INTRINSIC PRIORS FOR TWO-SAMPLE TESTS IN NORMAL POPULATIONS

ABSTRACT

There have been considerable amounts of work regarding the development of various default Bayes factors in model selection and hypothesis testing. Two commonly used criteria, the intrinsic Bayes factor and the fractional Bayes factor are compared to test two independent normal means and variances. We also derive several intrinsic priors whose Bayes factors are asymptotically equivalent to the respective Bayes factors. We demonstrate our results in simulated datasets.     

Intrinsic Priors for Model Selection Using an Encompassing Model with Applications to Censored Failure Time Data

In Bayesian model selection or testingproblems one cannot utilize standard or default noninformativepriors, since these priors are typically improper and are definedonly up to arbitrary constants. Therefore, Bayes factors andposterior probabilities are not well defined under these noninformativepriors, making Bayesian model selection and testing problemsimpossible. We derive the intrinsic Bayes factor (IBF) of Bergerand Pericchi (1996a, 1996b) for the commonly used models in reliabilityand survival analysis using an encompassing model. We also deriveproper intrinsic priors for these models, whose Bayes factors are asymptoticallyequivalent to the respective IBFs. We demonstrate our resultsin three examples.     

Intrinsic Bayes factor approach to a test for the power law process

The versatile new criterion called the intrinsic Bayes factor (IBF), introduced by Berger and Pericchi [J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 91 (1996) 109–122], has made it possible to perform model selection and hypotheses testing using standard (improper) noninformative priors in a variety of situations. In this paper, we use their methodology to test several hypotheses regarding the shape parameter of the power law process, which has been widely used to model failure times of repairable systems. Assuming that we have data from the process according to the time-truncation sampling scheme, we derive the arithmetic IBFs using four default priors, including the reference and Jeffreys priors. We establish the frequentist probability matching properties of these priors. We also identify two priors that are justifiable under both time-truncation and failure-truncation schemes, so that the IBFs for both schemes can be unified. Deducing the intrinsic priors of a certain canonical form, as the time of truncation tends to infinity, we show that the arithmetic IBFs correspond asymptotically to actual Bayes factors. We also discuss the expected IBFs, which are useful with small samples. We then use these results to analyze an actual data set on the interruption times of a transmission line, summarizing our results under the default priors.     

Alternative Bayes factors for model selection

Several alternative Bayes factors have been recently proposed in order to solve the problem of the extreme sensitivity of the Bayes factor to the priors of models under comparison. Specifically, the impossibility of using the Bayes factor with standard noninformative priors for model comparison has led to the introduction of new automatic criteria, such as the posterior Bayes factor (Aitkin 1991), the intrinsic Bayes factors (Berger and Pericchi 1996b) and the fractional Bayes factor (O'Hagan 1995). We derive some interesting properties of the fractional Bayes factor that provide justifications for its use additional to the ones given by O'Hagan. We further argue that the use of the fractional Bayes factor, originally introduced to cope with improper priors, is also useful in a robust analysis. Finally, using usual classes of priors, we compare several alternative Bayes factors for the problem of testing the point null hypothesis in the univariate normal model.     

Objective Bayesian Testing of a Poisson Mean

We consider testing hypotheses about a single Poisson mean. When prior information is not available, use of objective priors is of interest. We provide intrinsic priors based on the arithmetic intrinsic and fractional Bayes factors, and evaluate their characteristics.     

Objective priors for hypothesis testing in one-way random effects models

The Bayes factor is a key tool in hypothesis testing. Nevertheless, the important issue of which priors should be used to develop objective Bayes factors remains open. The authors consider this problem in the context of the one-way random effects model. They use concepts such as orthogonality, predictive matching and invariance to justify a specific form of the priors for common parameters and derive the intrinsic and divergence based prior for the new parameter. The authors show that both intrinsic priors or divergence-based priors produce consistent Bayes factors. They illustrate the methods and compare them with other proposals.     

Bayesian hypothesis testing for selected regression coefficients

ABSTRACT

We develop new Bayesian regression tests for prespecified regression coefficients. Simple, closed forms of the Bayes factors are derived that depend only on the regression t-statistic and F-statistic and the usual associated t and F distributions. The priors that allow those forms are simple and also meaningful, requiring minimal but practically important subjective inputs.     

