotic normality for his estimator. This article proposes a new bootstrap-based methodology that improves the performance of the asymptotic interval estimation for the small sample size case. Therefore, we compare the behavior of Stute's asymptotic confidence interval with that of several confidence intervals that are based on resampling bootstrap techniques. In order to build these confidence intervals, we propose a new bootstrap resampling method that has been adapted for the case of censored regression models. We use simulations to study the improvement the performance of the proposed bootstrap-based confidence intervals show when compared to the asymptotic proposal. Simulation results indicate that, for the new proposals, coverage percentages are closer to the nominal values and, in addition, intervals are narrower.     

Confidence intervals for parameters lying in a random polygon

This paper presents algorithms for computing confidence intervals and regions for elements of a parameter vector when the signs of linear combinations of unknown parameters are observed, but the coefficients contain experimental error. These methods were proposed in the geochemical literature by Kolassa (1992) as a method specific to petrology. Experimental data are used to give linear constraints, involving quantities measured with error, on unknown free energies and entropies of a chemical reaction. Confidence intervals are given for these parameters, and these are compared with more naïve approaches.     

近单位根过程脉冲响应函数的置信区间

本文提出一个构造近单位根自回归过程脉冲响应函数的置信区间的新方法。新方法首先修正自回归系数估计的偏误,然后利用标准自举方法构造脉冲响应函数的置信区间。蒙特卡罗模拟结果表明在小样本时新方法的表现要明显优于已有的方法。新方法的实际覆盖率能够一致地达到或超过名义置信水平。     

Confidence Intervals for Quantiles of a Two-parameter Exponential Distribution under Progressive Type-II Censoring

Confidence intervals for the pth-quantile Q of a two-parameter exponential distribution provide useful information on the plausible range of Q, and only inefficient equal-tail confidence intervals have been discussed in the statistical literature so far. In this article, the construction of the shortest possible confidence interval within a family of two-sided confidence intervals is addressed. This shortest confidence interval is always shorter, and can be substantially shorter, than the corresponding equal-tail confidence interval. Furthermore, the computational intensity of both methodologies is similar, and therefore it is advantageous to use the shortest confidence interval. It is shown how the results provided in this paper can apply to data obtained from progressive Type II censoring, with standard Type II censoring as a special case. The applications of more complex confidence interval constructions through acceptance set inversions that can employ prior information are also discussed.     

Profile Likelihood Based Confidence Intervals for Common Intraclass Correlation Coefficient

In this article, we propose an approach for estimating the confidence interval of the common intraclass correlation coefficient based on the profile likelihood. Comparisons are made with a procedure using the concept of generalized pivots. The method presented is less computationally demanding than the method using generalized pivots. The approach also provides better coverage, and shorter lengths of confidence intervals for the case when the value of the common intraclass correlation coefficient is low. The lengths of confidence intervals given by both methods are quite comparable for high but less realistic values of the common intraclass correlation coefficient.     

Empirical Likelihood for Linear Models Under Linear Process Errors

In this article, we study the construction of confidence intervals for regression parameters in a linear model under linear process errors by using the blockwise technique. It is shown that the blockwise empirical likelihood (EL) ratio statistic is asymptotically χ²-type distributed. The result is used to obtain EL based confidence regions for regression parameters. The finite-sample performance of the method is evaluated through a simulation study.     

Empirical Likelihood Confidence Intervals for Distribution Functions under Negatively Associated Samples

In this article, we discuss the construction of the confidence intervals for distribution functions under negatively associated samples. It is shown that the blockwise empirical likelihood (EL) ratio statistic for a distribution function is asymptotically χ²-type distributed. The result is used to obtain an EL-based confidence interval for the distribution function.     

Best exact nonparametric confidence intervals for quantiles

Well-known nonparametric confidence intervals for quantiles are of the form (X _{i : n} , X _{j : n} ) with suitably chosen order statistics X _{i : n} and X _{j : n} , but typically their coverage levels differ from those prescribed. It appears that the coverage level of the confidence interval of the form (X _{i : n} , X _{j : n} ) with random indices I and J can be rendered equal, exactly to any predetermined level γ?∈?(0, 1). Best in the sense of minimum E(J???I), i.e., ‘the shortest’, two-sided confidence intervals are constructed. If no two-sided confidence interval exists for a given γ, the most accurate one-sided confidence intervals are constructed.     

On construction of asymptotically correct confidence intervals

In this paper we discuss constructing confidence intervals based on asymptotic generalized pivotal quantities (AGPQs). An AGPQ associates a distribution with the corresponding parameter, and then an asymptotically correct confidence interval can be derived directly from this distribution like Bayesian or fiducial interval estimates. We provide two general procedures for constructing AGPQs. We also present several examples to show that AGPQs can yield new confidence intervals with better finite-sample behaviors than traditional methods.