Default Bayesian analysis of the Behrens–Fisher problem

In the Bayesian approach, the Behrens–Fisher problem has been posed as one of estimation for the difference of two means. No Bayesian solution to the Behrens–Fisher testing problem has yet been given due, perhaps, to the fact that the conventional priors used are improper. While default Bayesian analysis can be carried out for estimation purposes, it poses difficulties for testing problems. This paper generates sensible intrinsic and fractional prior distributions for the Behrens–Fisher testing problem from the improper priors commonly used for estimation. It allows us to compute the Bayes factor to compare the null and the alternative hypotheses. This default procedure of model selection is compared with a frequentist test and the Bayesian information criterion. We find discrepancy in the sense that frequentist and Bayesian information criterion reject the null hypothesis for data, that the Bayes factor for intrinsic or fractional priors do not.     

Objective Bayesian multiple comparisons for normal variances

This paper considers the multiple comparisons problem for normal variances. We propose a solution based on a Bayesian model selection procedure to this problem in which no subjective input is considered. We construct the intrinsic and fractional priors for which the Bayes factors and model selection probabilities are well defined. The posterior probability of each model is used as a model selection tool. The behaviour of these Bayes factors is compared with the Bayesian information criterion of Schwarz and some frequentist tests.     

Alternative Procedures to Discriminate Non Nested Multivariate Linear Regression Models

ABSTRACT

This article builds classical and Bayesian testing procedures for choosing between non nested multivariate regression models. Although there are several classical tests for discriminating univariate regressions, only the Cox test is able to consistently handle the multivariate case. We then derive the limiting distribution of the Cox statistic in such a context, correcting an earlier derivation in the literature. Further, we show how to build alternative Bayes factors for the testing of nonnested multivariate linear regression models. In particular, we compute expressions for the posterior Bayes factor, the fractional Bayes factor, and the intrinsic Bayes factor.     

Inference based on progressively censored sample from Pareto population

Abstract

In this paper, we assume that the lifetimes have a two-parameter Pareto distribution and discuss some results of progressive Type-II censored sample. We obtain maximum likelihood estimators and Bayes estimators of the unknown parameters under squared error loss and a precautionary loss functions in progressively Type-II censored sample. Robust Bayes estimation of unknown parameters over three different classes of priors under progressively Type-II censored sample, squared error loss, and precautionary loss functions are obtained. We discuss estimation of unknown parameters on competing risks progressive Type-II censoring. Finally, we consider the problem of estimating the common scale parameter of two Pareto distributions when samples are progressively Type-II censored.     

Objective Bayesian transformation and variable selection using default Bayes factors

In this work, the problem of transformation and simultaneous variable selection is thoroughly treated via objective Bayesian approaches by the use of default Bayes factor variants. Four uniparametric families of transformations (Box–Cox, Modulus, Yeo-Johnson and Dual), denoted by T, are evaluated and compared. The subjective prior elicitation for the transformation parameter \(\lambda _T\), for each T, is not a straightforward task. Additionally, little prior information for \(\lambda _T\) is expected to be available, and therefore, an objective method is required. The intrinsic Bayes factors and the fractional Bayes factors allow us to incorporate default improper priors for \(\lambda _T\). We study the behaviour of each approach using a simulated reference example as well as two real-life examples.     

ESTIMATION OF EXPONENTIATED WEIBULL SHAPE PARAMETERS UNDER LINEX LOSS FUNCTION

ABSTRACT

The paper deals with Bayes estimation of the exponentiated Weibull shape parameters under linex loss function when independent non-informative type of priors are available for the parameters. Generalized maximum likelihood estimators have also been obtained. Performances of the proposed Bayes estimator, generalized maximum likelihood estimators, posterior mean (i.e., Bayes estimator under squared error loss function) and maximum likelihood estimators have been studied on the basis of their risks under linex loss function. The comparison is based on a simulation study because the expressions for risk functions of these estimators cannot be obtained in nice closed forms.     

Equality and inequality constrained multivariate linear models: Objective model selection using constrained posterior priors

In objective Bayesian model selection, a well-known problem is that standard non-informative prior distributions cannot be used to obtain a sensible outcome of the Bayes factor because these priors are improper. The use of a small part of the data, i.e., a training sample, to obtain a proper posterior prior distribution has become a popular method to resolve this issue and seems to result in reasonable outcomes of default Bayes factors, such as the intrinsic Bayes factor or a Bayes factor based on the empirical expected-posterior prior.     

Posterior robustness with more than one sampling model

In order to robustify posterior inference, besides the use of large classes of priors, it is necessary to consider uncertainty about the sampling model. In this article we suggest that a convenient and simple way to incorporate model robustness is to consider a discrete set of competing sampling models, and combine it with a suitable large class of priors. This set reflects foreseeable departures of the base model, like thinner or heavier tails or asymmetry. We combine the models with different classes of priors that have been proposed in the vast literature on Bayesian robustness with respect to the prior. Also we explore links with the related literature of stable estimation and precise measurement theory, now with more than one model entertained. To these ends it will be necessary to introduce a procedure for model comparison that does not depend on an arbitrary constant or scale. We utilize a recent development on automatic Bayes factors with self-adjusted scale, the ‘intrinsic Bayes factor’ (Berger and Pericchi, Technical Report, 1993).     

Admissible minimax estimators for the shape parameter of Topp–Leone distribution

Abstract

The shape parameter of Topp–Leone distribution is estimated in this article from the Bayesian viewpoint under the assumption of known scale parameter. Bayes and empirical Bayes estimates of the unknown parameter are proposed under non informative and suitable conjugate priors. These estimates are derived under the assumption of squared and linear-exponential error loss functions. The risk functions of the proposed estimates are derived in analytical forms. It is shown that the proposed estimates are minimax and admissible. The consistency of the proposed estimates under the squared error loss function is also proved. Numerical examples are provided.     

Bayesian model selection for life time data under type II censoring

This paper considers the Bayesian model selection problem in life-time models using type-II censored data. In particular, the intrinsic Bayes factors are calculated for log-normal, exponential, and Weibull lifetime models using noninformative priors under type-II censoring. Numerical examples are given to illustrate our results.     

A family of admissible minimax estimators of the mean of a multivariate,normal distribution

Let X has a p-dimensional normal distribution with mean vector θ and identity covariance matrix I. In a compound decision problem consisting of squared-error estimation of θ, Strawderman (1971) placed a Beta (α, 1) prior distribution on a normal class of priors to produce a family of Bayes minimax estimators. We propose an incomplete Gamma(α, β) prior distribution on the same normal class of priors to produce a larger family of Bayes minimax estimators. We present the results of a Monte Carlo study to demonstrate the reduced risk of our estimators in comparison with the Strawderman estimators when θ is away from the zero vector.     

Bayes and robust Bayes predictions in a subfamily of scale parameters under a precautionary loss function

ABSTRACT

This paper deals with Bayes, robust Bayes, and minimax predictions in a subfamily of scale parameters under an asymmetric precautionary loss function. In Bayesian statistical inference, the goal is to obtain optimal rules under a specified loss function and an explicit prior distribution over the parameter space. However, in practice, we are not able to specify the prior totally or when a problem must be solved by two statisticians, they may agree on the choice of the prior but not the values of the hyperparameters. A common approach to the prior uncertainty in Bayesian analysis is to choose a class of prior distributions and compute some functional quantity. This is known as Robust Bayesian analysis which provides a way to consider the prior knowledge in terms of a class of priors Γ for global prevention against bad choices of hyperparameters. Under a scale invariant precautionary loss function, we deal with robust Bayes predictions of Y based on X. We carried out a simulation study and a real data analysis to illustrate the practical utility of the prediction procedure.     

Bayes admissible estimation of the means in Poisson decomposable graphical models

We investigate the Bayes estimation of the means in Poisson decomposable graphical models. Some classes of Bayes estimators are provided which improve on the maximum likelihood estimator under the normalized squared error loss. Both proper and improper priors are included in the proposed classes of priors. Concerning the generalized Bayes estimators with respect to the improper priors, we address their admissibility.